Endoscopic identification of endoluminal esophageal landmarks for radial and longitudinal orientation and lesion location

Endoscopic landmarks corresponding to anatomical landmarks for esophageal subsite classification

Objectives

Individual treatment strategies for esophageal cancer have been investigated based on the anatomical subsite classification. Accurate subsite classification based on these anatomical landmarks is thus important. We investigated the suitability of the existing endoscopic classification and explored alternative landmarks for esophageal subsite classification.

Methods

Patients who received endoscopic ultrasonography (and computed tomography scans for surveillance of esophageal cancer treatment or esophageal submucosal tumors were included. Distances between anatomical landmarks, including the inferior cricoid cartilage border, superior border of the sternum, and tracheal bifurcation, were measured using a combination of endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography, and other information.

Results

The mean (standard deviation) distances from the superior incisor dentition to the pharynx-esophagus, cervical-upper thoracic esophagus, and upper-middle thoracic esophagus boundaries were 16.9 (1.7), 21.7 (1.9), and 29.0 (1.9) cm, respectively. However, variances in the differences between the mean and individual distances were large (2.8, 3.4, and 3.7, respectively), mainly because of differences in body height. However, variances in the differences between individual distances and novel endoscopic landmarks, including the lower end of the pyriform sinus and lower end of compression of the left main bronchus, were lower (1.7, 1.2, and 0.6, respectively).

Conclusions

Existing indicators of esophageal subsite boundaries were not consistent with anatomical boundaries. Modification of the distance from the superior incisor dentition based on average distances from anatomical landmarks or the use of alternative endoscopic landmarks is recommended to provide more suitable anatomical boundaries.

UK and Ireland Joint Advisory Group (JAG) consensus statements for training and certification in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

International endoscopy societies vary in their approach for credentialing individuals in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to enable independent practice; however, there is no consensus in this or its implementation. In 2019, the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy (JAG) commissioned a working group to examine the evidence relating to this process for EUS. The aim of this was to develop evidence-based recommendations for EUS training and certification in the UK.

METHODS

Under the oversight of the JAG quality assurance team, a modified Delphi process was conducted which included major stakeholders from the UK and Ireland. A formal literature review was made, initial questions for study were proposed and recommendations for training and certification in EUS were formulated after a rigorous assessment using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool and subjected to electronic voting to identify accepted statements. These were peer reviewed by JAG and relevant stakeholder societies before consensus on the final EUS certification pathway was achieved.

RESULTS

39 initial questions were proposed of which 33 were deemed worthy of assessment and finally formed the key recommendations. The statements covered four key domains, such as: definition of competence (13 statements), acquisition of competence (10), assessment of competence (5) and postcertification mentorship (5). Key recommendations include: (1) minimum of 250 hands-on cases before an assessment for competency can be made, (2) attendance at the JAG basic EUS course, (3) completing a minimum of one formative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) every 10 cases to allow the learning curve in EUS training to be adequately studied, (4) competent performance in summative DOPS assessments and (5) a period of mentorship over a 12-month period is recommended as minimum to support and mentor new service providers.

CONCLUSIONS

An evidence-based certification pathway has been commissioned by JAG to support and quality assure EUS training. This will form the basis to improve quality of training and safety standards in EUS in the UK and Ireland.

Orientation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy—the only way is up

BACKGROUND

Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy is the gold standard investigation for the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. Orientation during endoscopy is challenging and United Kingdom training focusses on technical competence and procedural safety. The reported location of UGI pathologies is crucial to post-endoscopic planning.

AIM

To evaluate endoscopists’ ability to spatially orientate themselves within the UGI tract.

METHODS

A cross sectional descriptive study elicited, using an anonymised survey, the ability of endoscopists to orientate themselves within the UGI tract. The primary outcome was percentage of correct answers from all surveyed; secondary outcomes were percentage of correct answers from experienced vs novice endoscopists. Pearson’s χ² test was applied to compare groups.

RESULTS

Of 188 respondents, 86 were experienced endoscopists having completed over 1000 endoscopies. 44.4% of respondents correctly identified the anterior stomach and 47.3% correctly identified the posterior of the second part of the duodenum (D2). Experienced endoscopists were significantly more likely than novice to identify the anterior stomach correctly [61.6% vs 31.3%, X² (1, n = 188) = 11.10, P = 0.001]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in identifying the posterior of D2.

CONCLUSION

The majority of endoscopists surveyed were unable to identify key landmarks within the UGI tract. Endoscopic orientation appears to improve with experience yet there are some areas still not well recognised. This has potential considerable impact on post-endoscopic management of patients with posterior duodenal ulcers being more likely to perforate and associated with a higher rebleeding risk. We suggest the development of a consensus statement on endoscopic description.

Rio de Janeiro Global Consensus on Landmarks, Definitions, and Classifications in Barrett's Esophagus: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite the significant advances made in the diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE), there is still a need for standardized definitions, appropriate recognition of endoscopic landmarks, and consistent use of classification systems. Current controversies in basic definitions of BE and the relative lack of anatomic knowledge are significant barriers to uniform documentation. We aimed to provide consensus-driven recommendations for uniform reporting and global application.

METHODS

The World Endoscopy Organization Barrett's Esophagus Committee appointed leaders to develop an evidence-based Delphi study. A working group of 6 members identified and formulated 23 statements, and 30 internationally recognized experts from 18 countries participated in 3 rounds of voting. We defined consensus as agreement by ≥80% of experts for each statement and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

RESULTS

After 3 rounds of voting, experts achieved consensus on 6 endoscopic landmarks (palisade vessels, gastroesophageal junction, squamocolumnar junction, lesion location, extraluminal compressions, and quadrant orientation), 13 definitions (BE, hiatus hernia, squamous islands, columnar islands, Barrett's endoscopic therapy, endoscopic resection, endoscopic ablation, systematic inspection, complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, complete eradication of dysplasia, residual disease, recurrent disease, and failure of endoscopic therapy), and 4 classification systems (Prague, Los Angeles, Paris, and Barrett's International NBI Group). In round 1, 18 statements (78%) reached consensus, with 12 (67%) receiving strong agreement from more than half of the experts. In round 2, 4 of the remaining statements (80%) reached consensus, with 1 statement receiving strong agreement from 50% of the experts. In the third round, a consensus was reached on the remaining statement.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed evidence-based, consensus-driven statements on endoscopic landmarks, definitions, and classifications of BE. These recommendations may facilitate global uniform reporting in BE.

Unexpected toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and radiotherapy

Background

Cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have recently been approved for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive and HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer in association with endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women. Data on the interaction of CDK4/6 inhibition and radiotherapy are scarce, but some studies show unexpected toxicity.

Cases

We report three cases of unexpected severe or prolonged soft tissue, skin, and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients treated with a combination of radiotherapy and the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib.

Conclusion

These cases indicate a possible interaction between radiotherapy and palbociclib. Therefore, we recommend using radiotherapy cautiously when combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Clinical characteristic of esophageal cancer without lugol-voiding lesions in the background esophagus

Lugol chromoendoscopy is useful for the detection of early esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Multiple lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) on lugol chromoendoscopy are associated with a very high risk of multiple cancers arising in the esophagus. Due to the widespread use of narrow band image technology in many institutions, esophageal cancer without LVLs in the background esophagus is sometimes detected. This retrospective study aims to clarify the clinical characteristic of esophageal cancer without LVLs in the background esophagus. A total of 191 consecutive patients with 204 ESCCs had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from 2011 and 2014. Amongst these lesions, the number of LVLs in the background esophagus per endoscopic view was counted excluding main lesion, and the grading was divided into no LVLs ESCC (nL-ESCC) group and LVLs ESCC (L-ESCC) group. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and the cumulative incidence of metachronous ESCC after ESD in both groups. Thirty-six patients with 36 lesions and 155 patients with 168 lesions were separated into the nL-ESCC group and L-ESCC group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the nL-ESCC group was found to be more common in females, who were non-drinkers, or with erosive esophagitis. During follow-up periods, the cumulative incidence of metachronous ESCC at 3-years was 14.4% and 0.00% in the L-ESCC and nL-ESCC groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Our study showed that esophageal cancer without LVLs in the background esophagus was mostly occurred in females, who were non-drinkers, or with erosive esophagitis, which are uncommon features of ESCC.

Principles and practice to facilitate complete photodocumentation of the upper gastrointestinal tract: World Endoscopy Organization position statement

Although esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the most commonly used procedure in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the method of esophageal, gastric and duodenal mucosa photodocumentation varies considerably worldwide. One probable explanation is that for generations, EGD has primarily been taught by GI faculty and instructors based on their perceptions and experience, which has resulted in EGD being a non-standardized procedure. Currently, the procedure is facing a challenging scenario as endoscopy societies are implementing procedure-associated quality indicators aiming for best practice among practitioners and evidence-based care for patients. Contrary to colonoscopy where cecum landmarks photodocumentation is considered proof of completeness, there are currently no reliable performance measures to gauge the completeness of an upper endoscopy nor guidance for complete photodocumentation. This World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) position statement aims to provide practical guidance to practitioners to carry out complete EGD photodocumentation. Hence, an international group of experts from the WEO Upper GI Cancer Committee formulated the following document using the body of evidence established through literature reviews, expert opinions, and other scientific sources. The group acknowledged that although the procedure should be feasible in any facility, what is needed to achieve a global shift on the concept of completeness is a common written statement of agreement on its potential impact and added value. This best practice statement offers endoscopists principles and practical guidance in order to carry out complete photodocumentation from the hypopharynx to the second duodenal portion.