Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver in the era of gadoxetic acid

Hepatobiliary phase imaging in cirrhotic patients using compressed sensing and controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the image quality and focal lesion detection ability of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images obtained using compressed sensing (CS) and controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 244 gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI from 244 patients with cirrhosis obtained by two HBP images using CS and CAIPIRINHA from July 2020 to December 2020. The optimized resolution and scan time for CS-HBP and CAIPIRINHA-HBP were 0.9 × 0.9 × 1.5 mm3 and 15 s and 1.3 × 1.3 × 3 mm3 and 16 s, respectively. We compared the image quality between the two sets of images in 244 patients and focal lesion (n = 294) analyses for 112 patients.

RESULTS

CS-HBP showed comparable overall image quality (3.7 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.680), superior liver edge sharpness (3.9 ± 0.6 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), and fewer respiratory motion artifacts (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), but higher non-respiratory artifacts (3.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) and subjective image noise (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, p = 0.014) than CAIPIRINHA-HBP. CS-HBP showed a higher signal-to-noise ratio in the liver than CAIPIRINHA-HBP (20.9 ± 9.0 vs. 18.9 ± 7.1, p = 0.008). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90.0%, 77.5%, and 0.84 for CS-HBP and 73.5%, 82.4%, and 0.78 for CAIPIRINHA-HBP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CS-HBP showed better focal lesion detection ability, comparable overall image quality, and fewer respiratory motion artifacts, but higher non-respiratory artifacts and noise compared to CAIPIRINHA-HBP. Thus, CS-HBP could be recommended for liver MRI in patients with cirrhosis to improve diagnostic performance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Thin-slice CS-HBP may be useful for detecting sub-centimeter hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh classification A while maintaining comparable subjective image quality.

KEY POINTS

• Compared with controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration, compressed sensing hepatobiliary phase yielded thinner slices and shorter scan time at a higher accelerating factor. • Compressed sensing hepatobiliary phase showed comparable overall image quality, superior liver edge sharpness, and fewer respiratory motion artifacts, but higher non-respiratory artifacts and subjective image noise than controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration-hepatobiliary phase. • Compressed sensing hepatobiliary phase can detect sub-centimeter hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh classification A.

Gadoxetic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: pearls and pitfalls

Gadoxetic disodium (Primovist) is a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent with increasing popularity with its unique dual dynamic and excretory properties in focal liver lesion detection and characterisation. In-depth knowledge of its diagnostic utility and pitfalls in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases is crucial in facilitating clinical management. The current article reviews the pearls and pitfalls in these aspects with highlights from the latest research evidence. Pearls for common usage of Primovist in HCC includes detection of precursor cancer lesions in cirrhotic patients. Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity precedes arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without APHE can represent early or progressed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and high-grade dysplastic nodules. In addition, Primovist is useful to differentiate HCC from pseudolesions. Pitfalls in diagnosing HCC include transient tachypnoea in the arterial phase, rare hepatobiliary phase hyperintense HCC, and decompensated liver cirrhosis compromising image quality. Primovist is currently the most sensitive technique in diagnosing liver metastases before curative hepatic resection. Other patterns of enhancement of liver metastases, "disappearing" liver metastases are important pitfalls. Radiologists should be aware of the diagnostic utility, limitations, and potential pitfalls for the common usage of hepatobiliary specific contrast agent in liver MRI.

Imaging Findings in Cirrhotic Liver: Pearls and Pitfalls for Diagnosis of Focal Benign and Malignant Lesions

Cirrhosis is the end stage of chronic liver disease and causes architectural distortion and perfusional anomalies. It is a major risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Common disease entities in noncirrhotic livers, such as hemangiomas, can be rare in cirrhotic livers, and benign entities such as confluent hepatic fibrosis and focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions may mimic the appearance of malignancies,. HCC usually has typical imaging characteristics, such as the major features established by the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. However, HCC can also have a spectrum of atypical or uncommon appearances, such as cystic HCC, hypovascular HCC, or macroscopic fat-containing HCC. HCCs with certain genetic mutations such as CTNNB-1-mutated HCC can harbor unique imaging features not seen in other types of HCC. In addition, malignancies that are less common than HCC, such as cholangiocarcinoma and metastases, which can be difficult to differentiate, can still occur in cirrhotic livers. Atypical imaging features of benign and malignant lesions can be challenging to accurately diagnose. Therefore, familiarity with these features and an understanding of the prevalence of disease entities in cirrhotic livers are key in the daily practice of radiologists for evaluation of cirrhotic livers. The authors illustrate the typical and atypical features of benign and malignant lesions in cirrhosis and discuss the technical pitfalls and unique advantages associated with various imaging modalities in assessing cirrhotic livers, including noncontrast and contrast-enhanced US, CT, and MRI. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Utility of Wavelet Denoising with Geometry Factor Weighting for Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatobiliary-phase MR Imaging

PURPOSE

The wavelet denoising with geometry factor weighting (g-denoising) method can reduce the image noise by adapting to spatially varying noise levels induced by parallel imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical applicability of g-denoising on hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images with gadoxetic acid.

METHODS

We subjected 53 patients suspected of harboring hepatic neoplastic lesions to gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP imaging with and without g-denoising (g⁺HBP and g^-HBP). The matrix size was reduced for g⁺HBP images to avoid prolonging the scanning time. Two radiologists calculated the SNR, the portal vein-, and paraspinal muscle contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) relative to the hepatic parenchyma (liver-to-portal vein- and liver-to-muscle CNR). Two other radiologists independently graded the sharpness of the liver edge, the visibility of intrahepatic vessels, the image noise, the homogeneity of liver parenchyma, and the overall image quality using a 5-point scale. Differences between g^-HBP and g⁺HBP images were determined with the two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The liver-to-portal- and liver-to-muscle CNR and the SNR were significantly higher on g⁺HBP- than g^-HBP images (P < 0.01), as was the qualitative score for the image noise, homogeneity of liver parenchyma, and overall image quality (P < 0.01). Although there were no significant differences in the scores for the sharpness of the liver edge or the score assigned for the visibility of intrahepatic vessels (P = 0.05, 0.43), with g⁺HBP the score was lower in three patients for the sharpness of the liver edge and in six patients for the visibility of intrahepatic vessels.

CONCLUSION

At gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP imaging, g-denoising yielded a better image quality than conventional HBP imaging although the anatomic details may be degraded.

Advances in liver US, CT, and MRI: moving toward the future

Over the past two decades, the epidemiology of chronic liver disease has changed with an increase in the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in parallel to the advent of curative treatments for hepatitis C. Recent developments provided new tools for diagnosis and monitoring of liver diseases based on ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as applied for assessing steatosis, fibrosis, and focal lesions. This narrative review aims to discuss the emerging approaches for qualitative and quantitative liver imaging, focusing on those expected to become adopted in clinical practice in the next 5 to 10 years. While radiomics is an emerging tool for many of these applications, dedicated techniques have been investigated for US (controlled attenuation parameter, backscatter coefficient, elastography methods such as point shear wave elastography [pSWE] and transient elastography [TE], novel Doppler techniques, and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound [3D-CEUS]), CT (dual-energy, spectral photon counting, extracellular volume fraction, perfusion, and surface nodularity), and MRI (proton density fat fraction [PDFF], elastography [MRE], contrast enhancement index, relative enhancement, T1 mapping on the hepatobiliary phase, perfusion). Concurrently, the advent of abbreviated MRI protocols will help fulfill an increasing number of examination requests in an era of healthcare resource constraints.

Intraindividual Comparison of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Washout between MRIs with Hepatobiliary and Extracellular Contrast Agents

Objective

To intraindividually compare hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) washout between MRIs using hepatobiliary agent (HBA) and extracellular agent (ECA).

Materials and Methods

This study included 114 prospectively enrolled patients with chronic liver disease (mean age, 55 ± 9 years; 94 men) who underwent both HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI before surgical resection for HCC between November 2016 and May 2019. For 114 HCCs, the lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio (SIR) using a 5-point scale (−2 to +2) was evaluated in each phase. Washout was defined as negative visual SIR with temporal reduction of visual SIR from the arterial phase. Illusional washout (IW) was defined as a visual SIR of 0 with an enhancing capsule. The frequency of washout and MRI sensitivity for HCC using LR-5 or its modifications were compared between HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI. Subgroup analysis was performed according to lesion size (< 20 mm or ≥ 20 mm).

Results

The frequency of portal venous phase (PP) washout with HBA-MRI was comparable to that of delayed phase (DP) washout with ECA-MRI (77.2% [88/114] vs. 68.4% [78/114]; p = 0.134). The frequencies were also comparable when IW was allowed (79.8% [91/114] for HBA-MRI vs. 81.6% [93/114] for ECA-MRI; p = 0.845). The sensitivities for HCC of LR-5 (using PP or DP washout) were comparable between HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI (78.1% [89/114] vs. 73.7% [84/114]; p = 0.458). In HCCs < 20 mm, the sensitivity of LR-5 was higher on HBA-MRI than on ECA-MRI (70.8% [34/48] vs. 50.0% [24/48]; p = 0.034). The sensitivity was similar to each other if IW was added to LR-5 (72.9% [35/48] for HBA-MRI vs. 70.8% [34/48] for ECA-MRI; p > 0.999).

Conclusion

Extracellular phase washout for HCC diagnosis was comparable between MRIs with both contrast agents, except for tumors < 20 mm. Adding IW could improve the sensitivity for HCC on ECA-MRI in tumors < 20 mm.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Assessment of arterial phase artifacts and hepatobiliary uptake in a large series

PURPOSE

To report the quality of gadoxetate disodium MRI in a large series by assessing the prevalence of: 1) arterial phase (AP) artifacts and its predictive factors, 2) decreased hepatic contrast uptake during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP).

METHODS

This retrospective single center study included 851 patients (M/F:537/314, mean age: 63y) with gadoxetate disodium MRI. The MRI protocol included unenhanced, dual arterial [early and late arterial phases (AP)], portal venous, transitional and hepatobiliary phases. Three radiologists graded dynamic images using a 5-scale score (1: no motion, 5: severe, nondiagnostic) for assessment of transient severe motion (TSM, defined as a score ≥4 during at least one AP with a score ≤3 during other phases). HBP uptake was assessed using a 3-scale score (based on portal vein/hepatic signal). The association between demographic, clinical and acquisition parameters with TSM was tested in uni- and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

TSM was observed in 103/851 patients (12.1 %): 83 (9.8 %) in one AP and 20 (2.3 %) in both APs. A score of 5 (nondiagnostic) was assigned in 7 patients in one AP (0.8 %) and none in both. Presence of TSM was significantly associated with age (p = 0.002) and liver disease (p = 0.033) in univariate but not in multivariate analysis (p > 0.05). No association was found between acquisition parameters and TSM occurrence. Limited or severely limited HBP contrast uptake was observed in 87 patients (10.2 %), and TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.

CONCLUSION

TSM was present in approximately 12 % of gadoxetate disodium MRIs, rarely on both APs (2.3 %), and was poorly predicted. TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.

Outcome of LR-3 and LR-4 observations without arterial phase hyperenhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of LR-3 and LR-4 without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), and identify which features could predict LR-5 progression on serial Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up.

METHODS

Forty-nine cirrhotic patients with 55 LR-3 and 19 LR-4 without APHE were evaluated. Observations were classified as decreased, stable or increased in category at follow-up. Observation size and LI-RADS major and ancillary features were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen/fifty-five (31%) LR-3 and 8/19 (42%) LR-4 progressed to LR-5 at follow-up. Baseline LI-RADS major and ancillary features were not significantly different among LR-3 and LR-4. A diameter ≥ 10 mm significantly increased LR-5 progression risk of LR-3 (OR = 6.07; 95% CI: 0.12; 60.28]; P < .001). LR-4 with a diameter ≥ 10 mm more likely become LR-5 at follow-up (OR = 8.95; 95% CI: 0.73; 111.8; P = .083]).

CONCLUSION

LR-3 and LR-4 without APHE were often downgraded or remained stable in category on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up.

Lipase hypersecretion syndrome: A rare cutaneous manifestation of advanced pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma

Careful recognition of cutaneous lesions in patients with malignancies may aid in avoiding additional morbidity during end of life care.

An obese patient with acute cholecystitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cirrhosis: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis and liver cirrhosis is associated with increased risk. We present an obese patient with acute cholecystitis and liver cirrhosis caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), who was successfully managed with laparoscopic cholecystostomy and a low-carbohydrate diet with exercise.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 61-year-old woman presented with right upper quadrant abdominal pain. Ultrasonography and computed tomography were consistent with acute cholecystitis with multiple stones and cirrhosis. The patient had no history of alcohol intake, and serologic tests were negative. The patient's body mass index was 39 kg/m² (154 cm, 93 kg) and NASH was suspected. Percutaneous transhepatic drainage was impossible because of the anatomic position of the gallbladder. Emergency laparoscopic cholecystostomy was performed initially for drainage. A low-carbohydrate diet and exercise were started for weight loss and her weight reduced by 19 kg over three months. Open cholecystectomy was performed uneventfully, and liver biopsy suggested NASH.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic cholecystostomy is a reasonable temporary alternative to cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and increased surgical risk. Weight loss with diet and exercise can be effective in patients with NASH. A low-carbohydrate diet is a reasonable treatment for NASH, because glucose is converted to triglycerides and stored as lipid in the liver.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystostomy was effective in this obese patient with acute cholecystitis and NASH cirrhosis. Using a low-carbohydrate diet with exercise, her weight decreased, and subsequent open cholecystectomy was uneventful.

Comparison of the Enhancement Pattern of Hepatic Hemangioma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Performed With Gd-EOB-DTPA Versus Gd-BOPTA

PURPOSE

To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine for the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 26 hemangiomas (mean size was 14 mm ± 10 mm) in 19 patients (mean age 60 ± 14 years) scanned with both gadobenate dimeglumine MRI and gadoxetic acid MRI. For each patient, we collected multiple lesion variables including location, number, size and enhancement pattern on arterial, portal venous, 3-minute and hepatobiliary phases with both gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine. The enhancement pattern with the two contrast agents was then compared.

RESULTS

The typical enhancement pattern of hepatic hemangiomas was more common-though not statistically significant-with gadobenate dimeglumine compared to gadoxetic acid (57% [15 of 26] vs 42% [11 of 26], respectively; P = 0.4057 for both peripheral globular discontinuous enhancement in the arterial phase and centripetal fill-in in the portal venous phase). A significantly higher number of hemangiomas showed centripetal fill-in or hyperintensity in the 3-minute phase with gadobenate dimeglumine compared to gadoxetic acid (88% [23 of 26) vs 58% [15 of 26]; P = 0.0266). A pseudo washout sign in the 3-minute phase was detected in one of the 5 flash-filling hemangiomas with gadoxetic acid, but not gadobenate dimeglumine. All hemangiomas were hypointense in the hepatobiliary phase with both gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhancement pattern of hepatic hemangiomas may vary depending on the hepatobiliary agent, with more frequent lack of the typical pattern with gadoxetic acid compared to gadobenate dimeglumine.

Hepatobiliary phase in cirrhotic patients with different Model for End-stage Liver Disease score: comparison of the performance of gadoxetic acid to gadobenate dimeglumine

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in cirrhotic patients with different degrees of liver dysfunction.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed the unenhanced phase and the HBP of 131 gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI examinations (gadobenate dimeglumine group) and 127 gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI examinations (gadoxetic acid group) performed in 249 cirrhotic patients (181 men and 68 women; mean age, 64.8 years) from August 2011 to April 2017. For each MRI, the contrast enhancement index of the liver parenchyma was calculated and correlated to the Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (multiple linear regression analysis). A qualitative analysis of the adequacy of the HBP, adjusted for the MELD score (logistic regression analysis), was performed.

RESULTS

The contrast enhancement index was inversely related (r = - 0.013) with MELD score in both gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine group. At the same MELD score, the contrast enhancement index in the gadoxetic acid group was increased by a factor of 0.23 compared to the gadobenate dimeglumine group (p < 0.001), and the mean odds ratio to have an adequate HBP with gadoxetic acid compared to gadobenate dimeglumine was 3.64 (p < 0.001). The adequacy of the HBP in the gadoxetic acid group compared to the gadobenate dimeglumine group increased with the increase of the MELD score (exp(b)interaction = 1.233; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic patients, the hepatobiliary phase obtained with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is of better quality in comparison to gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI, mainly in patients with high MELD score.

KEY POINTS

• In cirrhotic patients, the adequacy of the hepatobiliary phase with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is better compared to gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI should be preferred to gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in cirrhotic patients with MELD score > 10, if the hepatobiliary phase is clinically indicated. • In patients with high MELD score (> 15), the administration of the hepatobiliary agent could be useless; even though, if it is clinically indicated, we recommend to use gadoxetic acid given the higher probability of obtaining clinically relevant information.

LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Accurate detection and characterization of liver observations to enable HCC diagnosis and staging using LI-RADS requires a technically adequate imaging exam. To help achieve this objective, LI-RADS has proposed technical requirements for CT, MR, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver. This article reviews the technical requirements for liver imaging, including the description of minimum acceptable technical standards, such as the scanner hardware requirements, recommended dynamic imaging phases, and common technical challenges of liver imaging.

Diffuse Liver Diseases: Role of imaging

Nowadays, the most common imaging techniques allow to study focal liver lesions with high diagnostic accuracy but a relatively recent emerging field of interest is represented by diffuse liver disease. They include a variegated series of storage and metabolic pathologies (ie, iron overload disorders and steatosis) requiring a precise diagnosis not always possible at imaging due to the overlapping of findings at conventional ultrasound, CT, or MR studies. In recent years, several imaging tecniques and specific softwares have been developed, especially for ultrasound and MR imaging, in order to identify different parameters useful in the noninvasive recognition and follow-up of these diffuse processes involving the liver. The aim of this article is to describe the most common and useful imaging findings of the most common and uncommon diffuse liver diseases illustrating the newest imaging technologies and developments at our disposal with corresponding advantages, limitations, and pitfalls.

Assessment of liver function by Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), a liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent, is increasingly used for imaging-based liver function tests. Like indocyanine green and mebrofenin, Gd-EOB-DTPA is taken up by hepatocytes through organic anion-transporting polypeptides 1 (OATP₁) B₁ and B₃ and is then excreted into the bile by multi-drug resistance protein (MRP₂). The advantages of Gd-EOB-DTPA-based liver function tests include function measurement integrated in an existing MRI protocol, ability of evaluating segmental liver function, and no ionizing radiation. The approaches based on Gd-EOB-DTPA for function measurement are as follows: measurement of biliary elimination, hepatic parenchymal enhancement, MR relaxometry, and MR perfusion. These approaches have potential value for assessing liver reserve, hepatic fibrosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and so on.