Pathogenesis and managenent of pain in chronic pancreatitis

Establishment of a murine pancreatic cancer pain model and microarray analysis of pain‑associated genes in the spinal cord dorsal horn

There is emerging evidence on the mechanisms of pancreatic cancer pain. Following the establishment of an orthotropic transplantation model of pancreatic cancer, microarray analysis was performed to identify changes in the expression levels of pain-associated genes in the spinal cord. A mouse model of pancreatic cancer-induced pain was established by implanting SW 1990 cells into the pancreases of female BALB/c-nu mice. The survival rate and body weight were measured following orthotropic transplantation. Gross anatomical techniques and hematoxylin and eosin staining were used to analyze the pancreatic tumor tissue. Multiple behavioral tests were also performed to assess pain-associated responses. Additionally, using samples from mice with or without observable pain, microarray analysis was performed to determine the gene expression profiles in the spinal cord dorsal horn. The survival rate of mice with pancreatic cancer was high during the initial 3 weeks post-surgery, although the body weight decreased progressively. Gross anatomical techniques demonstrated that the tumor size increased significantly following the surgery, and this result was confirmed by solid tumor masses in the pancreatic tissues of the mouse model. Observable pain behavioral responses were also examined in the pancreatic cancer model by measuring the mechanical threshold of the abdominal skin, hunching behavior and visceromotor responses. The profiles of 10 pain specific-associated genes in the spinal cord dorsal horn that accurately reflect the molecular pathological progression of disease were also identified. In conclusion, the present study has developed a novel animal model of pancreatic cancer pain in BALB/c-nu mice that resembles human pancreatic cancer pain, and the expression of pain-associated genes in the spinal cord dorsal horn has been profiled. The results of the present study may further the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that mediate pancreatic cancer pain.

Endogenous opioids inhibit early-stage pancreatic pain in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The endogenous opioid system is involved in modulating the experience of pain, the response to stress, and the action of analgesic therapies. Recent human imaging studies have shown a significant tonic modulation of visceral pain, raising the question of whether endogenous opioids tonically modulate the pain of visceral cancer.

METHODS

Transgenic mice expressing the first 127 amino acids of simian virus 40 large T antigen, under the control of the rat elastase-1 promoter, that spontaneously develop pancreatic cancer were used to investigate the role of endogenous opioids in the modulation of pancreatic cancer pain. Visceral pain behaviors were assessed as degree of hunching and vocalization.

RESULTS

Although mice with late-stage pancreatic cancer displayed spontaneous, morphine-reversible, visceral pain-related behaviors such as hunching and vocalization, these behaviors were absent in mice with early-stage pancreatic cancer. After systemic administration of the central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant opioid receptor antagonists naloxone or naltrexone, mice with early-stage pancreatic cancer displayed significant visceral pain-related behaviors, whereas systemic administration of the CNS-nonpenetrant opioid antagonist naloxone-methiodide did not induce an increase in visceral pain behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a CNS opioid-dependent mechanism tonically modulates early and late-stage pancreatic cancer pain. Understanding the mechanisms that mask this pain in early stage disease and drive this pain in late-stage disease may allow improved diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Effect of NCPB and VSPL on pain and quality of life in chronic pancreatitis patients

AIM: To compare the effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) and videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (VSPL) on pain and quality of life of chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients.

METHODS: Forty-eight small duct CP patients were treated invasively with NCPB (n = 30) or VSPL (n = 18) in two non-randomized, prospective, case-controlled protocols due to chronic pain syndrome, and compared to a control group who were treated conservatively (n = 32). Visual analog scales were used to assess pain and opioid consumption rate was evaluated. In addition, the quality of life was measured using QLQ C-30 for NCPB and FACIT for VSPL. Although both questionnaires covered similar problems, they could not be compared directly one with another. Therefore, the studies were compared by meta-analysis methodology.

RESULTS: Both procedures resulted in a significant positive effect on pain of CP patients. Opioids were withdrawn totally in 47.0% of NCPB and 36.4% of VSPL patients, and reduced in 53.0% and 45.4% of the respective patient groups. No reduction in opioid usage was observed in the control group. In addition, fatigue and emotional well-being showed improvements. Finally, NCPB demonstrated stronger positive effects on social support, which might possibly be attributed to earlier presentation of patients treated with NCPB.

CONCLUSION: Both invasive pain treatment methods are effective in CP patients with chronic pain.

Effect of NCPB and VSPL on pain and quality of life in chronic pancreatitis patients

AIM

To compare the effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) and videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (VSPL) on pain and quality of life of chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients.

METHODS

Forty-eight small duct CP patients were treated invasively with NCPB (n = 30) or VSPL (n = 18) in two non-randomized, prospective, case-controlled protocols due to chronic pain syndrome, and compared to a control group who were treated conservatively (n = 32). Visual analog scales were used to assess pain and opioid consumption rate was evaluated. In addition, the quality of life was measured using QLQ C-30 for NCPB and FACIT for VSPL. Although both questionnaires covered similar problems, they could not be compared directly one with another. Therefore, the studies were compared by meta-analysis methodology.

RESULTS

Both procedures resulted in a significant positive effect on pain of CP patients. Opioids were withdrawn totally in 47.0% of NCPB and 36.4% of VSPL patients, and reduced in 53.0% and 45.4% of the respective patient groups. No reduction in opioid usage was observed in the control group. In addition, fatigue and emotional well-being showed improvements. Finally, NCPB demonstrated stronger positive effects on social support, which might possibly be attributed to earlier presentation of patients treated with NCPB.

CONCLUSION

Both invasive pain treatment methods are effective in CP patients with chronic pain.