Dignity and its influencing factors in patients with cancer in North China: a cross-sectional study

Analysis of the status and influencing factors of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment

To investigate the status of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment and conduct a systematic analysis of its influencing factors, aiming to provide reference for clinical medical decision-making by healthcare professionals. A cross-sectional survey study. From April 15th to 21st, 2024, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 40 tertiary Grade A comprehensive hospitals in 9 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions including Sichuan Province, Zhejiang Province, and Chongqing Municipality. Various critically ill patients who were admitted to ICU treatment were surveyed using a general information questionnaire and the Dignity Inventory. A total of 346 questionnaires were collected in this survey, with 333 valid questionnaires and an effective response rate of 96%. The incidence rate of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment was 39%. Multifactor logistic regression analysis showed that age [OR = 1.124, 95%CI=(1.067-1.184)], frequency of visits [OR = 1.875, 95%CI=(1.075-3.269)], length of ICU stay [OR = 1.352, 95%CI=(1.108-1.649)], and tracheotomy upon discharge [OR = 2.269, 95%CI=(1.273-4.044)] were risk factors for dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment. Number of children [OR = 0.247, 95%CI=(0.106-0.576)] was a protective factor for dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment. Although the incidence of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment is relatively low, the psychological trauma it causes cannot be ignored. Healthcare professionals must actively establish and improve its prevention and management system.

Effect of logotherapy counseling program on chronic sorrow, dignity, and meaning in life of palliative care patients: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Palliative care patients experience chronic sorrow with loss in dignity and meaning in life. Logotherapy is an effective way to cope with loss. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of logotherapy on chronic sorrow, dignity, and meaning in life of palliative care patients.

METHODS

This study was conducted with 58 adults hospitalized due to advanced cancer and assigned to either intervention or control group by simple randomization. Data were collected with descriptive information form, Palliative Performance Scale, Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale-Patient Form (PGDS-PF), and Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MIL) on admission, at the 4th and 8th weeks. The intervention group received eight sessions of logotherapy. The control group received routine care.

RESULTS

The mean scores of PGDS-PF (p = 0.01), PDI (p = 0.01), and searched meaning subdimension of MIL (MIL-SM) (p = 0.11) decreased in the intervention group compared to controls, both at the 4th and 8th week evaluation. The mean score of the present meaning subdimension of MIL (MIL-PM) (p = 0.02) increased at the 4th week evaluation but decreased at a non-statistically significant level at the 8th week. The mean scores of PGDS-PF and PDI increased in the control group while MIL-PM and MIL-SM decreased, both at the 4th and 8th week evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Logotherapy was found effective in decreasing the sorrow and dignity-related distress of palliative care patients, while increasing finding meaning in life. Logotherapy is recommended to be used by palliative care professionals to empower patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials registration number and date: NCT05129059, 19/01/2021.

Factors influence the dignity of burns patients: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

There is a high incidence of burns in China and the sequelae of post-burn scar growth, disfigurement, and other body image disorders can cause serious psychological distress to burns patients, and negatively affecting the patient's dignity. However, there is limited knowledge relating to the dignity of burns patients.

AIM

To investigate the factors that affect dignity in burns patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

We recruited 323 burn patients from the burn unit of a tertiary care hospital. The Patient Dignity Scale, Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used to assess burn patients' dignity, quality of life, anxiety, and depression, respectively. 18 sociodemographic variables were included in the questionnaire.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Before the data were collected, the study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University (Reference: 2022-149-02) and all patients provided and signed informed consent forms.

FINDINGS

This study included 323 burns patients; of these, 26 (8%) had a mild loss of dignity, 94 (29.1%) had a moderate loss of dignity, 125 (38.7%) had a severe loss of dignity, and 78 (24.1%) had a very severe loss of dignity. The main factors that influence the loss of dignity in burns patients, including the department in which the patient was treated after their burns, gender, the clinical stage of the burn, quality-of-life, depression, resident medical insurance, the cause of the burn, and the burn site.

CONCLUSIONS

In most cases, the loss of dignity after burn injury is serious. Clinical health care professionals can provide personalized whole-life dignity care for patients by considering the factors that affect the dignity of burns patients, developing targeted dignity management programs, and implementing individualized interventions to maintain dignity, thus helping burns injury patients return to social life and work.

A Systematic Scoping Review on Dignity Assessment Tools

CONTEXT

The provision of person-centered dignity-conserving care is central to palliative care. It is important to reevaluate current methods of assessing dignity as the concept of dignity is multifaceted.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to understand the tools which are used to assess a patient's dignity and the elements of dignity evaluated in these tools.

METHODS

Two independent and concurrent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA) on existing dignity assessment tools and on accounts of assessments of dignity were carried out. The SSR in SEBA on dignity assessment tools involving PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and CINAHL databases saw 22 full-text articles included from the 645 articles reviewed. The SSR in SEBA on accounts of assessments of dignity featured in the PubMed database identified 102 full-text articles which saw 46 articles included.

RESULTS

The domains identified were factors affecting patients' definition of dignity; elements of dignity-conserving care; and components of effective tools.

CONCLUSION

Current accounts to assess dignity and assessment tools fail to capture shifting self-concepts of dignity holistically. A portfolio-like appraisal of dignity is proposed to achieve assessments that are timely, longitudinal, and patient-specific. Portfolio-based assessments by members of the multidisciplinary team will better direct timely evaluations of relevant aspects of changing concepts of dignity, without losing the patient's holistic perception of dignity.

Effectiveness of dignity therapy on well-being among patients under palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dignity therapy is a psychotherapeutic intervention that is potentially effective in improving the well-being of patients receiving palliative care. However, the effects of dignity therapy are not well-understood.

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to determine the effectiveness of dignity therapy in palliative patients to provide evidence that dignity therapy could be used in their care.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

The number of participants from all the studies was 1202 (intervention group, 619 patients; control group, 583 patients).

METHODS

The review was reported according to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020. Relevant studies were collected with database searching of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, CINAHL, and Psych Info databases from the inception of dignity therapy in 2002 to 2022. Literature was selected to identify trials of dignity therapy in patients with palliative care needs including cancer and non-cancer condition. Critical appraisal was performed independently by two reviewers to assess the relevance, reliability, and quality of the included studies. Two independent reviewers extracted data from all the studies. Data were synthesized using Review Manager version 4.5.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 1202 participants were included. Most studies were rated as medium quality (n = 10, 62.5 %). The results showed a significant difference between the dignity and control groups in dignity-related distress (MD = -3.54, 95 % CI: [-4.66, -2.42], p < 0.00001), hope (MD = 2.27, 95 % CI: [1.32, 3.22], p < 0.0001), and quality of life (SMD = 0.45, 95 % CI: [0.15, 1.14], p = 0.00). However, no significant difference was observed in depression (MD = -0.44, 95 % CI: [-1.09, 0.20], p = 0.18); anxiety (MD = -0.21, 95 % CI: [-1.68, 1.27], p = 0.78), and spiritual well-being (MD = 2.41, 95 % CI: [-0.82, 5.64], p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Dignity therapy was effective in improving dignity-related distress, quality of life, and levels of hope. A meta-analysis found no significant differences in patients' psychological or spiritual well-being. Differences in the providers of dignity therapy in the included studies may be the cause of the different findings regarding the varying effects of dignity therapy. Professional health workers need to be trained as dignity therapists to enhance the visibility of dignity therapy for patients.

REGISTRATION

CRD42022375319.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Dignity therapy is an effective and promising intervention in palliative care.

Perceived dignity is an unrecognized source of emotional distress in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results from the validation of the Mexican version of the Patient Dignity Inventory

INTRODUCTION

Dignity has rarely been explored in patients with rheumatic diseases (RMDs), which contrasts with patients´ observations that dignity is a relevant area for research focus. The study's primary objective was to adapt and validate the Mexican version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-Mx) in patients with RMDs, and to estimate the proportion of patients with distress related to perceived dignity (DPD) assessed with the PDI-Mx.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was developed in 2 phases. Phase 1 consisted of pilot testing and questionnaire feasibility (n = 50 patients), PDI-Mx content validity (experts' agreement), construct validity (exploratory factor analysis), discriminant validity (Heterotrait-Monotrait correlations' rate [HTMT]), criterion validity (Spearman correlations) and PDI-Mx reliability with internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest (intra-class correlation coefficients [ICC]) in 220 additional outpatients (among whom 30 underwent test-retest). Phase 2 consisted of quantifying DPD (PDI-Mx cut-off ≥54.4) in 290 outpatients with RMDs.

RESULTS

Overall, patients were representative of typical outpatients with RMDs from a National tertiary care level center. The 25-item PDI-Mx was found feasible, valid (experts' agreement ≥82%; a 4-factor structure accounted for 68.7% of the total variance; HTMT = 0.608; the strength of the correlations was moderate to high between the PDI-Mx, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale dimensions scores, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score) and reliable (Cronbach's ɑ = 0.962, ICC = 0.939 [95%CI = 0.913-0.961]). DPD was present in 78 patients (26.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PDI-Mx questionnaire showed good psychometric properties for assessing DPD in our population. Perceived dignity in patients with RMDs might be an unrecognized source of emotional distress.

Patient dignity and dignified care: A qualitative description of hospitalised older adults perspectives

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore older adults' perspectives about dignity and dignified nursing care during acute hospitalisation in Ghana.

BACKGROUND

Maintaining hospitalised older adults' dignity is an essential component of nursing care and one of the most important determinants of wellbeing. To date, no study has been published on older adults' perspectives of dignified nursing care in the African context.

STUDY DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive research design.

METHODS

Twenty hospitalised older adults were purposively selected from the medical and surgical wards of a teaching hospital in Ghana. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews between April and August, 2021, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis techniques. The SRQR checklist was used to document reporting of the study.

RESULTS

The following four themes were identified: Effective nurse-patient communication, Maintaining patients' privacy, Respectful and compassionate care provision and Providing quality and safe care. Dignity was preserved when patients were treated with respect and compassion, provided privacy, and had close family members involved in physical care. Identified barriers to dignity included inadequate information about their health condition, poor communication by the nurses, lack of autonomy, poorly designed healthcare infrastructure and inadequate privacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Several enablers and barriers to dignified nursing care have been identified that have been discussed in previous studies. The unique factors identified in the Ghanaian context were family members' involvement in physical care influenced by cultural and religious beliefs, environmental barriers to privacy and dignity and inadequate involvement in decision making.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses must treat older patients with respect, educate them about the health condition, involve them in care decisions, and identify their preferences regarding provision of hygiene needs, particularly in consideration of religious and cultural beliefs, including involvement of family members. Future planning of healthcare infrastructure needs to consider the importance of private cubicles with disability-accessible ensuite bathrooms for patients' comfort and privacy.

Methodological quality of dignity-related patient reported outcome measures used in acute hospital settings: A systematic review using the COSMIN methodology

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to examine the methodological quality of dignity-related patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to measure patients' dignity during acute hospitalisation using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic review of PROMs.

BACKGROUND

Previous scoping review studies on the methodological quality of dignity-related PROMs lack specificity for dignity during acute hospital admission. They included PROMs that were developed to measure constructs of care other than patient dignity or designed to measure dignity in contexts outside of the acute hospital setting.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.

METHODS

A systematic search was undertaken using five databases (CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete, EMBASE, PsycINFo and AgeLine) for articles published between 2000 and 2022. Relevant papers were identified using strict adherence to eligibility criteria, and studies that included development of dignity-related PROMs for use in acute hospital settings were selected. Two reviewers independently screened the identified papers, extracted data and examined the quality of studies.

RESULTS

Six papers met the inclusion criteria. Two PROMs, the 25-item Patient Dignity Inventory and the 34-item Inpatient Dignity Scale, met the COSMIN quality criteria because of their sufficient quality of evidence for content validity and reliable internal consistency. None of the PROMs met the quality criteria for assessment of measurement error, criterion validity, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the Patient Dignity Inventory and the Inpatient Dignity Scale as the PROMs of choice for evaluating patients' dignity and/or dignified care during acute hospital admissions. These PROMs were developed using robust procedures with sufficient overall quality for content validity, internal consistency reliability and other measurement properties, and with moderate to high quality of evidence for these measurement properties. Researchers and clinicians who wish to use other dignity-related PROMs identified in this review should consider the methodological limitations of these PROMs, as highlighted in the present systematic review.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The review findings will guide healthcare professionals about their choice of patient reported outcome measures for evaluating patients' dignity or dignified care during acute hospitalisation.

A systematic review of patient-reported dignity and dignified care during acute hospital admission

AIMS

To synthesize quantitative evidence on levels of dignity during acute hospital admission and identify barriers and facilitators to patients' dignity or dignified care from the perspective of hospitalized patients. The secondary aim was to examine the relationship between dignity and demographic, clinical and psychological characteristics of patients.

DESIGN

A systematic review based on the protocol of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

DATA SOURCES

Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, AgeLine) were searched in February 2021, followed by backward-forward searching using Web of Science and Scopus databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Potentially eligible articles were scrutinized by two reviewers. Articles that met the eligibility criteria were appraised for quality using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Two reviewers extracted data for the review and resolved differences by consensus.

RESULTS

Out of 3052 potentially eligible studies, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Levels of dignity for hospitalized patients vary widely across geographic locations. Patients' dignity is upheld when healthcare professionals communicate effectively, maintain their privacy, and provide dignity therapy. Patients' perceptions of dignity were, in some studies, reported to be associated with demographic (e.g. age, marital status, gender, employment, educational status), clinical (e.g. hospitalization, functional impairment, physical symptoms) and psychological (e.g. depression, anxiety, demoralization, coping mechanisms) variables whilst other studies did not observe such associations.

CONCLUSION

Patients in acute care settings experience mild to a severe loss of dignity across different geographic locations. Patients' dignity is influenced by several demographic, clinical and psychological characteristics of patients.

IMPACT

The findings of the review support impetus for improvement in dignified care for hospitalized patients, addressing factors that facilitate or impede patients' dignity. Measures aimed at alleviating suffering, fostering functional independence and addressing patients' psychosocial needs can be used to promote dignity.

Dignity and psychosocial related variables in elderly advanced cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Most cancers occur in older individuals, who are more vulnerable due to functional impairment, multiple comorbidities, cognitive impairment, and lack of socio-familial support. These can undermine patients' sense of dignity. This study seeks to compare dignity scores in older patients with advanced cancer on sociodemographic and clinical variables and analyze the predictive value of anxiety, depression, functional limitations, and social support on dignity scores.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted with participation of 15 hospitals in Spain from February 2020 to October 2021. Patients with newly-diagnosed, advanced cancer completed the dignity (PPDS), anxiety and depression (BSI), Social Support (Duke-UNC-11), and functional limitations (EORTC-C30) scales. Lineal regression analyses explored the effects of anxiety, depression, functional status, and social support on dignity, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 180 subjects participated in this study. The results of the correlation analysis revealed that dignity correlated negatively with anxiety, depression, and sex, and positively with social support, functional status, and longer estimated survival. Thus, women, and more anxious and depressed individuals scored lower on the dignity scale, whereas patients with more social support, fewer functional limitations, and longer estimated survival scored higher.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, being female, having a lower educational level, lower estimated survival, depression, anxiety, less social support, and limited functionality are correlated with less dignity in the elderly with advanced cancer. It is a priority to manage both physical and psychological symptoms in patients with unresectable advanced cancer to mitigate psychological distress and increase their sense of dignity.

How dignity-related distress interact with quality of life in young adult patients with cancer during the active treatment stage: A network analysis

OBJECTIVE

Young adult patients with cancer are a growing concern. By means of network analysis, this study aimed to explore the interplay between dignity-related distress and quality of life (QoL) in young adult patients with cancer when they undergo active treatments.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 309 young adults aged 18-39 and diagnosed with malignant tumors were recruited from an oncology center in China between September 2020 and August 2021. Participants completed the Patient Dignity Inventory and SF-36 questionnaires. Network analysis was applied to examine the network structure.

RESULTS

Overall, the core facets of dignity-related distress were negatively related to QoL and its corresponding domains, either directly or indirectly. Developmental distress played a central role among estimated networks and strongly interplayed with most QoL domains, especially the mental domains. Symptom distress was the only facet consistently interplayed with the physical domains of QoL (i.e., physical function and bodily pain). The social aspects were also revealed in the association between limited social support and vitality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early attention must be paid to guarantee the need of preserving dignity and enhancing QoL for young adult patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity

Background

A socioculturally appropriate appreciation of dignity is pivotal to the effective provision of care for dying patients. Yet concepts of dignity remain poorly defined. To address this gap in understanding and enhance dignity conserving end-of-life care, a review of current concepts of dignity is proposed.

Methods

To address its primary research question “How do patients conceive the concept of dignity at the end of life?”, this review appraises regnant concepts and influences of dignity, and evaluates current dignity conserving practices. To enhance accountability, transparency and reproducibility, this review employs the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) as its theoretical lens to guide a Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) of patient perspectives of dignity. Three independent teams of reviewers independently analysed included articles from a structured search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Databases using thematic and content analyses. The themes and categories identified were compared and combined using the Funnelling Process to create domains that guide the discussion that follows.

Results

Seventy-eight thousand five hundred seventy-five abstracts were identified, 645 articles were reviewed, and 127 articles were included. The three domains identified were definitions of dignity, influences upon perceptions of dignity, and dignity conserving care.

Conclusions

This SSR in SEBA affirms the notion that dignity is intimately entwined with self-concepts of personhood and that effective dignity conserving measures at the end of life must be guided by the patient’s concept of dignity. This SSR in SEBA posits that such personalised culturally sensitive, and timely support of patients, their family and loved ones may be possible through the early and longitudinal application of a RToP based tool.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4.

Perceived Dignity of Advanced Cancer Patients and Its Relationship to Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Psychological Factors

Objective

Loss of dignity is one of the main reasons for wishing for an early death in patients with incurable diseases such as cancer and is strongly associated with psychological distress and loss of quality of life. The present study aims to analyze the perceived dignity of patients with advanced cancer undergoing systemic treatment and their relationship with sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors.

Methods

A prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted in 15 oncology departments in Spain. Patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic cancer who were candidates for systemic treatment were included. Participants completed demographic information and Palliative Patients’ Dignity Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory, Mental Adjustment to Cancer, Functional Social Support Questionnaire, and Illness Uncertainty.

Results

A total of 508 patients were recruited between February 2020 and October 2021. Most were male, aged > 65 years, with digestive tumors (41%), and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Subjects were classified as having low (56%, N = 283) or high (44%, N = 225) perceived dignity. Patients ≥ 65 years, with worse baseline status (ECOG ≥ 1), and worse estimated 18-month survival had lower levels of perceived dignity. People with lower perceived dignity scored higher for anxious preoccupation and hopelessness and lower for positive attitude. They also displayed higher levels of anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms, greater uncertainty, and less social support.

Conclusion

Self-perceived dignity in advancer cancer patients is significantly associated with psychological factors, psychological distress, uncertainty, less social support. Knowledge of these specific interactions is importance for adequate, comprehensive palliative care.

The association between frailty and dignity in community-dwelling older people

BACKGROUND

The population of people aged 60 and older is rapidly increasing in developing countries such as Iran due to declining birth rates and increased life expectancy. Old age is associated with increased risk for frailty and reduced dignity. Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by depletion of physical reserves and multiple system disorders, reducing the individual's ability to cope with stressful events. Dignity is an inherent characteristic of human beings and respecting dignity is an ethical principle. This study investigated the association of frailty with dignity among older people in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

This correlational study was conducted on 200 individuals aged 60 years and older. Data collection relied on the Demographic Questionnaire, Frailty Index for Elders (FIFE) and the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI). Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 68 ± 5.05 years; 62% of the participants were at risk for frailty, and 69% had few dignity-related problems. The multiple regression results showed that frailty was significantly associated with dignity (ß = 0.571, p < 0.001). The association was significant across all the dimensions of dignity measured by the PDI. The highest predictors of frailty included dependency (ß = 0.584, p < 0.001), followed by existential distress (ß = 0.560, p < 0.001), symptom distress (ß = 0.400, p = 0.400), social support (ß = 0.391, p < 0.001), and peace of mind (ß = 0.338, p < 0.001) in dignity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that higher levels of frailty in older people are associated with decreases in their dignity, and frailty was the leading predictor of dignity. Providers should develop programs to prevent and reduce frailty in those at risk and to enhance the dignity of the already frail.

Dignity and its related factors among older adults in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the dignity and related factors among older adults in long-term care facilities.

Methods

Cross-sectional data were obtained from a sample of 253 Chinese older adults dwelling in long-term care facilities. Dignity among older adults was measured using the Dignity Scale, and its potential correlates were explored using multiple linear regressions.

Results

Results showed that the total score of the Dignity Scale is 151.95 ± 11.75. From high to low, the different factors of dignity among older adults in long-term care facilities were as follows: caring factors (4.83 ± 0.33), social factors (4.73 ± 0.41), psychological factors (4.66 ± 0.71), value factors (4.56 ± 0.53), autonomous factors (4.50 ± 0.57), and physical factors (4.38 ± 0.55). A higher score of the Dignity Scale was associated with higher economic status, fewer chronic diseases, less medication, better daily living ability and long-time lived in cities.

Conclusion

Older adults with low economic status, more chronic diseases, and poor daily living ability, taking more medications, or the previous residence in rural areas seem to be most at low-level dignity in long-term care facilities and thus require more attention than their peers.

Inpatient Dignity Scale: Mandarin translation and psychometric characteristics evaluation

Aim

The aim of this paper was to translate the English version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale into Mandarin and to test the psychometric properties of the Mandarin version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale.

Design

This research is a cross‐sectional survey, using convenience sampling.

Methods

The English version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale was translated into Mandarin Chinese. From June–August 2020, 736 inpatients from 50 tertiary hospitals in Guangzhou were recruited to assess the psychometric attributes of the Inpatient Dignity Scale.

Results

The Mandarin version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale consists of expectation and satisfaction subscales. It differs from the English language version, as the expectation subscale includes three dimensions and the satisfaction subscale includes two dimensions. The total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the expectation subscale and the satisfaction subscale were .820 and .965, respectively, and the split‐half reliability of the expectation subscale and the satisfaction subscale were 0.740 and 0.928, respectively, indicating good internal consistency and effectiveness. Known‐groups validity was established, as 70% of the hypotheses were supported.

Effects of meaning in life and individual characteristics on dignity in patients with advanced cancer in China: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of meaning in life and individual characteristics on dignity in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven patients with advanced cancer participated in this study. Dignity was assessed with the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), meaning in life was assessed with the Meaning in Life Scale (MiLS), and performance status was defined as the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Sociodemographic and clinical variables were also measured. Independent T tests and one-way ANOVA were performed for the PDI scores and sociodemographic and clinical variables. Relationships among the PDI, MiLS, and KPS scores were evaluated with bivariate analyses (Spearman rank correlation). A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors the of PDI score.

RESULTS

Patients reported a mean of 4.2 (SD 4.9) problems affecting their sense of dignity; 21.6% reported moderate to severe loss of their sense of dignity. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that a lower MiLS score, younger age, inpatient status, and a lower KPS score predicted the loss of dignity. Stepwise regression showed that 49.8% of dignity-related distress could be explained by the MiLS score, age, inpatient status, and the KPS score.

CONCLUSION

Self-perceived dignity is significantly negatively associated with meaning in life, age, inpatient status, and performance status. The early recognition of risk factors for the loss of dignity and interventions to enhance meaning in life may prevent the loss of dignity in patients with advanced cancer.

How patients with cancer experience dignity: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

A diagnosis of cancer and its treatments can be associated with a prominent issue of loss of dignity or an undermined sense of dignity for patients. Research is increasingly being conducted into how patients with cancer experience dignity, with the aim to build clinical foundations for care that preserves patients' sense of dignity.

AIM

This review summarises and synthesises the available empirical literature on the experience of dignity in patients with cancer regarding both the perception of dignity and associated factors.

METHOD

An integrative review method was used. A literature search was conducted in 11 databases using the search terms 'dignity' OR 'existential' OR 'existentialism' combined with 'cancer'. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2011) was adopted to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Nine qualitative studies and 13 quantitative studies met the selection criteria and were included in the review. The ways that patients with cancer perceived dignity include autonomy/control, respect, self-worth, family connectedness, acceptance, hope/future and God/religious. Factors associated with dignity include demographics, physical and psychosocial distress, experiences of suffering and coping strategies.

CONCLUSION

Dignity-conserving care should respect patients' human autonomy to strengthen their sense of self-worth, acceptance, hope, reinforce family connectedness, and foster coping strategies to control the physical, psychosocial factors and experience of sufferings that threaten their sense of dignity.