Maximum tolerated volume in drinking tests with water and a nutritional beverage for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia

Nutrient Drinking Test as Biomarker in Functional Dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent condition with multifactorial pathophysiology, including impaired gastric accommodation (GA), hypersensitivity to gastric distention, and delayed gastric emptying. Drink tests (DT) have been proposed as a potential biomarker for the presence and severity of gastric sensorimotor dysfunction. Thus, we aimed to summarize the state of knowledge on different DT and their potential as a biomarker for FD.

METHODS

A PubMed and MEDLINE search was conducted for English language articles, reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and randomized controlled trials, including also published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Several DT have been described in literature (e.g., different type of liquid, number of calories used, pace of drinking, and subject's awareness of the amount of liquid drunk). FD patients ingest significantly less volume in the different variants of the tests. The slow nutrient ("satiety drinking") test (SDT) studies show the most consistent separation between health and FD and correlation with GA. However, sensitivity to distention may be correlated with rapid DT. SDTs were used to evaluate the effect of several pharmacological agents, often showing concordance between their effects on GA and tolerated nutrient volume. This correlation was not found mainly for agents with central actions.

DISCUSSION

An SDT is a potential diagnostic biomarker in FD, reflecting GA. Additional studies are required to confirm its role as a predictive biomarker for treatment outcome in FD.

The water load test in school children and adolescents with functional gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We hypothesize that patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) drink less water volume than healthy subjects during water load test. We evaluated and compared the water load test in students with and without FGID using the Rome III questionnaire.

METHODS

We performed the water load test in 142 students from two schools in Colombia. Students were diagnosed using the Spanish version of the Rome III questionnaire. Students drank water ad libitum for 3 min or until pain, satiety, or vomiting occurred. We correlated anthropometric variables with water volumes drunk. We recorded symptoms like pain and nausea, before and after the water load test.

RESULTS

We evaluated 142 students, with a mean age of 12.1 ± 0.2 years and 59.9% girls. Mean water volume drunk was 459 ± 22 mL. There was no significant difference between water volume drunk by students with and without FGID (466 ± 36 vs. 453 ± 27 mL, p = 0.108). We found a significant correlation between water volume drunk and gender, age, weight, height, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Students with and without FGID ingest similar volumes of water. Test adverse effects are minimal, and the test is safe to perform and well tolerated.

Symptom pattern following a meal challenge test in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often complain of worsening of symptoms after meal intake. Meal challenge tests have previously been used to study symptoms and pathophysiology in functional dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to evaluate differences in gastrointestinal (GI) symptom response to a standardized meal test in IBS compared to healthy controls.

METHODS

We included 67 patients with IBS and 16 healthy controls. After an overnight fast the subjects were served breakfast (540 kcal; 36% fat, 15% proteins, 49% carbohydrates; 8.9 g fiber). They completed visual analog scales assessing severity of six GI symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, discomfort, nausea, gas, fullness) before breakfast and every 30 minutes up to 240 minutes after breakfast. The patients also completed a questionnaire (IBS-SSS) to assess IBS symptom severity during the preceding week. The course of symptom scores over time was analyzed using mixed models.

RESULTS

The meal was well tolerated and all subjects completed the test period. In patients, significant effects of time (initial increase to a maximum, followed by a return to baseline) were found for fullness, bloating, nausea and discomfort (all p values < 0.01 for linear, quadratic and third-order effect of time). In IBS patients, an independent significant association between IBS-SSS scores and all postprandial symptoms, except for nausea, was found (all p < 0.01). In controls, a significant linear, quadratic and third-order effect of time (all p < 0.0001) was found for fullness only. The difference in time course for bloating and discomfort between IBS patients and controls was confirmed when comparing the groups directly (significant time-by-group interaction effects, all p < 0.05), but not for nausea. On average, IBS patients scored significantly higher than controls on all symptoms, except for nausea (significant main effects of group, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized meal test seems to be a promising tool to study the symptom pattern in IBS and potentially to follow the effect of interventions.

Applying novel nutrient drink to clinical trial of functional dyspepsia

Background/Aims

The drink test has been regarded as a surrogate marker of gastric accommodation. The aims of this study were to develop a novel nutrient drink test (NDT) protocol and investigate its potential for application to a clinical trial of functional dyspepsia (FD).

Methods

A novel NDT was designed, involving drinking 125 mL of nutrient 4 times at 5-minute intervals or until maximal tolerability. Healthy volunteers and patients with FD rated their symptoms every 5 minutes for 20 minutes in a developmental study. Patients with FD were enrolled in an open trial of itopride for 4 weeks. NDT was performed before and after treatment. Improvement of integrative symptoms score during NDT after treatment for more than 50% compared with baseline was defined as responder.

Results

Total aggregate symptom scores, sum of symptom scores measured during NDT, were higher in FD patients (n = 40, 368.1 ± 245.3) than in controls (n = 19, 215.9 ± 171.2) (P = 0.018) in a developmental study. In an open trial of itopride, symptom scores measured during NDT decreased significantly at all time points after treatment in responders (n = 49), whereas did not in non-responders (n = 25). Total aggregate symptom score for NDT correlated significantly with integrative dyspeptic symptom score, sum of 8 symptom scores of NDI questionnaire, at baseline (r = 0.374, P = 0.001) and after treatment (r = 0.480, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our novel NDT can quantify dyspeptic symptoms and reflected therapeutic effects of itopride treatment in a clinical trial of FD patients. This NDT can be used as an effective parameter in clinical trials or drug development programs for assessing effects of novel therapies on postprandial symptoms.

[Functional dyspepsia and the satiety test: its usefulness in clinical practice]

INTRODUCTION

According to the Rome III Criteria, functional dyspepsia (FD) is classified as postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). On the other hand, the satiety test (ST) has been used to evaluate gastric accommodation and emptying, distinguishing healthy individuals from those with dyspepsia.

AIMS

To determine whether the ST can distinguish dyspeptic individuals from healthy ones and to evaluate its usefulness in differentiating the two FD subtypes.

METHODS

Adults with FD were consecutively enrolled in a cross-sectional study within the time frame of August 2011 and October 2012. Healthy subjects participated as controls. The ST consisted of the intake of a nutritional supplement (Fortisip®, Nutricia Bagó®) at a constant speed; satiety was graded at 5-minute intervals (1 to 5 points). Intake was suspended when the maximum score was reported. The total ingested volume and caloric intake was recorded and the Mann-Whitney U test was used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 39 dyspeptic patients and 20 control individuals. The patients were predominantly women (84.6 vs. 25%; p < 0.0001) and they were similar in age (39.59 ± 13.53 vs. 34.70 ± 9.85 years) and BMI (24.32 ± 3.52 vs. 25.82 ± 3.34 kg/m2) with respect to the controls. The FD subtype percentages were PDS: 61%, EPS: 31%, and Mixed syndrome: 8%. There was a lower ingested volume and caloric intake on the part of the dyspeptic patients (185 vs. 300 ml and 277 vs. 520 Kcal, respectively. Both: P<.001). No differences in the ST were observed between the two pure dyspepsia subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a difference in the ST between healthy individuals and those with dyspepsia, but the ingested volume and caloric intake in the two FD subtypes were similar.

Assessment of gastric motor function in childhood functional dyspepsia and obesity

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare gastric emptying rate and nutrient tolerance during a satiety drinking test in children with functional dyspepsia (FD) and obesity and to study the relationship between daily caloric intake and the satiety drinking test.

METHODS

A total of 28 dyspeptic children (22 girls, mean age 12.5 ± 3.1 years) and 15 obese children (five girls, 13.3 ± 1.8 years) were studied. The patients underwent an octanoic acid gastric emptying breath test and a satiety drinking test. Prior to both tests, a dyspepsia questionnaire was filled out to calculate the mean calorie intake.

KEY RESULTS

The most prevalent dyspeptic symptoms were early satiety (96.4%), postprandial fullness (89.2%), and epigastric pain (78.6%), followed by nausea (50%). All dyspeptic and obese children (n = 43) started the satiety drinking test and 41 children completed the test until a score of 5 was reached. The maximum ingested volume in FD was significantly lower than in obesity or in age-matched healthy controls (252 ± 85 vs 479 ± 199 and 359 ± 29 mL respectively, both P < 0.05). As a group, dyspeptic children had significantly slower gastric emptying than obese children (89.7 ± 54.8 min vs 72.5 ± 26.0 min, P = 0.05). Daily calorie intake was significantly higher in obese children than that in dyspeptic children (2325 ± 469 vs 1503 ± 272 cal, P < 0.0001). The endpoint of the satiety drinking test was significantly correlated with body weight or BMI (both R = 0.41, P = 0.04), but not with daily calorie intake, gastric emptying rate or age.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The satiety drinking test is a potentially useful non-invasive tool in the investigation of children with FD and obesity.

Characterization of a reproducible gastric pain model using oral capsaicin titration in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

  Sensory sensitization is one of the main pathophysiological hypotheses in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). As sensitization may affect various sensory modalities, we aimed to develop a reproducible gastric pain model utilizing polymodal pathways for use in functional and other pain disorders.

METHODS

In this double-blind, cross-over study 42 healthy subjects swallowed one capsule containing either capsaicin 0.5mg or nocebo every 15min until moderate pain (intensity >30 on 100mm visual analogue scale) was attained for at least 5min. Pain was rated every minute. Capsaicin titration was repeated thrice for reliability calculation.

KEY RESULTS

Moderate pain in the upper abdomen was successfully achieved in 38 of 42 subjects (90%) with capsaicin titration and in one of 42 (2%) with nocebo. The median dosage required to induce moderate pain for at least 5min was two capsules (interquartile range 1-3) and the median gastric pain intensity was 47 (41-53). The median duration of moderate pain was 8min (5-12). Moderate pain was successfully reproduced with capsaicin in all subjects on study days 2 and 3, with an excellent Cronbach reliability coefficient of >0.8.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Standardized gastric pain can be conveniently achieved in a majority of healthy subjects using a simple oral capsaicin titration, with minimal adverse events. The between-test reproducibility is high and nocebo responses are negligible. This technique stimulating a multimodal physiological pathway will be useful in the investigation of sensory changes in FGIDs, including functional dyspepsia.

The effect of a meal and water loading on heart rate variability in children with functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Alteration in autonomic function has been implicated as a possible pathophysiologic mechanism in functional dyspepsia (FD) in adults.

METHODS

This was a two-part study. For the first part of the study, nine children with FD and 28 controls underwent heart rate variability (HRV) analysis for 30 min baseline and for 60 min following a test meal. For the second part of the study, eight children with FD and 26 controls underwent HRV analysis for 30 min baseline and for 60 min following rapid water loading. HRV analysis yielded measures for power in the high frequency (HF) band (vagal activity), power in the low frequency (LF) band (mainly sympathetic activity), and LF/HF (sympathovagal balance).

RESULTS

HRV parameters did not differ between FD patients and controls in either baseline period or following water loading. Following the meal, HF was higher and LF and LF/HF were lower in FD patients as compared to controls. Baseline LF/HF was positively correlated with the water load volume in controls and negatively correlated with the water load volume in FD patients.

CONCLUSION

FD in children is associated with an abnormal autonomic response best demonstrated following a meal. The relationship between baseline sympathovagal balance and water load volume in FD patients is distinctly different from the relationship in control children.

Normal values for the satiety drinking test in healthy children between 5 and 15 years

In adults, a slow caloric drinking test has been proposed as a non-invasive tool to estimate gastric accommodation and to quantify meal-induced symptoms in functional dyspepsia (FD). The same test has been proposed for paediatric FD, but normal values are only available for adolescents and adults. The aim of the study was (i) to establish normal values for the satiety drinking test in young children and (ii) to study the influence of demographic factors. In all, 59 healthy children [27 girls; age range 5-16 years, body mass index (BMI) 17.4 +/- 2.5 kg m(-2)] were studied in the morning after an overnight fast. They drank a liquid nutrient meal (1.5 kcal mL(-1)) from beakers that were filled by a peristaltic pump filled at a rate of 15 mL min(-1) with. For every 5 min, satiety was scored on a graphic rating scale grade 0-5 (1 = threshold, 5 = maximum), until a score of 5 was reached. Values are given as mean +/- SEM and compared by t-test; correlation analysis was performed using Spearman rank test. All children performed the test as indicated except for one 5 years old who stopped prematurely for dislike of the taste. The endpoint was reached at 360 +/- 23 mL (540 +/- 34 kcal), and was age-dependent (Spearman r = 0.28, P = 0.03). No correlation was found between the maximum volume ingested and gender, weight, height or BMI. Age-dependent normal ranges were determined for ages 5-16 at 3-year intervals, and were found to increase with age. We established feasibility of and normal values for a non-invasive satiety drinking test in children with an age range of 5-15 years. This tool can now be used in the assessment of paediatric FD and eating disorders.

Impaired drinking capacity in patients with functional dyspepsia: intragastric distribution and distal stomach volume

The water drink test is a good tool to evoke dyspeptic symptoms. To what extent these symptoms are related to altered gastric distribution is not clear. Therefore, we determined gastric volumes after a drink test using SPECT. After a baseline scan 20 healthy volunteers (HV) and 18 patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) underwent a drink test (100 mL min(-1)) followed by five scans up to 2 h. Dyspeptic symptoms were scored before every scan. A Wilcoxon signed rank test (P < 0.05) and a mixed effects model were used for statistical analyses. Fasting volumes were significantly higher in FD compared to HV for total, proximal and distal stomach (P < 0.001). Functional dyspeptic patients ingested significantly less water (P < 0.001) and had an impaired filling of the distal part of the stomach (P = 0.001) after the drink test. In FD, bloating (prox. 80%, dist. 56%), pain (prox. 87%, dist. 62%) and fullness (prox. 80%, dist. 59%) were determined more by proximal stomach volume rather than distal stomach volume. These data suggest that drinking capacity is mainly determined by antral volume, with a reduced antral filling in FD compared to HV. The persisting symptoms of bloating, pain and fullness in FD are predominantly associated with proximal stomach volume.

Drinking capacity and severity of dyspeptic symptoms during a water load test after Nissen fundoplication

Up to 30% of subjects undergoing Nissen fundoplication develop dyspeptic symptoms. Previous studies using the water load test have shown that functional dyspepsia patients have a diminished drinking capacity due to increased visceral sensitivity. Here we investigate drinking capacity and severity of symptoms in 9 patients with dyspeptic symptoms after fundoplication, 9 patients without symptoms after surgery, 18 functional dyspepsia patients, and 18 controls. The water load test was performed by having subjects drinking room-temperature tap water at a predetermined rate of 15 ml/min. The presence and severity of symptoms during the test were evaluated every 5 min using a Likert scale. We found that patients with dyspeptic symptoms after fundoplication had a significantly lower drinking capacity and higher symptoms scores than controls (P<0.05) but values similar to those of functional dyspepsia patients (P>0.05). In contrast, drinking capacity in patients without symptoms after surgery was similar to that in controls (P>0.05). These findings suggest that, as in functional dyspepsia, severe dyspeptic symptoms after Nissen fundoplication are associated with an impaired drinking capacity, reflecting visceral hypersensitivity or impaired gastric accommodation or both.

Diagnostic utility of the water load test in children with chronic abdominal pain

OBJECTIVES

To compare water load test consumption patterns between children with functional gastrointestinal disorders and healthy control children.

METHODS

Seventy-one children with recurrent abdominal pain completed the Behavioral Assessment Scale for Children-Self-Report Form and the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms during their first visit to a pediatric gastroenterology clinic. Parent- and child-report functional gastrointestinal diagnoses were based on the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms scoring criteria, whereas the clinician's diagnosis was based on clinical impression from history and physical examination completed at this visit. Twenty-six healthy children also participated as controls. Statistical comparisons involved Student t tests, whereas receiver operating characteristic curves estimated sensitivity/specificity of the water load test and linear regression determined the amount of variance accounted for in water volume consumption.

RESULTS

Children with recurrent abdominal pain, particularly those with a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, consumed less water than healthy children on the water load test. The water load test demonstrated good specificity, but poor sensitivity, in identifying patients with functional dyspepsia. Clinician evaluation provided the greatest differentiation between functional gastrointestinal disorders on the water load test.

CONCLUSIONS

The water load test seems to be a poor diagnostic test for functional dyspepsia because of poor sensitivity. However, future research should examine whether the water load test is identifying a subset of children with functional dyspepsia experiencing a specific mechanosensory dysfunction and whether the water load test can predict clinical response to specific therapeutic interventions.

Relationship between antral distension and postprandial symptoms in functional dyspepsia

AIM: To investigate in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) after an every-day meal whether (1) gastrointestinal (GI) and extra-GI symptoms had any relation with the degree of antral volume, (2) the onset of postprandial symptoms was associated with, and may predict, delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS: In 94 symptomatic FD patients, antral volume variations and gastric emptying were assessed with ultrasonography after a 1050 kcal meal. Symptoms were evaluated with a standardized questionnaire. The association of GI and extra-GI symptoms with antral volumes and gastric emptying were estimated with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Forty percent of patients did not report any symptoms after a meal. Compared to the healthy controls, the antrum was more distended in patients throughout the entire observation period and 37 (39.4%) patients had delayed gastric emptying. Only postprandial drowsiness was associated with antral volume variations (AOR = 1.42; P < 0.001) and with delayed gastric emptying (AOR = 3.59; P < 0.03).

CONCLUSION: In FD patients, GI symptoms are neither associated with antral distension nor with gastric emptying. Drowsiness is associated with antral distension and delayed gastric emptying. The onset of drowsiness is preceded by an increment of antral distension and the duration of the symptom appears to be related to the persistence of antral distension.

Pathogenesis and therapy for idiopathic dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. This review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis and therapy for FD. Although distinction among FD, irritable bowel syndrome, and reflux disease is difficult in population-based studies, separate entities can be recognized in patients who seek medical attention. The pathogenesis of FD remains unclear, but recent studies have demonstrated a role for acute gastrointestinal infection in triggering FD and in genetic polymorphisms of G-proteins in predisposing to FD. The role of abnormalities in gastric motor function, visceral hypersensitivity, and psychosocial factors in the pathophysiology of dyspeptic symptoms has been the topic of multiple studies. Treatment options for FD remain limited. Recent studies have focused on acid-suppressive drugs and on novel prokinetics. Progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of FD may lead to new or improved treatment modalities. Areas of major advances are the role of infection and genetic predisposition and studies on the role of abnormalities in gastric motility and sensitivity.