Canadian cohort expanded-access program of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma

Exceptional response to combination ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma: Insights from genomic analysis

Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy and has a poor prognosis compared to other melanoma subtypes with a median overall survival of 6-10 months. With immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, either PD-1 inhibitor alone or combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD-1), responses are rare and often not durable. We present a case report of a now 66-year-old woman with diffuse metastatic uveal melanoma previously treated with a combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab, followed by maintenance nivolumab. Almost complete resolution of all sites of metastatic disease was observed except for one liver metastasis which regressed partially on immunotherapy. Notably, the patient had a significantly elevated BMI and developed widespread vitiligo on treatment. Whole-genome and transcriptome analysis was performed on the residual liver biopsy and molecular markers that may have contributed to the exceptional response were investigated. Several alterations were observed in genes involved in T-cell responses. Estimates of tumour infiltrating immune cells indicated a high level of plasma cells compared to other uveal melanoma cases, a finding previously associated with indolent disease. The patient also carried several germline SNPs that may have contributed to her treatment response as well as widespread vitiligo. Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing have provided insight into potential molecular underpinnings of an exceptional treatment response in a tumour type typically associated with poor prognosis. Immunological findings suggest a role for plasma cells in the tumour microenvironment. Elevated BMI and the development of vitiligo may be clinically relevant factors for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, warranting further studies in patients with uveal melanoma.

Comprehensive analyses indicated the association between m6A related long non-coding RNAs and various pathways in glioma

BACKGROUND

Glioma is one of the most malignant brain tumors and diseases. N6-methyladenosine modification (m6A) is the most abundant and prevalent internal chemical modification of mRNA and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in eukaryotes. Nevertheless, the correlated pathways and clinical utilization of m6A-related lncRNAs have not been fully evaluated in glioma.

METHODS

Public RNA-sequencing and clinical annotation data were retrieved from TCGA, CGGA and GEO database. Differential expression analysis and univariate Cox regression analysis were performed to identify the m6A-related and differentially expressed lncRNAs with prognostic function (m6A-DELPF). The consensus clustering was performed to identify the expression pattern of m6A-DELPF. LASSO Cox regression analysis was performed to construct the lncRNA-based signature. The CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms were performed to analyze immune infiltration and tumor microenvironment, respectively. Immunotherapy sensitivity analysis was performed using data from TCIA. The small molecule drugs prediction analysis was performed using The Connectivity Map (CMap) database and STITCH database. A competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNA) network was constructed based on miRcode, miRDB, miRTarBase, TargetScan database.

RESULTS

Two clusters (cluster1 and cluster2) were identified after unsupervised cluster analysis based on m6A-DELPF. Additionally, a 15-gene prognostic signature namely m6A-DELPFS was constructed. Analyses of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition score, tumor microenvironment, immune infiltration, clinical characterization analysis, and putative drug prediction were performed to confirm the clinical utility and efficacy of m6A-DELPFS. The potential mechanisms including tumor immune microenvironment of m6A-DELPF influence the initiation and progression of glioma. A clinically accessible nomogram was also constructed based on the m6A-DELPF and other survival-relevant clinical parameters. Two miRNAs and 114 mRNAs were identified as the downstream of seven m6A-related lncRNAs in a ceRNA network.

CONCLUSION

Our present research confirmed the clinical value of m6A related lncRNAs and their high correlation with tumor immunity, tumor microenvironment, tumor mutation burden and drug sensitivity in glioma.

Development of a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic Score (MUMPS) for Use in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

This is a retrospective cohort study of metastatic uveal melanoma patients. This study undertook to identify clinical characteristics that were predictive and prognostics of benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. We developed a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk Score based on retrospective data that is comprised of 3 readily available clinical variables (time to metastatic diagnosis, presence of bone metastases, and LDH). Our findings demonstrated that the Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk Score was associated with a statistically significant association with overall survival outcomes in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma treated with ICI. There was a significant predictive association with disease control to ICI for patients with a ‘good risk’ Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk score. This is one of the larger analysis of clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma patients to date and could inform clinical decision-making.

Abstract

Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a rare disease. There are limited data on prognostic clinical factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with mUM treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Retrospective and non-randomized prospective studies have reported response rates of 0–17% for anti-PD1/L1 ± anti-CTLA4 ICI in mUM, indicating a potential benefit only in a subset of patients. This study evaluates the characteristics associated with ICI benefit in patients with mUM. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with mUM who received anti-PD1/L1 ± anti-CTLA4 ICI between 2014–2019. Clinical and genomic characteristics were collected from a chart review. Treatment response and clinical progression were determined by physician assessment. Multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan–Meier log-rank tests were used to assess differences in clinical progression-free survival (cPFS) and OS between groups and identify clinical variables associated with ICI outcomes. We identified 71 mUM patients who received 75 lines of ICI therapy. Of these, 54 received anti-PD1/L1 alone, and 21 received anti-PD1/L1 + anti-CTLA4. Patient characteristics were: 53% female, 48% were 65 or older, 72% received one or fewer lines of prior therapy. Within our cohort, 53% of patients had developed metastatic disease <2 years after their initial diagnosis. Bone metastases were present in 12% of patients. The median cPFS was 2.7 months, and the median OS was 10.0 months. In multivariable analyses for both cPFS and OS, the following variables were associated with a good prognosis: ≥2 years from the initial diagnosis to metastatic disease (n = 25), LDH < 1.5 × ULN (n = 45), and absence of bone metastases (n = 66). We developed a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic Score (MUMPS). Patients were divided into 3 MUMPS groups based on the number of the above-mentioned prognostic variables: Poor prognosis (0–1), Intermediate prognosis (2) and Good prognosis (3). Good prognosis patients experienced longer cPFS (6.0 months) and OS (34.5 months) than patients with intermediate (2.3 months cPFS, 9.4 months OS) and poor prognosis disease (1.8 months cPFS, 3.9 months OS); p < 0.0001. We developed MUMPS—a prognostic score based on retrospective data that is comprised of 3 readily available clinical variables (time to metastatic diagnosis, presence of bone metastases, and LDH). This MUMPS score has a potential prognostic value. Further validation in independent datasets is warranted to determine the role of this MUMPS score in selecting ICI treatment management for mUM.

Safety and efficacy of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: results from a North American expanded access program (CheckMate 218)

CheckMate 218, a North American expanded access program (EAP), investigated nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Safety and efficacy, including 2-year survival in clinically relevant patient subgroups, are reported. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and no prior checkpoint inhibitors. Patients received nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (induction) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (maintenance) until progression or unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of 48 weeks. Safety and overall survival (OS) data were collected. This EAP included 754 treated patients from the USA (n = 580) and Canada (n = 174). Median follow-up time was 17.8 months. All-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 96% and 53% of patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 36% and 26% of patients, respectively. OS rates at 12 and 24 months were 82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 79-84] and 70% (95% CI 66-74), respectively. Twenty-four-month OS rates were 63% in patients aged ≥75 years, 56% in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, 73% in patients with BRAF wild-type tumors, 70% in patients with BRAF mutant tumors, and 56% in patients with mucosal melanoma. In this EAP, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated high survival rates and safety outcomes consistent with those from randomized clinical trials, further supporting the use of this combination for advanced melanoma across multiple subgroups.