Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Daptomycin in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis

Intraperitoneal daptomycin dosing for peritonitis may be inadequate: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to optimize dosing and outcomes

A two-compartmental mathematical pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination of patients receiving CAPD of 4 exchanges for 6 h with 2 L of dialysate used in each cycle was developed to predict daptomycin disposition in 120 h of therapy. The pharmacodynamic target was plasma AUC/MIC equal to or greater than 666. The dose that achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment was defined as an optimal dose. Administering intraperitoneal 300 mg daily for 1 exchange daily regimen would be sufficient to treat peritonitis with S. aureus infection with MICs of 0.25 mg/L in patients undergoing CAPD. A higher dosage may be required for infections with a higher minimum inhibitory concentration. Pharmacodynamic targets and MICs significantly contributed to daptomycin doses in this setting. Clinical validation of our recommendations is recommended.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Daptomycin

Due to the low level of resistance observed with daptomycin, this antibiotic has an important place in the treatment of severe Gram-positive infections. It is the first-in-class of the group of calcium-dependent, membrane-binding lipopeptides, and is a cyclic peptide constituted of 13 amino acids and an n-decanoyl fatty acid chain. The antibacterial action of daptomycin requires its complexation with calcium. Daptomycin is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and needs to be administered parenterally. The distribution of daptomycin is limited (volume of distribution of 0.1 L/kg in healthy volunteers) due to its negative charge at physiological pH and its high binding to plasma proteins (about 90%). Its elimination is mainly renal, with about 50% of the dose excreted unchanged in the urine, justifying dosage adjustment for patients with renal insufficiency. The pharmacokinetics of daptomycin are altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high interindividual variability. As a result, therapeutic drug monitoring of daptomycin may be of interest for certain patients, such as intensive care unit patients, patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency, dialysis patients, obese patients, or children. A target for the ratio of the area under the curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration > 666 is usually recommended for clinical efficacy, whereas in order to limit the risk of undesirable muscular effects the residual concentration should not exceed 24.3 mg/L.

Pharmacokinetics of 300 mg/d Intraperitoneal Daptomycin: New Insight from the DaptoDP Study

The DaptoDP (NCT 2012-005699-33) study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of daptomycin (DAP) in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis (PDRP) patients following intraperitoneal (IP) administration. The authors have already reported the findings on the 200-mg dosing and present here the follow-up results of the 300-mg dosing. The primary endpoint was a dialysate concentration of DAP above the effective concentration in situ during 6 hours of dwell time i.e., 16 mg/L. Secondary endpoints were to avoid the toxic threshold of 120 mg/L DAP and to be above 16 mg/L DAP for 2 hours in plasma. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated on days 1 and 5. Safety data were evaluated on days 1 to 14 based on clinical and biological parameters. Daptomycin was administered in Nutrineal during 6 hours of dwell time for 14 days plus the usual antibiotic therapy in a separate dwell. Because the 200-mg dosing objectives were not reached, a higher DAP dose of 300 mg was tested in the next 3 patients. Effective dialysate and plasma concentrations were achieved at the 300-mg DAP dose with the plasma concentration well below the toxic threshold, even at steady state, during which the accumulation factor never exceeded 3. The optimal DAP dose of 300 mg daily by the IP route, as determined by the pharmacokinetic data, needs to be clinically confirmed prior to routine use. The peritoneal bioavailability of DAP supports using the IP route as an alternative to the intravenous route for peritonitis and systemic infections.

Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: challenges and solutions

Peritoneal dialysis is an effective treatment modality for patients with end-stage renal disease. The relative use of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis varies widely by country. Data from a 2004 survey reports the percentage of patients with end-stage renal disease treated with peritoneal dialysis to be 5%-10% in economically developed regions like the US and Western Europe to as much as 75% in Mexico. This disparity is probably related to the availability and access to hemodialysis, or in some cases patient preference for peritoneal over hemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis remains the major complication and primary challenge to the long-term success of peritoneal dialysis. Fifty years ago, with the advent of the Tenckhoff catheter, patients averaged six episodes of peritonitis per year on peritoneal dialysis. In 2016, the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis proposed a benchmark of 0.5 episodes of peritonitis per year or one episode every 2 years. Despite the marked reduction in peritonitis over time, peritonitis for the individual patient is problematic. The mortality for an episode of peritonitis is 5% and is a cofactor for mortality in another 16% of affected patients. Prevention of peritonitis and prompt and appropriate management of peritonitis is essential for the long-term success of peritoneal dialysis in all patients. In this review, challenges and solutions are addressed regarding the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis from the viewpoint of an infectious disease physician.