A Pilot Study Examining the Effects of Tolvaptan on Residual Renal Function in Peritoneal Dialysis for Diabetics

On the importance of the interplay of residual renal function with clinical outcomes in end-stage kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most important public health concerns of the century, and is associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality and social costs. CKD evolving towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is on the rise resulting in a greater number of patients requiring peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). The aim of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the interplay of residual renal function (RRF) with clinical outcomes in ESKD. The persistence of RRF is one of the most important predictors of decreased morbidity, mortality, and better quality of life in both PD and HD patients. RRF contributes to the well-being of ESKD patients through various mechanisms including higher clearance of solutes, maintenance of fluid balance, removal of uremic toxins and control of electrolytes. Furthermore, RRF has beneficial effects on inflammation, anemia, malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, obesity, changes in the microbiota, and cardiac diseases. Several strategies have been proposed to preserve RRF, such as blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, better blood pressure control, incremental PD and HD. Several clinical trials investigating the issue of preservation of RRF are ongoing. They are needed to broaden our understanding of the interplay of RRF with clinical outcomes in ESKD.

A Case of Hepatitis E Virus Infection: One of Differential Diagnosis of Liver Injury in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

There are numerous causes of liver function disorder in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Infection with the Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a rare cause of liver injury, and the behavior of HEV in patients with PD is unclear. Since patients undergoing dialysis are frequently polypharmatic, liver injury caused by HEV infection may be misdiagnosed as drug-induced liver injury.

Case Presentation

A 61-year-old woman with PD developed abrupt elevation of blood transaminase levels on a routine outpatient session. Since the patient has been receiving tolvaptan as the only new medication, we suspected tolvaptan induced liver injury. In further investigating the cause of liver injury, the blood screening test was found to be positive for HEV-IgA. The patient was diagnosed with HEV infection, and had a self-limited course.

Conclusion

When encountered with patients developing liver injury during PD, HEV infection should be included in the differential diagnosis.

Effect of Tolvaptan in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage G5, and Impact of Concomitant Use of Thiazide Diuretics: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The diuretic effect of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, in patients with severe renal dysfunction remains poorly characterized. Thiazide diuretics reduce urinary volume (UV) in patients with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, which lacks V2 receptor function.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study investigated the acute urinary effects of tolvaptan in patients with stage G5 chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure (CHF), and the impact of thiazide diuretics on the urinary effects of tolvaptan.

METHODS

UVs 24 h before and after tolvaptan administration and 30-day dialysis initiation rate were compared between patients with and without thiazide diuretic administration.

RESULTS

Thiazide diuretics were used in 26 of the 106 recruited patients (age 73.4 ± 13.0 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate 8.07 ± 3.13 mL/min/1.73 m²). The pre- and post-tolvaptan 24-h UVs were significantly higher in patients not administered thiazide diuretics (1043.4 ± 645.6 vs. 1422.2 ± 774.0 mL/day; p < 0.001) than in those administered thiazide diuretics (1177.3 ± 686.5 vs. 1173.1 ± 629.1 mL/day; p = 0.93). In a multivariate regression model, thiazide diuretic use was significantly associated with decreased 24-h UV (β coefficient - 486.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 674.5 to - 298.8); increased urine osmolality (β coefficient 37.7, 95% CI 17.1-58.4); increased body weight (β coefficient 0.62, 95% CI 0.31-0.92); and increased 30-day dialysis initiation rate (odds ratio 3.40, 95% CI 1.18-9.82) after tolvaptan administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan exhibited significant diuretic effects in patients with CHF, including those with severe renal dysfunction, which were diminished with concomitant thiazide diuretic use.

Efficacy and safety of oral tolvaptan in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a Phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Loop diuretics are used to manage fluid retention in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, in Japanese HD patients.

METHODS

A total of 124 patients (24-h urine volume ≥500 mL) on thrice-weekly HD were randomized to receive oral tolvaptan 15 mg/day (n = 40), tolvaptan 30 mg/day (n = 40) or placebo (n = 44) for 24 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in 24-h urine volume, total fluid removal by HD per week and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG). Safety was assessed via the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

At treatment end, the difference (95% confidence interval) from the placebo group in the mean change from baseline in 24-h urine volume was significant in the tolvaptan 15 mg {429.1 mL [95% confidence interval (CI) 231.0, 627.2]; P < 0.0001} and 30 mg [371.6 mL (95% CI 144.1, 599.2); P = 0.0017] groups. The mean changes from baseline in total fluid removal by HD and IDWG were not significantly different in the tolvaptan groups versus the placebo group. Although the proportion of patients with TEAEs was lower in the placebo group (77.3%) than in the tolvaptan groups (92.3%), tolvaptan was safe and well-tolerated during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan significantly sustained diuretic action for 24 weeks in HD patients but did not reduce total fluid removal by HD per week and IDWG to the same extent.

Relation of Copeptin with Diabetic and Renal Function Markers Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Progressing Towards Diabetic Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and its related complications like diabetic nephropathy. Copeptin is considered as a reliable surrogate biomarker of AVP. If raised levels of copeptin in diabetic patients are detected earlier, prognosis of DM can be improved by timely modulating the treatment strategy.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

The study is therefore planned to assess copeptin levels in different groups of DM and in healthy controls to suggest a better and reliable biomarker for progressive stages of DM.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited as controls, pre diabetes, DM without nephropathy and diabetic nephropathy. Serum copeptin levels were measured by ELISA. While, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) and spot urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) were done using spectrophotometry. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Pearson's correlation tests on SPSS.

RESULTS

The average copeptin levels were 215.096 pg/mL. Copeptin levels were significantly elevated in subjects with positive family history of DM (p = 0.025), levels were also raised in pre diabetes kpatients (252.85 pg/mL) as compared to other groups. Copeptin levels were also correlated with HbA1c r = 0.171 (p = 0.101), BUN r = 0.244 (p = 0.007), creatinine r = 0.215 (p = 0.018), UACR r = 0.375 (p = <0.001) and GFR r = 0.215 (p = <0.019).

CONCLUSION

The significant correlation of copeptin with diabetic and renal biomarkers, along with its positive association with family history of DM support its' role as an early and reliable biomarker of DM and its associated nephropathy.

Tolvaptan for Heart Failure in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is frequently associated with renal impairment. Tolvaptan is reported to be effective in treating congestion in HF without significant electrolyte loss compared to conventional diuretics. However, the safety and efficacy of its use in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes of tolvaptan for HF management in patients with CKD, with a focus at a physiologic basis related to safety.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of tolvaptan against placebo or standard care in adult patients with HF and CKD. Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42017052775).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the qualitative review and six in the meta-analysis involving 1597 patients. Tolvaptan was associated with an increase in sodium concentration. No significant differences in change of eGFR and serum creatinine were found between tolvaptan and control groups. Urine flow rate appears to increase significantly with tolvaptan compared to baseline (p<0.0001). The meta-analysis demonstrated no heterogeneity between studies but the possibility of publication bias due to incomplete reporting in excluded studies and lack of RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of tolvaptan appears acceptable for patients with HF and CKD. There is evidence for an improvement in serum sodium and reduction in body water without deterioration in renal function. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term benefits of tolvaptan as an adjunct or alternative to diuretics in such patients.

Inflammation and Peritoneal Dialysis

Inflammation is one of the well-recognized nontraditional risk factors that contributes to the excessive cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Serum C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels are common surrogate markers used to measure inflammatory burden and predict adverse clinical outcomes in PD patients. Causes of inflammation are complex and can be categorized into factors related to a decrease in renal function and factors related to dialysis. They interact with each other and finally result in systemic and intraperitoneal inflammation. This review discusses the various causes and clinical implications of inflammation in PD patients. More importantly, potential therapeutic options that target the underlying pathogenic mechanisms are explored.

Advances in Understanding and Management of Residual Renal Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Residual renal function (RRF), defined as the ability of native kidneys to eliminate water and uremic toxins, is closely correlated with mortality and morbidity rates among patients receiving either peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) via continuous clearance of middle-sized molecules and protein-bound solutes. Therefore, preserving RRF is considered to be one of the primary goals in managing patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

SUMMARY AND KEY MESSAGES

In this article, we provide a review on the understanding and management of RRF in patients on dialysis. RRF may be estimated and measured by calculating the mean 24-hour urine creatinine level and urea clearance. Currently, several middle-sized molecules are reported but rarely used in practice. Many risk factors such as original renal diseases, dietary intake, and nephrotoxic agents impair RRF. Targeting such factors may halt the decline in RRF and offer better outcomes for patients on PD or HD. Except for in PD patients, RRF is a powerful predictor of survival in HD patients. RRF requires more clinical and research attention in the care of patients with ESRD on dialysis.