Stapled transperineal repair for low- and mid-level rectovaginal fistulas: A 5-year experience and comparison with sutured repair

Comparative study on the establishment efficacy of four types of animal models of rectovaginal fistula in rabbits

Various surgical methods have so far been developed for treating rectovaginal fistula (RVF), each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The lack of standardized animal models of RVF is a major reason for the failure to establish a unified and effective surgical method for the treatment of RVF. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of an RVF animal model by magnetic compression and compare it with the traditional modeling method. Thirty-two female Japanese white rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: A, B, C, and D, based on how the rectovaginal septum was treated. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and model success rate of each group were determined. The experimental animals were euthanized 2 weeks after the operation. Their rectovaginal septum specimens were obtained. RVF was observed by the naked eye. The fistula size was measured. Histological changes of fistula were observed by hematoxylin and eosin and Masson staining. All rabbits completed the RVF model and survived 2 weeks after the operation. Groups A and B had no bleeding, while groups C and D had < 0.5 mL of bleeding. The magnet detached in 4-6 days in group A, while it remained in place for 2 weeks after surgery in group B. Only one group D rabbit had a plastic hose for 2 weeks after surgery. The RVFs of groups A and C healed by themselves. In group B, the fistula was well formed. In group D, fistula healing was observed in three animals and the diameter of the fistulas was only 2.82-4.64 mm in the other four animals. Groups B and D had a scar on the inner surface of fistulas. Our study shows that the magnetic compression technique based on the T-shaped magnet is a highly useful method to establishing a continuous and stable RVF model in rabbits.

Stapled transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair for low- and mid-level rectovaginal fistulas: A comparison study with rectal mucosal advancement flap repair

BACKGROUND

As an innovative treatment, stapled transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair (STR) for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) has demonstrated effectiveness in preliminary reports. This study aims to compare STR with rectal mucosal advancement flap repair (RAF), a widely utilized surgical procedure, for the surgical outcome of the low- and mid-level RVF.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with low- and mid-level RVF who underwent STR or RAF were included from both the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Xi'an Daxing Hospital. Among the 99 total patients, 77 underwent STR and 22 underwent RAF. Patient demographics, operative data, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Recurrence rate and associated risk factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among patients in terms of clinical characteristics like age, BMI, aetiology, and fistula features. During the follow-up period of 20 months (interquartile range 3.0-41.8 months), a total of 28 patients relapsed, with a significantly lower recurrence rate in the STR group (20.8 %) than in the RAF group (54.6 %) (P = 0.005). In the multivariate Cox analysis, STR was an independent protective factor against recurrence (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01). Logistic regression indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between these two procedures in terms of surgical complications (OR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.19-1.48, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

For low- and mid-level RVF, STR may be an alternative option for treatment modality that offers a lower recurrence rate, without observed disadvantage in terms of surgical complication rates.