Solid, non-skin, post-liver transplant tumors: Key role of lifestyle and immunosuppression management

Liver Transplantation for Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Liver Disorder: Long-term Outcome

BACKGROUND

Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disorder (PSVD) is a rare disease that occasionally requires liver transplantation (LT), despite usually presenting preserved liver function. There remains a paucity of data pertaining to LT in PSVD. The aim was to identify features associated with post-LT outcomes in PSVD.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre study of 79 patients who received LT for PSVD.

RESULTS

Median post-LT follow-up was 37 (range 1-261) mo. Refractory ascites 24 (30%), hepatic encephalopathy 16 (20%), and hepatopulmonary syndrome 13 (16.3%) were the most frequent indications for LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the indication in only 2 patients. Twenty-four patients died, 7 due to liver and 17 to non-liver related causes. Post-LT survival was 82.2%, 80.7%, and 68.6% at 1, 2, and 5 y, respectively. Post-LT survival was significantly better in patients without (n = 58) than in those with a persistent severe PSVD-associated condition (n = 21). Pre-LT hyperbilirubinemia levels and creatinine >100 µmol/L were also independently associated with poor survival. Six patients (7.6%) required a second LT. Recurrence of PSVD was confirmed by liver biopsy in only 1 patient and in 3 further patients it was likely.

CONCLUSIONS

LT in PSVD is associated with an acceptable outcome in the absence of associated severe conditions. However, persistence of a severe associated condition, pre-LT high bilirubin levels, or creatinine >100 µmol/L impact outcome, and these are features that should be considered when evaluating PSVD patients for LT. PSVD recurrence is possible after LT and needs to be explored, at least, in cases of posttransplant portal hypertension.

Recurrent Liver Allograft Injury in Patients With Donor-Derived Malignancy Treated With Immunosuppression Cessation and Retransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Donor-derived malignancy of the liver allograft is a rare but serious condition in the setting of necessary immunosuppression. Retransplantation after abrupt immunosuppression cessation has been performed with durable cancer-free survival.

METHODS

We present 2 cases of patients with donor-derived malignancy who were treated with complete immunosuppression cessation, which induced rapidly progressive liver allograft rejection and failure, with a need for subsequent retransplantation. We reviewed all serial liver biopsies and explants from both patients and performed C4d immunostaining.

RESULTS

Initial explants of both patients showed severe allograft rejection, with unusual features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and C4d positivity. Malignant tumors in the explants were necrotic, related to rejection of donor-derived cancer cells and tissue. Follow-up of both patients has shown long-term cancer-free survival but issues with recurrent allograft failure requiring a third transplant. The reasons for retransplantation in both cases were related to allograft failure from antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of a potentially increased risk of rejection and recurrent allograft failure when strategizing treatment of donor-derived malignancy with immunosuppression cessation and retransplantation.

The Need to Update Endpoints and Outcome Analysis in the Rapidly Changing Field of Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) survival rates have continued to improve over the last decades, mostly due to the reduction of mortality early after transplantation. The advancement is facilitating a liberalization of access to LT, with more patients with higher risk profiles being added to the waiting list. At the same time, the persisting organ shortage fosters strategies to rescue organs of high-risk donors. This is facilitated by novel technologies such as machine perfusion. Owing to these developments, reconsideration of the current and emerging endpoints for the assessment of the efficacy of existing and new therapies is warranted. While conventional early endpoints in LT have focused on the damage induced to the parenchyma, the fate of the bile duct and the recurrence of the underlying disease have a stronger impact on the long-term outcome. In light of this evolving landscape, we here attempt to reflect on the appropriateness of the currently used endpoints in the field of LT trials.

Interactions between human microbiome, liver diseases, and immunosuppression after liver transplant

In liver transplant patients, solid tumors and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders have emerged as significant long-term mortality causes. In addition, it is assumed that de novo malignancy after liver transplantation (LT) is the second-leading cause of death after cardiovascular complications. Well-established risk factors for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumors are calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine, the cornerstones of all immunosuppressive therapies used after LT. The loss of immunocompetence facilitated by the host immune system due to prolonged immunosuppressive therapy leads to cancer development, including LT patients. Furthermore, various mechanisms such as bacterial dysbiosis, activation through microbe-associated molecular patterns, leaky gut, and bacterial metabolites can drive cancer-promoting liver inflammation, fibrosis, and genotoxicity. Therefore, changes in human microbiota composition may contribute further to de novo carcinogenesis associated with the severe immunosuppression after LT.

Foremost Concepts in Mechanisms of De Novo Post-Liver Transplantation Malignancy

In liver transplant patients, solid tumors and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) have emerged as significant long-term mortality causes. Additionally, it is assumed that de novo malignancy (DNM) after liver transplantation (LT) is the second-leading cause of death after cardiovascular complications. Well-established risk factors for PTLD and solid tumors are calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), tacrolimus (TAC), and cyclosporine, the cornerstones of all immunosuppressive (IS) therapies used after LT. The loss of immunocompetence facilitated by the host immune system due to prolonged IS therapy leads to cancer development, including in LT patients. Hindering DNA repair mechanisms, promoting tumor cell invasiveness, and hampering apoptosis are critical events in tumorigenesis and tumor growth in LT patients resulting from IS administration. This paper aims to overview the refined mechanisms of IS-induced tumorigenesis after LT and the loss of immunocompetence facilitated by the host immune system due to prolonged IS therapy. In addition, we also discuss in detail the mechanisms of action in different types of IS regimen used after LT, and their putative effect on DNM.

Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany

Improving long-term patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major challenge. Compared to the early phase after LT, long-term morbidity and mortality of the recipients not only depends on complications immediately related to the graft function, infections, or rejection, but also on medical factors such as de novo malignancies, metabolic disorders (e.g., new-onset diabetes, osteoporosis), psychiatric conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression), renal failure, and cardiovascular diseases. While a comprehensive post-transplant care at the LT center and the connected regional networks may improve outcome, there is currently no generally accepted standard to the post-transplant management of LT recipients in Germany. We therefore described the structure and standards of post-LT care by conducting a survey at 12 German LT centers including transplant hepatologists and surgeons. Aftercare structures and form of cost reimbursement considerably varied between LT centers across Germany. Further discussions and studies are required to define optimal structure and content of post-LT care systems, aiming at improving the long-term outcomes of LT recipients.

Non-adherence and transition clinics

The majority of children who undergo liver transplantation now survive into adulthood and their requirement for life-long follow-up means that they will need to transition from paediatric to adult services. Poor transition is a risk factor for poor clinical and psychosocial outcomes and one of the barriers to effective transition is vulnerability to risk-taking behaviours, and specifically non-adherence. This chapter focuses on practical considerations for transitioning young people from paediatric to adult services, with a particular focus on the risk factors associated with non-adherence and examples of interventions for managing it.

Tacrolimus exposure after liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver disease: Impact on complications

BACKGROUND

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is one of the main indications for liver transplantation (LT). For 20 years, tacrolimus (Tac) is the cornerstone immunosuppressive drug used after LT and is very efficient for the prevention of rejection. Nevertheless, the major drawback of long-term use of Tac is the risk for developing dose-dependent adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of Tac exposure (trough concentrations and concentration/dose (C/D) ratio) during the first year after LT, on short- and long-term complications after LT for ALD.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a LT for ALD at Lyon Edouard Herriot Hospital from October 1990 to September 2010, and who were treated with Tac for at least one year after LT, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study population consisted in 251 patients, mean age 53.4 ± 7.3 years, and followed during 11.6 ± 4.8 years. Post-LT complications included severe infectious events (44.6%), malignancies (41.4%), arterial hypertension (49.4%) dyslipidemia (44.2%), diabetes (18.7%) and cardiovascular events (15.5%). De novo hypertension, cardiovascular event, CMV infection, non-melanoma skin cancers and HCC recurrence after transplantation were significantly associated with higher Tac trough blood concentration. In addition, Tac fast-metabolizers (defined as C/D < 1.8) had significantly more impaired renal function at 1, 5, and 10 years and more cardiovascular events, PTLD, diabetes and hypertension than slow-metabolizers.

CONCLUSION

Our results strongly support that, in addition to blood trough concentrations, Tac metabolism, as estimated by the simple C/D ratio, could be an efficient parameter in daily practice to identify LT patients at risk to develop long term general complications of Tac.

Long-term care of transplant recipients: de novo neoplasms after liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the first liver transplantation in the early 1960s, there have been significant improvements in the recipients' long-term outcome. Patients who have undergone transplantation are exposed to a high risk of developing neoplastic disease, not only because of their chronic immunosuppression, but also related to physiological aging, lifestyle, chronic viral infections, liver disease cause, and carcinogenic immunosuppressants. The present review covers the latest and most relevant data on de novo neoplasms after liver transplantation, and discusses their implications for clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the impact of de novo neoplasms, in terms of morbidity and mortality, transplant teams must be prepared to diagnose and treat these conditions promptly. Dedicated cancer screening protocols are warranted. Although surveillance strategies are based on data concerning the general population, they should be customized in the light of each transplant recipient's risk factors. The resulting risk stratification is crucially important to the design of early intervention programs, and for addressing the modulation of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.

SUMMARY

De novo malignancies are a significant issue for the liver transplant population, but targeted screening programs have shown that survival rates similar to those of nonimmunosuppressed patients can be achieved. New oncological surveillance strategies covering the prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment of de novo neoplasms should take high priority in clinical research.

De Novo Head and Neck Cancer After Liver Transplant With Antibody-Based Immunosuppression Induction

BACKGROUND

Powerful antibody-based immunosuppression induction is now used routinely during organ transplantation and may place patients at even higher risk of post-transplant cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incidence of de novo head and neck cancer was extracted from the records of 1685 consecutive adult deceased donor liver transplant recipients with a minimum 1-year follow-up from 2001 to 2015. There were 121 patients positively identified as having developed de novo head and neck cancer post-liver transplant. Records of these patients were analyzed to determine demographics, history of cancer pre-liver transplant, de novo cancer type and location, treatment modalities, and alcohol and tobacco exposure.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients who developed cancer of the head and neck (7%), there were 103 cutaneous (6%) and 25 noncutaneous (1%). For noncutaneous cancers, factors associated with increased risk of cancer included alcohol abuse (P < .001), any smoking history (P = .05), and increasing exposure to tobacco (P < .01). Ten-year Cox regression patient survival demonstrates a survival disadvantage for patients who develop noncutaneous cancer (P  = .06) but a survival advantage for patients who develop cutaneous cancer (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and pattern of head and neck cancer in this population of liver transplant recipients was similar to those published previously, suggesting that induction immunosuppression does not increase risk of these types of cancers. Long-term survival was worse for patients with noncutaneous cancers, but better for those with cutaneous cancers, though the reason is unclear.

Is big bad or bearable? Long-term renal transplant outcomes in obese recipients

BACKGROUND

The global obesity epidemic has implications for kidney transplantation. There are conflicting reports regarding the impact of obesity on long-term post-transplant outcomes.

AIM

To explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation.

DESIGN

The association between BMI and cardiovascular disease, cancer, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, graft and recipient survival was investigated in recipients who had been transplanted at least ten years previously.

METHODS

All consecutive adult renal transplant recipients who received first, deceased donor, transplants between 1986 and 2005 in Northern Ireland were followed-up until 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients were eligible. Of them, 96 were overweight with a BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, and 56 were obese with a BMI exceeding 29.9 kg/m2. Median follow-up time was 16.7 years. In multivariate analysis recipient BMI was associated with the development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (P=0.003), but not with new cardiovascular disease (P=0.78). Cancer was less common in recipients with a higher BMI (hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, P < 0.001). BMI at the time of transplantation did not significantly influence graft (P=0.28) or recipient survival (P=0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased BMI at time of transplantation is associated with an increased risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus but not new cardiovascular disease or malignancy. Long-term graft and recipient survival is not impacted. Potential recipients should not be excluded from transplantation solely on the basis of obesity, rather it should be considered as one part of an individualized risk stratification, based on comorbidity and considering the risk of death on maintenance dialysis.

Epidemiology and Etiology of Sarcomas

Sarcomas are rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin and are broadly divided into soft tissue sarcomas and bone sarcomas. The etiology of these tumors is largely unknown, and most sarcomas are sporadic. A small subset of sarcomas is associated with certain genetic syndromes and environmental factors. Ionizing radiation is the strongest environmental factor linked to sarcoma development.