Preoperative administration of bevacizumab is safe for patients with colorectal liver metastases

Patients Undergoing Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy Who Require Surgical Intervention: What Surgeons Need to Know

As part of routine cancer care, patients may undergo elective surgery with the aim of long-term cure. Some of these patients will receive systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The majority of patients, usually with locally advanced or metastatic disease, will receive SACT with palliative intent. These treatment options are expanding beyond traditional chemotherapy to include targeted therapies, immunotherapy, hormone therapy, radionuclide therapy and gene therapy. During treatment, some patients will require surgical intervention on an urgent or emergency basis. This narrative review examined the evidence base for SACT-associated surgical risk and the precautions that a surgical team should consider in patients undergoing SACT.

Conversion therapy in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: What's new in the era of molecular and immune therapy?

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally, with limited therapies and unsatisfactory prognosis once in the advanced stages. With promising advances in locoregional and systematic treatments, fast development of targeted drugs, the success of immunotherapy, as well as the emergence of the therapeutic alliance, conversion therapy has recently become more well developed and an effective therapeutic strategy. This article aimed to review recent developments in conversion therapy in liver transplantation (LT) for HCC.

DATA SOURCES

We searched for relevant publications on PubMed before September 2022, using the terms "HCC", "liver transplantation", "downstaging", "bridging treatment" and "conversion therapy."

RESULTS

Conversion therapy was frequently represented as a combination of multiple treatment modalities to downstage HCC and make patients eligible for LT. Although combining various local and systematic treatments in conversion therapy is still controversial, growing evidence has suggested that multimodal combined treatment strategies downstage HCC in a shorter time, which ultimately increases the opportunities for LT. Moreover, the recent breakthrough of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for HCC also benefit patients with advanced-stage tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, applying the thinking of transplant oncology to benefit HCC patients receiving LT is a new topic that has shed light on advanced-stage patients. With the expansion of conversion therapy concepts, further investigation and research is required to realize the full potential of conversion treatment strategies, including accurately selecting candidates, determining the timing of surgery, improving the conversion rate, and guaranteeing the safety and long-term efficacy of treatment.

Bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-life setting - toxicity profile, survival outcomes, and impact of tumor sidedness

INTRODUCTION

Targeting angiogenesis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using bevacizumab is a standard of care. The addition of this targeted biological agent to first-line infusional fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was associated with superior overall survival (OS) in several randomized and controlled studies for CRC patients in the metastatic setting. However, access to this therapy in countries with limited resources is challenging. In Morocco, bevacizumab was introduced for this indication after considerable efforts of the Ministry of Health and Lalla Salma Foundation to support cancer patients with a limited income. In this report, the real-world efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in mCRC are reported based on a retrospective cohort in Eastern Morocco.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The archives of the medical records of 98 mCRC patients treated with first-line bevacizumab at the Hassan II Regional Cancer Center (Oujda, Morocco) were sampled from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2019 and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and a multivariable Cox regression model for a time-to-event study.

RESULTS

The toxicity profile was dominated by grade I-II proteinuria (10%), bleeding events (10%), thromboembolic events (9%), grade I-III hypertension (3%), and other rare events such as delayed healing of the stoma, scar dehiscence, intestinal perforation, and heart failure deterioration. In terms of survival, median OS and progression-free survival in the whole cohort were 22 and 13 months respectively. Patients who benefited from a metastasectomy after bevacizumab treatment had 31 months of median OS as compared to 14 months in the matched cohort with non-resectable liver metastasis. Notably, we demonstrated that tumor sidedness is a predictive factor of OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.452; 95% CI: 1.434-4.191, p = 0.001]. Moreover, the median OS for patients who received between 10 and 20 or more than 20 bevacizumab administrations was 24 and 33 months respectively as compared to those who received less than 10 cures (17 months) (log rank p < 0.0001). These markedly improved outcomes were also confirmed in multivariate Cox regression. A highly significant association of bevacizumab use and OS was found after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.518, 95% CI: 0.374-0.717; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study confirmed the important place of this therapeutic strategy in mCRC. Additional studies with prospective enrollment are awaited to validate these findings.

Effect of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy on Pathologic Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer is a potentially curable disease. Pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). We conducted the first meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the overall effect of bevacizumab on pR in preoperative systemic therapy for CLM.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and LILACS for studies published between January 2004 and August 2019 that compared the pR of CT plus bevacizumab to CT alone as preoperative therapy for CLM. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were pathologic major (pMaR) and minor (pMiR) response. Overall effects were expressed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 1,452 studies yielded by the search, 9 were eligible, totaling 1,202 patients (516 CT plus bevacizumab and 686 CT alone). The addition of bevacizumab to CT increased the pCR rate without reaching statistical significance (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.92, P = .32). However, pMaR was significantly higher (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.25, P < .001), and pMiR was significantly lower (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54, P < .001), in the bevacizumab group. The analyses showed a low level of heterogeneity (I² = 0% to 6%). Publication bias was not found.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that bevacizumab plus preoperative CT is associated with higher rates of pR in CLM. Antiangiogenics might improve the OS of CLM patients and should be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.

MICROABSTRACT

The benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is uncertain, but pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy is a strong prognostic factor. Our meta-analysis of observational studies compared the pR of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone as preoperative systemic therapy in the management of CLM. The addition of bevacizumab was associated with significantly higher rates of pR.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) for patients with biliary tract cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET) in the diagnosis and staging of patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) remains controversial, so we aimed to provide robust information on the utility of ¹⁸FDG-PET in the diagnosis and management of BTC.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the diagnostic test accuracy of ¹⁸FDG-PET as a diagnostic tool for diagnosis of primary tumour, lymph node invasion, distant metastases and relapsed disease. Subgroup analysis by study quality and BTC subtype were performed. Changes in management based on ¹⁸FDG-PET and impact of maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) on prognosis were also assessed. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2,125 patients were included from 47 eligible studies. The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of ¹⁸FDG-PET for the diagnosis of primary tumour were 91.7% (95% CI 89.8-93.2) and 51.3% (95% CI 46.4-56.2), respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8668. For lymph node invasion, Se was 88.4% (95% CI82.6-92.8) and Sp was 69.1% (95% CI 63.8-74.1); AUC 0.8519. For distant metastases, Se was 85.4% (95% CI 79.5-90.2) and Sp was 89.7% (95% CI86.0-92.7); AUC 0.9253. For relapse, Se was 90.1% (95% CI 84.4-94.3) and Sp was 83.5% (95% CI 74.4-90.4); AUC 0.9592. No diagnostic threshold effect was identified. Meta-regression did not identify significant sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis revealed no change in results when analyses were limited to studies with low risk of bias/concern. The pooled proportion of change in management was 15% (95% CI 11-20); the majority (78%) due to disease upstaging. Baseline high SUVmax was associated with worse survival (pooled hazard ratio of 1.79; 95% CI 1.37-2.33; p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to support the incorporation of ¹⁸FDG-PET into the current standard of care for the staging (lymph node and distant metastases) and identification of relapse in patients with BTC to guide treatment selection; especially if the identification of occult sites of disease would change management, or if diagnosis of relapse remains unclear following standard of care imaging. The role for diagnosis of the primary tumour remains controversial due to low sensitivity and ¹⁸FDG-PET should not be considered as a replacement for pathological confirmation in this setting.

LAY SUMMARY

A positron emission tomography (PET scan), using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG), can help doctors identify areas of cancer in the body by highlighting "hot spots". These hotspots may be cancerous (true positive) but may also be non-cancerous, like inflammation (false positive). We show that PET scans are useful to assess how far advanced the cancer is (by assessing spread to lymph glands and to other organs) and also to identify if the cancer has recurred (for example after surgery), thus helping doctors to make treatment decisions. However, a biopsy is still needed for the initial diagnosis of a biliary tract cancer, because of the high chance of a "false positive" with PET scans.

Bevacizumab Allows Preservation of Liver Function and its Regenerative Capacity after Major Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Parallel to the safety of liver resections, new chemotherapy drugs have emerged for the control of liver metastases. However, there is unclear evidence about the combination of intensive BVZ-therapy and extended resections. The main aim was to analyse the impact of Bevacizumab (BVZ) in terms of liver safety and tolerability in two experimental models: a basal-toxicity situation and after major hepatectomy.

METHODS

Eighty male-Wistar rats were grouped as toxicity analysis (sham-operated rats-OS-) and regeneration after- surgery analysis (hepatectomy rats-H-). Eight further subgroups were created according to sacrifice (6- hours-6h- or 24-hours-24h-) and dose (μg) of BVZ (none, 100, 200, 400). Several measurements were performed, including biochemical serum samples, histopathological analysis, cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β), oxidative-stress (GSH/GSSG, ATP), lipid-peroxidation (TBARS) and epidermal and vascular endothelium growth-factors (EGF and VEGF).

RESULTS

In the toxicity analysis, safe results with BVZ were observed, with no significant differences among the groups. A trend towards a lower oxidative status was observed in the OS 6 h-100, -200 and -400 versus the OS 6 h-none group. Similar results were observed in the hepatectomy model, with stable oxidative-stress-index and IL-6, TNF- α, and TGF- β levels. Despite higher lipid peroxidation status, overall regeneration was preserved. As expected, VEGF was almost undetectable in BVZ-treated groups after resection, but not in the non-resection group.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that liver status was not impaired by BVZ even at the high-dose. Similarly, liver regeneration after extended hepatectomy in BVZ-treated animals was well-preserved. Extended liver resections may be encouraged in BVZ-treated patients due to its excellent tolerability and good liver regeneration status.

Unravelling the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for targeted therapies in gastro-intestinal cancers Part 1: GI carcinomas

Until the 1990s, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of medical therapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Better understanding of the molecular biology of cancer cell has led to the therapeutic revolution of targeted therapies, i.e. monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors directed against proteins that are specifically overexpressed or mutated in cancer cells. These agents being more specific to cancer cells were expected to be less toxic than cytotoxic agents. Targeted agents have provided clinical benefit in many GI cancer types. For example, antiangiogenics and anti-EGFR therapies have significantly improved survival of patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer and have deeply changed the therapeutic strategy in this disease. However, their effects have sometimes been disappointing, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms (e.g., RAS mutation for anti-EGFR therapies), or to an activity restricted to some tumour settings (e.g., lack of activity in other cancer types, or on the microscopic residual disease in adjuvant setting). Many studies are negative in overall population but positive in some specific patient subgroups (e.g., trastuzumab in HER2-positive gastric cancer), illustrating the importance of patient selection and early identification of predictive biomarkers of response to these therapies. We propose a comprehensive two-part review providing a panoramic approach of the successes and failures of targeted agents in GI cancers to unravel the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for these agents in GI oncology. In this first part, we will focus on adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas, for which targeted therapies are mostly used in combination with chemotherapy.

Liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer: the surgical oncologist perspective

Neoadjuvant/conversion chemotherapy has emerged as an indispensable tool to achieve resectability of initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer and improves oncological outcomes. In parallel, surgical strategy has adopted a more aggressive treatment approach to achieve complete tumor clearance. However, chemotherapy affects liver function and combined with extensive liver resection, morbidity has increased, thereby compromising oncological outcome. There is an imperative need for careful patient selection to optimize patient management. In this review, we discuss available evidence and indications for neoadjuvant treatment in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases, on preoperative patient selection and identification of high-risk patients, potential treatment strategies to promote postoperative liver regeneration to avoid postoperative morbidity and potentially deleterious side effects of these therapies on tumor growth.

Chemotherapy plus targeted drugs in conversion therapy for potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficiency of the conversion therapy: chemotherapy plus anti-epidermal growth factor Receptor (EGFR) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) with different rat sarcoma (RAS) status in patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and the association between RAS mutation and clinical outcome in CRLM patients treated with anti-EGFR or anti-VEGFR MoAbs was investigated. Searches were performed for data recorded between January 2005 and August 2015 in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE. Objective response rates (ORR), conversion resection rates (CRR), R0 resection rates (R0R) and rate ratios (RR) were used to assess the strength of the association between different RAS status, MoAbs and conversion efficiency.

RESULTS

In the conversion therapy, ORR and RR were associated with patients with wild type RAS and different MoAbs. Patients treated with MoAbs: anti-VEGFR or anti-EGFR drugs, resulted in higher ORR, (RR=1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.84, P < 0.05). Furthermore, anti-EGFR regimens displayed higher ORR compared with anti-VEGFR regimens in CRLM patients, (RR=1.15, 95%CI: 1.04-1.26, P < 0.05). However, CRLM patients with mutant type RAS did not benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, (RR=0.91, 95%CI: 0.76-1.08, P<0.05) and wild type RAS patients displayed higher ORR with anti-EGFR therapy, (RR=1.56, 95%CI: 1.16-2.01, P <0.05). In addition, the patients achieved higher resection rates (RR=1.67, 95%CI: 1.00-2.81, P ≤ 0.05) and R0 resection (RR=1.85, 95%CI: 1.04-3.27, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We noted that the addition of MoAbs (anti-EGFR or anti-VEGFR) to standard chemotherapy could improve conversion efficiency for patients with potentially resectable CRLM patients, and anti-EGFR therapies maybe more effective than anti-VEGFR therapies. RAS status is a potential predictive marker of the clinical benefit resulting from treatment with anti-EGFR MoAbs therapy in CRLM patients and anti-EGFR MoAbs therapy could displayed greater efficiency only in patients with wild type RAS.

Survival after Gastrectomy in Node-Negative Gastric Cancer: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors

Background

Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival of patients with gastric cancer (GC) after surgical resection. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients have node-negative disease. We performed the present systematic review to evaluate survival and identify prognostic factors in node-negative GC patients undergoing curative intent resection.

Material/Methods

Relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2015 were identified by searching the PubMed database and reviewed systematically. Summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random-effects models.

Results

Thirty observational studies involving 12 504 patients were included in the review. Median 5-year overall survival was 84.3% (range, 53–96.3%). Pooled analysis showed that old age (RR, 1.26; 95%CI, 1.13–1.42), <D2 lymph node dissection (1.28; 1.05–1.55), larger tumor (1.18; 1.10–1.26), serosal invasion (2.03; 1.68–2.44), lymphatic invasion (1.25; 1.00–1.57), vascular invasion (1.67; 1.19–2.34), and lymphovascular invasion (1.93; 1.20–3.10) were significant association with decreased survival.

Conclusions

Surgical resection offers good overall survival for patients with node-negative GC. Tumor-related factors seem to have most prognostic significance.

Potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer: an individualized approach to conversion therapy

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. In recent years, the survival of patients with metastatic disease has improved due to the developments in both medical and surgical care. Patients with technically unresectable metastatic disease could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach for their possible shift toward a technically resectable condition; the choice of the most effective systemic treatment is then crucial to allow conversion to resectability. Systemic conversion therapy may include chemotherapy agents' combinations (fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin), with or without targeted agents (cetuximab, panitumumab, bevacizumab). The choice of the best treatment option has to be evaluated by taking into account each patient's baseline characteristics, biological and pathological information and surgical strategy. In particular, the role of some biologic characteristics of the disease, namely the mutational status of EGFR-pathway oncogenes, is emerging as an important predictive factor of response to anti-EGFR targeted agents. Patients presenting with colorectal cancer metastases should be evaluated for multimodal management with curative intent as the appropriate chemotherapy regimen may induce tumor shrinkage, conversion to resectability and improved survival.