Echo-enhanced ultrasound with pulse inversion imaging: A new imaging modality for the differentiation of cystic pancreatic tumours

SIUMB recommendations for focal pancreatic lesions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is increasingly being performed in Italy and Europe, particularly in the field of hepato-gastroenterology. Initially, it was mainly carried out to characterize focal hepatic lesions, but, since then, numerous studies have demonstrated its efficacy in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic pathologies (D’Onofrio et al. in Expert Rev Med Devices 7(2):257–273, 2010; Vidili et al. in J Ultrasound 22(1):41–51, 2019). The purpose of this paper is to provide Italian Medical Doctors with recommendations and thereby practical guidelines on the management of these patients. The present paper reports the final conclusions reached by the SIUMB guideline commission. This paper addresses particularly percutaneous ultrasound (US) examination (transabdominal US) and is drawn up specifically for publication.

Role of transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are incidental findings that are being increasingly identified because of recent advancements in abdominal imaging technologies. PCLs include different entities, with each of them having a peculiar biological behavior, and they range from benign to premalignant or malignant neoplasms. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is important to determine the best treatment strategy. As transabdominal ultrasonography (US) is noninvasive, inexpensive, and widely available, it is considered to be the most appropriate imaging modality for the initial evaluation of abdominal diseases, including PCLs, and for follow-up assessment. We present a review of the possibilities and limits of US in the diagnosis of PCLs, the technical development of US, and the ultrasonographic characteristics of PCLs.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound is able to discriminate benign submucosal lesions from gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has improved the diagnostic of potential malignancies, gastric lesions with suspicion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) or benign lesions like lipoma or leiomyoma can often not be accurately differentiated by EUS, therefore, requiring tissue sampling with the risk of bleeding complications especially in GIST. As with the newest generation of EUS machines, contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) has become a new option to determine perfusion characteristics. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether CEH-EUS may help to discriminate various submucosal lesions.

METHODS

Data sets of 17 patients with suspicious gastric or esophageal lesions, who were investigated with CEH-EUS were analyzed. Perfusion characteristics were classified by the investigator immediately and statistically analyzed after investigation. Samples from EUS-fine needle aspirates, biopsy samples after needle cut or surgical specimen served as gold standard.

RESULTS

CEH-EUS showed nine lesions with reduced contrast enhancement (maximum intensity 6.2 ± 1.9 db) and eight lesions with hyperenhancement (47.3 ± 11.6 db). The latter eight lesions were all histologically identified as GIST, while the nine hypoenhanced lesions emerged to be four lipoma and five leiomyoma. Statistical analysis corresponded with initial perfusion classification in all cases.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study showing that CEH-EUS can discriminate GIST from benign lesions with good accuracy. In the future, CEH-EUS-guided discrimination may lead to individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in handling submucosal lesions.

The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively determine the accuracy of baseline ultrasound (BUS) and of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions.

METHODS

Fifty-four pancreatic solid-cystic lesions in 52 patients were examined with BUS and CEUS, two different seniority radiologists read the images independently, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of BUS and CEUS in the diagnosis of benign or malignant pancreatic solid-cystic lesions, the diagnostic consistency between different seniority radiologists was evaluated by Kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Among the 54 lesions, there were pancreatic cyst five cases, pancreatic pseudocyst twenty cases, pancreatic cystadenoma eight cases, pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma seven cases, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas (IPMN) three cases, pancreatic carcinoma combined liquefied six cases, solid-pseudopallary tumor of pancreas (SPTP) three cases, pancreatic myopericytoma one case, pancreatic lymphangioma one case. After ROC analysis, the areas under the ROC curve (Az) were 0.752 by BUS, 0.928 by CEUS to resident radiologist, and 0.896 by BUS, 0.954 by CEUS to staff radiologist. The correct diagnosis rate of specific disease was 42.6% by BUS, 64.8% by CEUS to staff radiologist (P<0.05), and 33.3% by BUS, 53.7% by CEUS to resident radiologist (P<0.05). The interobserver agreement in CEUS is higher than that in BUS, the Kappa value was 0.889 ± 0.062 and 0.428 ± 0.126 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with BUS, CEUS can significantly enhance the diagnostic rate of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions.

Pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study (PAMUS)

AIM

To describe the typical CEUS pattern of pancreatic lesions and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in their characterization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All US and CEUS examinations of focal pancreatic masses performed in six centers during a period of five years were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: focal pancreatic mass pathologically proved, visible at ultrasound (US) and studied with CEUS. All lesions were then evaluated for size, aspect and enhancement pattern. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values with 95% CIs were calculated to define diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in respect to pathology. Diagnostic confidence of US and CEUS, discerning between benign and malignant lesions, were represented by using ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves. Agreement was evaluated by means of k statistics.

RESULTS

1439 pancreatic lesions were included. At CEUS the lesions were divided into solid (89%) and cystic (12%) masses and classified into six and eight categories, respectively. Among the solid lesions, adenocarcinomas were characterized with an accuracy of 87.8%. Among the cystic lesions, cystic tumors were diagnosed with an accuracy of 97.1%. ROC curve area increased from 0.637 for US to 0.877 for CEUS (p<0.0001). Inter-observer agreement was slightly higher for solid (k=0.78) than cystic (k=0.62) lesions. In none of the centers side effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is accurate in the characterization of pancreatic lesions. CEUS should be considered as a complementary imaging method for pancreatic lesions characterization.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS with novel ultrasonographic contrast (Sonazoid) in the preoperative T-staging for pancreaticobiliary malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Sonazoid is a new second-generation microbubble contrast for ultrasonography. In this pilot study, the diagnostic role of contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) with Sonazoid was prospectively evaluated in preoperative T-staging of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary malignancies underwent CH-EUS by a single examiner. After the lesions were observed carefully with conventional harmonic imaging EUS (H-EUS), CH-EUS was performed with intravenous injection of Sonazoid. A reviewer who was blinded reviewed the recordings of H-EUS and CH-EUS and assessed the T-staging. The accuracy of H-EUS and CH-EUS for T-staging was compared to the results of surgical histopathology in patients who underwent surgery.

RESULT

Twenty-six patients underwent surgical resection and could be included in the study. The final diagnosis were pancreatic cancer in 11, bile duct cancer in 7, gallbladder cancer in 4 and ampullary cancer in 4. The overall accuracy of H-EUS and CH-EUS for T-staging were 69.2 (18/26) and 92.4% (24/26), respectively (p < 0.05). There were disagreement in six cases between H-EUS and CH-EUS. CH-EUS staged correctly in all of these six cases, whereas H-EUS misdiagnosed the depth of invasion in one case of gallbladder cancer and one case of ampullary cancer, and invasion of portal vein in two cases of pancreatic cancer and two cases of bile duct cancer.

CONCLUSION

The depth of invasion of biliary cancer and vascular invasion of pancreatic and biliary cancer could be demonstrated more clearly with CH-EUS compared to H-EUS. CH-EUS has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative T-staging of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.

Diagnosis of pancreatic tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography

Pancreatic tumors are highly diverse, as they can be solid or cystic, and benign or malignant. Since their imaging features overlap considerably, it is often difficult to characterize these tumors. In addition, small pancreatic tumors, especially those less than 2 cm in diameter, are difficult to detect and diagnose. For characterizing pancreatic tumors and detecting small pancreatic tumors, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most sensitive of the imaging procedures currently available. This technique also provides good results in terms of the preoperative staging of pancreatic tumors. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has also proved to be a safe and useful method for tissue sampling of pancreatic tumors. Despite these advantages, however, it is still difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant, solid or cystic pancreatic tumors, malignant neoplasms, and chronic pancreatitis using EUS, even when EUS-FNA is performed. Recently, contrast-enhanced EUS with Doppler mode (CE-EUS) employing ultrasound contrast agents, which indicate vascularization in pancreatic lesions, has been found to be useful in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, especially small pancreatic tumors. However, Doppler ultrasonography with contrast-enhancement has several limitations, including blooming artifacts, poor spatial resolution, and low sensitivity to slow flow. Consequently, an echoendoscope was developed recently that has a broad-band transducer and an imaging mode that was designed specifically for contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) with a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent. The CEH-EUS technique is expected to improve the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease in the future. This review describes the EUS appearances of common solid and cystic pancreatic masses, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, and the relative efficacies and advantages of CE-EUS and CEH-EUS along with their relative advantages and their complementary roles in clinical practice.

Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET, combined FDG-PET/CT and EUS in diagnosing primary pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis

The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), combined (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in diagnosing patients with pancreatic carcinoma. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and some other databases, from January 1966 to April 2009, were searched for initial studies. All the studies published in English or Chinese relating to the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET, PET/CT and EUS for patients with pancreatic cancer were collected. Methodological quality was assessed. The statistic software called "Meta-Disc 1.4" was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

51 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity estimate for combined PET/CT (90.1%) was significantly higher than PET (88.4%) and EUS (81.2%). The pooled specificity estimate for EUS (93.2%) was significantly higher than PET (83.1%) and PET/CT (80.1%). The pooled DOR estimate for EUS (49.774) was significantly higher than PET (32.778) and PET/CT (27.105). SROC curves for PET/CT and EUS showed a little better diagnostic accuracy than PET alone. For PET alone, when interpreted the results with knowledge of other imaging tests, its sensitivity (89.4%) and specificity (80.1%) were closer to PET/CT. For EUS, its diagnostic value decreased in differentiating pancreatic cancer for patients with chronic pancreatitis. In conclusion, PET/CT was a high sensitive and EUS was a high specific modality in diagnosing patients with pancreatic cancer. PET/CT and EUS could play different roles during different conditions in diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma.

Utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinomas

The aim of our study was to assess the utility of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) for the depiction and differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors focusing in particularly those 2 cm or smaller. We compared different diagnostic procedures, contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CE-CT) and EUS with the use of power Doppler (PD-EUS) and CE-EUS for detection and differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. The study included 156 consecutive patients with suspected pancreatic tumors, who underwent CE-CT, and EUS followed by PD-EUS and CE-EUS. CE-EUS was performed by power Doppler mode using sonographic contrast agent Levovist. Thirty-six of 156 patients examined had tumors of < or =2 cm. EUS had significantly higher sensitivity (94.4%) for detection of pancreatic carcinomas of 2 cm or less in comparison to CE-CT (50%). For small pancreatic tumor of 2 cm or less, sensitivities for differentiating ductal carcinomas from other tumors were 50.0%, 11.0% and 83.3% for CE-CT, PD-EUS and CE-EUS. CE-EUS was significantly more sensitive than PD-EUS and CE-CT. EUS and subsequent CE-EUS are more sensitive than CE-CT in the detection and the differentiation of small pancreatic tumors.

A novel perfusion imaging technique of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with video)

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced harmonic-imaging techniques have been unavailable for EUS because of the limited frequency bandwidth and acoustic power output of current echoendoscopes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the contrast harmonic imaging technique by using a prototype echoendoscope equipped with an adequate broad-band transducer that can detect harmonic signals from the US contrast agents.

DESIGN

Identification of optimal settings (study I) and preliminary clinical investigations (study II).

SETTING

Bethesda General Hospital Bergedorf.

PATIENTS

A total of 104 patients undergoing standard EUS examinations.

INTERVENTIONS

Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) was performed by using a prototype echoendoscope and extended pure harmonic detection mode, a specific mode for contrast harmonic imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

In study I, time-intensity curves for peak signal intensity were calculated after infusion of a contrast agent, SonoVue, and the changes in echo intensity were compared for different mechanical indices and interval times. In study II, intermittent and real-time continuous images of pancreatobiliary and gastroduodenal diseases obtained by CEH-EUS were evaluated in comparison with contrast-enhanced power-Doppler EUS (CED-EUS).

RESULTS

In study I, with the optimal mechanical index (0.4), homogeneous parenchymal perfusion images of the pancreas were obtained by intermittent imaging, and finely branching vessels of the pancreas were obtained with real-time continuous imaging. In study II, apparent perfusion and vessel images were observed in pancreatobiliary carcinomas, GI stromal tumors, and lymph-node metastases. CED-EUS failed to depict images of the fine vessels and parenchymal perfusion.

LIMITATIONS

The subjective nature of the findings, with a limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CEH-EUS successfully visualized parenchymal perfusion and microvasculature in the pancreas and may play an important role in the differential diagnosis of digestive diseases.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy rates of unenhanced sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and MRI in displaying the anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses larger than 1.5 mm in diameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced sonographic and MRI examinations of 33 patients who underwent resection of a cystic pancreatic mass were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists blinded to the final histologic diagnosis reviewed the images, specifically assessing the presence of intralesional mural nodules and septa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated on the basis of correlation with surgical findings. Results of unenhanced sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and MRI were compared by McNemar test. Correlation of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced sonographic versus pathologic results was established with Spearman's test. Interobserver variability was determined.

RESULTS

Contrast-enhanced sonography correctly depicted intralesional septa in 14 of 15 lesions (sensitivity, 93.3%; specificity, 88.8%; positive predictive value, 87.5%; negative predictive value, 94.1%; accuracy, 90.9%) and nodules in six of eight lesions (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 96%; positive predictive value, 85.7%; negative predictive value, 92.3%; accuracy, 90.9%). MRI correctly depicted intralesional septa in 14 of 15 lesions (sensitivity, 93.3%; specificity, 61.1%; positive predictive value, 66.6%; negative predictive value, 91.6%; accuracy, 75.7%) and nodules in seven of eight lesions (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 80%; positive predictive value, 58.3%; negative predictive value, 95.2%; accuracy, 81.8%). The difference between the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography and that of MRI was not significant (p = 0.05, McNemar test) in the identification of septa and nodules. The correlation between contrast-enhanced sonographic findings and pathologic results (Rs = 0.93; p < 0.001) was significantly better than that between sonographic and pathologic results (Rs = 0.52; p < 0.0001). Interobserver agreement had a kappa value of 0.86-0.94.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced sonography compares favorably with MRI in displaying the anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses seen on transabdominal sonography.