Comparative study of indocyanine green-R15, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score for prediction of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS: Current status and prospects in predictive assessment

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an essential procedure for the treatment of portal hypertension but can result in hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a serious complication that worsens patient outcomes. Investigating predictors of HE after TIPS is essential to improve prognosis. This review analyzes risk factors and compares predictive models, weighing traditional scores such as Child-Pugh, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) against emerging artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. While traditional scores provide initial insights into HE risk, they have limitations in dealing with clinical complexity. Advances in machine learning (ML), particularly when integrated with imaging and clinical data, offer refined assessments. These innovations suggest the potential for AI to significantly improve the prediction of post-TIPS HE. The study provides clinicians with a comprehensive overview of current prediction methods, while advocating for the integration of AI to increase the accuracy of post-TIPS HE assessments. By harnessing the power of AI, clinicians can better manage the risks associated with TIPS and tailor interventions to individual patient needs. Future research should therefore prioritize the development of advanced AI frameworks that can assimilate diverse data streams to support clinical decision-making. The goal is not only to more accurately predict HE, but also to improve overall patient care and quality of life.

Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for portal hypertension and its' complications in liver cirrhosis, yet the development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains a significant concern. This review covers the reported incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for post-TIPS HE over the past decade. Incidence varies widely (7-61%), with factors like age, liver function, hyponatremia, and spontaneous portosystemic shunts influencing risk. Procedural aspects, including TIPS timing, indication, and stent characteristics, also contribute. Pharmacological prophylaxis with lactulose and rifaximin shows promise, but current evidence is inconclusive. Procedural preventive measures, such as shunt embolization and monitoring portal pressure gradients, are explored. Treatment involves pharmacological options like lactulose and rifaximin, and procedural interventions like stent diameter reduction. Ongoing studies on novel predictive markers and emerging treatments, such as faecal microbiota transplant, reflect the evolving landscape in post-TIPS HE management. This concise review provides clinicians with insights into the multifaceted nature of post-TIPS HE, aiding in improved risk assessment, prophylaxis, and management for patients undergoing TIPS procedures.

A novel nomogram predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in portal hypertension patients

We aim to develop a nomogram to predict overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal hypertension, according to demographic/clinical indicators such as age, creatinine, blood ammonia, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) and percentage of Portal pressure gradient (PPG) decline. In this retrospective study, 296 patients with portal hypertension who received elective TIPS in Beijing Shijitan Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were included. These patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 207) and a validation cohort (n = 89). According to the occurrence of OHE, patients were assigned to OHE group and non-OHE group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent variables for predicting OHE after TIPS. Accordingly, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to compare the accuracy and superiority of a novel model with conventional Child-Pugh and MELD scoring model. Age (OR 1.036, 95% CI 1.002-1.070, p = 0.037), Creatinine (OR 1.011, 95% CI 1.003-1.019, p = 0.009), Blood ammonia (OR 1.025, 95% CI 1.006-1.044, p = 0.011), ICG-R15 (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.009-1.052, p = 0.004) and Percentage decline in PPG (OR 1.068, 95% CI 1.029-1.109, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for OHE after TIPS using multifactorial analysis. A nomogram was constructed using a well-fit calibration curve for each of these five covariates. When compared to Child-Pugh and MELD score, this new nomogram has a better predictive value (C-index = 0.828, 95% CI 0.761-0.896). Consistently, this finding was reproduceable in validation cohort and confirmed with DCA. A unique nomogram was developed to predict OHE after TIPS in patients with PHT, with a high prediction sensitivity and specificity performance than commonly applied scoring systems.

Prediction of Patient Hepatic Encephalopathy Risk with Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival Score Following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts: A Retrospective Study

Background

Hepatic encephalopathy is a complication of portal hypertension. The Freiburg index of transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and patient outcomes have recently been described. This retrospective study was conducted at a single center in China and included 241 patients with portal hypertension who underwent TIPS implantation to evaluate the Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival score (FIPS) to predict hepatic encephalopathy.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study including 241 patients who underwent TIPS operation between April 2015 and July 2019 was conducted. Clinical demographics and relevant clinical parameters within 24h after admission were collected. The prediction performances of FIPS, Child–Pugh and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were compared by decision curve analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In addition, multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors.

Results

Eighty-three out of 241 patients (34.4%) finally developed post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy. The area under the ROC curve of FIPS was 0.744 (95% confidence interval: 0.684–0.798). FIPS was identified as an independent risk factor for post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (hazard ratio: 2.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.71–2.90, p<0.001). Moreover, we further grouped the FIPS scores into two categories (FIPS ≤-0.97, low-risk; FIPS >-0.97, high risk) to improve its applicability. Patients with high FIPS scores had a significantly higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy than patients with low FIPS scores (P<0.05).

Conclusion

This study showed that FIPS could be used to evaluate the risk of hepatic encephalopathy in this patient group with improved predictive performance when compared with the Child–Pugh and MELD scores.

Leveraging Blood-Based Diagnostics to Predict Tumor Biology and Extend the Application and Personalization of Radiotherapy in Liver Cancers

While the incidence of primary liver cancers has been increasing worldwide over the last few decades, the mortality has remained consistently high. Most patients present with underlying liver disease and have limited treatment options. In recent years, radiotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for some patients; however, the risk of radiation induced liver disease (RILD) remains a limiting factor for some patients. Thus, the discovery and validation of biomarkers to measure treatment response and toxicity is critical to make progress in personalizing radiotherapy for liver cancers. While tissue biomarkers are optimal, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically diagnosed radiographically, making tumor tissue not readily available. Alternatively, blood-based diagnostics may be a more practical option as blood draws are minimally invasive, widely availability and may be performed serially during treatment. Possible blood-based diagnostics include indocyanine green test, plasma or serum levels of HGF or cytokines, circulating blood cells and genomic biomarkers. The albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score incorporates albumin and bilirubin to subdivide patients with well-compensated underlying liver dysfunction (Child–Pugh score A) into two distinct groups. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge on circulating biomarkers and blood-based scores in patients with malignant liver disease undergoing radiotherapy and outlines potential future directions.

Differences in complications between hepatitis B-related cirrhosis and alcohol-related cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the differences in complications between hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related and alcohol-related cirrhoses.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with HBV-related and alcohol-related cirrhoses treated from January 2014 to January 2021 were, retrospectively, reviewed. The unadjusted rate and adjusted risk of cirrhotic complications between the two groups were assessed.

RESULTS

The rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hypersplenism were higher in HBV-related cirrhosis (both P < 0.05), whereas the rates of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) were higher in alcohol-related cirrhosis (both P < 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, HBV-related cirrhotic patients had higher risks of HCC (odds ratio [OR] = 34.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.61-251.77, P = 0.001) and hypersplenism (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.18-4.42, P = 0.014), whereas alcohol-related cirrhotic patients had higher risks of HE (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06-0.73, P = 0.013) and ACLF (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.73, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Cirrhotic patients with different etiologies had different types of complications: HBV-related cirrhotic patients exhibited increased risks of HCC and hypersplenism and alcohol-related cirrhotic patients more readily developing HE and ACLF.