Comprehensive risk assessment for early neurologic complications after liver transplantation

Improving treatment plan and mental health in children with abdominal infection for broad-spectrum bacterial infections

BACKGROUND

Pediatric abdominal infection is a common but serious disease that requires timely and effective treatment. In surgical treatment, accurate diagnosis and rational application of antibiotics are the keys to improving treatment effects.

AIM

To investigate the effect of broad-spectrum bacterial detection on postoperative antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

A total of 100 children with abdominal infection who received surgical treatment in our hospital from September 2020 to July 2021 were grouped. The observation group collected blood samples upon admission and sent them for broad-spectrum bacterial infection nucleic acid testing, and collected pus or exudate during the operation for bacterial culture and drug sensitivity testing; the control group only sent bacterial culture and drug sensitivity testing during the operation.

RESULTS

White blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, 3 days after surgery, showed better postoperative index than the control group (P < 0.05). The hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group. The hospitalization cost in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Early detection of broad-spectrum bacterial infection nucleic acids in pediatric abdominal infections can help identify pathogens sooner and guide the appropriate use of antibiotics, improving treatment outcomes and reducing medical costs to some extent.

Tacrolimus-Induced Neurotoxicity After Transplant: A Literature Review

Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is an immunosuppressant used globally to prevent rejection after organ transplantation. Although it significantly improves outcomes for solid organ transplant patients, it is associated with various side effects such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity is frequently encountered in clinical practice and can present with a variety of symptoms that may occur even at therapeutic levels. Although tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity is well documented, there is limited literature available on pharmacologic management. Twenty-eight case reports of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity were identified and analyzed in addition to other literature including reviews, retrospective studies, and animal model studies. The severity of cases of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity reported ranged from mild symptoms that could be managed with symptomatic treatment to conditions such as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy that may require more immediate intervention. This information was utilized in addition to clinical experience to compile potential management options for prevention and treatment of neurotoxic adverse events. This review is limited by the utilization of primarily retrospective studies and case reports. The available literature on the subject is largely narrative and there are no guidelines on treatment of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity at the time of this research. This comprehensive review may guide further studies to investigate the pathophysiology of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity and to define patient-specific strategies for mitigation or minimization of neurotoxicity. This is especially important given that management of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity can include changes to immunosuppression that can result in an increased risk of rejection.

Early neurologic complications after liver transplant are associated with reduced long-term survival and increased rates of rejection

Neurologic complications (NCs) are common following liver transplantation (LT) and have been associated with impaired short-term survival. The impact of NC on long-term survival is less defined. We aimed to characterize these outcomes and assess for risk factors for post-LT NC. We performed a single-center, retrospective review of 521 patients with LT from 2016 to 2020. Baseline clinical and laboratory factors, intraoperative events, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without NC. The 5-year overall and rejection-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable logistic regression assessed for an independent relationship between risk factors and the development of NC. Among 521 LT recipients, 24% experienced post-LT NC. Overall and rejection-free survival at 5 years was, respectively, 69% and 75% among those with NC versus 87% and 88% among those without NC (log-rank < 0.001). Among those who survived the first 3 months after LT, overall survival but not rejection-free survival was reduced among patients with NC. Risk factors for developing NC included peri-LT serum sodium (ΔSNa) ≥ 6 (29.4% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.04), grade 3 or 4 HE pre-LT, SNa < 125 pre-LT, and more intraoperative transfusions. In a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for described variables, SNa < 125 (or 0.21, 95% CI, 0.06-0.74) at LT and pre-LT HE grade 3 or 4 (or 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26-0.76) was independently associated with NC. Long-term survival was reduced among patients who developed NC in the immediate post-transplant period, even when censoring those who died in the first 3 months. Post-LT NC was associated with perioperative ΔSNa ≥ 6. Optimization of SNa pre-LT > 125 and limiting perioperative ΔSNa <6 mEq/L might have a beneficial impact in decreasing NC post-LT, which may improve long-term post-LT survival.

2021 Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation

In 2021, the United States performed 9,236 liver transplantations, an increase of 3.7% from 2020. As the specialty of transplant anesthesiologist continues to grow, so does the body of evidence-based research to improve patient care. New technology in organ preservation offers the possibility of preserving marginal organs for transplant or improving the graft for transplantation. The sequalae of end-stage liver disease have wide-ranging consequences that affect neurologic outcomes of patients both during and after transplantation that anesthesiologists should monitor. Obesity presents several challenges for anesthesiologists. As an increasing number of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are listed for transplant, managing their multiple comorbidities can be challenging. Finally, the rebalanced hemostasis of end-stage liver disease can cause both bleeding and thrombus. Often, bleeding risks predominate as a concern, but anesthesiologists should be aware of risks of intracardiac thrombus and review therapeutic options for prevention and treatment.

Hyponatremia and Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte disorder in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and is associated with increased mortality on the liver transplantation (LT) waiting list. The impact of hyponatremia on outcomes after LT is unclear. Ninety-day and one-year mortality may be increased, but the data are conflicting. Hyponatremic patients have an increased rate of complications and longer hospital stays after transplant. Although rare, osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) is a feared complication after LT in the hyponatremic patient. The condition may occur when the serum sodium (sNa) concentration increases excessively during or after LT. This increase in sNa concentration correlates with the degree of preoperative hyponatremia, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, and the volume of intravenous fluid administration. The risk of developing ODS after LT can be mitigated by avoiding large perioperative increases in sNa concentration . This can be achieved through measures such as carefully increasing the sNa pretransplant, and by limiting the intravenous intra- and postoperative amounts of sodium infused. SNa concentrations should be monitored regularly throughout the entire perioperative period.

Immunosuppressive drugs and associated complications in abdominal organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intensive care management of patients who have undergone organ transplantation of liver, small bowel, pancreas, and/or kidney requires a basic knowledge of immunosuppression principles and the management of immunosuppressive medications. This review highlights the core principles of immunosuppression management in abdominal organ transplantation with a focus on complications arising from immunosuppressive drugs, both in the immediate postoperative period and in long-term usage.

RECENT FINDINGS

The general principles of management of immunosuppression in the abdominal organ transplant population have remained largely unchanged. Improvements in drug monitoring coupled with improvements in knowledge of pathways involved in allograft rejection have further refined immunosuppressive therapy. Infectious and central nervous system complications remain prevalent and are common complications of immunosuppressive drug therapy.

SUMMARY

For the intensive care professional who cares for abdominal organ transplant recipients, a foundational knowledge of the core principles of immunosuppression management is essential. In addition, an understanding of the common immunosuppressive drug regimens and the complications associated with these regimens is required for optimal management, risk assessment, and outcomes.

Neurological Screening in Elderly Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Single Center Experience

Background: Cerebral small vessels disease (cSVD) is an age-related disorder and risk factor for stroke and cognitive/motor impairments. Neurological complications (NCs) are among the causes of adverse outcomes in older liver transplant recipients. This study sought to determine whether cSVD predicts acute NCs in over 65-year-old liver transplant patients. Methods: Data were collected, from a retrospective medical chart review, of 22 deceased donor liver transplant recipients aged 65 years or older with a pre-operative brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We used the Fazekas score (0–3) as a quantitative measurement of the vascular lesion load seen in the MRI. We analyzed all post-operative acute NCs occurring during the hospital stay and any other non-NC. Results: cSVD was recognized in all patients. Neurological complications (NCs) occurred in 18.1% of patients with toxic-metabolic encephalopathy the most frequent diagnosis (13.64%). More severe cSVD was associated with seizures (p = 0.0362), longer hospital stay (p 0.0299), and disability (p 0.0134). In our elderly cohort, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (p 0.0287) and ascites (p 0.0270) were predictors of NCs after liver transplantation. Ascites and/or variceal bleeding and severity of liver disease were associated with adverse post-operative outcomes. The small sample size limited the statistical analysis power. Conclusions: We present the preliminary data of a single-center retrospective study aimed at understanding the cSVD role on NCs and non-NCs after a liver transplantation in elderly patients. This would encourage a more appropriate multicenter prospective study that will definitely confirm if a neurological screening in old age liver transplant candidates is appropriate.

Association between donor/recipient MTRR gene polymorphisms and the risk of new-onset neurological complications after liver transplantation

Neurological complications are very common after liver transplantation. This study focuses on clinical risk factors and susceptibility gene polymorphisms of neurological complications after liver transplantation. A better predictive model is obtained. This study proves that MTRR is an independent susceptibility gene for neurological complications. Compared with the independent risk factor of abdominal infection, MTRR has a more advantageous value in predicting neurological complications after liver transplantation.

A 'real-world' analysis of risk factors for post liver transplant delirium and the effect on length of stay

BACKGROUND

The development of delirium has been previously demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of mortality and length of stay post liver transplant (LTx) with multiple risk factors being identified in previous studies. In this study, we have aimed to identify the most important variables associated with the onset of post-LTx delirium and understand the effect on length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

All liver transplants for chronic liver disease between 1 August 2012 and 1 August 2017 were included (n = 793). Data were collected for analysis retrospectively from electronic patient records.

RESULTS

Delirium is associated with an overall increased hospital and ICU LOS but not one-year mortality. The risk of developing post-LTx delirium was the greatest among patients: with post-LTx sepsis, who required renal sparing immunosuppression, who received donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts and who were older. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis seemed to be at lower risk of post-LTx delirium. However, global patient LOS was only prolonged in patients with sepsis and renal failure.

CONCLUSION

Many of the risk factors previously described to be associated with the development of post-LTx delirium were not demonstrated to be significant in this study. Sepsis, renal failure, older age and DCD use are associated with delirium post-LTx. It is unclear if this syndrome is an independent risk factor for increased LOS or if it is a symptom of well established syndromes associated with increased LOS. The role for prophylactic strategies to reduce the incidence of post-LTx delirium is therefore unclear.

Approach to the liver transplant early postoperative period: an institutional standpoint

The liver transplant program in our center started in 1992, and post-liver transplant patients are still admitted to the intensive care unit. For the intensive care physician, a learning curve started then, skills were acquired, and a specific practice was established. Throughout this time, several concepts changed, improving the care of these patients. The practical approach varies between liver transplant centers, according to local specificities. Hence, we wanted to present our routine practice to stimulate the debate between dedicated teams, which can allow the introduction of new ideas and potentially improve each local standard of care.

Acute symptomatic seizure due to tacrolimus-related encephalopathy after liver transplantation: two case reports

Liver transplantation is suitable for acute and chronic liver diseases that cannot be cured by other methods. Immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus have been applied to prevent rejection after liver transplantation. Among them, tacrolimus is generally effective in resisting rejection, and its main adverse reaction is nephrotoxicity. Tacrolimus-induced seizures are rarely reported. The present report describes trismus, restlessness, and generalized muscle twitching in a 44-year-old man and a 59-year-old man who received tacrolimus after liver transplantation. Tacrolimus-induced epilepsy was diagnosed by clinical symptoms and video-electroencephalography. After the patients developed epileptic symptoms, they received intramuscular injections of diazepam and phenobarbital. When the symptoms were relieved, the patients were treated with oral levetiracetam tablets. The tacrolimus was immediately stopped, and the epilepsy symptoms gradually disappeared after treatment with sedatives and levetiracetam. The patients continued taking the levetiracetam for approximately 2 weeks. No evidence of seizures occurred during the next 8 months. Although tacrolimus is reportedly effective against rejection after liver transplantation, tacrolimus-induced epilepsy should be carefully managed to prevent death. Additionally, epilepsy may rarely occur in patients with a normal blood concentration of tacrolimus. Further study on the mechanism of such neurological complications is needed.

Neurologic Considerations and Complications Related to Liver Transplantation

Neurologic complications of surgery can be devastating. The authors review neurologic considerations and complications associated with liver transplantation and discuss strategies to prevent, identify, and treat such adverse outcomes in the perioperative period.

Recent Topics on The Mechanisms of Immunosuppressive Therapy-Related Neurotoxicities

Although transplantation procedures have been developed for patients with end-stage hepatic insufficiency or other diseases, allograft rejection still threatens patient health and lifespan. Over the last few decades, the emergence of immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have strikingly increased graft survival. Unfortunately, immunosuppressive agent-related neurotoxicity commonly occurs in clinical practice, with the majority of neurotoxicity cases caused by CNIs. The possible mechanisms through which CNIs cause neurotoxicity include increasing the permeability or injury of the blood–brain barrier, alterations of mitochondrial function, and alterations in the electrophysiological state. Other immunosuppressants can also induce neuropsychiatric complications. For example, mTOR inhibitors induce seizures, mycophenolate mofetil induces depression and headaches, methotrexate affects the central nervous system, the mouse monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 antibody (used against the cluster of differentiation 3) also induces headaches, and patients using corticosteroids usually experience cognitive alteration. Therapeutic drug monitoring, individual therapy based on pharmacogenetics, and early recognition of symptoms help reduce neurotoxic events considerably. Once neurotoxicity occurs, a reduction in the drug dosage, switching to other immunosuppressants, combination therapy with drugs used to treat the neuropsychiatric manifestation, or blood purification therapy have proven to be effective against neurotoxicity. In this review, we summarize recent topics on the mechanisms of immunosuppressive drug-related neurotoxicity. In addition, information about the neuroprotective effects of several immunosuppressants is also discussed.