Azithromycin-containing versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A meta-analysis

Comparison of the Efficacy of Two-Week Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole-Based Quadruple Sequential Antibiotic Therapy in Eradicating Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial

AIM

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori is escalating in developing countries, exacerbated by unjustified antibiotic usage, which leads to increased resistance. This trend has been notably amplified since the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, the effectiveness of existing eradication regimens has been compromised. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two weeks of vonoprazan-based quadruple sequential therapy and lansoprazole-based quadruple sequential therapy in treating H. pylori infection.  Methods: A non-randomized clinical trial was conducted over 18 months at the Department of Gastroenterology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. It included patients presenting with dyspepsia, as defined by the Rome IV criteria, and who tested positive on the urea breath test. Patients were divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B. Group A patients received lansoprazole 30 mg + amoxicillin + tinidazole + tab. colloidal bismuth subcitrate for the first seven days, followed by lansoprazole + levofloxacin + azithromycin + colloidal bismuth subcitrate. Group B patients received vonoprazan + amoxicillin + tinidazole + colloidal bismuth subcitrate for the first seven days, followed by vonoprazan + levofloxacin + azithromycin + colloidal bismuth subcitrate. Both regimes continued for 14 days. Four weeks after 14 days of the treatment, an early morning urea breath test was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits at seven and 14 days post-treatment initiation to record adverse events and assess compliance with the treatment regimen. Patients who lost the follow-up and remained non-compliant to the medications were excluded from the final data analysis as per standard protocols of the per-protocol analysis.  Results: A total of 252 patients were included. In Group A and Group B, 6/126 (4.76%) and 8/126 (6.35%) of the patients were lost to follow-up, respectively. The non-compliance rate in Group A was 5/126 (3.97%), compared to Group B with 3/126 (2.38%). Finally, the per-protocol analysis of the results included 115 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, lifestyle, and clinical factors, were comparable between groups with p-values of 0.138 for age, 0.356 for gender, 0.126 for BMI, 0.495 for residence, 0.500 for water source, 0.866 for meal habit, 0.863 for smoking, 0.188 for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, 0.145 for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, 0.213 for antibiotics, and 0.456 for treatment history. Both treatments effectively eradicated H. pylori, as determined by a negative urea breath test at four weeks post-treatment, with Group B showing a higher eradication rate of 96.5% compared to 92.2% in Group A, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.153). There was no difference in adverse effects in both treatment groups (p-value > 0.05).  Conclusion: The study found that while the vonoprazan-based regime exhibited a slightly higher eradication rate of H. pylori compared to lansoprazole, the difference was not statistically significant. It was concluded that both regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy and similar profiles of adverse effects in treating H. pylori infection.

Intraluminal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several strategies have been proposed to increase the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori. However, the widespread increasing resistance rates to current multiple-dose oral antibiotic therapies call for alternative therapeutic approaches. We aim to develop a novel intraluminal therapy for H. pylori infection (ILTHPI).

METHODS

From April 2017 to December 2017, 100 H. pylori-infected treatment-naïve patients with upper abdominal pain or discomfort underwent endoscopic examinations and concomitant ILTHPI, which comprised the control of intragastric pH, the irrigation of gastric mucosal surface with a mucolytic agent, and the application of single-dose medicaments containing antibiotic powders. The safety profiles while conducting ILTHPI and adverse events after ILTHPI were evaluated. The success of eradication was assessed based on the result of the ¹³ C-urea breath test 6 weeks after ILTHPI. In addition, a patient with successful ILTHPI was reconfirmed by a negative H. pylori stool antigen test four to 6 months after ILTHPI to exclude short-term recurrence.

RESULTS

All the 100 enrolled patients completed the ILTHPI with good safety profiles and mild adverse events (6%). Five patients dropped out, and 51 of 95 patients (53.7%) achieved successful eradication immediately after endoscopic examinations. All 51 patients revealed negative stool H. pylori antigen tests four to 6 months after successful ILTHPI. No short-term recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a novel therapeutic approach. With the ILTHPI, H. pylori can be eradicated immediately by administrating a single-dose regimen while conducting an endoscopic examination.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT03124420.

Azithromycin and risk of COPD exacerbations in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is associated with reduced lung function and systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Azithromycin (AZ) is active against HP and reduces the risk of COPD exacerbation. We determined whether HP infection status modifies the effects of AZ in COPD patients.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 1018 subjects with COPD who participated in the Macrolide Azithromycin (MACRO) in COPD Study were used to determine the HP infection status at baseline and 12 months of follow-up using a serologic assay. Based on HP infection status and randomization to either AZ or placebo (PL), the subjects were divided into 4 groups: HP+/AZ, HP-/AZ, HP+/PL, and HP-/PL. Time to first exacerbation was compared across the 4 groups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. The rates of exacerbation were compared using both the Kruskal-Wallis test and negative binomial analysis. Blood biomarkers at enrolment and at follow-up visits 3, 12, and 13 (1 month after treatment was stopped) months were measured.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty one (17.8%) patients were seropositive to HP. Non-Caucasian participants were nearly three times more likely to be HP seropositive than Caucasian participants (37.4% vs 13.6%; p < 0.001). The median time to first exacerbation was significantly different across the four groups (p = 0.001) with the longest time in the HP+/AZ group (11.2 months, 95% CI; 8.4-12.5+) followed by the HP-/AZ group (8.0 months, 95% CI; 6.7-9.7). Hazard ratio (HR) for exacerbations was lowest in the HP+/AZ group after adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, ethnicity, history of peptic ulcer, dyspnea, previous hospital admission, GOLD grade of severity, and forced vital capacity (HR, 0.612; 95% CI, 0.442-0.846 vs HR, 0.789; 95% CI, 0.663-0.938 in the HP-/AZ group). Circulating levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-75 were reduced only in the HP+/AZ group after 3 months of AZ treatment (-0.87 ± 0.31 μg/L; p = 0.002); levels returned to baseline after discontinuing AZ.

CONCLUSIONS

AZ is effective in preventing COPD exacerbations in patients with HP seropositivity, possibly by modulating TNF pathways related to HP infection.

Pharmacological regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: an overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of the world's population is infected with Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), a bacterium shown to be linked with a series of gastrointestinal diseases. A growing number of systematic reviews (SRs) have been published comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for H.pylori infection but have not reached a consistent conclusion. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of SRs of pharmacological therapies for the eradication of H.pylori.

METHODS

Major electronic databases were searched to identify relevant SRs published between 2002 and February 2016. Studies were considered eligible if they included RCTs comparing different pharmacological regimens for treating patients diagnosed as H.pylori infected and pooled the eradication rates in a meta-analysis. A modified version of the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews' (AMSTAR) was used to assess the methodological quality. A Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the different proton pump inhibitors (PPI) within triple therapy.

RESULTS

30 SRs with pairwise meta-analysis were included. In triple therapy, the NMA ranked the esomeprazole to be the most effective PPI, followed by rabeprazole, while no difference was observed among the three old generations of PPI for the eradication of H.pylori. When comparing triple and bismuth-based therapy, the relative effectiveness appeared to be dependent on the choice of antibiotics within the triple therapy; moxifloxacin or levofloxacin-based triple therapy were both associated with greater effectiveness than bismuth-based therapy as a second-line treatment, while bismuth-based therapy achieved similar or greater eradication rate compared to clarithromycin-based therapy. Inconsistent findings were reported regarding the use of levofloxacin/moxifloxacin in the first-line treatment; this could be due to the varied resistant rate to different antibiotics across regions and populations. Critical appraisal showed a low-moderate level of overall methodological quality of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that the new generation of PPIs and use of moxifloxacin or levofloxacin within triple therapy as second-line treatment were associated with greater effectiveness. Given the varied antibiotic resistant rate across regions, the appropriateness of pooling results together in meta-analysis should be carefully considered and the recommendation of the choice of antibiotics should be localized.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Children by Triple Therapy Regimens of Amoxicillin, Omeprazole, and Clarithromycin or Azithromycin

Background and Objectives:

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of classical and azithromycin-containing triple therapy eradication regimen against H. Pylori in children, and to determine the level of patients’ tolerance.

Patients and Methods:

This single clinical trial was performed in 2014 on 2 to 15 years old children. All children, in whom H. Pylori infection was confirmed through multiple biopsies of the stomach and required treatment, were enrolled in the study. H. Pylori-positive patients were treated alternately with two different drug regimens; Group OCA received clarithromycin 7.5 mg/kg/day every 12 hours for 10 days, amoxicillin 50 mg/kg/day every 12 hours for 10 days, and omeprazole 1 mg/kg/day every 12 hours for two weeks, and Group OAA received azithromycin 10 mg/kg/day once a day (before meal) for 6 days along with amoxicillin and omeprazole. Four to six weeks after completion of treatment, patients’ stool was tested for H. Pylori through the monoclonal method using the Helicobacter antigen quick kit.

Results:

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding gender and age of patients. Based on ITT analysis, the therapeutic response in the OAA and OCA groups were 56.2% and 62.5%, respectively (P = 0.40). Drug adverse effects were 15.6% in the OCA and 3.1% in the OAA group (P = 0.19).

Conclusions:

The therapeutic response was seen in more than half of the patients treated with triple therapy of H. Pylori eradication regimen including azithromycin or clarithromycin, and there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups.

Pharmacological therapy used in the elimination of Helicobacter pylori infection: A review

The optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection should combine a high cure rate and a short treatment duration with a favorable side-effect profile and should maintain a low cost. Several strategies have been proposed to increase the H. pylori eradication rate, including the extension of the treatment duration to 14 d, the use of a four-drug regimen (quadruple, sequential, and concomitant treatments), and the use of novel antibiotics, such as levofloxacin. However, triple therapy remains the most widely accepted first-line treatment regimen in Brazil and the United States and throughout Europe. Because this therapy is limited by resistance to clarithromycin, other therapeutic regimens have been investigated worldwide. This review describes the current literature involving studies directly comparing these different therapies and their efficacies.

New dual therapy for primary treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A prospective randomized study in Shanghai, China

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the eradication rates, side effects and the patient compliance of a dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin as the first-line therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients diagnosed endoscopically with non-ulcer dyspepsia with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned into two groups, one treated with amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily plus rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily (R10A group) or 20 mg twice daily (R20A group) for 14 days. H. pylori eradication was evaluated by (13) C-urea breath test (UBT) at 4-6 weeks after the completion of treatment. H. pylori eradication rate was analyzed by per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses together with 95% confidence interval (CI). Side effects and patients' compliance were also recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 117 patients (58 in the R10A group and 59 in the R20A group) completed the study, among whom five did not undertake the UBT. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 89.8% of patients in the R20A group by ITT analysis and 93.0% by PP analysis, which was significantly higher than those in the R10A group (75.9% and 80.0%, respectively, P < 0.05). Side effects, including skin rash, abdominal discomfort, headache, insomnia and nausea, were all mild and were treated symptomatically without the need to discontinue the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The modified dual therapy with high doses of rabeprazole and amoxicillin is considered an effective and safe primary therapy for H. pylori eradication and could be recommended as the first-line eradication regimen for certain patients.

Replacement of clarithromycin with azithromycin in triple therapy regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Eradication of helicobacter pylori is important for treatment of GU but an ideal regimen is not available. HP is resistant to metronidazole and clarithromycin. Clarithromycin is expensive and is not available in under developing countries. This study aimed to compare two regimens containing clarithromycin or azithromycin.

METHODS

Totally, seventy-eight patients with GU (confirmed with endoscopy) and infection of HP (Confirmed by Rapid Urease Test (RUT)) were allocated to one of the groups of study (35 participants in each group). Two weeks regimen of Clarithromycin (2×500 mg) + Amoxicillin (2×1 gr) + omeprazole (2×20 mg) was administered for group A of patients while group B got a 10 days regimen of Azithromycin (1×250 mg) + 14 days Amoxicillin (2×1 gr) + omeprazole (2×20 mg). At the end of the treatment course, the patients were evaluated according to the side effects of the drugs. In addition, two months after the end of therapy, patients underwent endoscopy and biopsy to evaluate HP eradication.

RESULTS

After two weeks, the side effects of the drug were: Nausea 8 patients in group A and 7 patients in group B, Diarrhea 2 patients in group A, 3 patients in group B and vomiting 2 patients in group A, 3 patients in group B. There were no serious side effects in any group. Eradication rate in group A was 82.9% (based on per protocol analysis (PPA)) and 84.6 % (intention to treat (ITT)). In group B, eradication rate was 77.1 % (PPA) and 79.5 % (ITT) (P=0.55).

CONCLUSION

Based on our study results, azithromycin can be used in HP eradication regimen because of its similar efficacy to clarithromycin but also have lower cost, side effects and resistance.

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy research: Ethical issues and description of results

As an infectious disease, the approach to anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy differs from other common gastrointestinal conditions because treatment success of more than 90% to 95% should be expected and the reasons for treatment failure can always be understood. Neither comparisons with another regimen nor randomization are required to identify a highly successful therapy. Treatment success should be judged first in relation to outcome (ie, ≥95% or grade A). Inclusion of a known inferior regimen in a clinical trial is generally unethical. If the use of a known inferior drug is required by a regulatory agency, subjects must be given full and accurate information regarding expectations with each regimen; there can be no deceptions. Comparative trials should be restricted to highly successful treatments (ie, comparisons of different doses, durations, compliance, cost, and so forth). Success should be judged as ordered categories such as <85%, 85%-89%, 90%-94%, or ≥95% and statistically equivalent regimens with the same grade success (ie, 90%-94% [Grade B]) are inferior to those higher category (ie, ≥95% [Grade A]) regimens. Only grade A or B regimens should be prescribed. Here we discuss anti-H pylori eradication studies from the perspective [corrected] of an infectious disease with the goal of providing recommendations regarding changes in approach and in reporting that should help resolve the ethical issues and make the results of clinical trials more useful to clinicians.