Can composite performance measures predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer?

Adherence to quality indicators and hospital outcomes for patients with decompensated cirrhosis: An observational study

BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QIs) exist for the care of patients with cirrhosis. We retrospectively examined the records of patients admitted to a large academic tertiary care centre for adherence to QIs and examined for an association between QI adherence and hospital outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis admitted to a large academic tertiary care centre over a 2-year period (2014–2016). Medical records of 522 patients were examined for 17 QIs related to inpatient cirrhosis care and adherence-judged using three different standards: 100% adherence, 70% adherence, or the QI score as a continuous variable. Linear and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between QI score and length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and inpatient mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Adherence to QIs was variable (range 20%–95%). Overall, adherence to QIs relating to variceal bleeding was higher than adherence to indicators related to hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. There was weak evidence for a decreased odds of 30-day readmission when more QIs were met, regardless of the method used to quantify adherence (100% standard OR 0.53 [95% CI 0.26–1.09, p = .09], 70% standard OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.32–1.06, p = .08], continuous method OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.81–1.01, p = .07]). There was no observed relationship between mortality and QI adherence and equivocal evidence for an association between QI adherence and LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to QIs related to inpatient care of decompensated cirrhosis may be associated with decreased 30-day readmissions

Survival Predictability Between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study compared the prognostic significance of staging between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study population comprised patients with liver cancer registered in the Taiwan Cancer Database from 2007 to 2013 and was followed up until December 31, 2016. The study included patients with HCC, with known staging in both TNM and BCLC systems, and with follow-up >1 month. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were constructed to investigate the significance of staging by two systems. Goodness-of-fit of model was evaluated via Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the lower the better. Among 73,136 patients with newly diagnosed liver cancer, a total of 37,062 patients with HCC (25.6% underwent surgery) were eligible. The mean age and overall survival of this cohort were 63.9 years and 27.2%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages I, II, III, and IV (the TNM system) were 54.5%, 34.9%, 10.3%, and 6.4%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages A, B, C, and D (the BCLC classification) were 54.5%, 29.2%, 9.8%, and 4.0%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 59.4 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both systems predicted overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free rate well. Values of ΔAIC of the BCLC classification and the TNM system were lower for the surgery group and nonsurgery group, respectively. The TNM system (8th edition) predicted long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification in patients with HCC. But in patients treated initially with surgery, the BCLC classification outperformed the 8th edition of the TNM system. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates that the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) system (8th edition) and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification both predict long-term outcome significantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but that the TNM system (8th edition) predicts long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification. For patients treated initially with surgery, BCLC classification outperforms in 8th edition TNM system in predicting long-term outcome.