1
|
Pati I, Cruciani M, Candura F, Massari MS, Piccinini V, Masiello F, Profili S, De Fulvio L, Pupella S, De Angelis V. Hyperimmune Globulins for the Management of Infectious Diseases. Viruses 2023; 15:1543. [PMID: 37515229 PMCID: PMC10385259 DOI: 10.3390/v15071543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This review is focused on the use of hyperimmune globulin therapy to treat some infectious diseases of viral or bacterial origin. Despite the introduction of antibiotics and vaccines, plasma immunoglobulin therapy from whole blood donation can still play a key role. These treatments provide passive transfer of high-titer antibodies that either reduces the risk or the severity of the infection and offer immediate but short-term protection against specific diseases. Antibody preparations derived from immunized human donors are commonly used for the prophylaxis and treatment of rabies, hepatitis A and B viruses, varicella-zoster virus, and pneumonia caused by respiratory syncytial virus, Clostridium tetani, Clostridium botulinum. The use of hyperimmune globulin therapy is a promising challenge, especially for the treatment of emerging viral infections for which there are no specific therapies or licensed vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Pati
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Cruciani
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Candura
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vanessa Piccinini
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Masiello
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Samantha Profili
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia De Fulvio
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Simonetta Pupella
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Angelis
- National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Man X, Wei R. Advancements in the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence by nucleos(t)ide analogue monotherapies after liver transplantation. EUR J INFLAMM 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/1721727x221139254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the recurrence rate of HBV (hepatitis B virus) after liver transplantation (LT) can be as high as 80% without any preventive measures. Therefore, prevention of HBV recurrence after LT is always an essential part of clinical work worldwide. The NAs that have been approved for HBV treatment include lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir (ETV), and telbivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). They are often combined with HBIG to prevent HBV recurrence after LT clinically. However, NAs with a higher genetic barrier, such as ETV, TDF, and TAF, can improve liver function by strongly inhibiting HBV replication and reducing the risks of HBV resistance. Recently, some NAs with a higher genetic barrier, such as ETV, TDF, and TAF, have been adopted as monotherapy for preventing the recurrence of hepatitis B after LT in multiple organ transplant centres and have achieved effective outcomes. This article aims to review the advances for NAs monotherapy in prophylaxis for HBV recurrence after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xie Man
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China
| | - Rao Wei
- Division of Hepatology, Liver Disease Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China
- Department of Organ Transplantation, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
González Grande R, Santaella Leiva I, López Ortega S, Jiménez Pérez M. Present and future management of viral hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:8081-8102. [PMID: 35068856 PMCID: PMC8704279 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i47.8081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Viral hepatitis can result in important morbidity and mortality, with its impact on health conditioned by the specific type of hepatitis, the geographical region of presentation and the development and access to new drugs, among other factors. Most acute presentation forms are self-limiting and may even go unnoticed, with just a small percentage of cases leading to acute liver failure that may necessitate transplantation or even cause the death of the patient. However, when they become chronic, as in the case of hepatitis B virus and C virus, unless they are diagnosed and treated adequately they may have severe consequences, like cirrhosis or hepatocarcinoma. Understanding of the mechanisms of transmission, the pathogenesis, the presence of vaccinations and the development over recent years of new highly-efficient, potent drugs have meant that we are now faced with a new scenario in the management of viral hepatitis, particularly hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. The spectacular advances in hepatitis C virus treatment have led the World Health Organization to propose the objective of its eradication by 2030. The key aspect to achieving this goal is to ensure that these treatments reach all the more vulnerable population groups, in whom the different types of viral hepatitis have a high prevalence and constitute a niche that may perpetuate infection and hinder its eradication. Accordingly, micro-elimination programs assume special relevance at the present time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocío González Grande
- UGC de Aparato Digestivo. Unidad de Hepatología-Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga 29010, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Santaella Leiva
- UGC de Aparato Digestivo. Unidad de Hepatología-Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga 29010, Spain
| | - Susana López Ortega
- UGC de Aparato Digestivo. Unidad de Hepatología-Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga 29010, Spain
| | - Miguel Jiménez Pérez
- UGC de Aparato Digestivo. Unidad de Hepatología-Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga 29010, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dooghaie Moghadam A, Eslami P, Dowlati Beirami A, Iravani S, Farokhi E, Mansour-Ghanaei A, Hashemi MR, Aghajanpoor Pasha M, Mehrvar A, Nassiri-Toosi M. An Overview of the Current Hepatitis B Treatment Strategies after Liver Transplantation. Middle East J Dig Dis 2021; 13:5-14. [PMID: 34712432 PMCID: PMC8531931 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, liver transplantation (LT) is considered as the only option for the treatment of patients with various causes of liver failure, including patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. Overall, patients with HBV who undergo LT are at increased risk of hepatitis B infection recurrence. Although the current knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of this infection has been dramatically increased over the past few decades, it is still considered a complex disease process with varying degrees of clinical characteristics and changing patterns over time. There are various treatment strategies for preventing HBV recurrence in the LT setting. Generally, these regimens include oral nucleoside/ nucleotide analogues (NAs), hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), and vaccines or the combination of these drugs. The treatment strategy of choice should be based on cost-effectiveness, along with other patients underlying conditions. In this case, studies indicate that potent NAs are more cost-effective than HBIG in most case scenarios. In this article, we aimed to review the general medications used in the prophylaxis of the recurrence of HBV infection after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Dooghaie Moghadam
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pegah Eslami
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirreza Dowlati Beirami
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahrokh Iravani
- Research Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ermia Farokhi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Mansour-Ghanaei
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center (GLDRC), Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran
| | - Mahmood Reza Hashemi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Aghajanpoor Pasha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azim Mehrvar
- Research Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohssen Nassiri-Toosi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muhammad H, Zaffar D, Tehreem A, Ting PS, Simsek C, Gokcan H, Gurakar A, Idilman R. HBV/HDV management after liver transplantation: Review. JOURNAL OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.liver.2021.100046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
6
|
Shen Z, Wang Z, Jiang Y, Wu T, Zheng S. Early outcomes of implanting larger-sized grafts in deceased donor liver transplantation. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:1352-1357. [PMID: 32691510 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcomes of large-sized graft mismatch in deceased donor liver transplantation (LT) have been rarely studied. The aim of this study was to determine whether a large-sized graft for recipient influenced the post-transplant outcomes. METHODS A total of 273 patients undergoing LT were enrolled and divided into a large and a normal-sized graft group by graft weight to recipient weight (GWRW) >2.5% (n = 76) or GWRW ≤2.5% (n = 197). Post-operative complications and outcomes were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS The two groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the large-sized graft group including early allograft dysfunction (36.8% versus 17.8%, P = 0.001), hepatic necrosis (26.3% versus 13.7%, P = 0.01) and massive hydrothorax (25% versus 14.7%, P = 0.04). The large-sized graft group suffered higher early mortality compared with the normal-sized graft group (30 days: 14.5% versus 5.6%, P = 0.02, 90 days: 21.1% versus 9.6%, P = 0.01). The primary causes of early death were multiple organ failure (10.5% versus 2%, P = 0.002) and sepsis (2.6% versus 1.5%, P = 0.54). Four parameters including donor alanine transaminase, GWRW, estimated blood loss and model for end-stage liver disease score were significant on multivariate analysis, and indicated significant risk factors for the early mortality of recipients. CONCLUSION In deceased donor LT, GWRW >2.5% is associated with increased liver injury, risk of early mortality and other adverse outcomes. Thus, donor livers should be allocated to recipients with GWRW ≤2.5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Shen
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Huzhou Central Hospital), Huzhou, China
| | - Zhize Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuancong Jiang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tianchun Wu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious diseases, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dobrindt EM, Keshi E, Salim Y, Gillespie A, Saipbaev A, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Pratschke J, Eurich D. Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin discontinuation in long-term liver transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13303. [PMID: 32367631 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-as a monotherapy or combined with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs)-has effectively lowered Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. However, it is associated with high costs and viral resistance. HBIG-free prophylaxis with novel NUCs (tenofovir, entecavir) composes a viable alternative. We evaluated reinfection rate, histological changes, and outcome associated with HBIG discontinuation. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease at our center since 1988. A controlled HBIG discontinuation was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in 65 patients. Recurrent infection was determined by HbsAg values. Fibrosis and inflammation were evaluated by routine biopsy. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was compared to a control population on HBIG for prophylaxis. RESULTS From 1988 to 2013, 352 patients underwent liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease. 169 patients could be included for analysis. 104 (51.5%) patients continued a prophylaxis containing HBIG. HBIG was discontinued in 65 (38.5%) patients in a controlled manner, maintaining an oral NUC. None of those patients showed HBV reinfection or graft dysfunction. No significant changes of inflammation grades (P = .067) or fibrosis stages (P = .051) were detected. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was comparable to the control (P = .95). CONCLUSION HBIG withdrawal under continuation of oral NUC therapy is safe and not related to graft dysfunction, based on blood tests and histology. HBIG-free prophylaxis is not associated with a worse outcome and displays a financial relief as well as a logistic simplification during long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Maria Dobrindt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eriselda Keshi
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yones Salim
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Allan Gillespie
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Akylbek Saipbaev
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sasadeusz J, Grigg A, Hughes PD, Lee Lim S, Lucas M, McColl G, McLachlan SA, Peters MG, Shackel N, Slavin M, Sundararajan V, Thompson A, Doyle J, Rickard J, De Cruz P, Gish RG, Visvanathan K. Screening and Prophylaxis to Prevent Hepatitis B Reactivation: Transplant Recipients. Clin Liver Dis 2019; 23:493-509. [PMID: 31266623 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2019.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is a lifesaving procedure for many patients. To prevent rejection or graft-versus-host disease, recipients require long-term immunosuppression. In patients who have ever been exposed to hepatitis B, it is possible for reactivation to occur; this includes patients who are anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive only or both anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive and hepatitis B surface antibody-positive. The susceptibility to this varies with the nature of the transplant. Hepatitis B can be transmitted from donor to recipient. It is important to assess the hepatitis B status and formulate a strategy to prevent transmission and prevent reactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Sasadeusz
- Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
| | - Andrew Grigg
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Peter D Hughes
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
| | - Seng Lee Lim
- National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119077, Singapore
| | - Michaela Lucas
- University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Geoff McColl
- University of Queensland Oral Health Centre, 288 Herston Road, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Sue Anne McLachlan
- St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
| | - Marion G Peters
- University of California, San Francisco, S357 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Nicholas Shackel
- Ingham Institute, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, Sydney, New South Wales 2170, Australia
| | - Monica Slavin
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - Vijaya Sundararajan
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia; Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Alexander Thompson
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
| | - Joseph Doyle
- The Alfred and Monash University, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - James Rickard
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Peter De Cruz
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Robert G Gish
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kumar Visvanathan
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ajayi T, Luu H, Saberi B, Hamilton JP, Konduk BT, Özşeker B, Al Khalloufi K, Pustavoitau A, Philosophe B, Cameron AM, Gürakar A. Role of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and low-dose hepatitis B immune globülin in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence among cadaveric liver transplant recipients. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2018; 29:61-66. [PMID: 29391309 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positivity of the donor or the recipient may pose a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation following liver transplantation (LT). We retrospectively investigated patient survival and reactivation among recipients who were given low-dose Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG) plus antiviral agent (AV) versus AV only. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records of cadaveric LT recipients, between 2013 and 2016, with positive Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBsAg) and/or HBcAb and recipients who had received LT from HBcAb-positive donors were reviewed. Patient characteristics and clinical data were extracted. Donor variables were retrieved from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. HBIG (1560 IU/mL) Intravenous (IV) was intraoperatively administered with three daily doses. Entecavir 1 mg daily was also given. STATA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS There were 53 recipients; 39 (73.6%) were male with a median age of 59 y. HCV was the major indication in 30 (55.6%) patients. There were 28 recipients (52.8%) who received HBIG plus AV and 25 (47.2%) received AV only. The Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score between the groups were similar. Survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 100% (n=53), 93.2% (n=44), and 100.0% (n=26), respectively. There was no reactivation; two recipients in the AV group and one in the HBIG plus AV group died within 12 months. CONCLUSION This study supports the use of low-dose HBIG and AV for post-LT prophylaxis to be as effective as conventionally used high-dose HBIG (9600 IU) plus AV. Future prospective larger studies are warranted to examine the potential benefits of using AV alone without HBIG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tokunbo Ajayi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Harry Luu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Behnam Saberi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - James P Hamilton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bugra Tolga Konduk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Burak Özşeker
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kawtar Al Khalloufi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Aliaksei Pustavoitau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Benjamin Philosophe
- Transplant Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew M Cameron
- Transplant Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ahmet Gürakar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Transplant Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yu Y, Ai J, Zhang W. Current clinical evidence for nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:925-937. [PMID: 28661190 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1343665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of death globally and is frequently seen following Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or Hepatitis C virus infection. Areas with high HBV infection rates, such as Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, are therefore also high-risk areas for HCC. Areas covered: This review identifies and discusses the current evidence from robust clinical trials which have investigated the benefits of Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) antiviral therapy in HBV-related HCC patients, including HCC patients that underwent liver transplantation and HCC patients with or without curative treatment. In addition, we assess how this evidence has influenced current clinical practice, with a particular focus on those areas of high HBV infection rates. Expert commentary: A number of studies have assessed whether NA antiviral treatment can improve the prognosis of HBV-related HCC patients. In this review we evaluate the current evidence, including that from trials in Asia, for antiviral NA treatments in HBV-related HCC patients. We also focus on those NAs with a high genetic barrier to resistance (i.e. ETV or TDF), on different therapeutic approaches, and on the future evidence that is required in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqi Yu
- a Department of Infectious Diseases , Huashan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China
| | - Jingwen Ai
- a Department of Infectious Diseases , Huashan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China
| | - Wenhong Zhang
- a Department of Infectious Diseases , Huashan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The therapeutic goal which is currently unfrequent but realistic in HBV infected patients is sustained HBsAg clearance. It is preceded by the loss or significant suppression of HBV replication and leads to inhibition of the progression of liver fibrosis, normalization of biochemical indicators of liver damage, reduction in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, prolongation of survival, prevention of HBV infection in the transplanted organ in post-transplant patients, enhancement of the quality of life, inhibition or reversal of extrahepatic changes associated with HBV infection, and halting of the spread of HBV infections. Recommendations of Polish Group of Experts for HBV for 2017 provide guidelines to assess treatment eligibility, choice of the first-line drug, monitoring and duration of treatment, management of treatment failure as well as therapy of HBV associated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover it contains advice for treatment of HBV infection in children, females planning pregnancy or pregnant. We also included recommendations for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis, prevention of HBV transmission from mother to infant, after liver transplantation, on immunosuppressive therapy and during HCV treatment.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection contributes significantly to vaccine-preventable disease related deaths, and insufficient HBV immunity may have unique implications for the pediatric liver transplant population. This article reviews the significance of HBV infection and the vaccination and screening measures needed to achieve adequate HBV immunity in these children. RECENT FINDINGS HBV non-immunity among transplant candidates is higher than expected, even after appropriate completion of the vaccine series. Annual measurement of quantifiable HBV surface antibody in this vulnerable group should guide administration of booster and/or re-vaccination, improving immunoprotection from this potentially deadly hepatotropic virus. The liver plays a vital role in immune regulation; it induces immune tolerance and competence and both clears antigens from the circulation and generates liver-primed memory cells through antigen presentation via hepatic scavenger cells. Lymphocyte populations are depleted in patients with liver disease. SUMMARY Immunity provided during early childhood against HBV infection is important to both pediatric liver transplant candidates and aging recipients. Appropriate vaccination and achievement of adequate immunity pre-transplant and post-transplant is critical. The field of pediatric transplantation is ripe for functional cellular and humoral immunity studies that examine factors which predict poor immune response to childhood vaccines, particularly HBV.
Collapse
|
13
|
Liver transplantation today. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016; 21:186-7. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|