1
|
Wu S, Yu H, Liu Y, Zhou H, Zhou Y. Small bowel adenocarcinoma of the jejunum detected by double contrast enhanced ultrasound: a case report of a novel ultrasound modality. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1288041. [PMID: 38962263 PMCID: PMC11219900 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1288041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma (SBA) is rare, occult and life-threatening malignancy in digestive system. Given low incidence and nonspecific symptoms, SBA is frequently detected in later stages. Double contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) is an innovative imaging technique applied to visualize the gastrointestinal tract, merging intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound. In this case, DCEUS was utilized and successfully detected an SBA of the jejunum. Case presentation A Chinese woman, aged 64, sought consultation in the gastroenterology department at our hospital, reporting symptoms of abdominal pain. Three months before entering the hospital, she underwent gastroscopy and colonoscopy which suggested chronic gastritis, and she was treated with oral drugs. However, her symptoms were not relieved, and even worsened. To further investigate, DCEUS was performed. The oral contrast agent dilated the luminal space of the upper gastrointestinal tract, resolving the hindrance caused by gas in the gastrointestinal tract and creating an acoustic window for scanning. Through this acoustic window, oral agent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OA-CEUS) revealed a localized thickening of jejunal intestinal wall measuring 4x3 cm. Following intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast agent, the jejunal lesion exhibited faster enhancement and heterogeneous hyper-enhancement. Finally, the patient underwent jejunal tumor resection. Pathological examination revealed a jejunal adenocarcinoma. Conclusion The timely diagnosis of SBA can be challenging. DCEUS may have the potential to contribute to diagnosis and detailed evaluation of SBA, particularly in cases involving jejunum. Further researches are needed to fully explore the benefits of DCEUS in the standard diagnostic approach for small bowel diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yang Zhou
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ortega Larrode A, Farrais Villalba S, Guerrero Muñoz C, Blas Jhon L, Martin Relloso MJ, Sanchez-Fayos Calabuig P, Calero Baron D, Varela Silva A, Porres Cubero JC. Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumours by Enteroscopy: A Case Report. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1469. [PMID: 37629759 PMCID: PMC10456339 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
We present the case of a 62-year-old patient who developed melenas and in whom conventional endoscopic tests could not detect any bleeding lesion. In our case, capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy were the pivotal elements in establishing the diagnosis of a neuroendocrine tumour with an atypical location. As a result, it was possible to surgically remove the lesions at an early stage of the malignancy without metastatic disease and without the need for adjuvant therapy. Our case demonstrates the need for these new techniques in tumours of atypical location and aggressive course. Otherwise, this malignancy may be underdiagnosed until an advanced stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Ortega Larrode
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (S.F.V.); (C.G.M.); (L.B.J.); (M.J.M.R.); (P.S.-F.C.); (D.C.B.); (A.V.S.); (J.C.P.C.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Despott EJ, Dray X, Keuchel M, Moreels T, Sanders DS, Spada C, Carretero C, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Elli L, Fuccio L, Gonzalez Suarez B, Koulaouzidis A, Kunovsky L, McNamara D, Neumann H, Perez-Cuadrado-Martinez E, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Piccirelli S, Rosa B, Saurin JC, Sidhu R, Tacheci I, Vlachou E, Triantafyllou K. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2023; 55:58-95. [PMID: 36423618 DOI: 10.1055/a-1973-3796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
MR1: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3: ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8: ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9: ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn's disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11: ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne University, Endoscopy Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tom Moreels
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David S Sanders
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Carretero
- Department of Gastroenterology. University of Navarre Clinic, Healthcare Research Institute of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Elli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Begona Gonzalez Suarez
- Gastroenterology Department - ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, DIBAPS, CiBERHED, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Centre for Clinical Implementation of Capsule Endoscopy, Store Adenomer Tidlige Cancere Center, Svendborg, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lumir Kunovsky
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Stefania Piccirelli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Bruno Rosa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ilja Tacheci
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | | | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Alenezi NH, Albalawi TF, Alsaif O. Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Jejunum: Case Report of Rare Small Bowel Neoplasm. Cureus 2022; 14:e33032. [PMID: 36589706 PMCID: PMC9797756 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is rare cancer that accounts for less than 2% of all gastrointestinal tract cancers. Usually, the clinical presentation is unspecific, and a patient might complain of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, small bowel obstruction, and small bowel bleeding. Because of these unspecific symptoms, the patient might be diagnosed late, from six to ten months, which affects the prognosis. This study contains a case report of a 38-year female with SBA in the jejunum, with unspecific symptoms. She had a history of recurrent admissions due to acute pancreatitis, acute kidney injury, and hyponatremia caused by dehydration. The patient was diagnosed six months after the first symptoms of nausea and vomiting started. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy for a jejunal stricture mass, and a lymph node was resected. The course after surgery was smooth, and the patient was discharged home on the fourth-day post-surgery. In conclusion, the symptoms of SBA are unspecific and cannot be diagnosed without complete medical histories and lab examinations, making diagnosing SBA challenging.
Collapse
|
5
|
Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: a Nationwide Population-Based Study. J Gastrointest Cancer 2022; 54:67-72. [PMID: 35001295 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00653-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Small intestinal cancers have a non-specific clinical presentation and hence a delayed diagnosis. The prevalence of small intestinal cancers is low, and there are no cost-effective methods of screening. This study aimed to identify clinical characteristics of duodenal and jejunal adenocarcinomas that can assist in the early detection and diagnosis of disease. METHODS Duodenal adenocarcinoma and jejunal adenocarcinoma in Explorys database (1999-2019) were compared using odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Data on demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical features, and treatment were collected. RESULTS Out of a total of 8100 patients with a diagnosis of primary adenocarcinoma of the small intestine, 5110 are primary adenocarcinoma of duodenum (63%), and 600 are primary adenocarcinoma of jejunum (7.4%). Patients with jejunal adenocarcinoma when compared with patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma are more obese (OR, 1.36) and have a significantly higher prevalence of malignant neoplasm of colon (OR, 3.07), Crohn's disease (OR, 4.42), and celiac disease (OR, 2.48). Jejunal adenocarcinoma patients presented more frequently with intestinal obstruction (OR, 1.99), whereas duodenal adenocarcinoma patients more commonly presented with iron deficiency anemia (OR, 0.16). Patients with jejunal adenocarcinoma are less likely to undergo therapy with anti-neoplastic agents when compared with duodenal adenocarcinoma (OR, 0.81). There are no differences in patients undergoing surgical intervention or a combination of surgical intervention and antineoplastic therapy. CONCLUSIONS Jejunal adenocarcinoma is more commonly associated with colorectal cancer, celiac disease, and Crohn's disease. They also had lower odds of requiring chemotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhandari P, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Libanio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Albeniz E, Pioche M, Sidhu R, Spada C, Anderloni A, Repici A, Haidry R, Barthet M, Neumann H, Antonelli G, Testoni A, Ponchon T, Siersema PD, Fuccio L, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Revising the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) research priorities: a research progress update. Endoscopy 2021; 53:535-554. [PMID: 33822332 DOI: 10.1055/a-1397-3005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the aims of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) is to encourage high quality endoscopic research at a European level. In 2016, the ESGE research committee published a set of research priorities. As endoscopic research is flourishing, we aimed to review the literature and determine whether endoscopic research over the last 4 years had managed to address any of our previously published priorities. METHODS As the previously published priorities were grouped under seven different domains, a working party with at least two European experts was created for each domain to review all the priorities under that domain. A structured review form was developed to standardize the review process. The group conducted an extensive literature search relevant to each of the priorities and then graded the priorities into three categories: (1) no longer a priority (well-designed trial, incorporated in national/international guidelines or adopted in routine clinical practice); (2) remains a priority (i. e. the above criterion was not met); (3) redefine the existing priority (i. e. the priority was too vague with the research question not clearly defined). RESULTS The previous ESGE research priorities document published in 2016 had 26 research priorities under seven domains. Our review of these priorities has resulted in seven priorities being removed from the list, one priority being partially removed, another seven being redefined to make them more precise, with eleven priorities remaining unchanged. This is a reflection of a rapid surge in endoscopic research, resulting in 27 % of research questions having already been answered and another 27 % requiring redefinition. CONCLUSIONS Our extensive review process has led to the removal of seven research priorities from the previous (2016) list, leaving 19 research priorities that have been redefined to make them more precise and relevant for researchers and funding bodies to target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - Diogo Libanio
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Eduardo Albeniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed-UPNA-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Gastroenterology Division, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCSS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,GastroZentrum Lippe, Bad Salzuflen, Germany
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli, Ariccia, Rome, Italy.,Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.,Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Thierry Ponchon
- Gastroenterology Division, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li Q, Chen T, Cui H, Xiao X, Chen C, Shen Z, Ji F, Yin L. Misdiagnosis of multiple synchronous small bowel adenocarcinomas as intestinal tuberculosis: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:112. [PMID: 32299377 PMCID: PMC7164229 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01271-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy that primarily occurs in the duodenum. Multiple synchronous SBA is unique rare and difficult to diagnose due to non-specific disease presentation. Protocols to identify multiple synchronous SBA during early disease stages are urgently required. CASE PRESENTATION An elderly man experienced left lower abdominal pain and melena for 3 months. Abdominal CT showed thickening of the multiple segmental small intestinal walls. As the patient had pulmonary tuberculosis simultaneously, he was misdiagnosis as intestinal tuberculosis and received anti-spasm therapy. The treatment delayed radical resection surgery and the patient underwent palliative segmental resection of the jejunum after 4 months due to intestinal obstruction. Resected specimens showed multiple synchronous SBA (five tumors). The patient accepted chemotherapy postoperatively. Six months postoperatively, the patient died of brain metastasis. CONCLUSIONS We highlight how multiple synchronous SBA is rare and easily misdiagnosed. We should rule out multiple synchronous SBA when diagnosing intestinal diseases (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, IBS). Intestinal tuberculosis may also be one of the risk factors for multiple synchronous SBA. High-risk patients should be assessed for known tumor makers, and receive gastroscopy, enteroscopy or capsule endoscopy. Doctors should obtain the pathology under endoscopy to the greatest possible degree. For suspected patients, laparotomy should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei Li
- Department of General Surgery, South Campus, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200112, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, South Campus, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200112, China
| | - Hexi Cui
- Department of Nursing, South Campus, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200112, China
| | - Xiao Xiao
- Department of Tuberculosis Control, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200336, China
| | - Chunqiu Chen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Zhenyu Shen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Fu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Lu Yin
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to summarize the role of recently developed diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis and management of patients with small bowel tumours (SBTs). RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies show that the overall SBT incidence is increasing. The introduction of small bowel dedicated diagnostic tools [i.e. capsule endoscopy, device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), computed tomography (CT) and MRI-enterography] might partially explain this trend. In patients with SBT, DAE might represent an ideal tool by coupling careful mucosal inspection with sampling capability. Unfortunately, DAE is an invasive procedure and seldom allows complete small bowel evaluation in a single setting. Therefore, DAE is more often used in clinical practice as confirmatory tool, when other less invasive and readily available tests (i.e. capsule endoscopy or radiological tests) identify relevant findings. Nevertheless, in patients with SBT, capsule endoscopy is burdened by an increased risk of capsule retention and/or missing proximal small bowel lesions, whereas dedicated cross-sectional imaging techniques often identify nonspecific findings of limited clinical significance. SUMMARY Despite recent technical improvements, in patients with SBT, the result of a single diagnostic procedure is often insufficient to provide a definite diagnosis. A balanced combination of different tests allows reaching a final diagnosis and drive further management.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pasha SF, Leighton JA. Evidence-Based Guide on Capsule Endoscopy for Small Bowel Bleeding. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2017; 13:88-93. [PMID: 28450815 PMCID: PMC5402689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Capsule endoscopy is the diagnostic test of choice for the evaluation of overt and occult small bowel bleeding. Its yield is higher in patients presenting with overt bleeding. The yield is also improved if the capsule is performed soon after the presentation of bleeding. Capsule endoscopy has a complementary role with cross-sectional imaging to triage patients for appropriate management, including deep enteroscopy, surgery, or, if negative, conservative management. Although capsule endoscopy is useful to detect vascular and inflammatory lesions, it appears to have a significant miss rate for solitary small bowel lesions, including tumors. The main adverse event is capsule retention in patients with underlying small bowel obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shabana F Pasha
- Dr Pasha is an associate professor of medicine and Dr Leighton is a professor of medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Jonathan A Leighton
- Dr Pasha is an associate professor of medicine and Dr Leighton is a professor of medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li J, Wang Z, Liu N, Hao J, Xu X. Small bowel adenocarcinoma of the jejunum: a case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol 2016; 14:177. [PMID: 27402105 PMCID: PMC4940967 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In practice, small bowel cancer is a rare entity. The most common histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel (SBA) is challenging to diagnose, often presents at a late stage and has a poor prognosis. The treatment of early-stage SBA is surgical resection. No standard protocol has been established for unresectable or metastatic disease. Case presentation We report here on a 26-year-old man with SBA in the jejunum, lacking specific symptoms and with a delay of 6 months in diagnosis. The diagnosis was finally achieved with a combination of balloon-assisted enteroscopy, computed tomography scans, positron emission computed tomography scans and the values of carcino-embryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The patient underwent segmental intestine with lymph node resection, followed by eight cycles of FOLFOX palliative chemotherapy with good tolerance. As of the 11-month postoperative follow-up, there has been no evidence of recurrent disease. Conclusions This case is reported to arouse a clinical suspicion of SBA in patients with abdominal pain of unknown cause. We also provided evidence in this case of a response to palliative chemotherapy with FOLFOX. Because the incidence of SBA is very low, there is a need for further studies to evaluate the possible application of newer investigative agents and strategies to obtain a better outcome within the framework of international collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710004, China
| | - Zhiliang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710004, China
| | - Na Liu
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Junfeng Hao
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710004, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Koganemaru M, Nonoshita M, Iwamoto R, Kuhara A, Nabeta M, Kusumoto M, Kugiyama T, Nagata S, Abe T. Ultraselective embolization using a 1.7-Fr catheter and soft bare coil for small intestinal bleeding. MINIM INVASIV THER 2016; 25:345-350. [PMID: 27309942 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1192553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of embolization using a 1.7-Fr catheter and soft bare coil to treat acute small intestinal bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS Subjects were five consecutive patients who experienced onset of melena with small intestinal bleeding and underwent transcatheter arterial embolization with 1.7-Fr catheters and 0.010-inch detachable bare coils (five procedures in total). Technical success, clinical success, relative post-procedural complications, arterial bleeding source and cause, and relationship between coagulopathy and embolization efficacy were examined by capsule endoscopy. RESULTS We achieved 100% technical and clinical success for the five transcatheter arterial embolizations. All catheterizations of the vasa recta of the bleeding artery (jejunal artery, n = 2; ileal artery, n = 3) were possible with a 1.7-Fr catheter. We achieved high embolization efficacy in two patients with coagulopathy. No rebleeding, intestinal ischemia, or necrosis was observed on follow-up capsule endoscopy. We confirmed that peptic ulcers/ulcer scars were the cause of bleeding for all patients. CONCLUSION Embolization with 0.010-inch coils using a 1.7-Fr catheter and catheterization of the vasa recta of bleeding vessels was effective and safe for treating small intestinal bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masamichi Koganemaru
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Masaaki Nonoshita
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Ryoji Iwamoto
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Asako Kuhara
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Masakazu Nabeta
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Masashi Kusumoto
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Tomoko Kugiyama
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Shuji Nagata
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Toshi Abe
- a Department of Radiology , Kurume University School of Medicine , Kurume , Fukuoka , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Analysis of Non-Small Bowel Lesions Detected by Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Potential Small Bowel Bleeding. DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY 2016; 2016:9063293. [PMID: 27092029 PMCID: PMC4820590 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9063293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding cases in whom source cannot be identified after conventional upper and lower GI endoscopy are defined as potential small bowel bleeding. We aimed to search for lesions in the reach of conventional endoscopy in patients to whom video capsule endoscopy (VCE) had been applied for potential small bowel bleeding. 114 patients who had VCE evaluation for potential small bowel bleeding between January 2009 and August 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age of the patients was 55 ± 17 years. Female/male ratio is 39/75. In 58 patients (50.9%) bleeding lesion could be determined. Among these 58 patients 8 patients' lesions were in the reach of conventional endoscopes. Overall these 8 patients comprised 7% of patients in whom VCE was performed for potential small bowel bleeding. Among these 8 patients 5 had colonic lesions (4 angiodysplasia, 1 ulcerated polypoid cecal lesion), 2 had gastric lesions (1 GAVE, 1 anastomotic bleeding), and 1 patient had a bleeding lesion in the duodenal bulbus. Although capsule endoscopy is usually performed for potential small bowel bleeding gastroenterologists should always keep in mind that these patients may be suffering from bleeding from non-small bowel segments and should carefully review images captured from non-small bowel areas.
Collapse
|