Liver regeneration after liver resection: Clinical aspects and correlation with infective complications

Cell Sources and Influencing Factors of Liver Regeneration: A Review

Liver regeneration (LR) is a set of complicated mechanisms between cells and molecules in which the processes of initiation, maintenance, and termination of liver repair are regulated. Although LR has been studied extensively, there are still numerous challenges in gaining its full understanding. Cells for LR have a wide range of sources and the feature of plasticity, and regeneration patterns are not the same under different conditions. Many patients undergoing partial hepatectomy develop cirrhosis or steatosis. The changes of LR in these cases are not clear. Many types of cells participate in LR. Hepatocytes, biliary epithelial cells, hepatic progenitor cells, and human liver stem cells can serve as the cell sources for LR. However, different types and degrees of damage trigger the response from the most suitable cells. Exploring the cell sources of LR is of great significance for accelerating recovery of liver function under different pathological patterns and developing a cell therapy strategy to cope with the shortage of donors for liver transplantation. In clinical practice, the background of the liver influences regeneration. Fibrosis and steatosis create different LR microenvironments and signal molecule interaction patterns. In addition, factors such as partial hepatectomy, aging, platelets, nerves, hormones, bile acids, and gut microbiota are widely involved in this process. Understanding the influencing factors of LR has practical value for individualized treatment of patients with liver diseases. In this review, we have summarized recent studies and proposed our views. We discuss cell sources and the influential factors on LR to help in solving clinical problems.

Resina Draconis Reduces Acute Liver Injury and Promotes Liver Regeneration after 2/3 Partial Hepatectomy in Mice

Aim

To investigate the protective effects and possible mechanisms of action of resina draconis (RD) on acute liver injury and liver regeneration after 2/3 partial hepatectomy (PH) in mice.

Methods

2/3 PH was used to induce acute liver injury. Mice were divided into three groups: sham, vehicle + 2/3 PH, and RD + 2/3 PH. Resina draconis was administered intragastrically after 2/3 PH into the RD + 2/3 PH group, and the same volume of vehicle (1% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose) was injected into the vehicle + 2/3 PH group and sham group mice. The index of liver to body weight (ILBW) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were assayed to evaluate liver regeneration. Blood and liver tissues were collected for serological and western blotting analysis.

Results

Resina draconis protected against 2/3 PH-induced acute severe liver injury and promoted liver regeneration as shown by significantly increased ILBW compared with that of controls. 2/3 PH increased serum AST and ALT levels, which were significantly decreased by RD treatment, while 2/3 PH decreased serum TP and ALB, which were increased by RD treatment. In the RD + 2/3 PH group, PCNA expression was significantly increased compared with the 2/3 PH group. Further, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), TNFα, and EGFR levels were increased in the RD group at postoperative days 2 and 4 compared with the those in the 2/3 PH group.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that RD ameliorates acute hepatic injury and promotes liver cell proliferation, liver weight restoration, and liver function after 2/3 PH, probably via HGF, TNFα, and EGFR signaling.

Preoperative Alanine Aminotransferase and Remnant Liver Volume Predict Liver Regeneration After Live Donor Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Regeneration of the remnant liver in early postoperative period determines the outcome in live liver donors (LLDs). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the factors that influence liver regeneration following live donor hepatectomy.

METHODS

Total liver volume (TLV), estimated graft volume (EGV), and remnant liver volume (RLV) were calculated preoperatively in a prospective study of 154 LLDs. Absolute and percentage growth of remnant liver (regeneration index) in donor was estimated at 7th postoperative day (POD) by computed tomography (CT) volumetric analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen donors underwent right hepatectomy (RH), 29 underwent left hepatectomy (LH), 6 donors had left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), and one had right posterior sectionectomy. The median percentage growth of remnant liver at the end of the first week was 46.14% (51.74%, 35.32%, and 17.38% for RH, LH, and LLS, respectively). On univariate analysis, female donors (p = 0.051), RH graft (p = 0.001), no steatosis on ultrasonography (p = 0.042), lower TLV (p = 0.029), RLV (p = < 0.001), RLV-to-body weight ratio (RLVBWR) (p = < 0.001), preoperative alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (p = 0.017), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p = 0.035) and higher POD 7 alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (p = 0.033), and POD 7 gamma-glutamyl transferase GGT (p = 0.006) were found to be predictors of greater liver regeneration. Among them, lower RLV (P = 0.008), RLVBWR (p = 0.011), and preoperative ALT level (p = 0.021) were most significant factors predictive of liver regeneration on logistic regression analysis with backward elimination.

CONCLUSION

The liver regenerates rapidly in LLDs following hepatectomy. Low RLV, RLVBWR, and preoperative ALT levels were predictors of liver regeneration in the first week following donor hepatectomy.

Spleen stiffness and volume help to predict posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the main cause of perioperative death, and liver cirrhosis is one of the most important risk factors for PHLF. Spleen stiffness (SS) is a novel ultrasonic indicator for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, however, it is not clear that whether it has a significant influence on PHLF. Future remnant liver volume (FRLV) is a significant factor for liver regeneration after hepatectomy, spleen volume (SV) could also predict the degree of liver cirrhosis, and recent literatures reported that SV to FRLV ratio (SV/FRLV) could predict small for size syndrome (SFSS) in liver transplantation, however, the relationship between SV/FRLV and PHLF in patients receiving hepatectomy is not known. Systemic inflammatory response (SIR) plays a significant role in the pathogenesis and progression of liver cirrhosis, however, it is not very clear about the exact relationship between SIR and PHLF.We prospectively collected the medical data of consecutive patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatectomy from August 2015 to February 2016. Preoperative measurements of SS, liver stiffness (LS), SV, FRLV, and SIR were performed on all patients. A univariate analysis was performed to find the risk factors of PHLF and a multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors. The predictive efficiency of the risk factors was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Twenty three (23) (14.6%) patients developed PHLF. Univariate analysis found several variables significantly related to PHLF, they were as follows: tumor diameter (P = .01), cirrhosis (P = .001), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = .018), LS (P = .001), SS (P = .001), SV/FRLV (P < .001), operation duration (P = .003), transfusion (P = .009), hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) (P = .001). Finally, SV/FRLV (P < .001, hazard ratio (HR) = 26.356, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.627-425.21), SS (P = .009, HR = 1.077, 95%CI 1.017-1.141), and HIO time (P = .002, HR = 1.043, 95%CI 1.014-1.072) were determined as the independent risk factors of PHLF by multivariate analysis.SS and SV/FRLV help to predict the development of PHLF in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Treatment of the iatrogenic lesion of the biliary tree secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center experience

Surgical bile duct injury (SBDI), during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, is a worldwide ongoing problem. The purpose of this study is to analyze a single center retrospective experience with this topic. From 1999 to 2012, 30 patients with diagnosis of SBDI after laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in other institute for gallbladder lithiasis and then transferred to our facility were enrolled in this analysis. We considered in the study the following parameters: classification and site of the bile duct injury, infective complications and therapeutic management according to early or late referral. Twenty four patients (80 %) had a SBDI type E1; a concomitant vascular injury was described in 3/30 (10 %) in right hepatic artery. 11 patients had HJJ as primary surgical treatment in our hospital. Surgical site infection was documented in 9/30 (30 %). The most common micro-organisms documented in SSI were E. coli with an incidence of 55.5 % of SSI. Worse infective complications were detected in the late referral group. Complex SBDI occurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be early referred to advanced hepatobiliary program, for appropriate multidisciplinary management.