Inflammatory bowel disease in liver transplanted patients

Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting biliary complication and mortality rate in liver transplant patients

Post-Liver transplantation (LT) survival rates stagnate, with biliary complications (BC) as a major cause of death. We analyzed longitudinal data with a median 19-month follow-up. BC was diagnosed with ultrasounds and MRCP. Missing data was imputed using mean and median. Data preprocessing involved feature scaling and one-hot encoding. Survival analysis used filter (Cox-P, Cox-c) and embedded (RSF, LASSO) feature selection methods. Seven survival machine learning algorithms were used: LASSO, Ridge, RSF, E-NET, GBS, C-GBS, and FS-SVM. Model development employed 5-fold cross-validation, random oversampling, and hyperparameter tuning. Random oversampling addressed data imbalance. Optimal hyperparameters were determined based on average C-index. Features importance was assessed using standardized regression coefficients and permutation importance for top models. Stability was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation standard deviation. Finally, 1799 observations with 40 outcome predictors were included. RSF with Ridge achieved the highest performance (C-index: 0.699) for BC prediction, while RSF with RSF had the highest performance (C-index: 0.784) for mortality prediction. Top BC predictors were LT graft types, IBD in recipients, recipient's BMI, recipient's history of PVT, and previous LT history. For mortality, they were post-transplant AST, creatinine, recipient's age, post-transplant ALT, and tacrolimus consumption. We identified BC and mortality risk factors, improving decision-making and outcomes.

Diagnosis and management of de novo inflammatory bowel disease after solid organ transplantation in the era of biologic therapy: a case series

Introduction

The clinical characteristics of de novo inflammatory bowel disease (dnIBD) diagnosed after solid organ transplant (SOT) are not well-described, particularly since the advent of biologic therapy for treatment of IBD.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of SOT recipients between 2010 and 2022 at the University of Minnesota Medical Center who were diagnosed with IBD after transplant.

Results

Of 89 patients at our center with IBD and a history of SOT, five (5.6%) patients were diagnosed with IBD post-transplant (three liver, one kidney, and one simultaneous liver and kidney): three patients were female and four were Caucasian. Mean age at transplant and IBD diagnosis were 46.7 and 49.4 years respectively. Indication for transplant were alcohol-related cirrhosis (n = 2), idiopathic fulminant hepatic failure (n = 1), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (n = 1), and IgA nephropathy (n = 1). Four patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) and one with Crohn's disease (CD). Three patients (all with UC) required escalation to a biologic therapy. Four patients were in clinical remission from IBD at last follow-up, one patient required IBD surgery, while there was no rejection and no deaths following IBD diagnosis.

Conclusion

dnIBD post-SOT is uncommon, while newer IBD therapies may be safe and effective. Further study is required to better understand the natural history and IBD outcomes of this population relative to non-SOT patients.

The Use of Immunomodulators, Biologic Therapies, and Small Molecules in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Solid Organ Transplant

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) may require solid organ transplants (SOTs) for multiple reasons, making its prevalence slightly higher than the general population. Although immunosuppression used in SOT may help control IBD-related inflammation, many patients still require additional immunosuppressive medications. We aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of SOT-related immunosuppression and IBD medications in patients with liver, kidney, or heart transplantation. We conducted a clinical review using PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for our search. We included data from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and case reports to assess the safety, effectiveness, and side effect profile of immunomodulators, biologic therapies, and small molecules in patients with SOT. Our review encompassed 25 liver, 6 kidney, and 1 heart transplant studies involving patients with IBD. Common liver transplant immunosuppressants included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and steroids. Anti-TNF agents, widely used in all SOT types, showed no significant safety issues, though infections and malignancies were noted. Patients with liver transplant on tacrolimus responded well to anti-integrins and ustekinumab without major complications. For kidney transplants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus were prevalent, and their combination with anti-TNF or ustekinumab was generally safe, with rare reports of malignancy or infection. Hence, the use of anti-TNF, anti-integrin agents, and ustekinumab appears to be safe in patients with SOT, regardless of their transplant related immunosuppression. More studies are needed in patients with kidney and heart transplants and in patients treated with small molecules for their IBD.

Impact of liver transplantation on intestinal and systemic inflammation markers in patients with colitis ulcerosa concomitant with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Introduction

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an uncommon, chronic liver disease characterised by fibrosis and strictures of a bile ducts, causing cholestasis. In the long term it can lead to complete stenosis leading in turn to liver cirrhosis. In patients with severe form of the disease, the recommended treatment is liver transplantation. Because PSC frequently coexists with ulcerative colitis (UC), it is crucial to determine the effect of liver transplantation on the course of UC.

Aim

The aim was to determine the impact of liver transplantation on intestinal and systemic inflammation markers with UC concomitant with PSC (PSC-UC).

Material and methods

Sixty-three patients with PSC-UC were enrolled, 25 of whom underwent liver transplantation (OLTx) due to PSC progression. Clinical symptoms, faecal calprotectin levels, C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count (WBC) were obtained.

Results

Faecal calprotectin was significantly higher in the post-OLTx group. Mean calprotectin values were 163% higher - 474 ng/ml and 180 ng/ml (p = 0.024) in the post-OLTx group and in the PSC-UC group without the transplantation, respectively. Calprotectin levels exceeded the upper limit of normal (defined as 200 ng/l) in 66% of liver recipients and in 18% of non-transplanted patients (OR = 9.33, p = 0.011). In the post-OLTx group, also CRP concentration (11.01 mg/l vs. 6.54 mg/l, p = 0.30) and WBC (7.58 K/ml vs. 5.72 K/ml, p = 0.006) were higher than in the PSC-UC group without transplantation.

Conclusions

We found significantly higher inflammation markers in PSC-UC patients who underwent liver transplantation due to PSC. The effect was strongest in faecal calprotectin levels. In PSC-UC patients after liver transplantation, intensification of UC treatment may be needed, despite the lack of worsening of clinical symptoms.

Risks and benefits of anti-TNF therapy for ulcerative colitis in a patient with autoimmune hepatitis-related cirrhosis: Case report

RATIONALE

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by continuous inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis, and favorable response to immunosuppression. An association between IBD and AIH is uncommon, and experts have suggested that in patients with overlapping IBD and AIH, the anti-tumor necrosis factor agents can be used. Therefore, this study reports a rare case of a patient with liver cirrhosis due to AIH and UC refractory to conventional treatment and discusses the risks and benefits of using anti-tumor necrosis factor in both conditions.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 28-year-old female presented with symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal pain, asthenia, and inappetence, accompanied by abdominal collateral circulation, anemia, alteration of liver enzymes, and elevation of C-reactive protein levels.

DIAGNOSES

The patient underwent a liver biopsy, which was consistent with liver cirrhosis due to AIH. Colonoscopy showed an inflammatory process throughout the colon, compatible with moderately active UC.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received mesalazine, azathioprine, and corticotherapy, with no control of the inflammatory process. Faced with refractoriness to drug treatment and side effects of corticosteroids with an increased risk of severe infection due to cirrhosis, we opted to use infliximab for the treatment of UC. The patient presented with a clinical response and infliximab therapy was maintained.

OUTCOMES

Eight months after starting infliximab therapy, the patient developed pneumonia with complications from disseminated intravascular coagulation and died.

LESSONS SUBSECTIONS

AIH is a rare cause of elevated transaminase levels in patients with UC. The best treatment to control the 2 conditions should be evaluated with vigilance for the side effects of medications, mainly infections, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Concurrent inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis: a review of pre- and post-transplant outcomes and treatment options

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease which is associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) in 70% of cases. It seems PSC/IBD is a distinct phenotype that is different from PSC, and IBD alone. Hence, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, natural course and management of PSC/IBD before and after LT for PSC. Extensive colitis, rectal sparing, backwash ileitis, and mild symptoms are the characteristics of IBD coexisting with PSC. Moreover, PSC patients with concurrent IBD have higher risk of cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal neoplasia predominantly in right colon and at younger age. Therefore, it is essential to monitor these individuals continuously. It is interesting to note that the course of IBD (ulcerative colitis) after liver transplantation (LT) for PSC varies greatly, and some patients may develop worsening colitis after LT despite immunosuppressive regimens. As well, management of these patients was discussed in this review.

Inflammatory bowel disease and solid organ transplantation

The population of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and solid organ transplant (SOT) is increasing. Two clinical scenarios exist, recurrence of pre-existing IBD, which is more common, and de novo development of IBD, with a much higher incidence than in the general population. Their clinical course differs and may have a negative impact on the graft in both cases. The pathophysiological mechanisms remain unknown and no specific treatment recommendations are available. The combined effect of biologic therapy against IBD and immunosuppressive therapy against a potential rejection means that close monitoring is mandatory to identify infection, autoimmune events and malignancies. The colorectal cancer (CRC) rate is higher in this population. The group at greatest risk are patients with IBD undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Incidence and Impacts of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and its significance in kidney transplant recipients is not well established. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of and complications from IBD in adult kidney transplant recipients. Methods: Eligible articles were searched through Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception through April 2020. The inclusion criteria were adult kidney transplant patients with reported IBD. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using the fixed-effects model when I2 ≤ 50% and random-effects model when I2 > 50%. Results: of 641 citations, a total of seven studies (n = 212) were included in the systematic review. The mean age was 46.2 +/− 6.9 years and up to 51.1% were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 57.8 +/− 16.8 months. The pooled incidence of recurrent IBD was 27.6% (95% CI, 17.7–40.5%; I2 0%) while the pooled incidence of de novo IBD was 18.8% (95% CI, 10.7–31.0%; I2 61.3%). The pooled incidence of post-transplant IBD was similar across subgroup analyses. Meta-regression analyses showed no association between the incidence of IBD and age, male sex, and follow-up duration. For post-transplant complications, the pooled incidence of post-transplant infection was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.5–33.3%; I2 73.7%). The pooled incidence of graft rejection and re-transplantation in IBD patients was 31.4% (95% CI, 14.1–56.1%; I2 76.9%) and 30.4% (95% CI, 22.6–39.5%; I2 0%). Conclusion: Recurrent and de novo IBD is common among kidney transplant recipients and may result in adverse outcomes.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease: Intestine-liver interrelation

The association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis should be considered a distinct clinical entity. This association involves genetic abnormalities, epidemiological factors (more common in men, with no a geographical pattern) and, commonly, subclinical inflammation, predominance of the right colon (endoscopic and histological), backwash ileitis and rectal sparing. Furthermore, there is an increased risk of colorectal cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. The aim of this review is to show how IBD influences the progression of this entity, transplantation requirements and recurrence. We also discuss the current evidence on the use of biological therapy in this group of patients.

Harmful Effects and Potential Benefits of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α on the Liver

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents represent an effective treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases. However, some concerns about their potentially undesirable effects on liver function have been reported. On the other hand, evidence of their therapeutic effects on certain liver diseases is accumulating. Many data showed the safety of anti-TNF-α in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C and in liver transplanted patients even if a strict follow-up and prophylaxis are recommended in well-defined subgroups. On the other side, anti-TNF-α-induced liver injury is not a rare event. However, it is often reversible after anti-TNF-α withdrawal. Anti-TNF-α agents have been tested in advanced stages of severe alcoholic hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Limited data on the efficacy of anti-TNF-α in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis are also available. In this review, we explored the hepatic safety concerns in patients receiving anti-TNF-α agents with and without pre-existent hepatic diseases. In addition, the available evidence on their potential benefits in the treatment of specific hepatic diseases is discussed.

The gastroenterologist's guide to management of the post-liver transplant patient

The management of the post-liver transplant patient is complex and involves a large interdisciplinary team. After referral to a transplant center, evaluation and listing, and eventual transplantation, the patient is cared for closely by the transplant center. Once deemed ready for discharge, the patient returns to the primary care provider for ongoing management of the various issues that increase in incidence post transplant such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular, and renal diseases, as well as metabolic syndrome. The role of the gastroenterologist is not well defined, but certainly, he or she may be called upon for the initial evaluation and ongoing management of gastrointestinal as well as hepatobiliary issues. This includes but is not limited to the investigation of abnormal liver tests, non-specific gastrointestinal complaints such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea, biliary complications, and even recurrent hepatic disease. Having familiarity with post-transplant immunosuppressive agents, drug interactions, and potential infectious and malignancy-related complications of transplant is essential, as the primary gastroenterologist may be expected in some situations to field the initial work-up, if patient access to the transplant center is limited. The aim of this review is to summarize the gastroenterologist's role in the management of the post-liver transplant patient.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-TNF-α Agents in Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Liver Transplant: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) can appear de novo or worsen after liver transplant. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis-alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents after transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical database of our center searching for all liver transplant patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were treated with anti-TNF-α agents between 1997 and 2017. Clinical response was assessed from clinical activity indices 12 weeks after starting treatment. The median age of the 6 patients (3 women) was 37 years. Four patients were diagnosed before transplantation (2 UC and 2 CD), and in the other 2 the disease appeared de novo (1 UC and 1 CD). The indications for transplant were primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 3), cryptogenic cirrhosis (n = 2), and hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (n = 1).

RESULTS

Clinical response was seen in 3 of the 6 patients and, in the 3 cases for whom endoscopic data were available, no mucous healing was seen. The only adverse effects noted over a mean follow-up of 15 months were 1 cytomegalovirus infection and 1 severe infusion reaction to infliximab. No patients had recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis in the graft, and none of the patients died.

CONCLUSION

Use of an anti-TNF-α agent in a liver transplant patient with inflammatory bowel disease may be an effective option, with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio. Further studies are required to confirm their use in this context.