Selective intestinal decontamination for the prevention of early bacterial infections after liver transplantation

The role of gut barrier dysfunction in postoperative complications in liver transplantation: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations

PURPOSE

Gut barrier dysfunction is a pivotal pathophysiological alteration in cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, which is further aggravated during and after the operational procedures for liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we analyze the multifactorial disruption of all major levels of defense of the gut barrier (biological, mechanical, and immunological) and correlate with clinical implications.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed, PubMed Central and Google from inception until November 29th, 2023.

RESULTS

Systemic translocation of indigenous bacteria through this dysfunctional barrier contributes to the early post-LT infectious complications, while endotoxin translocation, through activation of the systemic inflammatory response, is implicated in non-infectious complications including renal dysfunction and graft rejection. Bacterial infections are the main cause of early in-hospital mortality of LT patients and unraveling the pathophysiology of gut barrier failure is of outmost importance.

CONCLUSION

A pathophysiology-based approach to prophylactic or therapeutic interventions may lead to enhancement of gut barrier function eliminating its detrimental consequences and leading to better outcomes for LT patients.

Bacterial Infections After Liver Transplantation and the Role of Oral Selective Digestive Decontamination: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are common after liver transplantation (LT) and cause serious morbidity and mortality. In our center, prolonged selective digestive decontamination (SDD) is the standard of care, which may lead to a reduced number and severity of bacterial infections. The aim of the current study was to investigate bacterial infection rates, the causative pathogens, localization, and the possible influence of SDD within the first year after LT.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed. Patients within their first year after LT between 2012 and 2017 were included. Patients received SDD for 3 weeks immediately after LT. The type of infection, bacterial subtype, CSI classification, severity, and potential interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six patients were included in the study. Seventy-eight patients (41.9%) had a bacterial infection within the first year after LT. The most common types of infection were cholangitis (25.8%) and secondary infected abdominal fluid collections (25.3%). The most common bacteria were Gram-positive enterococcal- (36.5%) and Gram-negative enterobacterial species (34.2%). 35.5% of the infections occurred within the first month after LT, mainly caused by Gram-positive bacteria (76.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cholangitis and infected abdominal fluid are the most common types of infection within one year after LT, mainly caused by enterococcal- and enterobacterial species. Within the first month after LT, infections were mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria, which could be a consequence of protocol use of SDD. The results can be used for the choice of empirical antibiotic therapy based on the most common types of bacteria and the time frame after LT.

Early Intra-Abdominal Bacterial Infections after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review for Clinicians

Despite recent advances in the transplant field, infectious complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Bacterial intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are predominant during the first month post-transplantation and affect patient and graft survival. Recently, the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria has generated great concern in OLT patients. We performed this narrative review of the literature in order to propose a "ready-to-use" flowchart for reasoned empirical antibiotic therapy in the case of suspected post-OLT IAIs. The review was ultimately organized into four sections: "Epidemiology and predisposing factors for IAI"; "Surgical-site infections and perioperative prophylaxis"; "MDRO colonization and infections"; and "Reasoned-empirical antibiotic therapy in early intra-abdominal infections post OLT and source control". Multidisciplinary teamwork is warranted to individualize strategies for the prevention and treatment of IAIs in OLT recipients, taking into account each patient's risk factors, the surgical characteristics, and the local bacterial epidemiology.

Surgical Revision Promotes Presence of Enterococcus spp. in Abdominal Superficial Surgical Site Infections

BACKGROUND

Superficial surgical site infections (SSSIs) are a major reason for morbidity after abdominal surgery. Microbiologic isolates of SSSIs vary widely geographically. Therefore, knowledge about the specific bacterial profile is of paramount importance to prevent SSSI.

METHODS

We performed a subgroup analysis of the microbiological isolates from patients with SSSI after abdominal surgery that were included in our institutional wound register. We aimed at identifying predominant strains as well as risk factors that would predispose for SSSI with certain bacteria.

RESULTS

A total of 494 patients were eligible for analysis. Of those 313 had received wound swaps, with 268 patients yielding a bacterial isolate. Enterobacterales (31.7%) and Enterococcus spp. (29.5%) were found as main bacteria in SSSI, with 62.3% of the wounds being polymicrobial. As risk factors for changes in bacterial isolates, we identified operative revision (OR 3.032; 95%CI 1.734-5.303) in multivariate analysis. Enterococcus spp. showed a significant increase in patients after revision surgery (p<0.001). Antibiotic therapy was neither influential on bacterial changes nor on the presence of Enterococcus spp. in SSSI.

CONCLUSION

Our study accentuates the high frequency of Enterococcus spp. in SSSI after abdominal surgery, while identifying surgical revision as major risk factor. The results urge vigilance in the treatment of patients with surgical revisions to include Enterococcus spp. in the prevention and treatment strategies.

Selective Intestinal Decontamination as a Method for Preventing Infectious Complications (Review)

Infectious complications are the most common cause of death in patients with severe burns. To date, there is no generally accepted method for preventing such complications in burn injury. One of the possible prevention options is selective intestinal decontamination (SID). This method is based on the enteral administration of non-absorbable antimicrobial agents. The preventive effect of SID involves inhibition of intestinal microflora translocation through the mucous membranes, inasmuch as studies demonstrate that endogenous opportunistic microorganisms are a common cause of infectious complications in various critical conditions.

The SID method was originally developed in the Netherlands for patients suffering from mechanical injury. Antimicrobial drugs were selected based on their high activity in relation to the main endogenous opportunistic pathogens and minimal activity against normal intestinal microflora components. The combination of polymyxin (B or E), tobramycin, and amphotericin B with intravenous cefotaxime was chosen as the first SID regimen. Other regimens were proposed afterwards, and the application field of the method was expanded. In particular, it became the method of choice for prevention of infectious complications in patients with severe burn injury.

Clinical studies demonstrate efficacy of some SID regimens for preventing infectious complications in patients with thermal injury. Concomitant administration of SID and systemic preventive antibiotics and addition of oropharyngeal decontamination increases the method efficacy. SID is generally well-tolerated, but some studies show an increased risk of diarrhea with this preventive option. In addition, SID increases the risk of developing antibiotic resistance like any other antibiotic regimens.

Surgical site infection after liver transplantation in the era of multidrug-resistant bacteria: what new risks should be considered?

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent infection site after liver transplantation (LT), and multidrug-resistant bacteria are common agents of those infections. This study aimed to analyze risk factors for SSI, including SSI caused by a multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDRO) after LT. We performed a cohort study of patients who underwent an LT from 2010 to 2018. The outcomes were SSI and SSI caused by MDRO. We analyzed features related to surgical procedure, patients' characteristics, and post-LT intercurrence. Surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) was performed through rectal swab at the LT admission and weekly until hospital discharge during all study periods. SSI was identified in 30.1% (229/762) of LTs. We observed a decline in the SSI rate from 37.5% in 2014 to 16.7% in 2018 (P 0.02). SSI caused by MDRO occurred in 109 (14.3%) patients. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common agent of both SSI and SSI caused by MDRO. The pre-LT colonization was 98 (12.9%) by CRE, 73 (9.6%) by VRE, and 28 (3.7%) by CRAB. Risk factors for SSI caused by MDRO identified were dialysis after LT (P 0.01), CRAB acquisition before LT (0.03), and CRE acquisition before LT (P 0.004); use of adjusted prophylaxis by MDRO risk was the only protective factor identified (P 0.01). MDROs were frequent agents of SSI after LT, and the carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative colonization before LT increased the risk of SSI by these agents.

Antibacterial and Antifungal Therapy for Patients with Acute Pancreatitis at High Risk of Pancreatogenic Sepsis (Review)

Controlling infection is crucial in treating patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The infectious process in AP often predisposes to subsequent sepsis by damaging not only the pancreas, but retroperitoneal tissues as well. Among other AP-associated factors, are the rapidly developing immune imbalance, the poor penetration of antimicrobial agents into necrotic tissue, and the impossibility of a single surgical debridement. Antibacterial and antifungal therapy for patients with infected necrosis and AP-associated extra-pancreatic infections remains a complex and largely unresolved problem, partially due to the high occurrence of multiresistant pathogens. The preventive use of antimicrobial agents has been discussed in the literature; however, the lack of consistent results makes it difficult to develop a unified strategy and clinical guidelines on this specific issue. Recent meta-analyses provide no conclusive evidence that antibacterial prophylaxis reduces the infection rate, mortality, or the need for surgical treatment in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. We found only two studies indicating the benefits of using carbapenems for prophylactic purposes and one meta-analysis indicating a reduction in mortality under antibiotic treatment started no later than 72 h after the onset of the attack. Selective bowel decontamination is considered as one of the preventive anti-infection measures, although the available data may not be fully reliable. The main indications for antibacterial therapy in patients with AP are confirmed infected necrosis or extra-pancreatic infection, as well as clinical symptoms of suspected infection. Intra-arterial administration or local treatment with antibiotics can increase the efficacy of antibacterial therapy. No randomized studies on antifungal prophylaxis in AP are available; some reports though recommend using such therapy among patients at high risk of invasive candidiasis.

Topical antimicrobial therapy: Current status and challenges

Topically applied antibacterial agents are widely used. Opinions regarding the clinical efficacy of topical antibiotics are conflicting, and for most indications, alternative oral therapies are available. Topical application has many potential advantages over systemic therapy that includes high and sustained concentrations of drug directly at the infected site, low quantity of antibiotic needed, better compliance, fewer systemic side effects and potentially less chance of antimicrobial resistance. Despite these advantages, an important concern has been the difficulty in monitoring antibiotic dosage and duration of therapy. Most topical preparations are applied on sites with pre-existing normal bacterial flora, and the detrimental effect of antibiotic on the 'good' bacteria is difficult to control. Unnecessary exposure of the resident microflora to high drug levels may select drug-resistant phenotypes. The number of antibiotics available and the quality and composition of the formulations recommended for topical drug delivery are improving. Their role in the prevention and treatment of locally invasive infections is established for many clinical conditions. However, there is still a lacuna in the availability of pharmacokinetic (PK) knowledge of these topical preparations and translation of the same to clinical practice. In addition, reporting the clinical outcome following the use of these agents and its analysis considering the recently proposed epidemiological cut-off value-based cut-offs are also areas which merit further research. In this review, we highlight the clinical utility and the PK aspects of topical antimicrobials in various infections. We also discuss the limitations of the current antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) protocols and new methods for AMST for topical agents.

The possible association between AQP9 in the intestinal epithelium and acute liver injury‑induced intestinal epithelium damage

The present study aimed to investigate the expression and function of aquaporin (AQP)9 in the intestinal tract of acute liver injury rat models. A total of 20 Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: Normal control (NC) group and acute liver injury groups (24, 48 and 72 h). Acute liver injury rat models were established using D-amino galactose, and the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (Tbil) and albumin were determined using an automatic biochemical analyzer. Proteins levels of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) in rat intestinal mucosa were investigated via immunohistochemistry. Pathological features were observed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. MLCK, AQP9 and claudin-1 protein expression levels were detected via western blotting. Levels of ALT and AST in acute liver injury rats were revealed to steadily increase between 24 and 48 h time intervals, reaching a peak level at 48 h. Furthermore, TBil levels increased significantly until 72 h. Levels of ALT were revealed to significantly increase until the 48 h time interval, and then steadily decreased until the 72 h time interval. The acute liver injury 72 h group exhibited the greatest levels of MLCK expression among the three acute liver injury groups; however, all three acute liver injury groups exhibited enhanced levels of MLCK expression compared with the NC group. Protein levels of AQP9 and claudin-1 were enhanced in the NC group compared with the three acute liver injury groups. H&E staining demonstrated that terminal ileum mucosal layer tissues obtained from the acute liver injury rats exhibited visible neutrophil infiltration. Furthermore, the results revealed that levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 serum cytokines were significantly increased in the acute liver injury groups. In addition, AQP9 protein expression was suppressed in acute liver injury rats, which induced pathological alterations in terminal ileum tissues may be associated with changes of claudin-1 and MLCK protein levels.