Postoperative biliary adverse events following orthotopic liver transplantation: Assessment with magnetic resonance cholangiography

Immediate and Late Complications After Liver Transplantation

Other than rejection, hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis are the most common complications in the immediate postoperative period with hepatic arterial thrombosis more common and more devastating. Hepatic artery stenosis is more common 1 month after transplantation, whereas portal and hepatic vein stenosis is more often seen as a late complication. Ultrasound is the first-line imaging examination to diagnose vascular complications with contrast-enhanced CT useful if ultrasound findings are equivocal. MR cholangiography is often most helpful in diagnosing bile leaks, biliary strictures, and biliary stones.

Radiologic findings of biliary complications post liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a potentially curative treatment for patients with acute liver failure, end-stage liver disease, and primary hepatic malignancy. Despite tremendous advancements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive management, there remains a high rate of post-transplant complications, with one of the main complications being biliary complications. In addition to anastomotic leak and stricture, numerous additional biliary complications are encountered, including ischemic cholangiopathy due to the sole arterial supply of the bile ducts, recurrence of primary biliary disease, infections, biliary obstruction from stones, cast, or hemobilia, and less commonly cystic duct remnant mucocele, vanishing duct syndrome, duct discrepancy and kinking, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, retained stent, and ampullary dysfunction. This article presents an overview of biliary anatomy and surgical techniques in liver transplantation, followed by a detailed review of post-transplant biliary complications with their corresponding imaging findings on multiple modalities with emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography.

Anastomotic biliary stricture following liver transplantation and management analysis: 15 years of experience at a high-volume transplant center

INTRODUCTION

The occurrence of anastomotic biliary stricture (BS) remains an essential issue following liver transplantation (LT). The present study aimed to compare our findings regarding the incidence of anastomotic BS to what is known.

METHODS

The present study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of a total number of 717 consecutive patients (426 men and 291 women) who had undergone LT from January 2001 to March 2016. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors associated with anastomotic BS development.

RESULTS

Post-transplant anastomotic BS developed in 70 patients (9.8%). In the Cox multivariate analysis (a stepwise forward conditional method), factors including biliary leak (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.08-17.58, p < 0.001), hepatic artery thrombosis (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.03-5.88; p = 0.003), and acute rejection (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.16-3.37; p = 0.006) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of anastomotic BS. Surgery in 6 cases (66.7%), followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ECRP) with a metal stent in 18 cases (62.1%), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in 9 (20.9%), and ERCP with a single plastic stent in 8 (18.2%), had the highest effectiveness rates in the management of BS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors including biliary leak, hepatic artery thrombosis, and acute rejection were independently associated with an anastomotic BS. ERCP with a metal stent may be considered as an effective treatment procedure with a relatively low complication rate in the management of benign post-LT anastomotic BS.

Post-transplant biliary complications: advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative therapy in patients with end-stage liver disease. Long-term survival is excellent, yet LT recipients are at risk of significant complications. Biliary complications are an important source of morbidity after LT, with an estimated incidence of 5%-32%. Post-LT biliary complications include strictures (anastomotic and non-anastomotic), bile leaks, stones, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Prompt recognition and management is critical as these complications are associated with mortality rates up to 20% and retransplantation rates up to 13%. This review aims to summarise our current understanding of risk factors, natural history, diagnostic testing, and treatment options for post-transplant biliary complications.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up in liver transplantation

The field of liver transplantation directly or indirectly embodies all liver diseases, in addition to specific ones related to organ rejection (cellular and humoral). The recommended non-invasive methods for determining the indication for liver transplantation are the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and the alpha-foetoprotein score in case of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiological methods are the cornerstones for the diagnosis of vascular and biliary complications after liver transplantation. The possible diseases of the liver graft after transplantation are multiple and often intertwined. Non-invasive diagnostic methods have been poorly evaluated in this context, apart from the recurrence of hepatitis C. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for evaluating graft lesions in the majority of cases, especially graft rejection.

Early Allograft Dysfunction and Complications in DCD Liver Transplantation: Expert Consensus Statements From the International Liver Transplantation Society

Livers for transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors are relatively more prone to early and ongoing alterations in graft function that might ultimately lead to graft loss and even patient death. In consideration of this fact, this working group of the International Liver Transplantation Society has performed a critical evaluation of the medical literature to create a set of statements regarding the assessment of early allograft function/dysfunction and complications arising in the setting of donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

Imaging findings of en bloc simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations (SLKTs) are increasing in incidence, and the en bloc surgical approach is associated with a unique spectrum of vascular complications. En bloc SLKTs have a common arterial supply from the celiac axis and post-operative assessment with Doppler ultrasound can help to localize vascular lesions as either proximal in the shared arterial supply or distal in the organ-specific arteries. Venous complications predominantly include thrombosis or stenosis of the portal vein, hepatic veins, renal vein, or IVC, but have a much lower incidence. Radiologists familiar with the post-operative anatomy and complications can provide meaningful and accurate assessment to help direct clinical care. The purpose of this article is to provide a targeted review of SLKT, review the post-surgical anatomy associated with en bloc SLKT, and review the imaging evaluation of vascular complications associated with SLKT.

Pediatric biliary disorders: Multimodality imaging evaluation with clinicopathologic correlation

The spectrum of pathologies affecting the biliary tree in the pediatric population varies depending on the age of presentation. While in utero insults can result in an array of anatomic variants and congenital anomalies in newborns, diverse acquired biliary pathologies are observed in older children. These acquired pathologies display different presentations and consequences than adults. Multimodality imaging assessment of the pediatric biliary system is requisite to establishing an appropriate management plan. Awareness of the imaging features of the various biliary pathologies and conveying clinically actionable information is essential to facilitate appropriate patient management. In this paper, we will illustrate the anatomy and embryology of the pediatric biliary system. Then, we will provide an overview of the imaging modalities used to assess the biliary system. Finally, we will review the unique features of the pediatric biliary pathologies, complemented by histopathologic correlation and discussions of clinical management.

Complications of liver transplant

Liver transplantation has become a definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and those meeting Milan criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The morbidity and mortality associated with liver transplantation continues to decrease thanks to refinements in surgical technique, immunosuppression, and imaging. In particular, imaging plays a vital role by facilitating early detection of post-operative complications and enabling prompt treatment. Post-operative complications that lead to graft failure and patient morbidity/mortality can be generally categorized as vascular, biliary, parenchymal, and malignant. Vascular complications include stenosis and thrombosis of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and inferior vena cava; hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm; arteriovenous fistula; and celiac stenosis. Biliary abnormalities include strictures, bile leak, obstruction, recurrent disease, and infection. While imaging is not primarily utilized to diagnose allograft rejection, it plays an important role in excluding mechanical causes of graft dysfunction that can mimic rejection. Ultrasound is routinely performed as the first-line imaging evaluation for the detection and follow-up of early and delayed complications. Cholangiography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are useful in detecting and characterizing biliary complications. Computed tomography is often used to further evaluate abnormal findings on ultrasound or for the characterization of post-operative fluid collections. The aim of this review is to discuss and illustrate the imaging findings of complications associated with liver transplantation and their role in facilitating treatment.

The real incidence of biliary tract complications after adult liver transplantation: the role of the prospective routine use of cholangiography during post-transplant follow-up

Biliary tract complications (BTCs) still burden liver transplantation (LT). The wide reporting variability highlights the absence of systematic screening. From 2000 to 2009, simultaneous liver biopsy and direct biliary visualization were prospectively performed in 242 recipients at 3 and 6 months (n = 212, 87.6%) or earlier when indicated (n = 30, 12.4%). Median follow-up was 148 (107-182) months. Seven patients (2.9%) experienced postprocedural morbidity. BTCs were initially diagnosed in 76 (31.4%) patients; 32 (42.1%) had neither clinical nor biological abnormalities. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) was present in 27 (11.2%) patients and in 6 (22.2%) BTC patients. Nine (3.7%) patients with normal initial cholangiography developed BTCs after 60 (30-135) months post-LT. BTCs directly lead to 7 (2.9%) re-transplantations and 14 (5.8%) deaths resulting in 18 (7.4%) allograft losses. Bile duct proliferation at 12-month biopsy proved an independent risk factor for graft loss (P = 0.005). Systematic biliary tract and allograft evaluation allows the incidence and extent of biliary lesions to be documented more precisely and to avoid erroneous treatment of ACR. The combination 'abnormal biliary tract-canalicular proliferation' is an indicator of worse graft outcome. BTCs are responsible for important delayed allograft and patient losses. These results underline the importance of life-long follow-up and appropriate timing for re-transplantation.

Can ultrasonography differentiate anastomotic and non-anastomotic biliary strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation- a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of ultrasonography (US) in differentiating anastomotic biliary strictures (AS) and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHOD

This retrospective study included 1259 OLT recipients between 2005-2018. Seventy-six with anastomotic strictures (AS) and 103 with non-anastomotic strictures (NAS) were analyzed. The reference standard was cholangiography. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of US was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between AS and NAS groups (p < 0.001) for skipped and irregular dilatation of intrahepatic bile duct and visualization of hilar biliary lumen. The better US imaging feature for NAS was poorly visualized and non- visible hilar bile duct luminal contour. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 94.2 %, 84.2 % and 88.9 % respectively. Combined two predictors greatly increased the specificity to 93.4 % while diminished its sensitivity and accuracy.

CONCLUSION

US is useful and efficient to differentiate AS and NAS after OLT.

Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MR Cholangiography for Evaluation of Biliary-Enteric Anastomoses: Added Value Beyond Conventional T2-Weighted Images

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate image quality and reader confidence in MR cholangiography of bile ducts using conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography alone in comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR cholangiography in a series of patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty patients with BEA and clinically and sonographically suspected complications underwent 1.5-T MRI. After acquisition of T1- and T2-weighted images, conventional MR cholangiography was performed using 3D fast relaxation fast spin-echo (FRFSE) and single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted sequences (image set 1). In each patient, a 3D fat-suppressed Liver Acquisition with Volume Acceleration (LAVA) sequence was performed before and 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 minutes after IV administration of 0.1 mL/kg of gadoxetate disodium (Primovist) (image set 2). Two radiologists in consensus evaluated image quality in the anatomic segments of the biliary tract and recorded diagnostic confidence scores for image set 1 alone and image sets 1 and 2 together. MRI findings were compared with postsurgical specimen if surgery was performed, conventional cholangiography, or 12 months of imaging follow-up. RESULTS. A significant improvement in image quality for visualization of all biliary segments was found using gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR cholangiography in comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography alone. Readers judged diagnostic confidence of image set 1 alone and image sets 1 and 2 together as very confident in three and 37 cases, confident in 30 and 11, not confident in 14 and one, and not confident at all in three and 1, respectively. Concordance between image set 1 alone and image sets 1 and 2 together and the reference standard results was present in 23 of 50 cases (46%) and 47 of 50 cases (94%), respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR cholangiography can improve image quality for visualization of the biliary tract and further enhanced the diagnostic performance of conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography in the evaluation of patients with BEA.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation: Assessment with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3T device

PURPOSE

Our study was aimed to assess the diagnostic value of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and MR imaging at 3 T device when evaluating biliary adverse events after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 384 MR examinations in 232 liver transplant subjects with suspected biliary complications (impaired liver function tests and/or biliary abnormalities on ultrasound) were performed at 3 T device (GE-DISCOVERY MR750; GE Healthcare). After the acquisition of axial 3D dual-echo T1-weighted images and T2-weighted sequences (propeller and SS-FSE), MRCP was performed through coronal thin-slab 3D-FRFSE and coronal oblique thick-slab SSFSE T2w sequences. DW-MRI of the liver was performed using an axial spin-echo echo-planar sequence with multiple b values (150, 500, 1000, 1500 s/mm²) in all diffusion directions. Contrast-enhanced MRCP was performed in 25/232 patients. All MR images were blindly evaluated by two experienced abdominal radiologists in consensus to determine the presence of biliary complications, whose final diagnosis was based on direct cholangiography, surgery and integrating clinical follow-up with ultrasound and/or MRI findings.

RESULTS

In 113 patients no biliary abnormality was observed. The remaining 119 subjects were affected by one or more of the following complications: non-anastomotic strictures including typical ischemic-type biliary lesions (n = 67), anastomotic strictures (n = 34), ampullary dysfunction (n = 4), anastomotic leakage (n = 4), stones, sludge and casts (n = 65), vanishing bile duct (n = 1). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of the reviewers for the detection of all types of biliary complications were 99%, 96%, 95%, 99% and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3 T device are extremely reliable for detecting biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Imaging of liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage chronic liver disease, fulminant liver failure and early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. As discussed in this review, state-of-the-art imaging modalities including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play a pivotal role in the selection of patients and donors, as well as in early detection of those complications at risk of impairing graft function and/or survival. We also illustrate main imaging findings related to the wide spectrum of clinical problems raised by LT.

Prognostic impact of postoperative low platelet count after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The positive impact of platelets has been recently implicated in liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for graft loss and mortality after LT, focusing on perioperative platelet counts.

METHODS

We reviewed all deceased donor LT from 2000 to 2012 and enrolled 975 consecutive recipients. The risk factors for graft loss and mortality were analyzed by multivariate analysis, using Cox's regression model.

RESULTS

Using cutoff values acquired by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, multivariate analyses determined that viral hepatitis C (hazard ratio [HR]=1.32), donor age >40 (HR=1.33), higher peak serum alanine aminotransferase (HR=1.01), reoperation within 30 days (HR=1.51), and platelet count <72 500/μL on postoperative day (POD) 5 (HR=1.30) were independent risk factors for graft loss. Viral hepatitis C (HR=1.33), reoperation within 30 days (HR=1.35), and platelet count <72 500/μL on POD 5 (HR=1.38) were independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

A low platelet count on POD 5 was associated with graft loss and mortality after LT. Platelet count <72 500/μL on POD 5 can be a predictor of poor graft and overall survival. Maintaining higher postoperative platelet counts could potentially improve graft and overall survival rates.

Imaging follow-up after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) represents the best treatment for end-stage chronic liver disease, acute liver failure and early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiologists should be aware of surgical techniques to distinguish a normal appearance from pathological findings. Imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, CT and MR, provide for rapid and reliable detection of vascular and biliary complications after LT. The role of imaging in the evaluation of rejection and primary graft dysfunction is less defined. This article illustrates the main surgical anastomoses during LT, the normal appearance and complications of the liver parenchyma and vascular and biliary structures.

Role of endoscopy in the conservative management of biliary complications after deceased donor liver transplantation

The clinical outcome of patients receiving liver transplantation could be significantly affected by biliary complications, including strictures, leaks, stones and bilomas; early diagnosis and treatment of these conditions lead to markedly reduction in morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic gold standard is represented by conservative approaches, both endoscopic and percutaneous, based on the type of biliary reconstruction, the local availability of the procedures and specific expertise. In patients with previous transplantation, the difficult biliary access and the possible presence of concomitant complications (mainly strictures) further restrict the efficacy of the endoscopic and percutaneous treatments; on the other hand, surgery should generally be avoided because of the even increased morbidity and mortality due to technical and clinical issues. Here we review the most common biliary complications occurring after liver transplantation and discuss available treatment options including future perspectives such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access in patients with Roux-en-Y choledocho-jejunostomy or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult stones.

Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Assessment of Nonanastomotic Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation

Nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) remain a frequent complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) could be used to detect NAS and to grade the severity of biliary strictures.

ESGAR consensus statement on liver MR imaging and clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents

Objectives

To develop a consensus and provide updated recommendations on liver MR imaging and the clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents.

Methods

The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) formed a multinational European panel of experts, selected on the basis of a literature review and their leadership in the field of liver MR imaging. A modified Delphi process was adopted to draft a list of statements. Descriptive and Cronbach’s statistics were used to rate levels of agreement and internal reliability of the consensus.

Results

Three Delphi rounds were conducted and 76 statements composed on MR technique (n = 17), clinical application of liver-specific contrast agents in benign, focal liver lesions (n = 7), malignant liver lesions in non-cirrhotic (n = 9) and in cirrhotic patients (n = 18), diffuse and vascular liver diseases (n = 12), and bile ducts (n = 13). The overall mean score of agreement was 4.84 (SD ±0.17). Full consensus was reached in 22 % of all statements in all working groups, with no full consensus reached on diffuse and vascular diseases.

Conclusions

The consensus provided updated recommendations on the methodology, and clinical indications, of MRI with liver specific contrast agents in the study of liver diseases.

Key points

• Liver-specific contrast agents are recommended in MRI of the liver.

• The hepatobiliary phase improves the detection and characterization of hepatocellular lesions.

• Liver-specific contrast agents can improve the detection of HCC.