Indications of external radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma from updated clinical guidelines: Diverse global viewpoints

Advances in gross tumor target volume determination in radiotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms. With the advancement of technology, the precision of radiotherapy (RT) for HCC has considerably increased, and it is an indispensable modality in the comprehensive management of HCC. Some RT techniques increase the radiation dose to HCC, which decreases the radiation dose delivered to the surrounding normal liver tissue. This approach significantly improves the efficacy of HCC treatment and reduces the incidence of Radiation-induced Liver Disease (RILD). Clear imaging and precise determination of the Gross Target Volume (GTV) are prerequisites of precise RT of HCC. The main hindrances in determining the HCC GTV include indistinct tumor boundaries on imaging and the impact on respiratory motion. The integration of multimodal imaging, four-dimensional imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can help overcome challenges for HCC GTV. In this article, the advancements in medical imaging and precise determination for HCC GTV have been reviewed, providing a framework for the precise RT of HCC.

Current perspectives on radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma management: a comprehensive review

This review examines the transformative role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), spotlighting the progression from traditional EBRT techniques to advanced modalities like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), and innovative particle therapy, including proton beam therapy and carbon ion RT. These advancements have significantly improved the precision and efficacy of RT, marking a paradigm shift in the multimodal management of HCC, particularly in addressing complex cases and enhancing local tumor control. The review underscores the synergistic potential of integrating RT with other treatments like transarterial chemoembolization, systemic therapies such as sorafenib, and emerging immunotherapies, illustrating enhanced survival and disease control outcomes. The efficacy of RT is addressed for challenging conditions, including advanced HCC with macrovascular invasion, and RT modalities, like SBRT, are compared against traditional treatments like radiofrequency ablation for early-stage HCC. Additionally, the review accentuates the encouraging outcomes of particle therapy in enhancing local control and survival rates, minimizing treatment-related toxicity, and advocating for continued research and clinical trials. In conclusion, the integration of RT into multimodal HCC treatment strategies, coupled with the emergence of particle therapy, is crucial for advancing oncologic management, emphasizing the need for relentless innovation and personalized treatment approaches.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy with and without lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

Lack of evidence on the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our research compared the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus lenvatinib versus SBRT alone in clinical practice for the treatment of advanced HCC.

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, safety profiles were also evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 35 patients from each group were selected and the date was compared. Compared with the SBRT alone group, the median OS, PFS, and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (median OS 16.8 vs. 11.0 months, pOS = 0.043; median PFS 9.1 vs. 3.7 months, pPFS < 0.001; median IHPFS 9.5 vs. 4.2 months, pIHPFS = 0.004). The 6- and 12-month OS rates were 91.4% and 68.6% in the combined therapy group and 82.9% and 48.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 68.6% and 34.3% in the combined therapy group and 31.4% and 8.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. Furthermore, a higher ORR was observed in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (54.29% vs. 22.86%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) also had similar results. Moreover, most adverse events (AEs) were mild-to-moderate and manageable in the SBRT plus lenvatinib group.

CONCLUSION

SBRT plus lenvatinib is expected to significantly improve OS, PFS, IHPFS, and ORR for patients with advanced HCC when compared to SBRT alone, with manageable adverse effects.

Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, the optimal strategy for patients with multiple HCC within the Milan Criteria is liver transplantation (LT). However, LT cannot be offered to all the patients due to organ shortages and long waiting lists, as well as because of the advanced disease carrying a high risk of poor outcomes. For early stages, liver resection (LR) or thermal ablation (TA) can be proposed, while trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) still remains the treatment of choice for intermediate stages (BCLC-B). Asian guidelines and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggest LR for resectable multinodular HCCs, even beyond Milan criteria. In this scenario, a growing body of evidence shows better outcomes after surgical resection when compared with TACE. Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and stereotaxic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can also play an important role in this setting. Furthermore, the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) specifically for patients with multiple HCC is still not clear. This review aims to summarize current knowledge about the best therapeutical strategy for multiple HCC while focusing on the role of minimally invasive surgery and on the most attractive future perspectives.

Challenges and Suggestions in Management of Lung and Liver Cancer in Uzbekistan: The Second Report of the Uzbekistan-Korea Oncology Consortium

The health burden of cancer increases in Uzbekistan as the country develops and the life expectancy increases. Management of such a burden requires efficient screening, treatment optimization, and investigation of the causes of cancer. The Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan formed an advisory consortium, including clinical oncology and healthcare management experts from Uzbekistan and South Korea, to design a strategy for cancer management. Our consortium has analyzed six cancer types with high morbidity and mortality in Uzbekistan by classifying them into three categories (breast, cervical (gynecologic cancers), lung, liver (cancer common in men), stomach, and colorectal cancers (gastrointestinal cancers)). Lung and liver cancers are common causes of death in men after middle age-they can yield a serious health burden on the country and ruin the livelihood of families. In this review, we will analyze the oncologic literature and suggest practical recommendations for the treatment and prevention of lung and liver cancer in Uzbekistan. Data from South Korea, which has conducted nationwide screening for two decades and made progress in improving prognosis, will be discussed as a comparative control.

Proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer represents one of the most common causes of death from cancer worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of all primary liver cancers. Among local therapies, evidence regarding the use of radiation therapy is growing. Proton therapy currently represents the most advanced radiation therapy technique with unique physical properties which fit well with liver irradiation. Here, in this review, we aim to 1) illustrate the rationale for the use of proton therapy (PT) in the treatment of HCC, 2) discuss the technical challenges of advanced PT in this disease, 3) review the major clinical studies regarding the use of PT for HCC, and 4) analyze the potential developments and future directions of PT in this setting.

Hypofractionation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma - The Effect of Fractionation Size

The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased over the years. Several prospective studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy, and randomised trials are underway. The advancement in technology has enabled the transition from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to highly focused SBRT. Liver damage is the primary limiting toxicity with radiation, with the incidence of grade 3 varying from 0 to 30%. The reported radiotherapy fractionation schedule for HCC, and in practice use, ranges from one to 10 fractions, based on clinician preference and technology available, tumour location and tumour size. This review summarises the safety and efficacy of various SBRT fractionation schedules for HCC.

Predictive Modeling of Survival and Toxicity in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To stratify patients and aid clinical decision making, we developed machine learning models to predict treatment failure and radiation-induced toxicities after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The models were developed using linear and nonlinear algorithms, predicting survival, nonlocal failure, radiation-induced liver disease, and lymphopenia from baseline patient and treatment parameters. The models were trained on 207 patients from Massachusetts General Hospital. Performance was quantified using Harrell's c-index, area under the curve (AUC), and accuracy in high-risk populations. Models' structures were optimized in a nested cross-validation approach to prevent overfitting. A study analysis plan was registered before external validation using 143 patients from MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical utility was assessed using net-benefit analysis.

RESULTS

The survival model stratified high-risk versus low-risk patients well in the external validation cohort (c-index = 0.75), better than existing risk scores. Predictions of 1-year survival and nonlocal failure were excellent (external AUC = 0.74 and 0.80, respectively), especially in the high-risk group (accuracy > 90%). Cause-of-death analysis showed differential modes of treatment failure in these cohorts and indicated that these models could be used to stratify RT patients for liver-sparing treatment regimen or combination approaches with systemic agents. Predictions of liver disease and lymphopenia were good but less robust (external AUC = 0.68 and 0.7, respectively), suggesting the need for more comprehensive consideration of dosimetry and better predictive biomarkers. The liver disease model showed excellent accuracy in the high-risk group (92%) and revealed possible interactions of platelet count with initial liver function.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning approaches can provide reliable outcome predictions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after RT in diverse cohorts across institutions. The excellent performance, particularly in high-risk patients, suggests novel strategies for patient stratification and treatment selection.

MiR-122 radiosensitize hepatocellular carcinoma cells by suppressing cyclin G1

PURPOSE

Emerging evidence has shown that radiotherapy is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Micro(mi)RNAs are involved in regulating radiosensitivity in many cancers. MiR-122 accounts for approximately 70% of all cloned miRNAs in the liver, but there are few reports about whether it is involved in regulating of radiosensitivity in HCC cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HCC cells (HepG2 and Huh7) overexpressing miR-122 were constructed by transfecting them with lentiviral-miR-122. Then, their proliferation ability was analyzed by the MTT, and colony formation assays and a xenograft tumor model was used to detect their radiosensitivity. The expression of cyclin G1 mRNA and protein was detected by the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting, respectively.

RESULTS

Overexpression of miR-122 inhibited the proliferation of, and radiosensitized HCC cells. Cyclin G1 mRNA and protein level were suppressed in HepG2 tumors overexpression miR-122.

CONCLUSION

MiR-122 may be useful as a potential radiosensitizer for HCC, and its mechanism is related to the regulation of cyclin G1.

Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is unresectable and non-transplantable can be treated by several liver-directed therapies. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is an increasingly accepted and widely utilized treatment modality in this setting. Accelerated charged particles such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) offer technological advancements over conventional photon radiotherapy. In this review, we summarize the distinct advantages of CIRT use for HCC treatment, focusing on physical and biological attributes, and outline dosimetric and treatment planning caveats. Based on these considerations, we posit that HCC may be among the best indications for use of CIRT, as it allows for maximizing tumoricidal doses to the target volume while minimizing the dose to the organs at risk.

Image-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using VMAT and Real-Time Adaptive Tumor Gating: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Toxicity for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Although the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, it is a therapeutic option often considered in patients not eligible to or recurring after other local therapies. Liver SBRT can be delivered using a wide range of techniques and linear accelerators. We report the first evaluation for HCC of SBRT using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and real-time adaptive tumor gating, which is a mainly completely non-invasive procedure (no fiducial markers for 65.2% of the patients). Our study showed that this SBRT technique has very favorable outcomes with optimal local control and a low toxicity rate.

Abstract

Liver SBRT is a therapeutic option for the treatment of HCC in patients not eligible for other local therapies. We retrospectively report the outcomes of a cohort of consecutive patients treated with SBRT for HCC at the Montpellier Cancer Institute. Between March 2013 and December 2018, 66 patients were treated with image-guided liver SBRT using VMAT and real-time adaptive tumor gating in our institute. The main endpoints considered in this study were local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The median follow-up was 16.8 months. About 66.7% had prior liver treatment. Most patients received 50 Gy in five fractions of 10 Gy. No patient had local recurrence. Overall survival and disease-free survival were, respectively, 83.9% and 46.7% at one year. In multivariate analysis, the diameter of the lesions was a significant prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival (HR = 2.57 (1.19–5.53) p = 0.02). Regarding overall survival, the volume of PTV was associated with lower overall survival (HR = 2.84 (1.14–7.08) p = 0.025). No grade 3 toxicity was observed. One patient developed a grade 4 gastric ulcer, despite the dose constraints being respected. Image-guided liver SBRT with VMAT is an effective and safe treatment in patients with inoperable HCC, even in heavily pre-treated patients. Further prospective evaluation will help to clarify the role of SBRT in the management of HCC patients.

Differences in radiotherapy application according to regional disease characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma

There are differences in opinion regarding the application of external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Some major guidelines state that external beam radiotherapy is yet to attain a sufficient level of evidence. However, caution should be exercised when attempting to understand the clinical need for external beam radiotherapy solely based on the level of evidence. Previously, external beam radiotherapy had low applicability in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma before computed tomography-based planning was popularized. Modern external beam radiotherapy can selectively target tumor cells while sparing normal liver tissues. Recent technologies such as stereotactic body radiotherapy have enabled more precise treatment. The characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma differ significantly according to the regional etiology. The main cause of hepatocellular carcinoma is the hepatitis B virus. It is commonly diagnosed as a locally advanced tumor but with relatively preserved hepatic function. The majority of these hepatocellular carcinoma cases are found in the East Asian population. Hepatocellular carcinoma caused by hepatitis C virus or other benign hepatitis tends to be diagnosed as a less locally aggressive tumor but with deteriorated liver function. The western world and Japan tend to have patients with such causes. External beam radiotherapy has been more commonly performed for the former, although the use of external beam radiotherapy in the latter might have more concerns with regard to hepatic toxicity. This review discusses the above subjects along with perspectives regarding external beam radiotherapy in recent guidelines.

Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?

Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.

Silencing the Expression of Cyclin G1 Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma In Vitro and In Vivo by Inducing Apoptosis

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cyclin G1 is a novel member of the cyclin family, and it is abnormally expressed in HCC. In this study we investigated the role of cyclin G1 in the radiotherapy of HCC cells. The expression of cyclin G1 was silenced by transfection of cyclin G1-siRNA into HepG2 cells and Huh7 cells, and the expression of cyclin G1 mRNA and protein was measured by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis. The proliferation was analyzed using MTT assay, and the radiosensitivity of HCC cells was detected using colony formation assay and a xenograft tumor model. The expression of apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2 and Bax) was detected by Western blot analysis, and caspase-3 was detected using fluorimetry. The expression of cyclin G1 mRNA and protein in HepG2/Huh7-cyclin G1-siRNA cells was found to be significantly decreased compared to that in HepG2/Huh7 cells. Silencing the expression of cyclin G1 inhibited the proliferation of HCC cells and enhanced radiosensitivity in HCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Knockdown of cyclin G1 expression significantly decreased Bcl-2 expression, and increased Bax expression and caspase-3 activity in HCC cells. Silencing of cyclin G1 expression enhances the radiosensitivity of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism for this may be related to the regulation of apoptosis-related proteins.

Imaging After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Emphasis on LIRADS Treatment Response Assessment Criteria

Radiologists play an essential role in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response and help guide further clinical management of patients. Interpretation of treatment response after locoregional therapy is challenging. The post-treatment imaging findings vary and depend on the type of treatment, the degree of treatment response, time interval after treatment and several other factors. Given the widespread use of local-regional therapies, understanding the appearance of treated lesions has become crucial to allow for a more accurate interpretation of post-treatment imaging. Several response criteria including the recently introduced Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) are currently used to assess treatment response. This review article describes the imaging assessment of HCC treatment response after several locoregional therapies using various response assessment criteria, emphasizing the LI-RADS treatment algorithm.

Radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: should they clash or reconcile?

Until a few decades ago, surgical resection was the only valid option for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, various locoregional modalities including arterial-directed therapy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and radiotherapy have been recently shown to be effective. RFA is now established as a standard treatment for small localized HCCs, showing oncological results comparable to those of surgical resection in randomized studies. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a modern radiotherapeutic modality that targets tumors with precision and delivers high radiation doses over a short period of time; it has particularly attracted clinical interest after its therapeutic efficacy was found to be similar to that of surgery in early-stage lung cancer. Given its potent disease control capability, SBRT has also been applied to early HCCs and demonstrated promising results in recent studies. It has also been noted for its suitability to treat tumors located in anatomical locations where RFA would be challenging. However, since its effectiveness has not been compared to that of RFA in randomized studies of patients eligible for RFA, the use of SBRT has been debated. This review was conducted to guide physicians from all fields involved in the treatment of early HCC. The therapeutic characteristics and indications of both SBRT and RFA are described, and recent comparative studies between the two modalities are discussed. In addition, we examined the factors that should be considered when selecting the appropriate treatments, and offer our recommendations.

Clinical efficacy of external beam radiotherapy complementing incomplete transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been commonly applied as salvage or a combination locoregional modality after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). This study reports oncologic outcomes and feasibility after application of the two modalities in our center.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients who underwent EBRT due to incomplete responses of TACE were evaluated. Fourteen patients (35.0%) received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and the remaining patients received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (RT). A majority of patients who underwent SBRT received doses of 27 to 48 Gy in 3-4 fractions [median EQD₂ (Equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction radiotherapy): 57.0 Gy]. Conventionally fractionated RT was performed with a median EQD₂ of 47.8 Gy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 14.4 months (range: 2.6-83.0 months). A majority (77.5%) of patients were regarded as having Child-Pugh grade A. The median tumor size was 3.4 cm (range: 0.8-20.1 cm). Ten patients (25.0%) had thrombosis at a main portal branch. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82.2% and 42.1% and 55.8% and 32.1%, respectively. The local control rates were 89.1% and 89.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The albumin level was a significant factor affecting OS (p = .002), and the BCLC stage significantly affected PFS (p = .001). Intrahepatic, out-of-field recurrence was the main cause of disease progression (60.0%), and distant metastasis developed in 12 patients (30.0%) during follow-up. Non-classic radiation-induced liver disease was seen in five (12.5%) patients, and two (5%) patients experienced grade ≥3 hepatic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

EBRT after incomplete TACE was feasible and yielded favorable oncologic outcomes. However, disease progression related to intrahepatic failure remained a hindrance.

[Stereotaxic radiotherapy of primary extracranial tumors]

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a fundamental change from the conventional fractionated radiotherapy and represents a new therapeutic indication. Stereotactic radiotherapy is now a standard of care for inoperable patients or patients who refuse surgery. The results are encouraging with local control and survival rates very high in selected populations. The rate of late toxicity remains acceptable. Good tolerability makes it appropriate even for elderly and frail patients. In these fragile patients or in certain specific clinical situations, different surgical, radiotherapy or interventional radiology attitudes can be discussed on a case-by-case basis. These situations are considered in this article for the pulmonary, hepatic and prostatic localizations.