Pegylated-interferon alpha 2a treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients on chronic haemodialysis

Thiol profiling in cancer cell lines by HPLC-mass spectrometry

We describe a protocol for identifying cellular thiol metabolites such as cysteine and cystine in adherent cells using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. We applied a modified extraction and sample derivatization protocol to accurately quantify the intracellular levels of labile thiol species and to inhibit oxidation prior to analysis.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Liu et al. (2020) and Koppula et al. (2021).

•

LC-MS-based quantification of labile thiol species

•

Modified extraction and derivatization procedure to prevent sample oxidation

•

Protocol for quantification of reduced and oxidized thiol species

Real-life results of treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir, dasabuvir, and ritonavir combination in patients with chronic renal failure infected with HCV in Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIMS

As the most common liver disease in hemodialysis patients, chronic hepatitis C (CHC) can cause cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, even increase in renal-related mortality. In Turkey, the frequency of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in hemodialysis patients ranged from 31.4% to 51%. Until recently, the mainstay of the CHC treatment for these patients was pegylated interferon with potential toxicities and low sustained virological response. The 3D regimen, a combination of four drugs (ombitasvir, paritaprevir, dasabuvir, and ritonavir), has recently been used for patients with chronic kidney disease infected with genotype 1a and 1b HCV. The aim of the present study was to present results of 3D treatment for patients with hemodialysis-dependent chronic renal failure (CRF) who were chronically infected with HCV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 25 patients with hemodialysis-dependent CRF who were infected with genotype 1a/1b HCV have been treated using the 3D regimen in our gastroenterology clinic between July 2016 and October 2017. Three patients were administered additional ribavirin 200 mg/day. Serum HCV RNAs, blood chemistry, blood count, and side effects were recorded at 0, 4, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

All 25 patients completed and well tolerated their planned treatment. At the end of 4 weeks, the viral response (defined as HCV RNA clearance) rate was 92%. At the end of 12 weeks of treatment and 3 months after treatment, viral response rates were both 100%.

CONCLUSION

We observed that the treatment with 3D regimen in hemodialysis patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C is highly effective and well tolerated.

Effectiveness, treatment completion and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir + dasabuvir in patients with chronic kidney disease: an ERCHIVES study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was a relative contraindication to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in the interferon/ribavirin era.

AIM

To determine the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir (PrOD) regimens in persons with CKD.

METHODS

We identified persons initiated on a SOF/LDV or PrOD regimen from October 30, 2014 to April 30, 2016. We excluded those with missing HCV genotype or eGFR values. We determined treatment completion and sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, and proportion developing worsening renal function or grade 3/4 haematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Among 13 663 persons on SOF/LDV±ribavirin, 14% and 1% persons had CKD Stage 3 and 4-5 respectively, 67.8% completed treatment, 98.2% achieved SVR. Treatment completion or SVR rates did not decline with advanced CKD or ribavirin administration. Among 3961 persons on PrOD±ribavirin, 9% and 3% persons had CKD Stage 3 and 4-5, respectively, 74.0% completed treatment and 98.2% achieved SVR. A decrease in treatment completion rates was seen in CKD stage 4-5 and those on ribavirin, but this did not impact SVR rates. A >10 mL/min/1.73 m² drop in eGFR from baseline was observed in 30%-38% of persons with baseline eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² , but in only 0%-6% with CKD4-5. Grade 3/4 anaemia was more frequent in persons with CKD4-5, but ribavirin co-administration did not appear to affect this.

CONCLUSIONS

SOF/LDV and PrOD achieved high SVR rates in CKD population. Treatment completion rates were lower than expected. A decline in eGFR and development of anaemia were observed in a substantial proportion of persons, but the clinical implications remain unclear.

The Management of Viral Hepatitis in CKD Patients: An Unresolved Problem

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in dialysis (HD) show peculiar, atypical features of clinical presentation and diseases (cardiovascular, metabolic, hematologic). This is also true for viral hepatitis infections, for which CKD patients represent an important risk group. In the past, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the major cause of viral hepatitis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the introduction of a rigorous infection-control strategy, routine screening of patients and staff for hepatitis B serologic markers, vaccination of susceptible patients and staff, use of separate rooms and dedicated machines for HD of HbsAg-positive patients have all led to a decline in the spread of HBV infection in dialysis. Despite the prevalence of the antibody-hepatitis C virus (HCV), there has been a marked decrease in HD patients; after the introduction of routine screening for HCV and the use of erythropoietin, its occurrence ranges from 5% to 25% in the United States, with a prevalence of 6.8% in Europe. In CKD and in HD patients, the presence of HBV and HCV is an independent and significant risk factor for death and this risk may be at least partially attributed to chronic liver disease with its attendant complications. Liver disease can progress with modest hepatic inflammation and prominent fibrosis; the natural history of viral hepatitis in these patients is dependent on the immune dysfunction typical of kidney disease. Despite recent advances in antiviral therapy, there are still many uncertainties in regards to the efficacy and long-term outcomes of treatment with antiviral agents.

Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease

All-oral, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have significantly improved the efficacy and safety of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment but their effectiveness and safety among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains poorly understood. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of DAAs for treatment of CKD patients. The National Library of Medicine through PubMed was searched for studies evaluating the efficacy of DAAs for the treatment of patients with CKD stages 4 or 5, as defined by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines [i.e. glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 15-29 ml/min per 1.73 m² and GFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m², respectively, or hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis]. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and relevant cohort studies were included if they were published in English and included sustained viral response after 12 weeks (SVR12) as a primary or secondary endpoint. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight studies (one RCT and seven cohort studies) following 350 patients were selected. For patients with CKD stage 4 or 5, ± hemodialysis, the overwhelming majority of DAA regimens were well-tolerated and resulted in SVR12 rates of 90-100%. Most studies were small, with the exception of one RCT evaluating elbasvir and grazoprevir. Overall, treatment of CHC in patients with CKD is highly effective with SVR12 rates similar to those seen in patients without CKD and with acceptable adverse event profiles. In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1a, 1b or 4 and Stage 4 or 5 CKD, the best evidence available is for the use of elbasvir and grazoprevir. This combination as well as the combination of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir for HCV GT-1b are recommended. More studies are needed to assess efficacy and adverse effects of DAAs and their impact on CKD patients and to fully elucidate the effect of curing CHC on the natural history and sequelae of renal disease in CHC patients with CKD.

Pegylated interferon monotherapy for hepatitis C virus infection in patients on hemodialysis: A single center study

There is no published study from India on hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in dialysis patients. Patients on dialysis with HCV infection treated with pegylated interferon (Peg-INF) monotherapy were studied. All patients were subjected to HCV-polymerase chain reaction, viral load, genotype, and liver biopsy. Quantitative HCV-RNA was performed monthly. Patients with genotype 1 and 4 were given 12 month therapy while those with genotypes 2 and 3 were given 6 months therapy. Response was classified as per standard criteria of rapid virological response (RVR), early virological response (EVR), end of treatment response (ETR), and sustained virological response (SVR). A total of 85 patients were treated. Mean age was 35.2 ± 10.5 (range 15-67) years, and 77.6% were males. HCV genotypes were 1 in 40.9%, 2 in 12%, 3 in 36.1%, 4 in 3.6%, and others in 7.2%. Mean viral load was 10(6) copies/mL. Mean liver biopsy grade was 4 ± 1.7 and stage 0.8 ± 0.8. Mean time from diagnosis of HCV infection and the treatment start was 10.7 ± 14.3 months. One patient died of unrelated illness, one was lost to follow-up, and three could not sustain treatment due to cost. Forty-three of the 80 (54%) patients had RVR while 49 (61%) patients had EVR and ETR. There was no difference in term of RVR related to genotype. Fifty -four percentage had SVR. Mild flu-like symptoms were seen in all patients. Sixty-four (80%) patients required increase in erythropoietin doses. Twenty-eight (35%) patients developed leukopenia (three treatment-limiting) and 16 (20%) developed thrombocytopenia (one treatment-limiting). Five patients developed tuberculosis, five bacterial pneumonia, and one bacterial knee monoarthritis. None of the patients developed depression. Our study concludes that Peg-INF monotherapy resulted in 54% RVR and SVR in dialysis patients with HCV infection. Therapy was well-tolerated with minimal side effects. There was no effect of viral genotype on response to therapy.

Pegylated Interferon Mono-Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C in the Dialysis Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The medical literature on mono-therapy with pegylated interferon for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients is mostly based on small clinical studies and the efficacy and safety of such approach is still unclear. A systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies was performed in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mono-therapy with pegylated interferon of chronic hepatitis C in patients on regular dialysis. The primary outcome was sustained viral response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcome was drop-out rate (as a measure of tolerability). The random-effects model of Der Simonian and Laird was used, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Twenty-four clinical studies (N = 744 unique patients) were retrieved; five (21%) being randomized controlled trials. The summary estimate for sustained viral response and drop-out rate was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35; 0.46) and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09; 0.20), respectively. The most frequent side-effects requiring discontinuation of treatment were hematological (31/83 = 37%) and gastrointestinal (9/31 = 10.8%). Meta-regression analysis showed a detrimental role of ageing on the frequency of sustained virological response (P = 0.01); drop-out rate was greater in diabetics (P < 0.005). Important heterogeneity was seen with regard to drop-out rate only. In summary, pegylated interferon monotherapy of hepatitis C in dialysis patients resulted unsatisfactory in terms of efficacy and safety. Studies with novel direct-acting antiviral agents in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C virus in dialysis population are under way.

Hepatitis C treatment in patients with kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains the most common cause of liver damage in patients with kidney disease, including those on long-term dialysis. The natural history of HCV in patients on regular dialysis is not fully elucidated, but an adverse effect of HCV on survival has been noted; a novel meta-analysis of observational studies (14 studies including 145,608 unique patients) showed that the summary estimate for adjusted relative risk (all-cause mortality) was 1.35 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.25-1.47. The adjusted RR for liver disease-related death and cardiovascular mortality among maintenance dialysis patients was 3.82 (95% CI, 1.92-7.61) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.10-1.45), respectively. It has been recommended that the decision to treat HCV in patients with chronic kidney disease be based on the potential benefits and risks of therapy, including life expectancy, candidacy for kidney transplant, and comorbidities. A pooled analysis including 494 dialysis patients on monotherapy with conventional interferon reported a summary estimate for sustained viral response and dropout rate of 39% (95% CI, 32-46) and 19% (95% CI, 13-26), respectively. All renal transplant candidates (dialysis dependent or not) with HCV should be assessed for antiviral treatment given the increased risk of progressive liver disease with immunosuppressive therapy, the increased life expectancy compared to other HCV-positive patients on dialysis, and the inability to receive interferon after transplant. Current guidelines support monotherapy with standard interferon in these patients, but modern antiviral approaches (that is, dual therapy with peg-IFN plus ribavirin) in a well-controlled setting may be an appropriate alternative.

Interferon treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C complicated with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Japan Society for Dialysis Therapy established "Guidelines for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Dialysis Patients." We evaluated the status of HCV infection and the treatment of hemodialysis patients in Gunma prefecture.

METHODS

Questionnaires concerning the infection rate, recognition of the guidelines, and treatment status were sent to all 64 hospitals/clinics that had hemodialysis systems in Gunma prefecture. The hepatitis C virus-infected hemodialysis patients who received pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) were analyzed at Gunma University Hospital.

RESULTS

The positive rate for hepatitis C virus antibody was 256/2582 hemodialysis patients (9.9%). The positive rate varied between institutions (range 0-40.0%; median 9.0%). All institutes recognized the establishment of the guidelines. Conventional or peg-IFN treatment was being given at 37.5% of the institutions. The other 62.5% institutions answered that they intended to provide the treatment in the future if collaboration with a hepatologist could be arranged. The most common answers regarding the indication for IFN treatment were as follows: few complications, under 60 years of age, more than 10 years of survival expected on hemodialysis. Eighteen patients received peg-IFN treatment. The sustained virological response rate of all patients was 33.3%, 0% in 1b/high viral titer, 50% in genotype 2, and 100% in genotype 2/low viral titer. The sustained virological response rate was worse in the patients with 1b/high viral load and diabetic nephropathy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of the publication of the guidelines was high. However, the number of patients treated with peg-IFN was still low. Further enlightenment and cooperation between hemodialysis teams and hepatologists are therefore needed.

Hepatitis C virus infection and dialysis: 2012 update

Hepatitis C virus infection is still common among dialysis patients, but the natural history of HCV in this group is not completely understood. Recent evidence has been accumulated showing that anti-HCV positive serologic status is significantly associated with lower survival in dialysis population; an increased risk of liver and cardiovascular disease-related mortality compared with anti-HCV negative subjects has been found. According to a novel meta-analysis (fourteen studies including 145,608 unique patients), the adjusted RR for liver disease-related death and cardiovascular mortality was 3.82 (95% CI, 1.92; 7.61) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.10; 1.45), respectively. It has been suggested that the decision to treat HCV in patients with chronic kidney disease be based on the potential benefits and risks of therapy, including life expectancy, candidacy for kidney transplant, and co-morbidities. According to recent guidelines, the antiviral treatment of choice in HCV-infected patients on dialysis is mono-therapy but fresh data suggest the use of modern antiviral approaches (i.e., pegylated interferon plus ribavirin). The summary estimate for sustained viral response and drop-out rate was 56% (95% CI, 28-84) and 25% (95% CI, 10-40) in a pooled analysis including 151 dialysis patients on combination antiviral therapy (conventional or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin).

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a single United Arab Emirates center experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is prevalent among hemodialysis patients. In patients with normal kidney function, treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin can lead to eradication of HCV (hepatitis C virus). But the treatment is more problematic in patients with impaired kidney function, in part due to the altered pharmacokinetics of these medications. Despite recent guidelines, the optimal strategy in this group of patients is not well defined.

METHOD

In a retrospective study, we reviewed all patients with chronic hepatitis C on hemodialysis treated at Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, in the United Arab Emirates between 2003 and 2009. The aim of our study was to determine the rate of sustained viral response (SVR) and to establish the safety and rate of dropouts in the different treatment regimens used (patients treated with peginterferon only and patients treated with peginterferon and low dose ribavirin).

RESULTS

22 patients were treated during this period. 5 patients received monotherapy with a reduced dose of peginterferon alfa 2b s.c. once weekly while 17 patients were treated with a combination of reduced dose of peginterferon alfa 2a or 2b s.c. once weekly and a low dose ribavirin (200mg/day). A SVR was achieved in 73% (16/22 patients) of the total patient population and in 76% (13/17 patients) in the sub-group of patients treated with a combination therapy. The tolerability was high. No patients had to discontinue their treatment. The use of ESA (erythropoietin stimulating agents) and G-CSF was common in the combination therapy (94% and 53% respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our study of patients on hemodialysis with chronic hepatitis C, the use of peginterferon or a combination of peginterferon with a low daily dose of ribavirin achieved a high rate of SVR and the rate of dropout was low after pursuing an aggressive management of side effects.

Anti-viral therapy in haemodialysed HCV patients: efficacy, tolerance and treatment strategy

BACKGROUND

In end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication improves patient and graft survival.

AIM

To determine optimal use of erythropoietin (EPO) and ribavirin, to compare ribavirin concentrations with those of HCV patients having normal renal function and to evaluate sustained virological response (SVR) in a prospective observatory of ESRD candidates for renal transplantation.

METHODS

Thirty-two naïve patients were treated with Peg-IFN-α2a and ribavirin. Two different schedules of ribavirin and EPO administration were used: starting ribavirin at 600mg per week and adapting EPO when haemoglobin (Hb) fell below 10g/dL (adaptive strategy) or starting ribavirin at 1000mg per week while increasing EPO from the start of treatment (preventive strategy).

RESULTS

Patients treated with the adaptive strategy had lower median Hb levels (9.6 vs. 10.9g/dL, P=0.02) and more frequent median Hb levels below 10g/dL (58 vs. 5%, P=0.0007) despite lower median ribavirin doses (105 vs. 142mg/day, P<0.0001) than patients treated with the preventive strategy. There was a trend for more frequent transfusion in patients treated with the adaptive strategy than in patients treated with preventive strategy (50 vs. 20%, P=0.08). Compared to patients with normal renal function, ESRD patients had lower ribavirin concentrations during the first month (0.81 vs. 1.7mg/L, P=0.007) and similar concentrations thereafter. SVR was reached in 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and an adapted schedule of ribavirin are effective in ESRD patients. Increasing EPO from the start of treatment provides better haematological tolerance. The optimal dosage of ribavirin remains unresolved, in light of frequent side effects.

Hepatitis C and kidney transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is relatively common among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis and kidney transplant recipients. HCV infection in hemodialysis patients is associated with an increased mortality due to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The severity of hepatitis C-related liver disease in kidney transplant candidates may predict patient and graft survival after transplant. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard in the assessment of liver fibrosis in this setting. Kidney transplantation, not haemodialysis, seems to be the best treatment for HCV+ve patients with ESKD. Transplantation of kidneys from HCV+ve donors restricted to HCV+ve recipients is safe and associated with a reduction in the waiting time. Simultaneous kidney/liver transplantation (SKL) should be considered for kidney transplant candidates with HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment of HCV is more complex in hemodialysis patients, whereas treatment of HCV recurrence in SLK recipients appears effective and safe.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The incidence of acute HCV infection during maintenance dialysis is much higher than that in the general population because of the risk of nosocomial transmission. Following acute HCV infection, most patients develop chronic HCV infection, and a significant proportion develop chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall, chronic hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis bear an increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality, either during dialysis or after renal transplantation. Interferon (IFN) therapy is modestly effective for the treatment of HCV infection in ESRD patients. Conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy has been used to treat acute hepatitis C in ESRD patients with excellent safety and efficacy. Regarding chronic hepatitis C, approximately one-third of patients can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) after conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy. The combination of low-dose ribavirin and conventional or pegylated IFN has further improved the SVR rate in treatment-naïve or retreated ESRD patients in clinical trials. Similar to the treatment of patients with normal renal function, baseline and on-treatment HCV virokinetics are useful to guide optimized therapy in ESRD patients. Of particular note, IFN-based therapy is not recommended at the post-renal transplantation stage because of the low SVR rate and risk of acute graft rejection. In conclusion, ESRD patients with HCV infection should be encouraged to receive antiviral therapy, and those who achieve an SVR usually have long-term, durable, virological, biochemical, and histological responses.

A meta-analysis that compares the use of either peginterferon-α2a or peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin for HCV infection

Background

Two kinds of peginterferons, peginterferon-α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) and peginterferon-α2b (PEG-IFN-α2b), are used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, it is unclear which is better in terms of virological responses and patient compliance. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess which peginterferon was better when used with ribavirin.

Methods

Relevant clinical trials were identified through the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Primary outcomes included early virological response (EVR), end of treatment response (ETR) and sustained virological response (SVR). Secondary outcomes included biochemical and histological responses and the discontinuation of treatment after adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effect methods, depending on absence or presence of significant heterogeneity. Analyses were performed with Review Manager Version 4.2.2.

Results

Seven clinical trials were included that involved 3,526 patients in total; six were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one was nonrandomized. PEG-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin was better than PEG-IFN-α2b plus ribavirin with regards to ETR (relative risk [RR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14–1.28). This advantage was less obvious for EVR (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06–1.19) and SVR (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02–1.18). Patients who received PEG-IFN-α2a were less likely to discontinue treatment for safety reasons (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52–1.38).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that PEG-IFN-α2a was a better choice than PEG-IFN-α2b in terms of virological responses.

Pegylated interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis of clinical trials

The efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon monotherapy in patients with chronic renal failure and chronic hepatitis C remains unclear, although a number of small clinical trials have been published addressing this issue. A systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed in order to assess efficacy and safety of initial pegylated interferon monotherapy in chronic renal failure patients with chronic hepatitis C. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcome was drop-out rate (as a measure of tolerability). The random effects model of Der Simonian and Laird was used, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Sixteen clinical trials (254 unique patients) were identified, five (31%) being controlled studies; the majority (15/16 = 94%) regarded patients on long-term dialysis. The summary estimate for sustained virological response and drop-out rate was 33% [95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI) 24-43] and 23% (95%CI, 14-33), respectively. The most frequent side-effects requiring interruption of treatment were haematological (18%) and gastrointestinal (14%). In the group of controlled clinical trials, the summary estimate for sustained viral response and drop-out rate was 38% (95% CI, 18-59), and 15% (95% CI, 3-26), respectively. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to sustained virological response and drop-out rate. Pegylated IFN does not provide an added benefit in terms of virological response in comparison with standard IFN monotherapy. Tolerance to pegylated-IFN monotherapy was unsatisfactory. Prospective trials are in progress to assess the optimal antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients.

Safety and efficacy of an escalating dose regimen of pegylated interferon alpha-2b in the treatment of haemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in persons undergoing haemodialysis. This single-arm, open-label clinical trial investigated the safety and efficacy of an escalating dosage regimen of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha-2b in this patient population. Patients with chronic hepatitis C who were undergoing haemodialysis began treatment with PEG-IFN alpha-2b at a dose of 0.5 microg/kg/week, which was increased every 4 weeks to a maximum of 1 microg/kg/week. Treatment duration was 24 weeks for patients with genotype (G) 2 or 3 infection and 48 weeks for patients with G1 infection. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR). Of 46 patients screened, 34 (G1: 70.6%; G3: 29.4%) were treated and 23 (67.6%) completed treatment. Overall, 85.3% of patients experienced early virological response, 52.9% experienced end-of-treatment response, and 50% attained SVR, with a trend toward higher SVR rates in G3 compared with G1 patients (80%vs 37.5%; P = 0.06). Anaemia was the main reason for discontinuation of treatment. Patients with chronic hepatitis C who are undergoing haemodialysis can be successfully treated with an escalating dosage regimen of PEG-IFN alpha-2b monotherapy. G3-infected patients can attain high rates of SVR with only 24 weeks of therapy.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2a for treatment of chronic HCV infection in hemodialysis patients: a single Saudi center experience

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis C infection is common among patients on dialysis. While the associated liver disease is usually relatively mild during dialysis, disease progression can accelerate due to immunosuppression following kidney transplantation, and interferon therapy after transplantation stimulates graft rejection. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin are now the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus in patients without renal failure. However, until now, there has been relatively little information on the efficacy and tolerability of pegylated interferon in dialysis patients.

AIM OF THE WORK

To evaluate the response to pegylated interferon alpha-2a in chronic hepatitis C-infected patients on chronic hemodialysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This controlled study included 28 patients with end-stage renal disease who had been on dialysis in the Prince Salman Center for Kidney Disease for more than 6 months and tested positive for HCV RNA on repeated occasions. Thirteen patients were treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a therapy (of which three were also receiving ribavirin), and the remaining fifteen served as controls. Viral genotyping and both qualitative and quantitative PCR were carried out before starting therapy. Treatment was continued for 48 weeks. After 24 weeks of treatment, the biochemical and virological responses were evaluated. Biochemical response was evaluated at the end of the treatment, with sustained virological response (SVR) being evaluated 24 weeks later. The side effects were monitored throughout the treatment period.

RESULTS

All patients in the treatment group completed 48 weeks of therapy without any drop out. Their mean age was 43.38 ± 11.62 years. After 24 weeks of therapy, 10 patients (76%) were initial responders, while 3 patients (24%) were resistant. Six months after termination of therapy, 9 patients (69%) were sustained responders, while one patient relapsed. Their ALT and AST dropped from 55.78 ± 33.79 IU/dl and 34.04 ± 19.58 IU/dl before starting therapy to 27.22 ± 16.54 IU/dl and 18.88 ± 12.28 IU/dl after termination (P = .06 and .08, respectively). Their mean hemoglobin (Hb) level dropped from 11.05 ± 1.43 to 9.48 ± 1.24 g/dl (P = 0.3), and white blood cell count (WBC) dropped from 6.82 ± 2.6 × 10(3)/mm(3) to 4.1 ± 2.34 × 10(3)/mm(3); (P = 0.57). Platelet count fell from 194.56 ± 129.78 × 10(3)/mm(3) to (152.33 ± 107.66 × 10(3)/mm(3); P = 0.39). When initial responders (n = 10) were compared to resistant patients (n = 3), the only observable difference was higher ALT and AST levels in resistant patients. Pegylated interferon alpha-2a was well tolerated, and none of the patients stopped interferon because of hematological side effects while dose modification was carried out in most of the patients. All three patients who received combination therapy from the start were sustained responders. None of the patients in the control group seroconverted to HCV negative status during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Pegylated interferon alpha-2a was well tolerated among our hemodialysis patients. Hematological disturbances appeared to be the most important adverse effects. At the end of therapy a response rate of up to 76%, with 69% sustained response, can be obtained with pegylated interferon alpha-2a therapy.

Hepatic disorders in chronic kidney disease

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are the most common and serious causes of liver damage in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The natural histories of HBV and HCV infections in patients with CKD are not fully understood; however, recent evidence has emphasized the adverse effect of HBV and/or HCV infection on survival in this population. Chronic liver disease is the fourth most important cause of death after renal transplantation. The negative effect of HCV infection on survival among renal transplant recipients has been linked to liver dysfunction and extrahepatic complications, such as chronic glomerulonephritis, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus, chronic allograft nephropathy, and sepsis. The transmission of HCV by solid organ transplantation has been unequivocally demonstrated. Renal transplant recipients who receive kidneys from HCV-positive donors are at increased risk of death. Although several studies have shown that in patients with HCV infection and chronic renal failure renal transplantation is associated with better survival than is dialysis, recent clinical guidelines recommend that kidneys from HCV-infected donors should not be used in HCV-seropositive recipients without detectable HCV viremia. Monotherapy with conventional interferon has been suggested to be a useful treatment for hepatitis C infection in patients on dialysis. Although no evidence suggests that patients with CKD are more prone to suffer from hepatic toxic effects than individuals with normal kidney function, patients with CKD usually receive multiple medications; and drug interactions may, therefore, have a role in the pathogenesis of drug-induced liver disease in this population.

Health care-associated transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses in hemodialysis units

Liver disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving long-term dialysis. This article summarizes the most recent information on epidemiology, clinical significance, and management of infection by hepatitis B and C viruses in this population.

Interferon for hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis--an individual patient meta-analysis of factors associated with sustained virological response

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in hemodialysis patients and causes excess mortality. Interferon (IFN) treatment of chronic HCV infection in hemodialysis patients results in high sustained virological response (SVR) rates 6 mo after treatment. The authors aimed to identify factors associated with SVR in hemodialysis patients through analysis of individual patient data obtained from systematic review of published literature.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS

Medline was searched from 1966 through February 2009, and prospective studies describing IFN treatment of hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection with published individual patient data were included. To identify factors associated with SVR, logistic regression was applied with adjustment for study.

RESULTS

Twenty studies of IFN treatment provided data on 428 patients. Overall SVR was 45% and in univariate analyses was higher with: 1) three million units or higher three times weekly of IFN; 2) treatment for at least 6 mo; 3) treatment completion; 4) lower baseline HCV RNA; 5) female gender; and 6) early virological negativity. Although limited by missing data, these relationships persisted in multivariate regression.

CONCLUSIONS

SVR is more likely with larger IFN dose, longer treatment duration, treatment completion, female gender, lower HCV RNA and early virological negativity. For appropriate treatment candidates, regimens should consist of three million units of IFN three times weekly for at least 6 mo, with patients encouraged to complete the full course.

Treatment of hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients using pegylated interferon alpha-2a in Turkey

PURPOSE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is prevalent in renal insufficient patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN-alpha-2a) among these patients.

METHODS

Among 437 patients within total hemodialysis population in hemodialysis units, in total 83 patients (19.0%) were anti-HCV positive and of these 83 patients, 33 (39.7%) were HCV-RNA positive. Treatment was initiated in 33 patients who had chronic HCV infection. All patients were found to be HCV-RNA positive. During treatment, peg-IFN-alpha-2a (40 kDa), 135 microg/week was used on these 33 patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (78.8%) of the 33 patients enrolled in the study completed the treatment. Two patients (6.0%) did not complete treatment because they had serious adverse events such as anemia and thrombocytopenia. At the onset of treatment, while all of 26 patients were HCV RNA positive, HCV RNA turned to negative in all 26 patients 3 months after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

At the end of the study, peg-IFN-alpha-2a treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C on maintenance hemodialysis may improve prognosis and their quality of life.

KDOQI US commentary on the KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in CKD

KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) is an international initiative with a key mission of developing clinical practice guidelines in the area of chronic kidney disease (CKD). KDIGO recently published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in individuals with CKD. The process of adaptation of international guidelines is an important task that, although guided by general principles, needs to be individualized for each region and country. Therefore, the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a multidisciplinary group to comment on the application and implementation of the KDIGO guidelines for patients with CKD in the United States. This commentary summarizes the process undertaken by this group in considering the guidelines in the context of health care delivery in the United States. Guideline statements are presented, followed by a succinct discussion and annotation of the rationale for the statements. Research recommendations that are of particular interest to the United States are then summarized to highlight future areas of inquiry that would enable updating of the guidelines.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is especially problematic in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are undergoing hemodialysis. Rates of HCV infection are higher among hemodialysis patients than in the general population, and several routes of transmission are thought to stem from the dialysis unit. Management of chronic hepatitis C is also more complicated in hemodialysis patients because of altered pharmacokinetics and a predisposition for drug-related toxicity, particularly ribavirin-induced anemia. Clinical trials of patients with chronic hepatitis C and healthy, functioning kidney grafts are rare because of the inherent dangers of graft rejection. As a result, most studies in patients with ESRD have focused on patients waiting for a kidney transplant. Additionally, because ribavirin is contraindicated in this patient population, many studies have examined monotherapy treatments. According to meta-analyses, conventional interferon alfa treatment yields a sustained virological response (SVR) rate of 37%, whereas studies of pegylated interferon alfa monotherapy have yielded SVR rates between 13% and 75%. Several small studies have also used the monitoring of ribavirin plasma concentrations or hemoglobin levels to facilitate the use of combination therapy. In light of the results from these clinical trials, we herein review treatment guidelines and recommend strategies to help optimize the treatment of patients with ESRD.

CONCLUSION

There remains a lack of clarity surrounding the most effective treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD. Treatment can be effective with many patients attaining SVR; however, unfavorable tolerability with interferon alfa-based therapy remains a concern and thus close supportive care should be aggressively pursued to help maintain adherence.

Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent in patients on renal replacement therapy and has an adverse impact on survival in infected patients on chronic hemodialysis as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. Nosocomial spread of HCV within dialysis units continues to occur. HCV is also implicated in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction often mediated by cryoglobulins leading to chronic kidney disease as well as impairing renal allograft function. The role of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in patients with renal failure remains unclear. Monotherapy with conventional interferon (IFN) for chronic hepatitis C is probably more effective in dialysis than in non-uraemic patients but tolerance is lower. Limited data only are available about monotherapy with pegylated interferon and combination therapy (pegylated IFN plus ribavirin) for chronic HCV in the dialysis population. Clinical experience with antiviral therapy for acute HCV in dialysis population is encouraging. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concerns about precipitating graft dysfunction. Sustained viral responses obtained by antiviral therapy in renal transplant candidates are durable after renal transplantation and may reduce HCV-related complications after RT (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, HCV-related glomerulonephritis, and chronic allograft nephropathy).

Treatment of dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C using pegylated interferon and low-dose ribavirin

BACKGROUND

No safe and effective therapy exists for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Available data on the antiviral treatment of hepatitis C in dialysis population is mostly based on standard interferon monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a prospective, cohort trial with combined therapy (pegylated-interferonalpha-2a (135 mcg/week) plus low dose ribavirin (200 mg/day)) for chronic hepatitis C in 15 patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Twelve patients had HCV genotype 1a/1b, three were co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and two had compensated cirrhosis. End-points were sustained viral response and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response was obtained in four patients (including two with HCV genotype 1); the SVR rate was 28.6% (4/14), on an intention-to-treat analysis. One subject with SVR had compensated cirrhosis. All HIV co-infected patients had well controlled HIV and one of them (33%) reached SVR. Seven (50%) of the 14 patients were non-responders, two of which relapsed after discontinuation of therapy. Drop-out rate was 71.4% (10/14). The most frequent side-effect was anemia, which required ribavirin discontinuation in three patients; seven (47%) patients received blood transfusions. Two patients died (week 4 and 14) of causes related to cardiovascular disease, which was frequent in our cohort. Two subjects were hospitalized and discontinued therapy (week 1, and 27).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study showed that about one-third of HD patients achieved sustained virological response with pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a plus low-dose ribavirin; however, tolerance to antiviral treatment was unsatisfactory. Well- controlled HIV infection should not be a contraindication to HCV therapy in dialysis patients. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of combined antiviral therapy targeted at HCV in chronic kidney disease population are indicated.

Kinetics of hepatitis C viral RNA and HCV-antigen during dialysis sessions: evidence for differential viral load reduction on dialysis

Hepatitis C infection is a common problem in dialysis units. The prevalence ranges from 3% to more than 50%. Several reports have described a variable reduction of HCV-RNA during hemodialysis treatment sessions. But so far nothing is known about the HCV antigenemia or the kinetics of the reduction of HCV-RNA and HCV antigenemia during these sessions. HCV-RNA was monitored using the VERSANT HCV bDNA assay 3.0 (Bayer Healthcare Diagnostics, Leverkusen, Germany) or the HCV-Monitor TaqMan (Roche Diagnostics). HCV antigenemia was tested by using Ortho-trac-C assay (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Neckargemünd, Germany). Kinetics of HCV-RNA were available in 15 dialysis sessions measured by bDNA assay and in 5 dialysis sessions measured by rt-PCR. Quantitative HCV-antigenemia was available in fourteen dialysis sessions. Not only HCV-RNA but as expected also the HCV-antigenemia fell during the dialysis session. However, while the average reduction of HCV-antigen appears steady and linear, the level of HCV-RNA seems to be stable during the first 3 hr of dialysis, and decreases rapidly during the last 2 hr. The results seem to be independent of the HCV-RNA detection method. The different kinetics of HCV RNA and HCV antigen load suggest that there are different mechanisms responsible for the reduction of the HCV antigen and HCV-RNA, respectively. Reduction of viral load during dialysis session indicates a potential benefit of dialysis in case of HCV associated antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis C infection in patients with chronic kidney disease

The management of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complex and represents a particular concern since numerous issues, such as antiviral therapy in dialysis patients and post renal transplant, and prevention of HCV spread within dialysis units, remain unresolved. An enormous body of literature has been published on HCV in the CKD population; however, clinical evidence on important issues is mostly based on uncontrolled clinical trials or retrospective surveys. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature. Responses to the critical issues have been developed by a consensus of experts, endorsed by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) and some clinical recommendations have been added.

Interferon treatment in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of treatment efficacy and harms

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in patients undergoing hemodialysis and is associated with greater mortality. We determined the efficacy and harms of interferon (IFN) and pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) treatment of hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection and identified factors associated with these outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials, uncontrolled trials, and prospective observational studies.

SETTING & POPULATION

Hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

MEDLINE indexed studies since 1966, sample size greater than 10.

INTERVENTION

IFN-based treatment, including PEG-IFN with and without ribavirin.

OUTCOMES

Sustained virological response (SVR) 6 months after treatment, rate of treatment discontinuation caused by adverse events, and factors associated with these outcomes.

RESULTS

20 studies of 459 IFN-treated patients, 3 studies of 38 PEG-IFN-treated patients, and 2 studies of 49 PEG-IFN and ribavirin-treated patients met inclusion criteria. The overall SVR rate was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33 to 49) for IFN and 37% (95% CI, 9 to 77) for PEG-IFN. Treatment discontinuation rates were 26% (95% CI, 20 to 34) for IFN and 28% (95% CI, 12 to 53) for PEG-IFN. SVR was higher with 3 million units (MU) or higher of IFN 3 times weekly, with lower mean HCV RNA, and with lower rates of cirrhosis, HCV genotype 1 or elevated transaminase, but these findings were not statistically significant. Treatment discontinuation rates were greater in studies using larger doses.

LIMITATIONS

Publication bias, few randomized controlled trials, and limitations in generalizability to all hemodialysis patients.

CONCLUSION

IFN treatment of hemodialysis patients results in an SVR rate of 41%. Higher dose, lower mean HCV RNA level, and lower rates of cirrhosis, transaminase level increase, and HCV genotype 1 may be associated with greater SVR rates, but additional studies using individual patient data are needed.

Interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials

The efficacy of monotherapy with interferon (IFN) (conventional or pegylated IFN) in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C remains unclear, although a number of clinical trials have been published addressing this issue. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy by conventional or pegylated IFN in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR; as a measure of efficacy), and the secondary outcome was drop-out rate (as a measure of tolerability). We used the random-effects model of Der Simonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. We identified 28 clinical trials (645 unique patients), of which six (21.4%) had a controlled design. In the group of trials based on conventional IFN, the summary estimate for SVR and drop-out rate was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32-46] and 19% (95% CI 13-26) respectively. The summary estimate for SVR rate in patients with the hepatitis C virus genotype 1 was 33% (95% CI 19-47). In the subset of trials using pegylated IFN, the summary estimate for SVR and drop-out rate was 31% (95% CI 7-55) and 27% (95% CI 1-52) respectively. The most frequent side-effects requiring interruption of treatment were flu-like symptoms, and gastrointestinal and haematological changes. A relationship between age and drop-out rate was found, even if no statistical significance was reached (P = 0.064). The studies were heterogeneous with regard to SVR and drop-out rate. No publication bias was observed. One-third of dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C were successfully treated with conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy. Preliminary evidence does not support additional benefit due to monotherapy with pegylated IFN on the viral response in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. Tolerance to IFN monotherapy was unsatisfactory, particularly to pegylated IFN. The optimal antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis populations is currently under active investigation.

Efficacy and safety of pegylated-interferon α-2a in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated-interferon alpha-2a in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS: Thirty-six hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C were enrolled in a controlled and prospective study. All patients were treatment naive, positive tested for anti-HCV antibodies, and positive tested for serum HCV-RNA. Twenty-two patients received 135 &mgr;g peglyated-interferon α-2a weekly for 48 wk (group A). The remaining patients were left untreated, eleven refused therapy, and three were not candidates for kidney transplantation and were allocated to the control group (group B). At the end of the treatment biochemical and virological response was evaluated, and 24 wk after completion of therapy sustained virological response (SVR) was assessed. Side effects were monitored.

RESULTS: Of 22 hemodialysis patients, 12 were male and 10 female, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 12.1 years. Virological end-of-treatment response was observed in 14 patients (82.4%) in group A and in one patient (7.1%) in group B (P = 0.001). Sustained virological response was observed in 11 patients (64.7%) in group A and in one patient in group B (7.1%). Biochemical response parameters normalized in 10/14 patients (71.4%) at the end of the treatment. ALT levels in group B were initially high in six patients and normalized in one of them (25%) at the end of the 48 wk. In five patients (22.7%) therapy had to be stopped at mo 4 due to complications of weakness, anemia, and bleeding.

CONCLUSION: SVR could be achieved in 64.7% of patients on hemodialysis with chronic hepatitis C by a treatment with peglyated-interferon α-2a. Group A had a significantly better efficacy compared to the control group B, but the side effects need to be concerned.

Hepatitis C virus infection and the dialysis patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients undergoing regular dialysis and is an important cause of liver disease in this population both during dialysis and after renal transplantation (RT). Anti-HCV screening of blood products has almost eliminated posttransfusion HCV infection but acquisition of HCV continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis population is not completely understood though recent data show that HCV infection has a detrimental role on survival of chronic dialysis patients. Several clinical trials have suggested that the response rate to conventional interferon (IFN) is higher in dialysis patients than those with normal kidney function but tolerance is lower. There are only limited data about pegylated IFN alone or in association with ribavirin for hepatitis C in dialysis population. IFN remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction; however, preliminary evidence shows the durability of sustained response to antiviral therapy pre-RT after renal transplant. Successful pretransplant therapy is associated with several benefits after RT including reduced incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and de novo glomerulonephritis in HCV-infected recipients.

Preliminary Results of Treatment With Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2A for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus in Kidney Transplant Candidates on Hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

At present, there is little published information on the outcome of treatment with pegylated interferon (Peg-IF alpha 2a) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected hemodialysis patients awaiting renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of Peg-IF alpha 2a in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve noncirrhotic HCV-infected patients (10 men, 50 +/- 8 years of age, genotype 1b 84%), were prescribed Peg-IF alpha 2a, at 135 microg/wk for 48 weeks. Liver biopsy was performed in 11 of 12 cases.

RESULTS

Six patients completed 48 weeks of treatment, with one end of treatment response (ETR), two sustained viral responses (SVRs), and three HCV relapses. Treatment was shorter in the six remaining patients: two cases 24 weeks (one due to medical reasons with relapse, one due to nonresponse), one patient chose to discontinue at 14 weeks (with relapse), one patient died of stroke at 10 weeks, and in two additional patients interferon was withdrawn at 18 weeks because of severe anemia (SVR) and at 26 weeks due to prolonged fever (relapse). Other secondary treatment-related events included anemia (requiring transfusion in two patients and major erythropoietin administration in six), and fever in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Peg-IF had limited efficacy in this group, with ETR in 83%, SVR in only 25%, and recurrence in 50%. Tolerance was moderate, with 4/12 (33%) discontinuing treatment due to adverse events, personal decision, or death. Large randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the role of Peg-IF treatment in this population.

Current and Future Hepatitis C Therapies

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients has evolved significantly in the past 15 years. With a better knowledge of viral kinetics and molecular virology of the hepatitis C virus, we have gone from a low chance of viral eradication to a chance as high as 50%. Despite this, current therapies are not ideal and are associated with side effects, complications, and poor patient tolerability. Therefore, an urgent need to look for better strategies to treat this disease is imperative. Thanks to the current knowledge and ongoing research, we know the way we treat hepatitis C today will change dramatically in the next 5-10 years. This review will focus on current therapies for hepatitis C and the most recent advances in the search for new therapies.

Hepatitis C in dialysed patients--what is the current optimal treatment?

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the dialysis population. The problem is more pronounced after renal transplantation. It seems that immunosuppressive drugs facilitate HCV replication and accelerate hepatic lesions. Interferon is not recommended after renal transplantation because of the risk of acute rejection and graft dysfunction, and for this reason it is important to eradicate HCV RNA before transplantation. Prevention is the most important treatment measure. Good clinical practice together with screening of blood products and organs is of outstanding importance. Pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin are currently considered to be optimal therapy for HCV infection. Pegylation delays clearance of interferon, which leads to a more potent and longer antiviral effect. The two PEG-INF formulations (alfa-2a and alfa-2b) with different pharmacokinetic characteristics are currently available. Their clearance is reduced by almost 45% in patients with end-stage renal disease. Taken together with the high prevalence of adverse effects associated with the PEG-INF, an increased awareness of their use in dialysis patients is reasonable. There are few published studies on interferon and PEG-INF therapy in uremic patients. These studies confirm that the rate of response to different interferon formulations in dialysis is much higher than in the general population, but with a higher rate of adverse events. Ribavirin increases the response rate to treatment with PEG-INF. Great caution is warranted on its use in dialysis patients, whereas in patients with renal disease it accumulates and causes a dose-related haemolysis. Current results are encouraging but limited by a small number of patients and short follow-up. Multi-centre, controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish an optimal protocol for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in dialysis patients.