Signet-ring cell carcinoma arising from a fundic gland polyp in the stomach

Disappearing Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinoma in Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of diffuse-type gastric cancer is increasing steadily in the United States, Europe, and Asia. This subtype is known for aggressive clinical characteristics and transmural invasion. However, T1a diffuse-type cancers have been observed to have a better 5-year, disease-specific mortality than stage-matched intestinal tumors, supporting a clinical difference in these early-stage cancers.

METHODS

Data on all living patients with T1a gastric adenocarcinoma with a finding of signet ring cell morphology on pathology and ≥1 year of follow-up from 2013 to 2023 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) was collected from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with known CDH1 or CTNNA1 mutations were excluded.

RESULTS

In 7 of 30 patients, sporadic pathologically confirmed T1a signet ring cell (diffuse) cancer identified on initial biopsy was no longer detectable upon subsequent biopsy or resection with mean follow-up of 50 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases allude to the distinct pathways of carcinogenesis in T1a signet ring cell cancers. Potential factors that may underlie the spontaneous regression of these T1a cancers include complete removal at initial biopsy, immune clearance, and lack of survival advantage conferred by signet ring cell genetic alterations in these cases. Given their more indolent behavior at an earlier stage, we suggest that these lesions can be closely followed by endoscopy in select circumstances with thorough disease assessment and an experienced care team.

Proton pump inhibitors are not associated with fundic gland polyps - a systematic review that takes into consideration all known confounders

Sporadic fundic gland polyps (FGPs) progress, albeit rarely, to dysplasia and cancer. Two meta-analyses, including 8 and 11 studies, concluded that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were associated with FGPs. Intervention is considered unnecessary when FGPs have a background of PPIs use. Both meta-analyses, however, disregarded known confounders: age, sex, endoscopy indications, study design (prospective or retrospective), duration of PPI use, and H. pylori infection. Confounders are known to invalidate meta-analyses. We followed PRIXMA guidelines and searched the literature for studies on FGPs in PPI-users and PPI-nonusers. In the 22 studies searched, we compared FGPs in PPI-users (n = 6534) and PPI-nonusers (n = 41 115). Heterogeneity was significant (Cochran Q = 277.8, P < 0.0001; I2 = 92.8%), annulling meta-analysis performed by blanket tallying. To offset the above confounders, we matched PPI-users and PPI-nonusers by (a) age and sex (n = 4300 and 29 307, respectively) and (b) their propensity scores derived from the confounders (n = 2950 and 4729, respectively). After both matching, FGPs were not significantly different between PPI-users and PPI-nonusers [odds ratio (OR) = 1.1, P = 0.3078; OR = 0.9, P = 0.3258, respectively]. Furthermore, FGP frequency did not correlate with increasing duration of PPI use (Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients = 0.1162, 0.0386, P < 0.6064, 0.8646, respectively); it was not significantly different between any of the duration periods of observation, namely, <10, 10-20, 20-40, >40 months, nor was it significantly different between PPI-users and PPI-nonusers within each duration period (P > 0.05). We conclude that PPIs are not associated with FGPs, implying that a background history of PPI use is not a justification for nonintervention in the management of FGPs.

Sporadic fundic gland polyps with dysplasia or carcinoma: Clinical and endoscopic characteristics

Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) are the most common gastric polyps and have been regarded as benign lesions with little malignant potential, except in the setting of familial adenomatous polyposis. However, in recent years, the prevalence of FGPs has been increasing along with the widespread and frequent use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). To date, several cases of FGPs with dysplasia or carcinoma (FGPD/CAs) have been reported. In this review, we evaluated the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sporadic FGPD/CAs. Majority of the patients with sporadic FGPD/CAs were middle-aged women receiving PPI therapy and without Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Majority of the sporadic FGPD/ CAs occurred in the body of the stomach and were sessile and small with a mean size of 5.4 mm. The sporadic FGPs with carcinoma showed redness, irregular surface structure, depression, or erosion during white light observation and irregular microvessels on the lesion surface during magnifying narrow-band imaging. In addition, sporadic FGPs, even with dysplasia, are likely to progress to cancer slowly. Therefore, frequent endoscopy is not required for patients with sporadic FGPs. However, histopathological evaluation is necessary if endoscopic findings different from ordinary FGPs are observed, regardless of their size. In the future, the prevalence of FGPs is expected to further increase along with the widespread and frequent use of PPIs and decreasing infection rate of H. pylori. Currently, it is unclear whether FGPD/CAs will also increase in the same way as FGPs. However, the trends of these lesions warrant further attention in the future.

Fundic Gland Polyp With Parietal Cell Vacuolation Mimicking Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Pseudo-signet ring parietal cell vacuolation has been described as a mimic of invasive signet ring cell carcinoma. Moreover, signet ring cell carcinoma has been described in a fundic gland polyp. This case demonstrates parietal cell vacuolation in a fundic gland polyp in a patient on a long-term proton pump inhibitor.

Clinical features of fundic gland polyps and their correlation with colorectal tumors

Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) are multiple, sessile polypoid bumps formed by the gastric mucosa of the fundus and body, which are the most common type of gastric polyps and generally tend to be benign. Studies have shown that patients with FGPs have a higher risk of developing colorectal tumors (adenoma and cancer) than the general population, but their correlation is still controversial. This article is aimed to review the clinical features of FGPs and their correlation with colorectal tumors.

Small gastric hyperplastic polyp with acute bleeding as an unusual presentation of malignancy: A case report

RATIONALE

Gastric hyperplastic polyps are frequently found on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and usually asymptomatic.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

A 65-year-old man visited the emergency department due to melena. Emergency upper endoscopy revealed a semi-pedunculated polyp measuring 1.2 cm in diameter with blood oozing. We resected the polyp using snare polypectomy. Ulceration was noted on the polypectomy specimen and was thought to be a bleeding focus.

DIAGNOSES

Histopathologic findings revealed hyperplastic polyp with focal well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in the ulcerated area and involvement of the lateral resection margin by carcinoma.

INTERVENTION

We performed additional endoscopic resection using endoscopic submucosal dissection at the previous polypectomy site.

OUTCOME

At 1 year follow up, no recurrence or other distant metastasis was detected.

LESSONS

This is a rare case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a small gastric hyperplastic polyp, which was found to be adenocarcinoma. When bleeding small gastric polyps are encountered during endoscopy, the possibility of malignancy and wider resection should be considered.

Comparison of dysplastic fundic gland polyps in patients with and without familial adenomatous polyposis

AIMS

Dysplastic fundic gland polyps (d-FGPs) typically arise in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) but may occur in non-syndromic patients. They rarely become malignant, but their significance is unclear, especially in non-syndromic patients. We aimed to compare d-FGPs in patients with and without FAP, using clinicopathologic findings and β-catenin immunohistochemistry (IHC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 124 fundic gland polyps with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or indefinite for dysplasia (IFD) from 66 patients (27 with FAP; 39 non-syndromic). We recorded patient sex, age at first d-FGP, time until subsequent d-FGP (if any), history of non-gastric cancer (no patients had gastric cancer), proton-pump inhibitor use, and the presence of Helicobacter pylori. β-Catenin IHC was performed on cases with available blocks. The mean age at d-FGP diagnosis was 31 years for FAP patients and 61 years for non-syndromic patients (P < 0.0001). Sixteen FAP patients (59%) developed at least one subsequent d-FGP, as compared with 10 (27%) non-syndromic patients (P = 0.0099). The median time between d-FGP detection was 11.5 months in FAP patients and 7 months in non-syndromic patients (P = 0.82). Six FAP patients (22%) and 17 non-syndromic patients (44%) had non-gastric malignancies (P = 0.11). β-Catenin IHC showed nuclear positivity in 14 of 112 (13%) d-FGPs: 12 of 94 with LGD, two of three with HGD, and none of 15 with IFD polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

Familial adenomatous polyposis patients develop d-FGPs earlier and more often develop additional ones than non-syndromic patients. d-FGPs in FAP and non-syndromic patients have similar low rates of β-catenin nuclear IHC positivity. FAP and non-syndromic patients developed non-gastric cancers at similar rates, suggesting that d-FGPs may portend a general increased risk of carcinogenesis in non-syndromic patients.