Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms

Transrectal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Postendoscopic Submucosal Dissection Coagulation Syndrome in Patients With Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Postendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome (PECS) prevention is one of the common postoperative complications of colorectal ESD. Considering the increasing incidence of PECS, it is critical to investigate various prevention methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transrectal drainage tubes (TDTs) in PECS prevention in patients following colorectal ESD.

METHODS

From July 2022 to July 2023, a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 3 hospitals in China. Patients with superficial colorectal lesions ≥20 mm who had undergone ESD for a single lesion were enrolled. Initially, 229 patients were included in the study and 5 were excluded. Two hundred twenty-four were randomly assigned to the TDT and non-TDT group in the end. This open-label study utilized a parallel design with a 1:1 allocation ratio, and endoscopists and patients were not blind to the randomization, and a 24 Fr drainage tube was inserted approximately 10-15 cm above the anus after the ESD under the endoscopy and tightly attached to a drainage bag. The TDTs were removed in 1-3 days following the ESD.

RESULTS

A total of 229 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, and 5 patients were excluded. Ultimately, 224 patients were assigned to the TDT group (n = 112) and non-TDT group (n = 112). The median age for the patients was 63.45 years (IQR 57-71; 59 men [52.68%]) in the TDT group and 60.95 years (IQR 54-68; 60 men [53.57%]) in the non-TDT group. Intention-to-treat analysis showed patients in the TDT group had a lower incidence of PECS than patients in the non-TDT group (7 [6.25%] vs 20 [17.86%]; relative risk, 0.350; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.154-0.795; P = 0.008). In the subgroup analysis, TDTs were found to prevent PECS in patients of the female gender (odd ratio, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.021-0.449; P = 0.001), tumor size <4 cm (odd ratio, 0.203; 95% CI, 0.056-0.728; P = 0.011), tumor located in the left-sided colorectum (odd ratio, 0. 339 95% CI, 0.120-0.957; P = 0.035), and shorter procedure time (<45 minutes) (odd ratio, 0.316; 95% CI, 0.113-0.879; P = 0.023). The tube fell off in 1 case (0.89%) accidentally ahead of time. No TDT-related complication was observed.

DISCUSSION

The results from this randomized clinical study indicate that the application of TDTs effectively reduced the incidence of PECS in patients after colorectal ESD ( chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2200062164).

Characteristics and Risk Factors for Postoperative Bleeding Following Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Squamous Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Reports on postoperative bleeding after esophageal endoscopic resection are limited.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and risk factors for postoperative bleeding following endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasms.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or squamous intraepithelial neoplasm between January 2018 and December 2022. We investigated the incidence, timing, severity, and risk factors for postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 1288 patients, 1062 (82%) underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, and 226 (18%) underwent endoscopic mucosal resection. Postoperative bleeding occurred in seven (0.5%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-1.1%; median postoperative day 8 [range, 4-17 days]). In these seven patients, hemoglobin concentration decreased by a median of 3.0 g/dL (range, 1.6-6.8 g/dL). Antithrombotic agent use, resection wound circumference, and specimen size were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.024, respectively). Among 43 patients who received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), postoperative bleeding occurred in four (9%) patients (95% CI 2.6-22.1%). DOACs were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding even after propensity score matching (4/40 [10%] vs. 0/80 [0%], respectively; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall bleeding rate following esophageal endoscopic resection was 0.5%, with a delayed onset, leading to anemia. DOACs emerged as the most significant risk factor for postoperative bleeding.

Establishing a nomogram for predicting the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to establish a nomogram that can predict the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This model can be used to assess the probability of delayed bleeding before ESD surgery, thereby avoiding wasting medical resources and improving patient satisfaction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which all patients underwent ESD surgery for colorectal tumors between August 2021 and February 2024. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were collected. All patients were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of the training set revealed the independent risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD. These independent risk factors were used to construct a nomogram model. This model was validated using internal validation methods such as the C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 587 patients. The occurrence rate of delayed bleeding after ESD in the training set was 8.98%. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the location of the lesion in the rectum, a large lesion, and a prolonged surgery time were independent risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD. The C-index for this model was 0.89, and validation of this nomogram model demonstrated good consistency between the predicted and actual values.

CONCLUSION

Multivariate regression analysis revealed the independent risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD, and a nomogram with a relatively consistent accuracy was established. The clinical application of this model can reduce the incidence of delayed bleeding and therefore improve patient healing.

Predictors of En Bloc, R0 Resection, and Postprocedural Complications After Advanced Endoscopic Resections for Colorectal Neoplasms: Results of 1213 Procedures

BACKGROUND

Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are used to treat colorectal neoplasms that are not amenable to conventional colonoscopic resection. Literature regarding the predictors of the outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections, especially from a colorectal surgical unit, is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictors of short-term and long-term outcomes after advanced endoscopic resections.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTINGS

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent advanced endoscopic resections for colorectal neoplasms from November 2011 to August 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection, and combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Predictors of en bloc and R0 resection, bleeding, and perforation were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cox regression models were used to determine the predictors of tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 1213 colorectal lesions from 1047 patients were resected (median age 66 [interquartile range, 58-72] years, 484 women [46.2%], median BMI 28.6 [interquartile range, 24.8-32.6]). Most neoplasms were in the proximal colon (898; 74%). The median lesion size was 30 (interquartile range, 20-40; range, 0-120) mm. Nine hundred eleven lesions (75.1%) underwent previous interventions. The most common Paris and Kudo classifications were 0 to IIa flat elevation (444; 36.6%) and IIIs (301; 24.8%), respectively. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 56.6% and 54.3%, respectively. Smaller lesions, rectal location, and procedure type (endoscopic submucosal dissection) were associated with significantly higher en bloc and R0 resection rates. Bleeding and perforation rates were 5% and 6.6%, respectively. Increased age was a predictor for bleeding (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09; p < 0.0001). Lesion size was a predictor for perforation (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; p = 0.03). The tumor recurrence rate was 6.6%. En bloc (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05-1.93; p = 0.02) and R0 resection (HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.06; p = 0.008) were associated with decreased recurrence risk.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center, retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections can be predicted by patient-related and lesion-related characteristics. See Video Abstract .

PREDICTORES DE LA RESECCION R, EN BLOQUE Y LAS COMPLICACIONES POR RESECCIONES ENDOSCPICAS AVANZADAS EN CASOS DE NEOPLASIA COLORRECTAL RESULTADOS DE PROCEDIMIENTOS

ANTECEDENTES:Las técnicas avanzadas de resección endoscópica se utilizan para el tratamiento de neoplasias colorrectales que no son susceptibles de resección colonoscópica convencional. La literatura sobre los predictores de los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas, especialmente en una unidad de cirugía colorrectal, es limitada.OBJETIVO:Determinar los predictores de resultados a corto y largo plazo después de resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.LUGAR:Centro de tercer nivel de atención.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas por neoplasias colorrectales desde noviembre de 2011 hasta agosto de 2022.INTERVENCIÓNES:Resección endoscópica de la mucosa, disección endoscópica submucosa (ESD), ESD híbrida, cirugía laparoscópica endoscópica combinada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los predictores de resección en bloque y R0, sangrado y perforación se determinaron mediante modelos de regresión logística univariables y multivariables. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de Cox para determinar los predictores de recurrencia del tumor.RESULTADOS:Se resecaron 1.213 lesiones colorrectales en 1.047 pacientes [edad media 66 (58-72) años, 484 (46,2%) mujeres, índice de masa corporal medio 28,6 (24,8-32,6) kg/m 2 ]. La mayoría de las neoplasias se encontraban en el colon proximal (898, 74%). El tamaño medio de la lesión fue de 30mm (RIC: 20-40, rango: 0-120). 911 (75,1%) lesiones tenían intervenciones previas. Las clasificaciones de París y Kudo más comunes fueron 0-IIa elevación plana (444, 36,6%) y III (301, 24,8%), respectivamente. Las tasas de resección en bloque y R0 fueron del 56,6% y 54,3%, respectivamente. Las lesiones más pequeñas, la ubicación rectal y el tipo de procedimiento (ESD) se asociaron con tasas de resección en bloque y R0 significativamente más altas. Las tasas de sangrado y perforación fueron del 5% y 6,6%, respectivamente. La edad avanzada [1,06 (1,03-1,09), p < 0,0001] fue un predictor de sangrado. El tamaño de la lesión [1,02 (1,00-1,03), p = 0,03] fue un predictor de perforación. La tasa de recurrencia del tumor fue del 6,6%. En bloque [HR 1,41 (IC 95% 1,05-1,93), p = 0,02] y la resección R0 [HR 1,49 (IC 95% 1,11-2,06), p = 0,008] se asociaron con un menor riesgo de recurrencia.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico, retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas pueden predecirse según las características del paciente y de la lesión. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

The Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID) Multicenter Study

Colorectal neoplasms are prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are not well understood. This retrospective analysis included ESD procedures performed in 1266 patients with CKD across five tertiary medical institutions from January 2015 to December 2020. Patients were categorized based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which ranged from CKD1 to CKD5 (including those on dialysis). We found that en bloc resection rates remained high across all CKD stages, affirming the procedural efficacy of ESD. Notably, the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, such as ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus, significantly increased with an advancing CKD stage, with a corresponding increase in the Charlson Comorbidity Index, highlighting the complexity of managing these patients. Despite these challenges, the complete resection rate was lower in the CKD5 group (50%) than in the CKD1 group (83.4%); however, procedural complications, such as perforation and bleeding, did not significantly differ among the groups. The predictive models for complete resection and major complications showed no significant changes with a decreasing eGFR. These findings underscore that ESD is a feasible and safe treatment for colorectal neoplasms in patients with CKD, successfully balancing the inherent procedural risks with clinical benefits.

Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Electrocoagulation Syndrome in Patients with Colorectal Neoplasms: A Multicenter, Large-Scale, Retrospective Cohort Study by the Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID)

Background and Objectives: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective technique for removing colorectal neoplasms with large or cancerous lesions. However, there are few studies on post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS), a complication of colorectal ESD. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the various risk factors for PECS after colorectal ESD. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 1413 lesions from 1408 patients who underwent colorectal ESD at five tertiary hospitals between January 2015 and December 2020. We investigated the incidence and risk factors associated with PECS. Based on the data, we developed a risk-scoring model to predict the risk of PECS after colorectal ESD. Results: The incidence rate of PECS was 2.6% (37 patients). In multivariate analysis, the use of anti-platelet agents (odds ratio (OR), 2.474; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.088-5.626; p < 0.031), a lesion larger than 6 cm (OR 3.755; 95% CI, 1.237-11.395; p = 0.028), a deep submucosal invasion (OR 2.579; 95% CI, 1.022-6.507; p = 0.045), and an ESD procedure time ≥ 60 min (OR 2.691; 95% CI, 1.302-5.560; p = 0.008) were independent risk factors of PECS after colorectal ESD. We developed a scoring model for predicting PECS using these four factors. As the score increased, the incidence of PECS also increased, from 1.3% to 16.6%. PECS occurred more frequently in the high-risk group (≥2) (1.8% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, the risk factors for PECS after colorectal ESD were the use of anti-platelet agents, a lesion larger than 6 cm, a deep submucosal invasion, and an ESD procedure time ≥ 60 min. The risk-scoring model developed in this study using these factors could be effective in predicting and preventing PECS.

Randomized trial of gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection defect closure comparing a novel through-the-scope suturing system with an over-the-scope suturing system (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mucosal closure adds time but reduces adverse events associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to assess the closure time (CT), technical success, and cost-effectiveness between a novel through-the-scope helix tack suture system (TTSS) and the over-the-scope suturing system (OTSS).

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, randomized trial, all patients undergoing ESD with anticipated closure were randomized 1:1 to TTSS (study group) or OTSS (control group). Primary outcomes were CT and overall CT (OCT; CT + setup time). Secondary outcomes were rates of technical success, adverse events, and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Forty patients were randomized to OTSS (n = 20) or TTSS (n = 20). OTSS and TTSS groups were similar with respect to age, gender, proportion of colorectal polyps, proximal colon polyps, and mean size of the resected specimen (40.9 mm vs 40.4 mm). The mean CT was 18.4 minutes for OTSS and 23.3 minutes for TTSS (P = .36). The mean OCT was 32 minutes for OTSS and 39.5 minutes for TTSS (P = .36). Closure with a primary device was successful in 17 cases (85%) with OTSS and 18 cases (90%) with TTSS (P = .63). No closure-related intraprocedural adverse events or delayed perforations were noted. Mean cost of closure was significantly lower in the TTSS group for lesions <35 mm (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

TTSS was not found to be superior to OTSS with respect to CT and technical and clinical success for closure of gastric and colorectal ESD defects. TTSS is more cost-effective for closure of lesions <35 mm. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04925271.).

Risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: the Limoges Bleeding Score

BACKGROUND

Clinically significant delayed bleeding (CSDB) is a frequent, and sometimes severe, adverse event after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We evaluated risk factors of CSDB after colorectal ESD.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective registry of 940 colorectal ESDs performed from 2013 to 2022. The incidence of bleeding was evaluated up to 30 days. Risk factors for delayed bleeding were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. A Korean scoring model was tested, and a new risk-scoring model was developed and internally validated.

RESULTS

CSDB occurred in 75 patients (8.0%). The Korean score performed poorly in our cohort, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.567. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors were age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95%CI 0.97-2.73; 1 point), use of antithrombotics (OR 1.72; 95%CI 1.01-2.94; 1 point), rectal location (OR 1.51; 95%CI 0.92-2.48; 1 point), size >50 mm (OR 3.67; 95%CI 2.02-7.14; 3 points), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III or IV (OR 2.26; 95%CI 1.32-3.92; 2 points). The model showed fair calibration and good discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.751 (95%CI 0.690-0.812). The score was used to define two groups of patients, those with low-medium risk (0 to 4 points) and high risk (5 to 8 points) for CSDB (respective bleeding rates 4.1% and 17.5%).

CONCLUSION

A score based on five simple and meaningful variables was predictive of CSDB.

Does Prophylactic Closure Improve Outcomes After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have described prophylactic closure after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal lesions for improving postoperative outcomes. We reviewed the evidence on the impact of prophylactic closure after ESD.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science by 2 reviewers independently for studies published up to July 9, 2023. All types of comparative studies were eligible.

RESULTS

Ten studies compared 939 patients undergoing prophylactic closure with 1074 controls. Three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) while the rest were observational. Pooled data from all included studies showed that prophylactic closure resulted in reduced incidence of delayed bleeding after ESD [odds ratio (OR): 0.30; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.72; I2 =0%]. These results were significant only for observational studies but not for RCTs. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the risk of delayed perforation (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.18, 1.70; I2 =0%) or post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.41, 3.19; I2 =63%) between closure and nonclosure groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational data suggest that prophylactic closure of colorectal mucosal defects after ESD may reduce the risk of delayed bleeding. However, the results are not concurred by RCTs. Furthermore, there seems to be no impact of prophylactic closure on the risk of delayed perforation and PECS.

Onset Time and Characteristics of Postprocedural Bleeding after Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Postprocedural bleeding is a major adverse event after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but the optimal surveillance time after endoscopy is unclear. In this study, we determined onset time and characteristics of postprocedural bleeding events.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened patients who underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions at three German hospitals between 2010 and 2019 for postprocedural bleeding events using billing codes. Only patients who required re-endoscopy were included for analysis. For identified patients, we collected demographic data, clinical courses, characteristics of colorectal lesions, and procedure-related variables. Factors associated with late-onset bleeding were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

From a total of 6,820 patients with eligible billing codes, we identified 113 cases with postprocedural bleeding after endoscopic mucosal (61.9%) or snare resection (38.1%) that required re-endoscopy. The median size of the culprit lesion was 20 mm (interquartile range 14-30 mm). The median onset time of postprocedural bleeding was day 3 (interquartile range: 1-6.5 days), with 48.7% of events occurring within 48 h. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrates that a continued intake of antiplatelet drugs (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 0.89-10.12, p = 0.025) and a flat morphology of the colorectal lesion (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.08-8.01, p = 0.031) were associated with an increased risk for late postprocedural bleeding (>48 h), whereas intraprocedural bleeding was associated with a decreased risk (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.50, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Significant postprocedural bleeding can occur up to 18 days after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but was predominantly observed within 48 h. Continued intake of antiplatelet drugs and a flat polyp morphology are associated with risk for late postprocedural bleeding.

Risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely used in treating gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs); however, complications occur frequently after resection. We aimed to determine factors associated with postoperative complications for ER of gGISTs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multi-center, observational study. Consecutive patients who underwent ER of gGISTs at five institutes from January 2013 to December 2022 were analyzed. The risk factors for delayed bleeding and postoperative infection were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 513 cases were finally analyzed. Of 513 patients, 27 (5.3%) had delayed bleeding and 69 (13.4%) had a postoperative infection. Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for delayed bleeding were long operative time (OR = 50.655; 95% CI, 13.777-186.252; P < 0.001) and severe intraoperative bleeding (OR = 4.731, 95% CI, 1.139-19.658; P = 0.032), and risk factors for postoperative infection were long operative time (OR = 13.749, 95% CI, 6.884-27.461; P < 0.001) and perforation (OR = 4.339, 95% CI, 2.178-8.644; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated the risk factors for postoperative complications in ER of gGISTs. Long operation time is a common risk factor for delayed bleeding and postoperative infection. Patients with these risk factors should be given careful observation postoperatively.

Management of complications related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), colonoscopic endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) has the advantages of higher en bloc resection rates and lower recurrence rates of colorectal neoplasms. Therefore, C-ESD is considered an effective treatment method for laterally spread tumors and early colorectal cancer. However, C-ESD is technically more difficult and requires a longer procedure time than EMR. In addition to therapeutic efficacy and procedural difficulty, safety concerns should always be considered when performing C-ESD in clinical practice. Bleeding and perforation are the main adverse events associated with C-ESD and can occur during C-ESD or after the completion of the procedure. Most bleeding associated with C-ESD can be managed endoscopically, even if it occurs during or after the procedure. More recently, most perforations identified during C-ESD can also be managed endoscopically, unless the mural defect is too large to be sutured with endoscopic devices or the patient is hemodynamically unstable. Delayed perforations are quite rare, but they require surgical treatment more frequently than endoscopically identified intraprocedural perforations or radiologically identified immediate postprocedural perforations. Post-ESD coagulation syndrome is a relatively underestimated adverse event, which can mimic localized peritonitis from perforation. Here, we classify and characterize the complications associated with C-ESD and recommend management options for them.

Complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer (Review)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a gastrointestinal malignancy that seriously threatens human life and health, resulting in a heavy disease burden. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used in clinical practice and is an effective treatment for early CRC (ECC). Colorectal ESD is a challenging operation, and the incidence of postoperative complications is relatively high because of the thin intestinal wall and limited space for endoscopic operations. Systematic reports on the postoperative complications of colorectal ESD, such as fever, bleeding and perforation, from both China and elsewhere are lacking. In the present review, progress in research on postoperative complications after ESD for ECC is summarized.

Efficacy of self-assembling peptide in mitigating delayed bleeding after advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions: A meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Advanced endoscopic resection techniques carry a risk of delayed bleeding (DB). A novel fully synthetic self-assembling peptide (SAP) has shown promising results in mitigating this risk. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated all available data and analyzed the effectiveness of SAP in reducing DB after advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal luminal lesions. Patients and methods  Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from January 2010 through October 2022 were searched for publications addressing the use of SAP solution in patients undergoing advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models. Results  The initial search identified 277 studies, of which 63 relevant articles were reviewed. The final analysis included data from six studies comprising 307 patients that met inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of DB was 5.73 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 3.42-8.59). Mean patient age was 69.40 years ± 1.82. The weighted mean size of resected lesions was 36.20 mm (95 % CI = 33.37-39.02). Endoscopic submucosal dissection was used in 72.69 % (95 % CI = 67.62-77.48), while endoscopic mucosal resection was used in 26.42 % (95 % CI = 21.69-31.44) of the procedures. Among the 307 patients, 36 % were on antithrombotic medications. No adverse events (AEs) were attributable to using SAP, with a pooled rate of 0.00 % (95 % CI = 0.00-1.49). Conclusions  SAP solution appears promising in reducing post-procedural DB after advanced endoscopic resection of high-risk gastrointestinal lesions with no reported AEs.

Continuous use of antithrombotic medications during peri-endoscopic submucosal dissection period for colorectal lesions: A propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to elucidate the continuous use of antithrombotic medications during the peri-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) period.

METHODS

This study included 468 patients with colorectal epithelial neoplasms treated by ESD, consisting of 82 under antithrombotic medications and 386 patients without the medications. Among patients taking antithrombotic medications, antithrombotic agents were continued during the peri-ESD period. Clinical characteristics and adverse events were compared after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Before and after propensity score matching, post-colorectal ESD bleeding rate was higher in patients continuing antithrombotic medications (19.5% and 21.6%, respectively) than in those not taking antithrombotic medications (2.9% and 5.4%, respectively). In the Cox regression analysis, continuation of antithrombotic medications was associated with post-ESD bleeding risk (hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.6; P < 0.05) compared with patients without antithrombotic therapy. All patients who experienced post-ESD bleeding were successfully treated by endoscopic hemostasis procedure or conservative therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuation of antithrombotic medications during the peri-colorectal ESD period increases the risk of bleeding. However, the continuation may be acceptable under careful monitoring for post-ESD bleeding.

Repeated bleeding caused by acquired hemophilia A after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report and literature review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract lesions, and hemorrhage is one of the most common complications. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of hemorrhage after ESD in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Firstly, a case of AHA with multiple bleeding events after ESD is reported. Colonoscopy was used to perform ESD treatment of the submucosal tumor, and immunohistochemical analysis was used to analyze the tumor properties. Secondly, literature relevant to postoperative hemorrhage caused by AHA was researched and analyzed, with the changes in activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) before and after operation, coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) activity, FVIII inhibitor value and treatment plan noted. The majority of patients with AHA had no history of coagulation disorder or genetic disease and showed a normal APTT. However, it was found that the APTT value gradually increased after bleeding. In addition, the APTT correction test did not correct for prolonged APTT and FVIII antibody positivity in AHA. There was no bleeding or bleeding tendency prior to surgery in patients with AHA. The study concludes that when repeated bleeding and a poor hemostatic effect occurs, it is necessary to be alerted to the possibility of AHA, as an early diagnosis is essential for effective hemostasis.

Clinical and technical outcomes of endoscopic closure of postendoscopic submucosal dissection defects: Literature review over one decade

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which enables curative en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms, has been an attractive minimally invasive surgery during the past two decades. Large post-ESD defects must be carefully managed to prevent adverse events (AEs). The major AEs comprise delayed bleeding (DB) and delayed perforation (DP), and overall AEs comprise DB plus DP. This review aimed to clarify the clinical efficacy and technical outcomes of endoscopic prophylactic closure for post-ESD defects. We identified studies involving ≥10 patients up to March 2022 in which endoscopic closure was applied for gastric, duodenal, and colorectal post-ESD defects. In the stomach, total rates of overall AEs and DB were significantly lower in the closure than non-closure group. In the duodenum, total rates of overall AEs, DB, and DP were significantly lower in the closure group. In the colorectum, total rates of overall AEs and DB were significantly lower in the closure group. Closure techniques, categorized into three groups (clip-based techniques, mechanical clipping, and surgical stitch-based techniques), were illustrated. Endoscopic closure demonstrated a certain ability to reduce DB after gastric, duodenal, and colorectal ESD as well as DP after duodenal ESD. Considering closure-associated costs, the indications and limitations of closure techniques should be further investigated.

Efficacy of using red dichromatic imaging throughout endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure

BACKGROUND

Management of bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is critical. Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technology, has been reported to improve the visibility of deep vessels and bleeding source compared to white light imaging (WLI). We hypothesized that using RDI during the entire cutting process (full time RDI ESD: FTR-ESD), higher R0 resection rate, shorter procedure time and fewer complications could be achieved. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate the efficacy and safety of FTR-ESD.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included a total of 82 consecutive patients who underwent ESD by a single expert endoscopist for 40 esophageal, 17 gastric and 25 colorectal cancers at our institution from January 2018 to March 2021. The clinicopathological data were collected from patients' medical records and the treatment outcomes were analyzed according to the treatment phase (early; 57 WLI-ESD and late; 25 FTR-ESD).

RESULTS

The median of the greatest diameter of resected specimen was 40.0 mm. The median procedure time was relatively shorter in the FTR-ESD group (35 min) than in the WLI-ESD group (40 min), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.34). The median dissection speed in the FTR-ESD group (27.23 mm²/min) was significantly faster than that in the WLI-ESD group (20.94 mm²/min) (p = 0.025). The dissection speed was not different among different organs. A multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size (more than 30 mm) and FTR-ESD were significant independent factors contributing to faster dissection speed (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the rates of en bloc resection, HM0, VM0 or occurrence of adverse events between WLI-ESD and FTR-ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

FTR-ESD significantly increases the dissection speed compared to WLI-ESD. FTR-ESD can be performed safely and therapeutic outcomes in FTR-ESD are comparable with WLI-ESD. A further multicenter prospective study is warranted to confirm our results.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Colon and Rectum: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Multimodal assessment of colorectal polyps is needed before decision-making for endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Assessment should include morphology according to Paris classification, magnification endoscopy for vascular pattern, and Kudo pit pattern analysis. ESD should be offered to patients that have Vi pit pattern, lateral spreading tumors (LST) granular multinodular and LST nongranular, lesions with fibrosis and those in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A defined strategy for resection and planning is crucial for successful and efficient resection with a clear audit of outcomes aiming for a perforation and bleeding rate of less than 1% and R0 resection greater than 90%.

Management of Adverse Events of Submucosal Endoscopy

The risk-benefit profile of submucosal endoscopic procedures is generally favorable but there exist unique considerations regarding the recognition, treatment, and prevention of submucosal endoscopic complications. Bleeding during the procedure can be managed with knife electrocautery, tamponade by injection of additional submucosal agent, or hemostatic forceps, depending on the location and degree of bleeding. Delayed bleeding should be managed with repeat endoscopy. Potential means to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding include anticipatory coagulation of visible vessels in the dissection ulcer base, applied hemostatic chemicals, snares, clips, and sheets of cultured cells.

[Research Progress in Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early-Stage Gastrointestinal Cancer]

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the clinical treatment of early-stage and precancerous lesions of the digestive tract. Compared with traditional open surgery, the procedure has a number of advantages, including low postprocedural recurrence rate, the location and scope of lesions not posing much restrictions on the procedure, and quick patients recovery afterwards. The procedure has hence become one of the minimally-invasive procedures commonly performed with gastrointestinal endoscope. However, due to the influence of various factors, complications such as intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, perforation, electrocoagulation syndrome and lumen stenosis may occur. Delayed postoperative bleeding, in particular, may induce cardiovascular and other related diseases due to the insidious nature of its onset, resulting in serious consequences. It is critically important for the further development of ESD that we should acquire thorough understanding and mastery of the relevant influencing factors and preventive measures of delayed bleeding after ESD of early-stage gastrointestinal cancer. We herein summarized and discussed the latest research findings in the preventative and treatment measures.

Patient Selection, Risks, and Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Colorectal Polyp Resection

The 2 most significant complications of colonoscopy with polypectomy are bleeding and perforation. Although the incidence rates are generally low (<1%), these can be avoided by recognizing pertinent risk factors, which can be patient, polyp, and technique/device related. Endoscopists should be equipped to manage bleeding and perforation. Currently available devices and techniques to achieve hemostasis and manage colon perforations are reviewed.

Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends

Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.

Risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding after treatment of gastrointestinal polyps with snare-assisted endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection

Context

Gastrointestinal polyps are common gastrointestinal diseases that involve localised hyperplastic masses derived from gastrointestinal mucosa.

Aims

To investigate the risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) after the treatment of gastrointestinal polyps with snare-assisted endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) and to construct a nomogram model to predict the risk of DPPB.

Settings and Design

A total of 226 patients who underwent snare-assisted ESD for gastrointestinal polyps from May 2018 to November 2020 were divided into DPPB group (n = 10) and non-DPPB group (n = 216).

Subjects and Methods

The correlations of clinical data and endoscopic data with DPPB were compared. Univariate analysis was performed to screen the influencing factors of DPPB. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors of DPPB, which was employed to construct a nomogram prediction model.

Statistical Analysis Used

SPSS 16.0 software was utilised for statistical analysis. Numerical data were expressed as percentage (n [%]), and Chi-square test was performed for univariate analysis. The significant factors (P < 0.05) in univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the variables with statistical significance (P < 0.05) were considered as independent risk factors. The factors were used to construct a nomogram model for predicting the risk of DPPB. Bootstrap method was employed to perform repeated sampling 1000 times for internal verification. The consistency index (C-index) was used to evaluate the discrimination of the model, and C-index ≥0.70 represented a good discrimination. Two-tailed P < 0.05 indicated that a difference was statistically significant.

Results

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that hypertension, polyp location, polyp diameter, polyp morphology and intra-operative bleeding were the independent risk factors for DPPB (P < 0.05). The C-index of the nomogram model for predicting the risk of DPPB was 0.791, indicating a good discrimination. The calibration curve showed that the mean absolute error between predicted and actual DPPB occurrence risks was 0.014, indicating a high accuracy.

Conclusions

Hypertension, polyp location, polyp diameter, polyp morphology and intra-operative bleeding are the independent risk factors for DPPB, and the nomogram model established based on these factors for prediction has good discrimination and accuracy. Therefore, it is recommended to perform targeted intervention for high-risk groups to reduce the incidence of DPPB.

Risk factors for adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is already an established treatment for superficial colorectal tumors. However, its technical difficulty and high adverse events rates, compared to endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection, are a concern to some specialists and have probably contributed to discouragement in its widespread adoption. The debate mentioned above stimulated us to perform a systematic review aiming to identify risk factors for colorectal ESD-related adverse events. We conducted this study following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement and registered in the PROSPERO (University of York) international database (CRD42016042625). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and LILACS for the publications focused on risk factors for colorectal ESD-related adverse events from inception until April 2020. We included a total of 22 qualified studies in this analysis. We found that fibrosis had an odds ratio (OR) for perforation of 2.90 [95% confidence interval, (1.83-4.59)], right colon location of 2.35 (1.58-3.50), colonic location of 2.20 (1.44-3.35) and larger size of 2.17 (1.47-3.21), as well as one protective factor, the endoscopist experience OR = 0.62 (0.45-0.86). For bleeding, we considered rectal location a risk factor [OR = 3.55 (2.06-6.12)]. Through the several meta-analyses that we performed in this article, we could summarize the main risk factors for perforation and bleeding on colorectal ESD. Therefore, we provide insightful information for clinical judgment on regions where colorectal ESD is already widespread and help in the learning process of this challenging technique.

Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

AIM

To investigate the risk factors for delayed bleeding following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 991 consecutive patients who underwent ESD for colorectal neoplasms at our hospital from January 2007 to November 2016. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was defined as bleeding within 6 h to 30 days after ESD that resulted in either of the three situations: overt hematochezia, bleeding spots confirmed by repeat colonoscopy, or the requirement of a blood transfusion. Delayed bleeding was furtherly separated into early and late delayed bleeding by the end of post-ESD day 2. We analyzed the relationship between delayed bleeding and candidate factors including patient-, lesion-, and treatment-related details.

RESULTS

Delayed post-ESD bleeding was found in 47 patients (4.7%), of which 18 cases were late delayed bleeding. Among all patients, 14 patients required a second colonoscopy, and 2 other patients were transferred to surgery. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with hypertension (p = 0.017) and using hot biopsy forceps for wound management (p = 0.028) were significantly associated with late delayed bleeding. Both risk factors remained significant after multivariate analysis: hypertension (OR 2.829, 95% CI 1.101-7.265, p = 0.031), hot biopsy forceps (OR 2.873, 95% CI 1.013-8.147, p = 0.047). Using hot biopsy forceps was also the significant risk factor for late delayed bleeding compared with early delayed bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Patient with hypertension and using hot biopsy forceps for wound management during procedure call for attention on high risk of delayed post-ESD bleeding. Therefore, additional perioperative treatment is recommended in patients with these risk factors.

The efficacy of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection on delayed bleeding

OBJECTIVE

Although prophylactic clip closure after endoscopic mucosal resection may prevent delayed bleeding, information regarding colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (CR-ESD) is lacking. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of prophylactic clip closure on delayed bleeding rate after CR-ESD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 614 CR-ESD procedures performed in 561 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome, which was delayed bleeding rate, was analyzed between the prophylactic clip closure and non-closure groups. Furthermore, the predictors of delayed bleeding were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into the clip closure group (n = 275) and non-closure group (n = 339). Delayed bleeding rate was significantly lower in the closure group than in non-closure group (6 cases [2.2%] vs. 20 cases [5.9%], p = .026). The univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that delayed bleeding was significantly associated with laterally spreading tumor-granular-nodular mixed type (LST-G-Mix; odds ratio [OR], 3.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-8.34; p = .001). By contrast, prophylactic clip closure was significantly associated with low delayed bleeding rate (OR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.14-0.90; p = .029). The multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed LST-G-Mix as a significant independent delayed bleeding predictor (OR, 3.25; 95%CI, 1.45-7.32; p = .004), whereas, prophylactic clip closure was identified as a significant independent preventive factor of delayed bleeding (OR, 0.39; 95%CI, 0.15-1.00; p = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic clip closure after CR-ESD is associated with low delayed bleeding rate. LST-G-Mix promotes delayed bleeding, and performing prophylactic clip closure may be advisable.

Second-look endoscopy findings after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although second-look endoscopy (SLE) is frequently performed after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to prevent bleeding, no studies have reported SLE findings after colorectal ESD. This study aimed to investigate SLE findings and their role in preventing delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.

METHODS

Post-ESD ulcer appearances were divided into coagulation (with or without remnant minor vessels) and clip closure groups. SLE findings were categorized according to the Forrest classification (high-risk ulcer stigma [type I and IIa] and low-risk ulcer stigma [type IIb, IIc, III, or clip closure]), and risk factors for high-risk ulcer stigma were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 375 cases investigated, SLEs were performed in 171 (45.6%) patients. The incidences of high-risk ulcer stigma and low-risk stigma were 5.3% (9/171) and 94.7% (162/171), respectively. During SLE, endoscopic hemostasis was performed more frequently in the high-risk ulcer stigma group than in the lowrisk ulcer stigma group (44.4% [4/9] vs. 1.9% [3/162], respectively; p < 0.001), but most of the endoscopic hemostasis in the high-risk ulcer stigma group (3/4, 75.0%) were prophylactic hemostasis. Post-ESD delayed bleeding occurred in three (0.8%) patients belonging to the SLE group, of which, one patient was from the high-risk stigma group and two were from the low-risk stigma group.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of high-risk ulcer stigma during SLE was low, and delayed bleeding occurred in, both, high-risk and low-risk groups of SLE. SLEs performed after colorectal ESD may not be effective in preventing delayed bleeding, and further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of SLE in post-colorectal ESD.

The risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The most common complication of post-colorectal endoscopic resection is delayed bleeding. The assessment of risk factors for delayed bleeding provides important and useful information in standard clinical operations. The risk factors have been previously reported; however, they remain inconsistent across different studies.

AREAS COVERED

In this meta-analysis, the patient conditions, lesion-related factors, and operation-related factors were compared between delayed bleeding and no bleeding. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database were searched to identify eligible studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated along with heterogeneity.

EXPERT OPINION

This study is the first meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for colorectal delayed bleeding. We found several risk factors contributing to this condition: colorectal tumors located in the proximal colon, a history of antithrombotic drug use, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer, piecemeal resection, intraoperative hemorrhage, no clip placement, and severe submucosal fibrosis. Despite our findings, we also conclude that more high-quality, large-scale clinical randomized controlled studies are needed due to limited retrospective studies at present. Future therapeutic colonoscopies should focus on precise diagnosis, treatment safety, and management during the perioperative period.

Management of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in endoscopy: A review of literature

Endoscopic procedures hold a basal risk of bleeding that depends on the type of procedure and patients' comorbidities. Moreover, they are often performed in patients taking antiplatelet and anticoagulants agents, increasing the potential risk of intraprocedural and delayed bleeding. Even if the interruption of antithrombotic therapies is undoubtful effective in reducing the risk of bleeding, the thromboembolic risk that follows their suspension should not be underestimated. Therefore, it is fundamental for each endoscopist to be aware of the bleeding risk for every procedure, in order to measure the risk-benefit ratio for each patient. Moreover, knowledge of the proper management of antithrombotic agents before endoscopy, as well as the adequate timing for their resumption is essential. This review aims to analyze current evidence from literature assessing, for each procedure, the basal risk of bleeding and the risk of bleeding in patients taking antithrombotic therapy, as well as to review the recommendation of American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy, European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy, British society of gastroenterology, Asian pacific association of gastroenterology and Asian pacific society for digestive endoscopy guidelines for the management of antithrombotic agents in urgent and elective endoscopic procedures.

Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables removal of broad-based colorectal polyps or lateral spreading tumors with a higher rate of en bloc resection and a lower risk of local recurrence. However, it is technically demanding. Over the past 20 years, various equipment and innovative techniques have been developed to reduce the difficulty of ESD. The information in the literature is scattered. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive review on the setup and technical aspects of colorectal ESD.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database and systemically reviewed all original and review articles related to colorectal ESD. Further manual search according to reference lists of identified articles were done. The selected articles were categorized and reviewed. Original figures were created to help readers understand some of the ESD techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 216 articles were identified, in which 25 of them were review articles and 191 of them were original articles. They were categorized and reviewed. An in-depth appraisal of the setting, equipment, and technical aspects of colorectal ESD was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ESD is a technically demanding procedure that requires expert endoscopic skills, it can be mastered. With good peri-procedural preparation, sufficient knowledge of the equipment, and thorough understanding of the useful endoscopic tricks and maneuvers, colorectal ESD can be performed smoothly and safely.

Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is generally used to treat gastric mucosal and submucosal lesions. Nevertheless, ESD is more difficult and complicated to perform than a traditional endoscopic mucosal resection, which can increase the incidence of various complications including hemorrhage, perforation and infection. Hemorrhage is a major post-ESD complication. Prevention and early diagnosis of post-ESD bleeding for gastric lesions are closely associated with the efficacy and safety of the operation. Many studies have reported the risks of and the preventative measures for hemorrhage after gastric ESD, but there remain some issues to be solved. We thus reviewed the risk factors, precautions and treatments for hemorrhage after ESD of gastric lesions.

Effect of prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now commonly performed as a treatment for not only gastric tumor but also colorectal tumor. However, colorectal ESD has a substantial risk of complications, including post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome, bowel perforation and bleeding. This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic endoscopic closure can reduce the occurrence of complications after colorectal ESD.Materials and methods: Patients who underwent colorectal ESD in our unit were randomly assigned to either of two groups. Prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after ESD was performed in group I but not in group II. After the procedure, the incidence of complications, visual analog scale (VAS) score for abdominal pain, and laboratory findings were investigated.Results: Of the 220 patients (110 per group) enrolled in this study, 137 were men. No significant differences were found in age, sex, comorbidity, medication history, tumor location, size of resected specimen, and pathologic result between the two groups. No significant difference was found in ESD outcomes, including hospitalization period, laboratory findings, VAS score for abdominal pain, incidence of surgical operation, and incidence of post-ESD complications, between the two groups.Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, prophylactic endoscopic closure after colorectal ESD does not decrease the incidence of complications, and it does not ameliorate inflammatory response and abdominal pain.Clinical trial registration number: KCT0001666.

Management of Complications of Colorectal Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a useful procedure for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasm. Compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has several benefits, which include resectability of various difficult lesion, accurate histologic assessment of specimen, and lower recurrence rate. However, the risk of procedure- related complications is higher with ESD than with EMR. Moreover, because the colon has a thin wall and limited endoscopic maneuverability, ESD is considered a more challenging and risky procedure when performed in the colon than in the stomach. ESD-related complications are more likely to occur. The significant complications associated with ESD are bleeding, perforation, coagulation syndrome and stenosis, most of which can be treated and prevented by endoscopic intervention and preparation. Therefore, it is important to know how to occur and manage the ESD related complication.

Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: When Is Emergency Colonoscopy Needed?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-colorectal cancer. Although delayed bleeding is a serious potential complication, there is no consensus on the optimal protocol to determine which cases require emergency colonoscopy.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD and evaluate the "watch and wait" strategy for delayed bleeding. The "watch and wait" strategy was used for delayed bleeding, unless the shock index was ≥ 1 and/or a moderate amount of hematochezia occurred more than five occurrences.

METHODS

This study included 404 patients who had undergone endoscopic resection for 439 lesions between April 2012 and February 2018. Patients were classified into the bleeding group or the no-bleeding group to investigate the risk factors for delayed bleeding, and to assess the necessity of emergency colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients into the bleeding group and 412 into the no-bleeding group were classified. However, no case required emergency colonoscopy for hemostasis under "watch and wait strategy." Multivariate analysis revealed the risk factors for bleeding were rectal lesion (OR 5.547, 95% CI 1.456-21.130; P = 0.012) and lesion size ≥ 40 mm (OR 3.967, 95% CI 1.003-15.696; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for delayed bleeding are rectal lesions and lesion size ≥ 40 mm. This watch and wait strategy resulted in no requirements for emergency colonoscopy or blood transfusion, and no serious conditions caused by delayed bleeding.

Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective and study aims  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic resection techniques for laterally spreading colorectal tumors (LST). Methods  Relevant studies were identified in three electronic databases (PubMed, ISI and Cochrane Central Register). We considered all clinical studies in which colorectal LST were treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR] and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]) and/or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TEMS). Rates of en-bloc/piecemeal resection, complete endoscopic resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events (AEs) or recurrence, were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results  Forty-nine studies were included. Complete resection was similar between techniques (EMR 99.5 % [95 % CI 98.6 %-100 %] vs. ESD 97.9 % [95 % CI 96.1 - 99.2 %]), being curative in 1685/1895 (13 studies, pooled curative resection 90 %, 95 % CI 86.6 - 92.9 %, I ²  = 79 %) with non-significantly higher curative resection rates with ESD (93.6 %, 95 % CI 91.3 - 95.5 %, vs. 84 % 95 % CI 78.1 - 89.3 % with EMR). ESD was also associated with a significantly higher perforation risk (pooled incidence 5.9 %, 95 % CI 4.3 - 7.9 %, vs. EMR 1.2 %, 95 % CI 0.5 - 2.3 %) while bleeding was significantly more frequent with EMR (9.6 %, 95 % CI 6.5 - 13.2 %; vs. ESD 2.8 %, 95 % CI 1.9 - 4.0 %). Procedure-related mortality was 0.1 %. Recurrence occurred in 5.5 %, more often with EMR (12.6 %, 95 % CI 9.1 - 16.6 % vs. ESD 1.1 %, 95 % CI 0.3 - 2.5 %), with most amenable to successful endoscopic treatment (87.7 %, 95 % CI 81.1 - 93.1 %). Surgery was limited to 2.7 % of the lesions, 0.5 % due to AEs. No data of TEMS were available for LST. Conclusions  EMR and ESD are both effective and safe and are associated with a very low risk of procedure related mortality.

Use of anticoagulants increases risk of bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Japanese guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy have recommended temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], or heparin) to prevent hemorrhagic complications during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasias (CRNs). However, serious thrombosis might occur during temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants. The current study aimed to evaluate outcomes with anticoagulants in patients undergoing ESD for CRNs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This study was a single-institution retrospective cohort study based on clinical records. We assessed 650 consecutive patients with 698 CRNs who underwent ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between December 2010 and June 2016. The patients were divided into three groups: the warfarin group (19 patients with 19 CRNs), DOAC group (7 patients with 9 CRNs), and no-antithrombotics group (624 patients with 670 CRNs). We replaced warfarin with heparin 3 to 5 days before endoscopy. Although DOAC was suspended on the morning of endoscopy, we did not replace heparin.

RESULTS

 Bleeding after the procedure occurred in 26.3 % (5/19), 22.0 % (2/9), and 2.7 % (18/670) of patients in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. In the warfarin group, four patients who bled after the procedure took not only warfarin but also other antiplatelets. En bloc resection rates were 94.7 % (18/19), 100 % (9/9), and 96.6 % (647/670) in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. No patients experienced ischemic events in the perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing ESD for CRNs, risk of bleeding was higher among patients who took anticoagulants than among those who did not. In particular, careful attention to patients who took antiplatelets in addition to warfarin before ESD for CRNs is warranted.

Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for cecal lesions

BACKGROUND

The treatment results of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal lesions have improved markedly, but some lesions remain difficult to treat. Hence the cecum is considered a technically challenging site for ESD. We examined the feasibility of ESD for cecal lesions.

METHODS

Among a total of 708 colorectal ESD performed in our hospital between March 2006 and December 2016, 549 procedures performed after April 2012 were studied, at a time when the techniques of ESD had stabilized and the procedure was covered by health insurance in Japan. Among 549 cases, 61 were cecal lesions and 488 were noncecal lesions. The treatment outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

For cecal lesions, the en bloc resection rate was 95.1%, R0 resection rate was 91.8%, perforation rate was 0%, delayed bleeding rate was 6.6%, median diameter of resected specimen was 32 mm (16-65 mm), median time of the procedure was 44 minutes (8-140 min). The corresponding results for noncecal lesions were 97.3%, 95.5%, 0.4%, 2.7%, 30 mm (10-109 mm), and 37 min (7-225 min). No significant differences were observed and the good treatment results were seen. When the outcomes were analyzed for cecal sites considered to be particularly challenging; proximity to appendiceal orifice, the ileocecal valve, and the bottom of cecum, the treatment results were not inferior to other sites.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is safe and effective even for cecal lesions considered challenging to treat. ESD is feasible for cecal lesions.

Continued Use of a Single Antiplatelet Agent Does Not Increase the Risk of Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

BACKGROUND

With the aging of the population and rising incidence of thromboembolic events, the usage of antiplatelet agents is also increasing. There are few reports yet on the management of antiplatelet agents for patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether continued administration of antiplatelet agents is associated with an increased rate of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.

METHODS

A total of 1022 colorectal neoplasms in 927 patients were dissected at Yokohama City University Hospital and its three affiliate hospitals between July 2012 and June 2017. We included the data of 919 lesions in the final analysis. The lesions were divided into three groups: the no-antiplatelet group (783 neoplasms), the withdrawal group (110 neoplasms), and the continuation group (26 neoplasms).

RESULTS

Among the 919 lesions, bleeding events occurred in a total of 31 (3.37%). The rate of bleeding after ESD was 3.3% (26/783), 4.5% (5/110), and 0% (0/26), respectively. There were no significant differences in the rate of bleeding after ESD among the three groups (the withdrawal group vs. the no-antiplatelet group, the continuation group vs. the no-antiplatelet group, and the withdrawal group vs. the continuation group).

CONCLUSIONS

Continued administration of antiplatelet agents is not associated with any increase in the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to determine whether treatment with antiplatelet agents must be interrupted prior to colorectal ESD in patients who are at a high risk of thromboembolic events.

Risk of colonic diverticular rebleeding according to endoscopic appearance

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Re-commencement of bleeding (rebleeding) of colonic diverticula after endoscopic hemostasis is a clinical problem. This study aimed to examine whether endoscopic visibility of colonic diverticular bleeding affects the risk of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We performed a retrospective review of endoscopic images and medical charts of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding who underwent endoscopic hemostasis. Endoscopic visibility was classified into two types according to visibility of the source of bleeding; source invisibility due to bleeding or attached hematin (type 1), or endoscopically visible responsive vessels (type 2). Rebleeding rates within one year after initial hemostasis were examined.

RESULTS

 Of 93 patients with successful endoscopic hemostasis, 38 (41 %) showed type 1 visibility, while the remaining presented type 2. All patients received hemostasis with clipping, rebleeding developed in 20 patients (22 %). Type 1 visibility was more likely to be observed in patients with rebleeding (65 % vs. 34 %, P  = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed that after endoscopic hemostasis, type 1 visibility (invisible source) was the only independent risk factor for colonic diverticular rebleeding (odds ratio, 3.05; 95 % confidence interval, 1.03 - 9.59, P  = 0.044). Kaplan-Meier curve showed the cumulative incidence of rebleeding was significantly higher in patients with type 1 visibility than those with type 2 visibility ( P  = 0.0033, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

 Hemostasis by clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding without definite observation of the source of bleeding may not be sufficiently effective. Other hemostatic methods, including band ligation, should be considered when the source of bleeding is unclear.

Effects of antithrombotic therapy on bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Bleeding is the most common adverse event after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Although several studies have reported on the use of antithrombotic agents and post-ESD bleeding, many issues remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the effects of antithrombotic therapy on post-ESD bleeding.

METHODS

The published literature was searched on online databases, and all studies were included up to January 2017. Standard forms were used to extract data by 2 independent reviewers. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was used to assess the quality of studies. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was computed for the effect of antithrombotic agents. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. Heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochran Q test and I² statistic.

RESULTS

Sixteen retrospective articles were included. Regardless of discontinuation (OR, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.39; P = .007) or continuation (OR, 8.39; 95% CI, 4.64-15.17; P < .00001), antithrombotic therapy was significantly associated with post-ESD bleeding, particularly for delayed bleeding (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.42-4.98; P = .002). The bleeding rate was higher in the discontinued multiple antithrombotics group (OR, 5.17; 95% CI, 3.13-8.54; P < .00001) than in the discontinued a single antithrombotic group (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.29-3.85; P = .004) and single antiplatelet group (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.93-4.63; P = .07). In the subgroup analysis, resuming antithrombotics within 1 week (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.54-3.93; P = .0002) and using heparin replacement (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.94-9.09; P= .0003) significantly increased post-ESD bleeding risk. Continued use of low-dose aspirin (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.17-8.61; P = .84) did not significantly increase the bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is a risk factor for post-ESD bleeding, especially for delayed bleeding. Using multiple antithrombotic drugs, resuming antithrombotics within 1 week, and heparin replacement were significantly associated with post-ESD bleeding; but continuous low-dose aspirin was not. However, much larger prospective studies are required.

Efficacy, Safety, and Overall Quality of Life of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Purpose

Studies reporting the treatment of early colorectal cancer (ECC) by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in elderly patients are lacking in China. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall quality of life of elderly patients with ECC who undergoing ESD.

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-nine patients with 401 colorectal lesions entered into our study from March 2013 to March 2016 (Patients with an age 70 years old or older were divided into the elderly group and those who were less than 70-year-old entered the non-elderly group).

Results

No significant differences were found in sex ratio, body mass index, location, endoscopic classification, pathological pattern, lesion size, mean procedure time, hospitalization days, complete excision, and en bloc resection rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of complications during and after ESD procedure (P > 0.05). There were no statistical differences between two groups in Quality of life index (QL-Index) and European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life version 3.0 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

ESD was relatively safe and effective for elderly patients with ECC, and it may be an recommended first-line treatment.

Colorectal ESD in day surgery

BACKGROUND

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed in Japan and is growing in popularity in Europe. Patients undergoing a colorectal ESD procedure in Japan are hospitalized for several days. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of colorectal ESD as an outpatient procedure in a European setting.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of all patients undergoing colorectal ESD at Danderyds Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden from April 2014 to December 2015 were studied. Data on patient demographics, procedural outcome and 30-day readmissions were studied. Data are presented as median (range), mean ± SD or true numbers as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients underwent a colorectal ESD during the study period. Of the 182 these, 11 were scheduled for an in-hospital procedure and of 171 patients scheduled for a day-procedure and 15 were admitted for observation. The remaining 156 patients were discharged after 2-4 h of observation and comprise the study cohort. Mean age was 69 years. Median lesion size was 28 (10-120) mm, and median resection time was 65 (10-360) min. Lesions were located as follows: anal canal 1 (0.6%), rectum 52 (33.3%), sigmoid 17 (10.9%), descending 3 (1.9%), transverse 24 (15.4%), ascending 29 (18.6%), and cecum 30 (19.2%). Eight (5.1%) of the 156 day surgery patients returned for medical attention during the postoperative 30-day period. Three of them were admitted for in-hospital observation. None of the day surgery patients required any surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Uncomplicated colorectal ESD can safely be carried out in a day surgery setting.

Endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps in patients on antiplatelet therapy: an evidence-based guidance for clinicians

Due to the rising prevalence of coronary heart disease, endoscopists are more frequently performing a polypectomy in patients on antiplatelet therapy (APT) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DATP). Despite the availability of several guidelines with regard to the management of antiplatelet drugs during the periprocedure period, there is still variability in the current clinical practice. This may be influenced by the low quality of the evidence supporting recommendations, because most of the studies dealing with APT and polypectomy are observational and retrospective, and include mainly small (< 10 mm) polyps. However, some recommendations can still be made. An estimation of the bleeding and thrombotic risk of the patient should be made in advance. In the case of DAPT the procedure should be postponed, at least until clopidogrel can be safely withheld. If possible, non-aspirin antiplatelet drugs should be withheld 5-7 days before the procedure. Polyp size is the main factor related with post-polypectomy bleeding and it is the factor that should drive clinical decisions regarding the resection method and the use of endoscopic prophylactic measures. Non-aspirin antiplatelet agents can be reintroduced 24-48 hours after the procedure. In conclusion, there is little data with regard to the management of DAPT in patients with a scheduled polypectomy. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to support clinical recommendations.

Endoscopic Approach for Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females, with an estimated 1.4 million cases and 693,900 deaths in 2012. Colonoscopy is the cornerstone for the detection and prevention of CRC. In addition, endoscopic treatment for CRC at an early stage can effectively improve patients' quality of life and cure rate.

SUMMARY

This review focuses on endoscopic approaches, including white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, magnifying endoscopy and therapeutic endoscopy, for the evaluation and treatment of superficial colorectal neoplasms.

KEY MESSAGE

Understanding the preoperative evaluation, indications and techniques of endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection as well as postoperative surveillance for superficial colorectal neoplasms is critical for providing appropriate management to the patients.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Endoscopic therapy, a method preserving organ function and improving quality of life, is a widely applied microinvasive treatment for superficial colorectal neoplasms. This review describes the basics and developments of endoscopic approaches and may facilitate daily practice for superficial colorectal neoplasms.