1
|
Chang WK, Peng CL, Chen YW, Sun CK, Chen CC, Liu TC, Chu YY, Tsai IF, Chung CS, Lin HF, Hsu FY, Tai WC, Lee HC, Yen HH, Wang EM, Chen SH, Chu CH, Chen MJ, Lu CL, Chiu CT. Recommendations and guidelines for endoscope reprocessing: Current position statement of digestive endoscopic society of Taiwan. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, IMMUNOLOGY, AND INFECTION = WEI MIAN YU GAN RAN ZA ZHI 2024; 57:211-224. [PMID: 38135645 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Reprocessing of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes and accessories is an essential part of patient safety and quality control in GI endoscopy centers. However, current endoscopic reprocessing guidelines or procedures are not adequate to ensure patient-safe endoscopy. Approximately 5.4 % of the clinically used duodenoscopes remain contaminated with high-concern microorganisms. Thus, the Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan (DEST) sets standards for the reprocessing of GI endoscopes and accessories in endoscopy centers. DEST organized a task force working group using the guideline-revision process. These guidelines contain principles and instructions of step-by-step for endoscope reprocessing. The updated guidelines were established after a thorough review of the existing global and local guidelines, systematic reviews, and health technology assessments of clinical effectiveness. This guideline aims to provide detailed recommendations for endoscope reprocessing to ensure adequate quality control in endoscopy centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Kuo Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Ling Peng
- Department of Integrated Diagnostics & Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Wei Chen
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kay Sun
- Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 11101, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Tao-Chieh Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Yi Chu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - I-Fang Tsai
- Ultrasonography and Endoscopy Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Shuan Chung
- Ultrasonography and Endoscopy Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Fen Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renai Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Fang-Yu Hsu
- Therapeutic Endoscopic Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Tai
- Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Chang Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renai Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Heng Yen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
| | - E-Ming Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Hui Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsin Chu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jen Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Liang Lu
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Tang Chiu
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garcia NB, Oliveira ACD. What Are the Ready-to-Use Endoscope Channels Hiding?: Unraveling the Risks of Safe Reuse. Gastroenterol Nurs 2023; 46:455-464. [PMID: 37700439 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Contamination due to failures or omissions in the reprocessing steps of gastrointestinal endoscopes is common in clinical practice. Ensuring the proper execution of each step is a challenge for reprocessing personnel. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an endoscopy setting between March and May 2021. We performed interviews about reprocessing practices, analyzed the life history of the equipment, and performed inspections through a borescope video of gastrointestinal endoscope channels that were stored and ready for use. A borescope is a complementary tool used to validate endoscope reprocessing, evaluate the internal visualization of channels, and identify changes that can compromise the safety of its use, which are often not detected in the leak test. Thirteen biopsy channels from stored gastrointestinal endoscopes were inspected. We found that 85% had stains and grooves, 69% contained moisture, and 46% had debris. There was at least one noncompliance issue in all of the channels inspected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naiara Bussolotti Garcia
- Núcleo de Estudos e pesquisas em Infecção Relacionada ao Cuidar em Saúde NEPIRCS, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Speth J. Guidelines in Practice: Processing Flexible Endoscopes. AORN J 2023; 118:169-178. [PMID: 37624056 DOI: 10.1002/aorn.13982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Flexible endoscopes allow surgeons and proceduralists to view patients' internal organs through small incisions or natural orifices. These devices may be difficult to clean and dry adequately, and the formation of biofilm can further complicate effective cleaning. The updated AORN "Guideline for processing flexible endoscopes" provides perioperative personnel with evidence-based best practice recommendations on a variety of concepts associated with this topic. This article provides an overview of the guideline and discusses recommendations for point-of-use treatment, transport, cleaning (including verification and drying), and storage of flexible endoscopes. It also includes a scenario that illustrates the importance of adequately drying and storing flexible endoscopes. When processing flexible endoscopes, personnel should adhere to the endoscope and processing equipment manufacturers' instructions for use. Perioperative nurses should review the guideline in its entirety and implement recommendations in practice settings where flexible endoscopes are used.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ofstead CL, Smart AG, Hopkins KM, Wetzler HP. The utility of lighted magnification and borescopes for visual inspection of flexible endoscopes. Am J Infect Control 2023; 51:2-10. [PMID: 36075293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infections have been linked to damaged or contaminated endoscopes with visible defects. Endoscope processing standards and guidelines state endoscopes should be visually inspected every time they are used. This study evaluated a new visual inspection program using magnification and borescopes in an endoscopy department that had not previously utilized these tools. METHODS Site personnel were given visual inspection tools and training before systematically examining fully processed endoscopes twice during a 2-month period. A risk assessment protocol was used to determine whether endoscopes required recleaning, repair, or other action. Findings were documented using log sheets, photographs, and videotapes. RESULTS Visible damage and residue or debris were observed in 100% of 25 endoscopes at both assessments, and 76% required repair. Defects at baseline included scratches (88%); channel shredding or peeling (80%); adhesive band disintegration (80%); residual soil or debris (white 84%; black 68%; brown 40%; yellow/green 36%; and orange/red 8%); retained fluid (52%); and dents (40%). Findings were similar at follow-up. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS Visual inspection with magnification and borescopes identified actionable defects that could interfere with processing effectiveness in 100% of endoscopes. Infection preventionists have a critical role to play in supporting processing personnel now that standards, guidelines, and manufacturer instructions recommend enhanced visual inspection of every endoscope, every time.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chung KH, Chae JD, Choe W, Lee HY, Oh IH, Son BK. Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:674-682. [PMID: 35916003 PMCID: PMC9539290 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Endoscopic channels are difficult to clean and can cause infection transmission. We examined the effectiveness of a newly developed channel-cleaning ball brush (BB), which is sucked into the endoscopic channel and scrapes and cleans the lumen as it passes through.
Methods The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopes used for patient examinations were randomly selected as the conventional brush (CB) or BB group. After manual cleaning, the presence or absence of carbohydrates, proteins, adenosine triphosphate, and hemoglobin was assessed.
Results Fifty-six and 58 endoscopes were cleaned with the CB and BB, respectively. Carbohydrate and protein were detected in one (1.8%) and two endoscopes (3.4%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=1.000). Hemoglobin was observed in one (1.8%) and three endoscopes (5.2%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.636). The adenosine triphosphate levels were 10.6±15.9 and 12.5±14.3 relative light units in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.496). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (32.8%) endoscopes were positive for microbial cultures in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.136).
Conclusions The efficacy of BB was not significantly different from that of CB in the endoscopic channel-cleaning process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang Hyun Chung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Jeong Don Chae
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonho Choe
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Hyo Young Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Il Hwan Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byoung Kwan Son
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goyal H, Larsen S, Perisetti A, Larsen NB, Ockert LK, Adamsen S, Tharian B, Thosani N. Gastrointestinal endoscope contamination rates - elevators are not only to blame: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E840-E853. [PMID: 35692921 PMCID: PMC9187382 DOI: 10.1055/a-1795-8883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Duodenoscopes that are contaminated due to inadequate reprocessing are well-documented. However, studies have demonstrated poor reprocessing of other kinds of endoscopes as well, including echoendoscopes, gastroscopes, and colonoscopes. We estimated the contamination rate beyond the elevator of gastrointestinal endoscopes based on available data. Methods We searched PubMed and Embase from January 1, 2010 to October 10, 2020, for studies investigating contamination rates of reprocessed gastrointestinal endoscopes. A random-effects model was used to calculate the contamination rate of patient-ready gastrointestinal endoscopes. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate differences among endoscope types, countries, and colony-forming unit (CFU) thresholds. Results Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 1,059 positive cultures from 7,903 samples. The total contamination rate was 19.98 % ± 0.024 (95 % confidence interval [Cl]: 15.29 %-24.68 %; I 2 = 98.6 %). The contamination rates of colonoscope and gastroscope channels were 31.95 % ± 0.084 and 28.22 % ± 0.076, respectively. Duodenoscope channels showed a contamination rate of 14.41 % ± 0.029. The contamination rates among studies conducted in North America and Europe were 6.01 % ± 0.011 and 18.16% ± 0.053 %, respectively. The contamination rate among studies using a CFU threshold > 20 showed contamination of 30.36 % ± 0.094, whereas studies using a CFU threshold < 20 showed a contamination rate of 11 % ± 0.026. Conclusions On average, 19.98 % of reprocessed gastrointestinal endoscopes may be contaminated when used in patients and varies between different geographies. These findings highlight that the elevator mechanism is not the only obstacle when reprocessing reusable endoscopes; therefore, guidelines should recommend more surveillance of the endoscope channels as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemant Goyal
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States,Clinical Assistant Professor, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia, United States
| | | | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Division of Interventional Oncology & Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE). Parkview Cancer Institute, Wayne, Indiana, United States
| | | | - Lotte Klinten Ockert
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Sven Adamsen
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States,Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- General and Advanced Endoscopy, Assoc. Prof of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gromski MA, Sherman S. Technological review: developments in innovative duodenoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:42-50. [PMID: 34487777 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Gromski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart Sherman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peng CL, Liu TC, Wang HP, Chang WK. Two novel protocols for cleaning residual simethicone and fluid in patient-ready duodenoscopes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:1843-1850. [PMID: 33274470 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Approximately 42-95% of working channels have been reported to show the presence of residual fluid despite endoscope reprocessing. The aim of this study was to design two novel protocols for cleaning residual simethicone and demonstrate its efficiency by evaluating the residual fluid and cleanliness in the working channels of patient-ready duodenoscopes. METHODS The designed protocol for cleaning residual simethicone was implemented in manual cleaning and/or high-level disinfection (HLD). The residual fluid inside the working channels was estimated by visual inspection. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) values were evaluated to determine cleanliness after manual cleaning. RESULTS Manual cleaning with novel simethicone cleaning protocol demonstrated a significant decrease in fluid droplets (14.6 ± 29.9 vs 0 ± 0, P < 0.001) and ATP values (157 ± 196 relative light units [RLUs] vs 52 ± 41 RLUs, P = 0.031). HLD with simethicone cleaning protocol, using either enzymatic detergent with effective for cleaning simethicone or cleaning time set in the automatic endoscope reprocessor program for 8 min, demonstrated significant decrease in the number of fluid droplets. Follow-up after the implementation of the simethicone cleaning protocol showed a significant decrease in fluid droplets (37.4 ± 41.0 vs 2.1 ± 5.5, P = 0.003) and ATP values (271 ± 268 RLUs vs 82 ± 136 RLUs, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS Simethicone cleaning protocol is advantageous for significantly decreasing fluid droplets and ATP values within endoscope working channels. After manual cleaning with the simethicone cleaning protocol, in particular, no retained fluid droplet was observed in patient-ready duodenoscopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ling Peng
- Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tao-Chieh Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Kuo Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|