Radical treatment of stage IV pancreatic cancer by the combination of cryosurgery and iodine-125 seed implantation

Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of cryosurgery on unresectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) continues to rank as one of the deadliest forms of cancer, with the majority of patients being diagnosed with unresectable disease. The implementation of cryoablation-based comprehensive treatment is expected to lead to a reduction in tumour size and potentially achieve complete resection. However, the availability of systematic and evidence-based treatment guidelines for cryoablation in pancreatic cancer is currently limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computerized search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Clinicaltrials to retrieve studies published from August 1987 to June 2023. The perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) who underwent cryosurgery were systematically collected. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test, and a funnel plot was implemented to evaluate publication bias. Data were pooled and analyzed using Stata 14.0 software. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form tool was employed for quality evaluation.

RESULTS

Nine studies, including 368 patients, were identified. The pooled overall incidence rate was 4% (95% CI: 0-14%; I²=54.06%) for acute pancreatitis, 0% (95% CI: 0-0%; I²=0.0%) for delayed gastric emptying, 0% (95% CI: 0-1%; I²=0.0%) for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) or bile leakage, 2% (95% CI: 0-5%; I²=0.0%) for bleeding, and 4% (95% CI: 0-12%; I²=70.46%) for fever. The subgroup analysis revealed that the percutaneous treatment group had a lower incidence of complications compared to laparotomy but had higher incidences of POPF, bleeding, and pancreatitis than the intraoperative group. Median overall survival (OS) varied from 5 to 16.2 months. The median survival rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for patients who underwent cryosurgery were as follows: 94.9%, 64.8% (range: 4.8-63.1%), 22.80%, and 9.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With the advancements in cryoablation and anti-tumour therapy, cryoablation has emerged as a promising treatment modality for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. According to existing literature, the combination of cryoablation with radioactive particle implantation or immunotherapy has demonstrated considerable efficacy and safety. However, while the majority of included data is derived from retrospective studies, it is imperative to conduct larger sample sizes or prospective trials for further validation.

New Isotopes for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer in Collaboration With CERN: A Mini Review

The use of radioactivity in medicine has been developed over a century. The discovery of radioisotopes and their interactions with living cells and tissue has led to the emergence of new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. The CERN-MEDICIS infrastructure, recently inaugurated at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN), provides a wide range of radioisotopes of interest for diagnosis and treatment in oncology. Our objective is to draw attention to the progress made in nuclear medicine in collaboration with CERN and potential future applications, in particular for the treatment of aggressive tumors such as pancreatic adenocarcinoma, through an extensive review of literature. Fifty seven out of two hundred and ten articles, published between 1997 and 2020, were selected based on relevancy. Meetings were held with a multi-disciplinary team, including specialists in physics, biological engineering, chemistry, oncology and surgery, all actively involved in the CERN-MEDICIS project. In summary, new diagnostic, and therapeutic modalities are emerging for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Targeted radiotherapy or brachytherapy could be combined with existing therapies to improve the quality of life and survival of these patients. Many studies are still in the pre-clinical stage but open new paths for patients with poor prognosis.

A review on the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seed implantation in unresectable pancreatic cancers

Background: Pancreatic cancers are the common digestive system tumors with poor prognosis and due to its late diagnosis, surgical resection does not remain a viable treatment option in about 80% of patients. Amongst different treatment options, radioactive 125I seed implantation therapy has also emerged as a good alternative in non-resectable pancreatic cancer patients.Purpose: The present review describes the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seed implantation in unresectable pancreatic cancers in preclinical and clinical studies.Results: In this technique, small radioactive particles are implanted inside the tumor cells to produce the sustain effects. Due to the short radial distance of these radiations, there is a selective and efficient killing of cancer cells without any significant injury to the neighboring cells. Amongst the different methods for implanting 125I seeds in the pancreatic tissues, CT scan or ultrasound-guided percutaneous seed implantation is preferred as it offers shorter operative time, lesser bleeding, early recovery, lesser complications, and low medical costs. The clinical studies have shown that radioactive 125I seed implantation is a good option for the management of local tumor growth, pain palliation, and improvement in the life span of patients suffering from unresectable pancreatic cancer.Conclusion: It may be employed either alone or in combination with cryotherapy, existing chemotherapy, bypass surgery or radiations to achieve the optimal results in these patients. Nevertheless, there is a need to formulate a uniform dose and procedure to achieve homogeneity and develop references for clinical practices.

The role of seed implantation in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using ERCP

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of iodine-125 seed implantation, guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or percutanous ultrasound, in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 101 patients with obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017 in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 50 underwent implantation of iodine-125 seeds under EUS and/or percutaneous ultrasound guidance after receiving a stent via ERCP (treatment group), and 51 received a stent via ERCP without undergoing seed implantation (control group). The clinical data and therapeutic outcomes of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the treatment group obtained significant relief of abdominal pain at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month followup (p < 0.05), with a significantly lower visual analog scale pain score (p < 0.05). The treatment group obtained a longer median survival (8.8 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.02), longer median duration of stent patency (10.8 ± 1.4 vs. 6.9 ± 0.8 months, p = 0.02), and prolonged average time to gastric outlet obstruction (6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.02). Differences between liver function and appetite for the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05 and p = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine-125 seed implantation after relief of obstructive jaundice via ERCP prolongs survival, biliary stent patency, and time to gastric outlet obstruction and improves patient quality of life by relieving pancreatic pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

The side effects and complications of percutaneous iodine-125 seeds implantation under CT-guide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The present study investigates the side effects and complications of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous iodine-125 (I-125) seeds implantation for advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for patients treated with implantation of I-125 seeds under CT-guide in our hospital from May 2010 to April 2015. The side effects and complications were collected and their possible reasons were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were enrolled. The side effects were categorized as fever in 29 cases (37.18%), abdominal pain in 26 cases (33.33%), nausea and vomiting in 9 cases (11.54%), diarrhea in 5 cases (6.41%), and constipation in 4 cases (5.13%). Complications were composed of pancreatitis in 9 cases (11.54%), infection in 5 cases (6.41%), seed migration in 2 cases (2.56%), intestinal perforation in 1 case (1.28%), and intestinal obstruction in 1 case. The incidence of complication was 23.08% (18/78). The difference in incidence of complication was statistically significant between patients implanted with ≤27 seeds and those with >27 seeds (P = .032).

CONCLUSION

The side effects and complications frequently occur in implantation of I-125 seeds for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. More concern should be given to the patients treated by this technique.

Survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after iodine125 seeds implantation brachytherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy with iodine-labeled seeds (I-seeds) implantation is increasingly being used to treat tumors because of its positional precision, minimal invasion, least damage to noncancerous tissue due to slow and continuous release of radioactivity and facilitation with modern medical imaging technologies. This study evaluates the survival and pain relief outcomes of the I-seeds implantation brachytherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

Literature search was carried out in multiple electronic databases (Google Scholar, Embase, Medline/PubMed, and Ovid SP) and studies reporting I seeds implantation brachytherapy in pancreatic cancer patients with unresectable tumor were selected by following predetermined eligibility criteria. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to achieve inverse variance weighted effect size of the overall survival rate after the intervention. Sensitivity and subgroups analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies (824 patients' data) were included in the meta-analysis. I-seeds implantation brachytherapy alone was associated with 8.98 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.94, 11.03] months (P < 0.00001) overall survival with 1-year survival of 25.7 ± 9.3% (mean ± standard deviation; SD) and 2-year survival was 17.9 ± 8.6% (mean ± SD). In stage IV pancreatic cancer patients, overall survival was 7.13 [95% CI: 4.75, 9.51] months (P < 0.00001). In patients treated with I-seeds implantation along with 1 or more therapies, overall survival was 11.75 [95% CI: 9.84, 13.65] months (P < 0.00001) with 1-year survival of 47.4 ± 22.75% (mean ± SD) and 2-year survival was 16.97 ± 3.1% (mean ± SD). I-seeds brachytherapy was associated with relief of pain in 79.7 ± 9.9% (mean ± SD) of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of pancreatic cancer patients after I-seeds implantation brachytherapy is found to be 9 months, whereas a combined treatment with I-seeds brachytherapy and other therapies was associated with approximately 12 months' survival. The majority of patients who underwent I-seeds brachytherapy had their pain relieved.

Advances in cryoablation for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic carcinoma is a common cancer of the digestive system with a poor prognosis. It is characterized by insidious onset, rapid progression, a high degree of malignancy and early metastasis. At present, radical surgery is considered the only curative option for treatment, however, the majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed too late to undergo surgery. The sensitivity of pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy or radiotherapy is also poor. As a result, there is no standard treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cryoablation is generally considered to be an effective palliative treatment for pancreatic cancer. It has the advantages of minimal invasion and improved targeting, and is potentially safe with less pain to the patients. It is especially suitable in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, our initial findings suggest that cryotherapy combined with 125-iodine seed implantation, immunotherapy or various other treatments for advanced pancreatic cancer can improve survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Although these findings require further in-depth study, the initial results are encouraging. This paper reviews the safety and efficacy of cryoablation, including combined approaches, in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Iodine-125 induces apoptosis via regulating p53, microvessel density, and vascular endothelial growth factor in colorectal cancer

Background

Iodine interstitial brachytherapy has been widely reported for treating colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the inhibitory molecular mechanism of iodine-125 (I-125) on CRC has not been reported.

Methods

To illustrate the inhibitory mechanism of iodine-125 (I-125) on CRC, we established the animal models of CRC via the injection of HCT-8 cells into nude mice. Subsequently, the I-125 granules were implanted into the tumor of the animal model at different dosages. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and terminal transferase dUTP nick end labeling were used to detect the apoptosis of the tumor cells. Immunohistochemistry SP staining was used to measure the expression of p53 protein. The protein levels were examined with western blot and ELISA. Meanwhile, microvessel density (MVD) was counted by endothelial cells immunostained by anti-CD34 antibody.

Results

The results showed that I-125 protests against CRC via increasing the protein level of p53 and decreasing the level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), leading to the decrease of MVD in CRC (P <0.0001). An effective inhibition dosage of I-125 ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mCi.

Conclusions

The inhibitory mechanisms of iodine on CRC acted through an increase in the level of p53 and a decrease in the level of VEGF, resulting in a decrease of MVD.

Percutaneous cryotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer: experience with 23 patients

Bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract and in many patients is metastatic at diagnosis. Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for these patients but has serious side effects and in many patients is not tolerated. To avoid the side effects of systemic chemotherapy, patients with late stage bladder cancer have sought cryotherapy in our hospital. We reviewed data for the past 4 years to evaluate the safety and efficiency of percutaneous cryotherapy in 23 patients. Within 3 days after cryosurgery, all complications of bladder cancer (e.g. hematuria, urinary irritation, hypogastralgia, lumbago) had decreased to some degree. No new complications (e.g. bladder perforation) occurred and all complications had disappeared completely after 2 weeks. The progression-free survival (PFS) of these patients was 14 ± 8 months. There was no effect on PFS of tumor location or histopathology; however, differentiation status and tumor size influenced the therapeutic effect of percutaneous cryoablation. In conclusion, percutaneous cryotherapy may be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option in the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer.

Therapeutic outcomes of combining cryotherapy, chemotherapy and DC-CIK immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Currently there are no effective therapies for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we conducted a retrospective study of 161 patients to evaluate the therapeutic effects of combining cryosurgery, chemotherapy and dendritic cell-activated cytokine-induced killer cells (DC-CIK) immunotherapy. The overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC to patient death was assessed during a 5-years follow-up period. OS of patients who received comprehensive cryotherapy was (median OS, 20 months; n = 86) significantly longer than that of patients who did not received cryotherapy (median OS, 10 months; n = 75; P < 0.0001). Five treatment combinations were selected: chemotherapy (n = 44); chemo-immunotherapy (n = 31); cryo-chemotherapy (n = 32); cryo-immunotherapy (n = 21); and cryo-chemo-immunotherapy (n = 33). A combination of cryotherapy with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy lead to significantly longer OS (18 months and 17 months, respectively) compared to chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy (8.5 months and 12 months, respectively; P < 0.001); however, the median OS of patients who underwent cryo-chemo-immunotherapy was significantly longer (27 months) compared to the other treatment programs (P < 0.001). In conclusion, a combination of cryotherapy, chemotherapy and DC-CIK immunotherapy proved the best treatment option for metastatic NSCLC in this group of patients.

Combination treatment with comprehensive cryoablation and immunotherapy in metastatic hepatocellular cancer

AIM: To retrospectively assess the effect of comprehensive cryosurgery (ablation of intra- and extra-hepatic tumors) plus dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in metastatic hepatocellular cancer.

METHODS: We divided 45 patients into cryo-immunotherapy (21 patients), cryotherapy (n = 12), immunotherapy (n = 5) and untreated (n = 7) groups. Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of metastatic hepatocellular cancer was assessed after an 8-year follow-up.

RESULTS: Median OS was higher following cryo-immunotherapy (32 mo) or cryotherapy (17.5 mo; P < 0.05) than in the untreated group (3 mo) and was higher in the cryo-immunotherapy group than in the cryotherapy group (P < 0.05). In the cryo-immunotherapy group, median OS was higher after multiple treatments (36.5 mo) than after a single treatment (21 mo; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Cryotherapy and, especially, cryo-immunotherapy significantly increased OS in metastatic hepatocellular cancer patients. Multiple cryo-immunotherapy was associated with a better prognosis than single cryo-immunotherapy.

Alleviating visceral cancer pain in patients with pancreatic cancer using cryoablation and celiac plexus block

Little is known about the effects of pancreas cryoablation (PCA) on abdominalgia in pancreatic cancer patients or its synergism with celiac plexus block (CPB). In patients without abdominalgia, to investigate the effects of PCA; in patients with abdominalgia, to investigate the pain-alleviating effects of PCA+CPB. Sixty-two patients were enrolled in this retrospective review; 12 without abdominalgia refused PCA, 15 without abdominalgia received PCA to reduce their tumor load and 35 with abdominalgia received PCA+CPB to reduce tumor load and alleviate pain. All PCA and PCA+CPB procedures were performed successfully. Some slight adverse effects (e.g. increased serum amylase, abdominal distension and nausea, abdominal bleeding) had disappeared by 3weeks, spontaneously or after symptomatic treatment. In patients without abdominalgia, pain occurred in one-third of cases (all with pancreatic head cancer) after PCA but had stopped 1-12days after treatment; in patients with abdominalgia before treatment, pain stopped immediately after PCA+CPB in 18 cases and 2-24days after treatment in 17 (all with pancreatic head cancer); a significant difference was found between pretreatment and post-treatment pain frequency (P=0.0019), regardless of the presence of advanced (P=0.0096) or metastatic (P=0.0072) cancer. The average time to pain relief was approximately 7days after both PCA and PCA+CPB, and abdominalgia did not recur for more than 8weeks. PCA may cause short-term pain in some pancreatic cancer patients. Combined PCA+CPB can alleviate cancer pain for more than 8weeks, without severe side effects.