1
|
Perrier M, Mouawad C, Gueguen D, Thomé B, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Walter T. Health care resource use and costs among patients with carcinoid syndrome in France: Analysis of the National Health Insurance Database. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47:102177. [PMID: 37453678 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Carcinoid syndrome (CS) develops in approximately 20% of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET). This study described healthcare resource utilization and its associated costs among patients with NET and CS, using the French national health care data system. METHODS Patients were included if they had a hospital stay associated with the code E34.0 "CS" and at least one delivery of a somatostatin analogue (SSA) between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. The end of the analysis was either 31/12/2017 or the date of death, whichever occurred first. Mean overall costs were described by item of expenditure and by periods. RESULTS 646 patients were included: 64yo, 55% men, 64% and 15% had NET from the small-intestine or lung, respectively. Among them, 309 patients were incident and 271 died during the study period. Mean overall cost per person per month (PPPM) was €2,892: €3,273 for the first year following diagnosis, €2,574 in "middle-years" and €5,039 within the year preceding death. The two most costly expenditure items were drugs (€1,695 PPPM) and hospital stays (€870 PPPM). CONCLUSION The first year following diagnosis and the year preceding death are the two periods representing the highest costs for CS care in France. Successful disease management may contribute to lower costs in the intermediate period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Perrier
- Department of Digestive Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France.
| | | | | | | | - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
- Department of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Thomas Walter
- Department of Digestive Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koumarianou A, Daskalakis K, Tsoli M, Kaltsas G, Pavel M. Efficacy, safety and unmet needs of evolving medical treatments for carcinoid syndrome. J Neuroendocrinol 2022; 34:e13174. [PMID: 35794780 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This review reports on the currently available medical treatment options for the control of symptoms due to carcinoid syndrome in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of approved drugs such as somatostatin analogues (SSA), telotristat ethyl (TE) and interferon-alpha, are reviewed. Somatostatin analogues remain the standard treatment of carcinoid syndrome based on the high expression of somatostatin receptors and the resulting inhibition of secretion of bioactive compounds; their use is associated with relatively mild AEs, involving mainly the gastrointestinal system, and being usually transient. Although dose escalation of SSA remains an unapproved option, it is clinically implemented to alleviate symptoms in refractory carcinoid syndrome and supported by the most recent guidelines. The side effects associated with the increased dose are in general mild and consistent with standard dose of SSA. Telotristat ethyl, an oral inhibitor of tryptophan hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in serotonin biosynthesis, represents a rather novel innovative treatment option in patients with carcinoid syndrome suffering from diarrhea and complements the standard therapy of SSA. Given the low toxicity profile, TE may be considered an early add-on treatment to SSA in patients with uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome. However, further prolonged follow-up of patients treated with TE may be needed to exclude potential AEs, such as liver toxicity or depressed mood, in patients with long-term treatment. Interferon alpha is a cytokine with direct inhibitory effect on hormone secretion and tumor cell proliferation and an approved therapy in carcinoid syndrome but is associated with significant AEs in the majority of the patients requiring frequently dose reduction. The finding of a more favorable tolerability of pegylated interferon needs to be confirmed in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology-Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Kosmas Daskalakis
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- 2nd Department of Surgery, "Korgialenio-Benakio", Red Cross General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marina Tsoli
- 1st Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gregory Kaltsas
- 1st Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Endocrinology, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic diarrhea in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) may be caused by bioactive products of NET, bile acid malabsorption (BAM), ileal resection (IR) or steatorrhea. AIM To quantitate BA and fat malabsorption in NET with diarrhea. METHODS Part of evaluation in medical oncology clinical practice, 67 patients [42F, 25 M; median age 64.0 y (17.0 IQR)] with well-differentiated NET and diarrhea underwent clinically indicated measurements of 48-h fecal BA [(FBA), fecal weight (normal < 400 g/48 h), fecal fat (normal < 7 g/day) in n = 52] and fasting serum 7αC4 (marker of hepatic BA synthesis, n = 30) between 01/2018 and 11/2020. IR had been performed in 45 patients. BAM diagnosis was based on FBA criteria: elevated total FBA (> 2337 µmol/48 h) or > 10% primary FBA or combination > 4% primary FBA plus > 1000 µmol total FBA/48 h. We also measured fecal elastase (for pancreatic insufficiency) in 13 patients. RESULTS BAM was present in 48/52 (92%) patients with NET. There were significant correlations between total FBA and 48-h fecal weight (Rs = 0.645, P < 0.001). Mean length of IR was 47 cm; in patients with IR < 25 cm, total FBA was elevated in 85% and primary FBA > 10% in 69%. In 22 patients with no IR, 13/15 tested (87%) had BAM. Among 6 patients with pancreatic NET and no IR, 80% had BAM. Fecal fat was ≥ 15 g/day in 18/42 (43%). In 4/17 (24%) with IR < 25 cm and 8/19 (42%) patients with IR > 25 cm fecal fat was 44.0 (40.5) and 38.0 (38.0)g/day, respectively. CONCLUSION A majority of patients with NET and diarrhea had BAM, even with < 25 cm or no IR.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pan IW, Halperin DM, Kim B, Yao JC, Shih YCT. A Systematic Review of Economic and Quality-of-Life Research in Carcinoid Syndrome. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:1271-1297. [PMID: 34378163 PMCID: PMC9109155 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01071-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, the economic burden and patient-reported outcomes associated with carcinoid syndrome (CS) in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of economic and quality-of-life (QOL) studies related to the treatment of CS. METHODS Articles included in the review were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies had to be in English and published between 1 January 2000 and 2 July 2020. Other study eligibility criteria included patients with NET with CS receiving treatment for CS, study outcomes of cost or QOL, and clinical trials or population-based studies using claims or other secondary databases. The interventions included somatostatin analogs, telotristat ethyl, or other treatment for CS. To evaluate the quality and bias of the included studies, the 24-item CHEERS and 10-item Gill and Feinstein checklists were used. We report a narrative synthesis of the findings from the selected studies. RESULTS A total of 12 economic and 12 QOL studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for review. Patients with uncontrolled CS symptoms had 23-92% higher costs than those with controlled CS; mostly, ambulatory/outpatient services were the primary drivers of the costs. The use of telotristat ethyl may be cost effective if the societal willingness to pay is as high as $US150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year in the USA. Of the 12 QOL papers, only three case-control studies assessed QOL at baseline and more than two follow-up time points. Seven studies evaluated QOL at two or more time points but lacked a control group, obscuring direct intervention effects on patients' well-being. CONCLUSIONS We observed wide variations in the reviewed studies evaluating the economic burden and patient-reported outcomes, in terms of cost and QOL, of patients with CS. Although QOL is consistently impaired and costs are consistently increased by CS, the numbers of both cost and QOL studies among this patient population remain sparse, and many of the existing studies indicated an important need for quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Wen Pan
- Section of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bumyang Kim
- Section of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - James C Yao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Section of Cancer Economics and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kulke MH, Kennecke HF, Murali K, Joish VN. Changes in Carcinoid Syndrome Symptoms Among Patients Receiving Telotristat Ethyl in US Clinical Practice: Findings from the TELEPRO-II Real-World Study. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:7439-7446. [PMID: 34611437 PMCID: PMC8485853 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s330429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequately controlled symptoms incur a substantial burden on patients with neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome (CS). The effectiveness of telotristat ethyl (TE) with a somatostatin analog for uncontrolled CS diarrhea has been demonstrated in clinical trials and observational studies. TELEPRO-II was a prospective observational study evaluating TE's effectiveness in clinical practice over the first 3 months of treatment. METHODS Patients initiating TE in 2018 participated in an optional nurse support program reporting CS symptoms during interviews at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 months after TE initiation. Eligible patients received TE for ≥3 months and reported symptom burden at baseline and ≥1 follow-up visit within the first 3 months. Daily bowel movement (BM) frequency and flushing episodes were reported as events/episodes per day. Stool consistency, nausea severity, urgency severity, and abdominal pain were reported on a severity scale (1-10). Symptom changes were evaluated using paired-sample t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analysis of symptoms based on achievement of <30% or ≥30% reduction in daily BM frequency was conducted using a cumulative distribution function. RESULTS A total of 684/1603 (43%) patients were eligible for analysis. At baseline, patients reported a mean of 6.3 BM/day, nausea severity of 8.4/10 and stool urgency of 8.2/10. Significant improvements in all CS symptoms were observed after 3 months of TE. Mean daily BMs were reduced 64% after 3 months of TE (mean reduction [SD], -3.99 [3.8]; P<0.0001). Most patients (74%, n=503) reported ≥30% reduction in daily BM frequency; these patients also reported improvements in other symptoms (76-87%). Patients with <30% reduction in daily BMs also reported improvements in nausea severity (62%, n=24), daily flushing episodes (66%, n=98), abdominal pain (50%, n=60), urgency severity (38%, n=64), and stool consistency (24%, n=44). CONCLUSION Patients treated with TE in a real-world setting experienced significant, clinically meaningful improvements in CS symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew H Kulke
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Boston University and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, Providence Cancer Institute and Chiles Research Institute, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Vijay N Joish
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Woodlands, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pusceddu S, Rossi RE, Torchio M, Prinzi N, Niger M, Coppa J, Giacomelli L, Sacco R, Facciorusso A, Corti F, Raimondi A, Prisciandaro M, Colombo E, Beninato T, Del Vecchio M, Milione M, Di Bartolomeo M, de Braud F. Differential Diagnosis and Management of Diarrhea in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2468. [PMID: 32752158 PMCID: PMC7464810 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Diarrhea is a recurrent symptom in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and can represent different etiologies; thus, differential diagnosis is challenging. This paper distinguishes the different causes of chronic diarrhea in patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs, with the aim to identify the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Underlying causes of diarrhea can be multifactorial, including not only diarrhea that is related to specific hormonal hypersecretory syndromes, but also diarrhea that is secondary to the following: extensive surgery which can cause pancreatic exocrine insufficiency or short bowel syndrome, treatment with somatostatin analogs or other antineoplastic agents, and bile acid malabsorption. After initial management of diarrhea with general treatments (dietary modification, use of antidiarrheals), a proper differential diagnosis is necessary to treat patients with specific etiology-driven therapeutic approaches, such as somatostatin analogs, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitors. In conclusion, NETs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients suffering from chronic diarrhea, after the exclusion of more common etiologies. Furthermore, physicians should keep in mind that several different etiologies might be responsible for diarrhea occurrence in NET patients. A prompt diagnosis of the actual cause of diarrhea is necessary to guide the treatment and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Pusceddu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Roberta Elisa Rossi
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (R.E.R.); (J.C.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplant, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Torchio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Natalie Prinzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Monica Niger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Jorgelina Coppa
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (R.E.R.); (J.C.)
| | - Luca Giacomelli
- Polistudium SRL, 20135 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16126 Genoa, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (R.S.); (A.F.)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (R.S.); (A.F.)
| | - Francesca Corti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Alessandra Raimondi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Elena Colombo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Teresa Beninato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Marta Del Vecchio
- Unit of Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Massimo Milione
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS–Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastro-entero-pancreatic and Neuroendocrine Unit 1, ENETS Center of Excellence, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.T.); (N.P.); (M.N.); (F.C.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (E.C.); (T.B.); (M.D.B.); (F.d.B.)
- Oncology and Hematology-Oncology Department, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|