Safety of hepatitis B virus core antibody-positive grafts in liver transplantation: A single-center experience in China

Prediction of early recovery of graft function after living donor liver transplantation in children

For end-stage liver disease in children, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is often the important standard curative treatment. However, there is a lack of research on early recovery of graft function after pediatric LDLT. This is a single-center, ambispective cohort study. We collected the demographic and clinicopathological data of donors and recipients, and determined the risk factors of postoperative delayed recovery of hepatic function (DRHF) by univariate and multivariate Logistic analyses. 181 cases were included in the retrospective cohort and 50 cases in the prospective cohort. The incidence of DRHF after LDLT in children was 29.4%, and DRHF could well evaluate the early recovery of graft function after LDLT. Through Logistic analyses and AIC score, preoperative liver function of donors, ischemia duration level of the liver graft, Ln (Cr of recipients before operation) and Ln (TB of recipients on the 3rd day after operation) were predictive indicators for DRHF after LDLT in children. Using the above factors, we constructed a predictive model to evaluate the incidence of postoperative DRHF. Self-verification and prospective internal verification showed that this prediction model had good accuracy and clinical applicability. In conclusion, we pointed many risk factors for early delayed recovery of graft function after LDLT in children, and developed a visual and personalized predictive model for them, offering valuable insights for clinical management.

De novo hepatitis B infection following liver transplantation with core antibody positive grafts: The role of surface antibody status in guiding long-term prophylaxis

Liver transplantation (LT) with hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive grafts to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg) negative recipients is safe and has likely contributed to improvements in organ access over the years. The incidence of de novo hepatitis B infection (HBV) in these instances is low with appropriate prophylaxis and is affected by recipient immunologic status. There is debate as to whether hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) positivity may safely inform prophylaxis discontinuation post-LT. In this retrospective study of all hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative recipients of anti-HBc positive organs at three large academic centers between January 2014 and December 2019, nine LT recipients discontinued prophylaxis after developing anti-HBs antibodies 1 year or later post-LT. Three of the nine patients (33%) developed de novo HBV, defined by positive HBsAg or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, during the study period. The remaining six patients had no evidence of HBV infection after a mean follow-up of 37 months. The patients without de novo HBV had higher anti-HBs titers at the time of prophylaxis discontinuation and were less likely to have negative anti-HBs at the time of transplant or negative anti-HBc at any time point. These results suggest that quantitative anti-HBs titer thresholds rather than qualitative anti-HBs positivity at 1 year or later after LT should be used to identify patients at decreased risk of de novo infection and help guide prophylaxis duration.

Hepatitis B prophylaxis among recipients of a hepatitis B core antibody positive liver transplant

OBJECTIVE

Using organs from donors with a history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has expanded the pool for solid organ transplant. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of HBV postexposure prophylaxis among recipients of a hepatitis B core antibody positive (HBcAb+) liver transplant and compare post-transplant outcomes with those who received a hepatitis B core antibody negative (HBcAb-) liver transplant.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center cohort analysis of liver transplant recipients at our institution. All adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2014, and August 30, 2020, were reviewed for inclusion. Recipients of an HBcAb+ organ who were administered antiviral therapy were matched 1:2 with recipients of an HBcAb- organ using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was breakthrough HBV infection. Secondary outcomes included graft survival, patient survival, and allograft rejection. Postexposure prophylaxis strategies for HBV were also assessed. Outcomes were analyzed for the first 12 months after transplant.

RESULTS

Twenty-four HBcAb+ patients were matched to 48 HBcAb- patients. There were no documented cases of breakthrough HBV infection. Patient and graft survival was similar between both groups. Seven HBcAb+ patients (29%) experienced an episode of rejection within the first year compared with zero HBcAb- patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study suggest that current strategies for HBV postexposure prophylaxis are effective. Patient and graft survival rates at 30 days after transplant were similar to institutional reported values. Rejection was more prominent in the HBcAb+ group.

Marginal donor liver versus standard donor liver: A single center-observational study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of marginal donor livers remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of marginal donor livers in patients with liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

This study included 199 liver donors (including 16 split donors) and 206 liver recipients from January 1, 2018 to January 27, 2020, with case follow-up until July 2021. Clinical data of donors and recipients were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into the marginal donor and standard donor groups according to the criteria of marginal donor livers. Indices of liver and kidney functions, complications, and survival curves of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the standard donor group, the blood creatinine levels were significantly higher in the marginal donor group in the first week after operation (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in the alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels after LT (all P > 0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications after LT (P > 0.05); there was also no significant difference in the survival curve (P = 0.335).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in liver and kidney function and survival curve between the standard donor and marginal donor groups. The marginal donor liver appears safe and reliable for LT and may be an important strategy to expand the donor pool and solve the shortage of organs.

Cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts with hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis in Korea

Background/Aims

Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive donors are used as an extended donor pool, and current guidelines recommend the usage of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) as prophylaxis for preventing de novo hepatitis B virus infection (DNH). We analyzed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of liver transplantation (LT) patients receiving anti-HBc-positive grafts and evaluated the risk of DNH when hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy was used as prophylaxis. We also compared the cost-effectiveness of HBIG and NAs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 457 patients with anti-HBc-positive grafts and 898 patients with anti-HBc-negative grafts who underwent LT between January 2001 and December 2018. We compared recipient characteristics according to the anti-HBc status of the donor, and compared the costs of using NAs for the rest of the patient’s life and using HBIG to maintain hepatitis B surface antibody titers above 200 IU/L.

Results

The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 87.7%, 73.5%, and 67.7%, respectively, in patients with anti-HBc-positive grafts, and 88.5%, 77.4%, and 70.3%, respectively, in patients with anti-HBc-negative grafts (P=0.113). Among 457 recipients with anti-HBc-positive grafts, 117 (25.6%) were non-HBV recipients. The overall incidence of DNH was 0.9%. When using HBIG under insurance coverage, the cumulative cost was lower compared with using NA continuously without insurance coverage in Korea.

Conclusions

Anti-HBc-positive grafts alone do not affect patient survival or graft survival. HBIG monoprophylaxis has good outcomes for preventing DNH, and the patient’s long-term cost burden is low in Korea because of the national insurance system in this cohort.

Prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B after living donor liver transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B in children after liver transplantation with livers positive for HBcAg and to examine the treatment of new hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 22 children who received livers positive for HBcAg between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. After their operations, the children were given lamivudine for anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment, a hepatitis B vaccine or intermittent supplements of hepatitis B immunoglobulins to prevent recurrence of the infection, and entecavir for anti-hepatitis B treatment. The children were categorized into two groups: one group of children stopped taking lamivudine one year after operation (n=7) by themselves, while the other group did not (n=15).

RESULTS

Of the seven children who stopped lamivudine anti-HBV treatment, six developed hepatitis B at 24.33±13.95 months after operation. Of these children, five were treated with entecavir, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to undetectable levels (<50 IU/mL). HBsAg turned negative in four of these patients, but in one patient it did not. The other patient with new hepatitis B continued to use lamivudine, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to normal levels (<50 IU/mL) but without their HBsAg turning negative. No new cases of hepatitis B were found in the 15 children who did not stop anti-HBV treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term prophylactic therapy of nucleoside analogues combined with hepatitis B immunoglobulins should be used for a long time after liver transplantation with a liver positive for HBcAg. Discontinuation of nucleoside analogues is associated with a higher risk of the new onset of hepatitis B. Entecavir has a significant effect on the treatment of postoperative new hepatitis B in children.

Risk of disease transmission in an expanded donor population: the potential of hepatitis B virus donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lack of availability of donor organs is a constant challenge that patients and providers face in transplantation. To address this shortage, donors that test positive for hepatitis B, in particular those with resolved infection, have been increasingly utilized in clinical practice. We review here the potential risks for the recipient and the advances in hepatitis B management that have made use of these donors a well tolerated and advisable proposition.

RECENT FINDINGS

As routine administration of antiviral prophylaxis in the posttransplant setting among those deemed high risk for transmission, outcomes for recipients of hepatitis B donors, including liver transplant recipients, have been comparable to uninfected donors. Universal hepatitis B nucleic acid testing of donors has also enhanced our ability to accurately inform recipients regarding transmission risk. Appropriate use of prophylaxis and careful monitoring for transmission posttransplant is key to ensuring no adverse outcomes occur.

SUMMARY

Treatment of hepatitis B has evolved over the past two decades. Expanding the donor pool with hepatitis B donors is now well tolerated, ethical, and advantageous to the transplant community at large. A clear discussion with recipients on the substantial benefit and low harm of using hepatitis B donors will lead to greater acceptance and utilization of these organs.

Review article: preventing hepatitis B graft infection in hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation: immunoglobulin vs anti-virals

BACKGROUND

A critical aspect of liver transplantation in hepatitis B patients is to prevent graft reinfection with hepatitis B virus. The use of hepatitis B immune globulin after transplant was a significant milestone, which allowed prolonged graft and patient survival by controlling hepatitis B reinfection in liver grafts. The development of anti-viral treatments with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues, led to a further reduction in graft reinfection and improvement in patient survival. The combination of the aforementioned two therapies has been widely used in hepatitis B-associated liver transplants.

AIMS

To address the post-transplant management of hepatitis B and provide updates on preventing graft reinfection.

METHODS

We performed a literature search on Ovid and PubMed for randomised controlled trials or cohort studies in English, which investigated the effectiveness of hepatitis B immune globulin and anti-viral therapy on hepatitis B-associated transplants (1/2000-1/2020). Studies that met pre-established criteria were reviewed.

RESULTS

Based on currently available evidence, an algorithm for post-transplant management with anti-viral therapy is proposed. Also, the management of recipients who received grafts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of hepatitis B immune globulin and anti-viral treatments led to substantial improvement in graft and patient survival. The prevention of hepatitis B graft reinfection is complex and involves a broad interdisciplinary team.

Prevention of HBV Recurrence after Liver Transplant: A Review

Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as a major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and HBV-induced liver failure is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Until about two decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection was a relative contraindication, due to high risk of viral replication with the use of immunosuppressants which could result in graft infection. In the 1990s, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) use significantly reduced the risk of graft infection, improving outcomes of liver transplant in patients with chronic HBV infection. However, very high costs, especially with the need for long-term use, became a major concern. With the advent of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), there was less need for high-dose, long-term HBIg use to prevent HBV recurrence. Lamivudine was initially used but resistance soon became a major issue. This was followed by more potent NAs, such as entecavir and tenofovir, emerging as the more preferred agents. Additionally, the use of these antiviral agents (HBIg and/or NAs) have made it possible to use the grafts from donors with positivity for hepatitis B core antibody, allowing for expansion of the donor pool. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on management protocols, which vary significantly amongst centers. In this review, we appraise studies on management strategies used and the role of active vaccination in the prevention of HBV recurrence in post-liver transplant patients.

Hepatitis C-positive donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C seronegative recipients

BACKGROUND

The opioid crisis has led to an increase in hepatitis C virus-positive donors in the past decade. Whereas historically hepatitis C seropositive organs were routinely discarded, the advent of direct-acting antiviral agents has notably expanded the utilization of organs from donors with hepatitis C. There has been growing experience with liver transplantation (LT) from hepatitis C seropositive donors to hepatitis C seropositive recipients. However, data remain limited on LT from hepatitis C seropositive or hepatitis C ribonucleic acid positive donors to hepatitis C seronegative recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 26 hepatitis C seronegative recipients who received hepatitis C seropositive donor livers followed by preemptive antiviral therapy with direct-acting antiviral treatment at the Johns Hopkins Hospital Comprehensive Transplant Center from January 1, 2017, to August 31, 2019.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of the 26 recipients are alive with proper graft function; 20 of them received livers from hepatitis C nucleic acid testing positive donors. All 12 recipients who completed their direct-acting antiviral courses and have reached sufficient follow-up for sustained virologic response have achieved sustained virologic response. Nine of our recipients have either completed direct-acting antiviral treatment without sufficient follow-up time for sustained virologic response or are undergoing direct-acting antiviral treatment. One patient is awaiting antiviral treatment initiation pending insurance approval. Of note, 11 of 12 patients with sustained virologic response received a hepatitis C nucleic acid testing positive donor liver.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis C seronegative patients who receive a hepatitis C seropositive or hepatitis C nucleic acid testing positive liver allograft can enjoy good short-term outcomes with hepatitis C cure following direct-acting antiviral treatment.