MRI versus 64-row MDCT for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Quantum iterative reconstruction on a photon-counting detector CT improves the quality of hepatocellular carcinoma imaging

BACKGROUND

Excellent image quality is crucial for workup of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis because a signature tumor signal allows for non-invasive diagnosis without histologic proof. Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) can enhance abdominal image quality, especially in combination with a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR). The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of different QIR levels on PCD-CT imaging of HCC in both phantom and patient scans.

METHODS

Virtual monoenergetic images at 50 keV were reconstructed using filtered back projection and all available QIR levels (QIR 1-4). Objective image quality properties were investigated in phantom experiments. The study also included 44 patients with triple-phase liver PCD-CT scans of viable HCC lesions. Quantitative image analysis involved assessing the noise, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio of the lesions. Qualitative image analysis was performed by three raters evaluating noise, artifacts, lesion conspicuity, and overall image quality using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Noise power spectra in the phantom experiments showed increasing noise suppression with higher QIR levels without affecting the modulation transfer function. This pattern was confirmed in the in vivo scans, in which the lowest noise levels were found in QIR-4 reconstructions, with around a 50% reduction in median noise level compared with the filtered back projection images. As contrast does not change with QIR, QIR-4 also yielded the highest contrast-to-noise ratios. With increasing QIR levels, rater scores were significantly better for all qualitative image criteria (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Without compromising image sharpness, the best image quality of iodine contrast optimized low-keV virtual monoenergetic images can be achieved using the highest QIR level to suppress noise. Using these settings as standard reconstruction for HCC in PCD-CT imaging might improve diagnostic accuracy and confidence.

Palatine Tonsil Measurements and Echogenicity during Tonsillitis Using Ultrasonography: A Case-Control Study

This case-control study aimed to assess the size and echogenicity of inflamed tonsils using ultrasonography. It was carried out at different hospitals, nurseries, and primary schools in Khartoum state. About 131 Sudanese volunteers between 1 and 24 years old were recruited. The sample included 79 volunteers with normal tonsils and 52 with tonsillitis according to hematological investigations. The sample was divided into groups according to age-1-5 years old, 6-10 years old, and more than ten years. Measurements in centimeters of height (AP) and width (transverse) of both tonsils (right and left) were taken. Echogenicity was assessed according to normal and abnormal appearances. A data collection sheet containing all the study variables was used. The independent samples test (t-test) showed an insignificant height difference between normal controls and cases with tonsillitis. The transverse diameter increased significantly with inflammation (p-value < 0.05) for both tonsils in all groups. Echogenicity can differentiate between normal and abnormal tonsils (p-value < 0.05 using the chi-square test) for samples from 1-5 years and 6-10 years. The study concluded that measurements and appearance are reliable indicators of tonsillitis, which can be confirmed with the use of ultrasonography, helping physicians to make the correct diagnosis and decisions.

Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To determine the consistency of major hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) features between CT and MRI based on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 and to investigate the additional value on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent dynamic CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI within 1 month were investigated. Two radiologists evaluated the presence of major HCC features and categorized observations using LI-RADS v2018 algorithm. In addition, each observation was recorded as hyper-, iso-, or hypo-intensity on hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with 110 observations were identified. Among 88 observations classified as LR-3, 4 or 5, arterial phase hyper-enhancement and washout appearance showed higher frequencies on CT than on MRI (75.0% vs. 58.0%, P < 0.001, and 60.2% vs. 44.3%, P = 0.014, respectively). Of the 59 LR-3 observations categorized on MRI, 70.0% of observations with hypo-intensity on HBP images were HCCs, whereas 89.5% of observations with iso- or hyper-intensity on HBP images were non-HCCs (P < 0.001) CONCLUSION: The frequencies of arterial phase hyper-enhancement and washout appearances were higher on CT than on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. For LR-3 observations, adding the hepatobiliary-phase hypo-intensity to major features improved the diagnostic performance of MRI in distinguishing HCCs from non-HCC lesions.

View-Sharing Artifact Reduction With Retrospective Compressed Sensing Reconstruction in the Context of Contrast-Enhanced Liver MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Screening

BACKGROUND

View-sharing (VS) increases spatiotemporal resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI by sharing high-frequency k-space data across temporal phases. This temporal sharing results in respiratory motion within any phase to propagate artifacts across all shared phases. Compressed sensing (CS) eliminates the need for VS by recovering missing k-space data from pseudorandom undersampling, reducing temporal blurring while maintaining spatial resolution.

PURPOSE

To evaluate a CS reconstruction algorithm on undersampled DCE-MRI data for image quality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing MRI for HCC screening (29 males, 21 females, 52-72 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T MRI. Multiphase 3D-SPGR T₁ -weighted sequence undersampled in arterial phases with a complementary Poisson disc sampling pattern reconstructed with VS and CS algorithms.

ASSESSMENT

VS and CS reconstructions evaluated by blinded assessments of image quality and anatomic delineation on Likert scales (1-4 and 1-5, respectively), and HCC detection by OPTN/UNOS criteria including a diagnostic confidence score (1-5). Blinded side-by-side reconstruction comparisons for lesion depiction and overall series preference (-3-3).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank tests for paired nonparametric analyses with Bonferroni-Holm multiple-comparison corrections. McNemar's test for differences in lesion detection frequency and transplantation eligibility.

RESULTS

CS compared with VS demonstrated significantly improved contrast (mean 3.6 vs. 2.9, P < 0.0001) and less motion artifact (mean 3.6 vs. 3.2, P = 0.006). CS compared with VS demonstrated significantly improved delineations of liver margin (mean 4.5 vs. 3.8, P = 0.0002), portal veins (mean 4.5 vs. 3.7, P < 0.0001), and hepatic veins (mean 4.6 vs. 3.5, P < 0.0001), but significantly decreased delineation of hepatic arteries (mean 3.2 vs. 3.7, P = 0.004). No significant differences were seen in the other assessments.

DATA CONCLUSION

Applying a CS reconstruction to data acquired for a VS reconstruction significantly reduces motion artifacts in a clinical DCE protocol for HCC screening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:984-993.

Does a combined CT and MRI protocol enhance the diagnostic efficacy of LI-RADS in the categorization of hepatic observations? A prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To compare diagnostic performance and agreement between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI in reference to LI-RADS classification system to categorize hepatic observations detected in hepatic patients during screening ultrasound.

METHODS

240 patients with 296 liver observations detected during ultrasound surveillance underwent hepatic CT and MRI examinations, histopathology, and clinical and radiological follow-up. Using LI-RADS v2014, six radiologists evaluated the observations independently and assigned a LI-RADS category to each observation using CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI.

RESULTS

Combined CT and MRI in LI-RADS yielded better accuracy (91.29 %), sensitivity (90.71 %) and specificity (92.31 %) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis than using MRI or CT alone; accuracy, sensitivity and specificity decreased to 85.37 %, 86.34 %, and 83.65 %, respectively, for MRI and 67.6 %, 54.10 % and 91.35 %, respectively, for CT. The intraclass agreement of the LI-RADS scores between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI was excellent (κ=0.9624 (95 % CI: 0.9318-0.9806)).

CONCLUSION

CT and MRI are complementary to each other. Combined CT/MRI enabled a more precise determination of LI-RADS category of hepatic observations; however, due to the expense and minor increase in accuracy, the combined methodology should only be utilized in cases of suspected HCC.

KEY POINTS

• Hepatic observation may be categorized differently depending on the imaging modality used. • We compared LI-RADS categorization between CT, MRI and combined CT/MRI. • MRI produces higher accuracy and sensitivity, while CT produces higher specificity. • Combining CT and MRI improves LIRADS categorization reports. • Considering additional cost, combined methodology could be restricted to challenging cases.

Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the interpretation, reporting, and data collection for imaging examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It assigns category codes reflecting relative probability of HCC to imaging-detected liver observations based on major and ancillary imaging features. LI-RADS also includes imaging features suggesting malignancy other than HCC. Supported and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the system has been developed by a committee of radiologists, hepatologists, pathologists, surgeons, lexicon experts, and ACR staff, with input from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing. Development of LI-RADS has been based on literature review, expert opinion, rounds of testing and iteration, and feedback from users. This article summarizes and assesses the quality of evidence supporting each LI-RADS major feature for diagnosis of HCC, as well as of the LI-RADS imaging features suggesting malignancy other than HCC. Based on the evidence, recommendations are provided for or against their continued inclusion in LI-RADS. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Multiphasic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are both used for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. To determine if there is a relative diagnostic benefit of one over the other, we synthesized evidence regarding the relative performance of CT, extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. We also assessed whether liver biopsy versus follow-up with the same versus alternative imaging is best for CT-indeterminate or MRI-indeterminate liver nodules in patients with cirrhosis. We searched multiple databases from inception to April 27, 2016, for studies comparing CT with extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI or gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in adults with cirrhosis and suspected HCC. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Of 33 included studies, 19 were comprehensive, while 14 reported sensitivity only. For all tumor sizes, the 19 comprehensive comparisons showed significantly higher sensitivity (0.82 versus 0.66) and lower negative likelihood ratio (0.20 versus 0.37) for MRI over CT. The specificities of MRI versus CT (0.91 versus 0.92) and the positive likelihood ratios (8.8 versus 8.1) were not different. All three modalities performed better for HCCs ≥2 cm. Performance was poor for HCCs <1 cm. No studies examined whether adults with cirrhosis and an indeterminate nodule are best evaluated using biopsy, repeated imaging, or alternative imaging. Concerns about publication bias, inconsistent study results, increased risk of bias, and clinical factors precluded support for exclusive use of either gadoxetate-enhanced or extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI over CT.

CONCLUSION

CT, extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI, or gadoxetate-enhanced MRI could not be definitively preferred for HCC diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis; in patients with cirrhosis and an indeterminate mass, there were insufficient data comparing biopsy to repeat cross-sectional imaging or alternative imaging. (Hepatology 2018;67:401-421).

Imaging prediction of residual hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy in patients undergoing liver transplantation or partial hepatectomy

PURPOSE

Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) offer alternatives for patients unable to undergo resection or awaiting transplant. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and interobserver agreement of imaging features suggestive of viable tumor at posttherapy CT/MRI and to determine a size threshold for tumor detection.

METHODS

Patients having undergone liver transplant or hepatectomy between 2012 and 2014 with presurgical embolization or ablation of HCC were identified. Imaging was retrospectively reviewed, and enhancement characteristics of each lesion were noted by two radiologists. Original pathology slides were reviewed, and the size of nodular viable tumor was noted, if present. Cohen's kappa was used to evaluate interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

87 patients with 129 HCCs were reviewed retrospectively following IRB approval. 50% (65/129) of lesions showed viable tumor at pathology. 86 lesions (67%) were imaged with CT and 43 (33%) with MR. Of viable lesions, 25 (38%) showed nodular arterial enhancement and 18 (28%) demonstrated washout. One lesion had capsule appearance. Sensitivity/specificity for nodular enhancement, washout, and capsule were 0.38/0.83, 0.28/0.89, and 0.02/1.00, respectively. Overall detection rate was 41% of <1 cm, 54% of 1-2 cm, and 57% of >2 cm viable lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Nodular arterial enhancement was most frequently observed, followed by washout. Both showed moderate interobserver agreement. Sensitivity of any imaging feature was less than 50%, though findings were specific for viable disease. There is limited detection of nodules of viable tumor <1 cm and only marginal detection of larger lesions, though MRI outperformed CT for the detection of subcentimeter viable tumor.

Differences in Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Categorization Between MRI and CT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether focal liver observations are categorized differently by CT and MRI using the Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 58 patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver protocol CT and MRI within 1 month of each other. Two readers assigned a LI-RADS category for all focal liver observations in consensus. A significant category upgrade was defined as a change from LI-RADS categories 1 and 2 or nonvisualization to LI-RADS categories 3-5, from LI-RADS category 3 to category 4 or 5, from LI-RADS category 4 to category 5, or from any category to LI-RADS category 5V. A significant downgrade was defined as a change from LI-RADS category 5 to categories 1-4, from LI-RADS category 4 to categories 1-3, or from LI-RADS category 3 to categories 1 or 2.

RESULTS

The LI-RADS category was different between CT and MRI for 77.2% (176/228) of observations. A significant upgrade occurred on MRI for 42.5% (97/228) of observations because of nonvisualization by CT (n = 78), capsule (n = 8), arterial hyperenhancement (n = 4), intratumoral fat (n = 2), larger size (n = 2), tumor in portal vein (n = 2), and wash-out (n = 1). Of these 97 upgraded observations, two were upgraded to LI-RADS category 5V, 15 were upgraded to category 5, and 13 were upgraded to category 4. A significant downgrade occurred on MRI for 8.8% (20/228) of observations because of marked T2 hyperintensity (n = 14), smaller size (n = 2), wedge shape (n = 2), and marked T2 hypointensity (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

LI-RADS categorization of focal liver observations is dependent on imaging modality. MRI results in both upgraded and downgraded categorization compared with CT in an important proportion of observations.

Effect of MRI Versus MDCT on Milan Criteria Scores and Liver Transplantation Eligibility

OBJECTIVE

The Milan criteria for the selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation were originally based on the findings of contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Studies have shown improvement in HCC detection of using contrast-enhanced MRI instead of CT, but they have provided little information on the potential downstream effect on patient management that might result from discrepant imaging findings. We sought to assess the effect of discrepant imaging findings on patient eligibility to undergo liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2006 to 2013, patients with a diagnosis of HCC who underwent both MDCT and MRI examinations within a 40-day period were studied retrospectively. All examinations were independently reviewed by two abdominal radiologists who recorded the number, diameter, and location of each lesion. Secondary confirmation of the lesions was made on the basis of histopathologic findings, diffusion restriction on DWI, increased T2 signal intensity, lesion growth, presence of fat, uptake of ethiodized oil, or a combination of these findings.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (48 men and 16 women; mean age, 62 years) met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Of the 129 lesions identified by MRI, only 102 of these lesions (79%) were identified by MDCT. This discrepancy led to a difference in the Milan criteria scoring for nine patients (14%). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (± SD) greatest lesion diameter measured using the two modalities, with measurements of 3.52 ± 2.8 cm and 3.46 ± 2.8 cm noted on MDCT and MRI, respectively (p = 0.8). Lesions missed on MDCT studies tended to be smaller, with a mean diameter of 2.7 cm. Of the 129 lesions identified by MRI, 112 (87%) had available histopathologic findings or other confirmatory diagnostic evidence.

CONCLUSION

MDCT missed one-fifth of the HCC lesions detected by MRI. Had MDCT been the only imaging examination performed, failure to identify these lesions would have led to a different management plan for 14% of patients.

MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of current practices

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and liver transplantation is the optimal treatment for selected patients with HCC and chronic liver disease (CLD). Accurate selection of patients for transplantation is essential to maximize patient outcomes and ensure optimized allocation of donor organs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful tool for the detection, characterization, and staging of HCC. In patients with CLD, the MRI findings of an arterial-enhancing mass with subsequent washout and enhancing capsule on delayed interstitial phase images are diagnostic for HCC. Major organizations with oversight for organ donor distribution, such as The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), accept an imaging diagnosis of HCC, no longer requiring tissue biopsy. In patients that are awaiting transplantation, or are not candidates for liver transplantation, localized therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation may be offered. MRI can be used to monitor treatment response. The purpose of this review article is to describe the role of imaging methods in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of HCC, with particular emphasis on established and evolving MRI techniques employing nonspecific gadolinium chelates, hepatobiliary contrast agents, and diffusion weighted imaging. We also briefly review the recently developed Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) formulating a standardized terminology and reporting structure for evaluation of lesions detected in patients with CLD.

Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several imaging modalities are available for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the test performance of imaging modalities for HCC.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1998 to December 2014), the Cochrane Library Database, Scopus, and reference lists.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies on test performance of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

DATA EXTRACTION

One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed them; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality and strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Few studies have evaluated imaging for HCC in surveillance settings. In nonsurveillance settings, sensitivity for detection of HCC lesions was lower for ultrasonography without contrast than for CT or MRI (pooled difference based on direct comparisons, 0.11 to 0.22), and MRI was associated with higher sensitivity than CT (pooled difference, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.07 to 12]). For evaluation of focal liver lesions, there were no clear differences in sensitivity among ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI. Specificity was generally 0.85 or higher across imaging modalities, but this item was not reported in many studies. Factors associated with lower sensitivity included use of an explanted liver reference standard, and smaller or more well-differentiated HCC lesions. For MRI, sensitivity was slightly higher for hepatic-specific than nonspecific contrast agents.

LIMITATIONS

Only English-language articles were included, there was statistical heterogeneity in pooled analyses, and costs were not assessed. Most studies were conducted in Asia and had methodological limitations.

CONCLUSION

CT and MRI are associated with higher sensitivity than ultrasonography without contrast for detection of HCC; sensitivity was higher for MRI than CT. For evaluation of focal liver lesions, the sensitivities of ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI for HCC are similar.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (

PROSPERO

CRD42014007016).

MR-PET evaluation of 1-month post-ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary observations

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and protocol optimization of whole-body hybrid MR-PET system performed 1-month after post-locoregional thermoablative procedures for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients (6 men and 2 women; mean age, 56.6 ± 5.5 years) with 9 ablated HCCs constituted our study population. Three readers interpreted the studies to determine the presence or absence of residual malignancy. Two readers independently assessed the fused MR-PET images to compare registration accuracy of two types of T2-weighted (triggered T2 half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and turbo spin-echo) and T1-weighted [Cartesian and radial 3D gradient echo (GRE)]. Image quality evaluation of both 3D-GRE T1-weighted sequences was evaluated. Kappa statistics were used to measure inter-observer agreement. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Definite residual tumor was observed in 3/9 ablations; two were PET positive. All residual tumors were isovascular on MRI. Radial 3D-GRE demonstrated significantly superior MR-PET subjective co-registration in comparison with the remaining sequences and showed a non-significant trend toward higher image quality scores than Cartesian GRE.

CONCLUSION

Whole-body hybrid MR-PET is feasible as a part of 1-month follow-up post-locoregional thermoablative treatment for HCC. Radial 3D-GRE offers improved co-registration with PET data, with overall good image quality.

Considerations regarding current diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major health issue, ranked the fifth most common tumor and currently being responsible for a third of the cancer-related deaths globally, with an ever-increasing number of fatalities. Current advances in contrast-enhanced imaging techniques such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, multi-detector computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging are improving the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has widely become the first choice in liver tumor assessment, as it is faster, simpler and safer than other forms of diagnostic imaging. On the other hand, cross sectional computed tomography is frequently employed when a hepatic formation is suspected of malignancy and allows a more accurate characterization of lesions through multiphasic multi-detector computed tomography technology. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging represents another addition to the wide range of diagnostic and prognostic techniques available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and is currently regarded as one of the best tools for the characterization of these lesions. Furthermore, groundbreaking biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma are being discovered, although alpha-fetoprotein remains one of the most frequently used serum test in the early stages. Nonetheless, further advances are required for the detection of small liver carcinomas.

Is 3-Tesla Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging superior to 64-slice contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Objectives

To compare 64-slice contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using Gd-EOB-DTPA for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in this setting.

Methods

3-phase-liver-CT was performed in fifty patients (42 male, 8 female) with suspected or proven HCC. The patients were subjected to a 3-Tesla-MRI-examination with Gd-EOB-DTPA and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) at b-values of 0, 50 and 400 s/mm². The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-value was determined for each lesion detected in DWI. The histopathological report after resection or biopsy of a lesion served as the gold standard, and a surrogate of follow-up or complementary imaging techniques in combination with clinical and paraclinical parameters was used in unresected lesions. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated for each technique.

Results

MRI detected slightly more lesions that were considered suspicious for HCC per patient compared to CT (2.7 versus 2.3, respectively). ADC-measurements in HCC showed notably heterogeneous values with a median of 1.2±0.5×10⁻³ mm²/s (range from 0.07±0.1 to 3.0±0.1×10⁻³ mm²/s). MRI showed similar diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values compared to CT (AUC 0.837, sensitivity 92%, PPV 80% and NPV 90% for MRI vs. AUC 0.798, sensitivity 85%, PPV 79% and NPV 82% for CT; not significant). Specificity was 75% for both techniques.

Conclusions

Our study did not show a statistically significant difference in detection in detection of HCC between MRI and CT. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI tended to detect more lesions per patient compared to contrast-enhanced CT; therefore, we would recommend this modality as the first-choice imaging method for the detection of HCC and therapeutic decisions. However, contrast-enhanced CT was not inferior in our study, so that it can be a useful image modality for follow-up examinations.

APASL and AASLD Consensus Guidelines on Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review

Consensus guidelines for radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been drafted by several large international working groups. This article reviews the similarities and differences between the most recent guidelines proposed by the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases and the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver. Current evidence for the various imaging modalities for diagnosis of HCC and their relevance to the consensus guidelines are reviewed.

Radiation risk from medical imaging

This review provides a practical overview of the excess cancer risks related to radiation from medical imaging. Primary care physicians should have a basic understanding of these risks. Because of recent attention to this issue, patients are more likely to express concerns over radiation risk. In addition, physicians can play a role in reducing radiation risk to their patients by considering these risks when making imaging referrals. This review provides a brief overview of the evidence pertaining to low-level radiation and excess cancer risks and addresses the radiation doses and risks from common medical imaging studies. Specific subsets of patients may be at greater risk from radiation exposure, and radiation risk should be considered carefully in these patients. Recent technical innovations have contributed to lowering the radiation dose from computed tomography, and the referring physician should be aware of these innovations in making imaging referrals.