Report of 16 kindreds and one kindred with hMLH1 germline mutation

Mutation and methylation of hMLH1 in gastric carcinomas with microsatellite instability

AIM: To appraise the correlation of mutation and methylation of hMSH1 with microsatellite instability (MSI) in gastric cancers.

METHODS: Mutation of hMLH1 was detected by Two-dimensional electrophoresis (Two-D) and DNA sequencing; Methylation of hMLH1 promoter was measured with methylation-specific PCR; MSI was analyzed by PCR-based methods.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight cases of sporadic gastric carcinoma were studied for mutation and methylation of hMLH1 promoter and MSI. Three mutations were found, two of them were caused by a single bp substitution and one was caused by a 2 bp substitution, which displayed similar Two-D band pattern. Methylation of hMLH1 promoter was detected in 11 (16.2%) gastric cancer. By using five MSI markers, MSI in at least one locus was detected in 17/68 (25%) of the tumors analyzed. Three hMLH1 mutations were all detected in MSI-H (≥ 2 loci, n = 8), but no mutation was found in MSI-L (only one locus, n = 9) or MSS (tumor lacking MSI or stable, n = 51). Methylation frequency of hMLH1 in MSI-H (87.5%, 7/8) was significantly higher than that in MSI-L (11.1%, 1/9) or MSS (5.9%, 3/51) (P < 0.01-0.001), but no difference was found between MSI-L and MSS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Both mutation and methylation of hMLH1 are involved in the MSI pathway but not related to the LOH pathway in gastric carcinogenesis.

Methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoter in colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability

AIM: To explore methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoter with microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal carcinomas.

METHODS: Methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoter was measured with methylation-specific PCR; MSI was analyzed by PCR-based methods.

RESULTS: No methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoter was found in 10 normal colorectal mucosas. Seventy-six cases of sporadic colorectal carcinoma were studied for methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoter and MSI. Methylation of hMLH1 promoter was detected in 8 (10.5%)colorectal carcinomas and none in hMSH2. Frequence of hMLH1 methylation on right-sided colorectal cancer (23.1%)was significantly higher than that on left one (4.0%, P < 0.05). MSI was detected in at least one locus in 26.3%(20/76) of the tumors analyzed with five microsatellite markers. Frequence of hMLH1 methylation in gastric cancer with MSI-H (80.0%)was significantly higher than that in gastric cancer with MSI-L (20.0%, P < 0.01) and with MSS (10.7%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Methylation of hMLH1 promoter is related to right-sided colorectal cancer and involved in the MSI pathway.

Clinical characteristics and diagnosis of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

AIM: To study the clinical characteristics of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in the Chinese population and discuss the identification and management of the patients with HNPCC.

METHODS: A series of 140 patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) and HNPCC associated tumors from 30 families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS: A total of 118 patients had CRC. Average age at diagnosis of the first CRC was 45.7 years, 56.8% and 23.4% of the first CRC were located proximal to the splenic flexure and in the rectum respectively. Twenty-three (19.5%) had synchronous and metachronous CRC. Twenty-seven patients were found to have extracolonic tumors. Gastric carcinoma was the most common tumor type in our series (44.4%).

CONCLUSION: The frequency of HNPCC was 2.6% in our series of patients. The main features are an excess of early onset with a propensity to involve the proximal colon, and high frequency of multiple foci. Management and surveillance for these patients should be different from sporadic CRC. Contrary to American and European reports, gastric cancer seems more frequent than endometrial cancer in Chinese. It is necessary to formulate a new HNPCC criterion for Chinese patients.

Silencing-specific methylation and single nucleotide polymorphism of hMLH1 promoter in gastric carcinomas

AIM: To investigate CpG methylation and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of a specific promoter region of hMLH1 in primary gastric carcinoma.

METHODS: Primary gastric carcinomas (n = 80), their corresponding normal mucosal samples, and gastric mucosal biopsies from normal/gastritis control patients (n = 54) were used. Hypermethylation at -253 nt and -251 nt in relation with the translational start site and SNP of a silencing specific region (-339 nt-46 nt) in the hMLH1 promoter were analyzed by Bst UI-combined bisulfite assay (COBRA), denaturing high performance liquid chromatogram (DHPLC), and sequencing.

RESULTS: (A) The specific methylation at -253 nt and -251 nt was observed in 2 of 60 primary gastric carcinomas, but neither in all of the corresponding mucosa nor in normal/gastritis samples, by Bst UI-COBRA and DHPLC. (B) The hMLH1 promoter was methylated homogeneously in the xenograft of the primary gastric carcinoma with the methylated and unmethylated hMLH1. (C) The pattern of SNP at -93 nt of the hMLH1 promoter in 54 Chinese patients with gastric carcinoma was the same as that in the control patients: 51% was A/G heteroalleles, 34% and 15% were A/A and G/G homoalleles, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Biallelic inactivation of hMLH1 by epigenetic silencing existed in human primary gastric carcinoma homogeneously. Hypermethylation of hMLH1 may play a role in the early stage of development of a few gastric carcinomas. The SNP at -93 nt is not related to the susceptibility of gastric carcinomas.

Analysis for phenotype of HNPCC in China

AIM: The aims of this study were to identify the clinicopathological features of Chinese HNPCC families and to evaluate the value of criteria for suspected HNPCC (sHNPCC) in clinical diagnosis.

METHODS: According to the follow-up records, 54 HNPCC families (including 12 ICG-HNPCC families and 42 sHNPCC families) were screened out from patients with colorectal cancers (CRCs), operated upon in 2^nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from 1984 to 2001. Clinical data of probands and tumor spectrum in these families were listed and analyzed.

RESULTS: (1) Mean age, proportion of colonic cancer, poorly differentiated cancer, multiple CRCs and Dukes’ A+B of the probands in ICG-HNPCC and sHNPCC kindred were 39 ys and 47.5 ys, 75% and 62%, 0 and 12.8%, 16.7% and 14.3%, 58.3% and 81%, respectively. Compared with sporadic colorectal cancers, probands from ICG-HNPCC and sHNPCC families were obviously different at age of onset (P = 0.025 and 0.031), tumor location (P = 0.001 and 0.000), differentiation (P = 0.002 and 0.011) and development of multiple tumors (P = 0.014 and 0.002). (2) A total of 178 malignant neoplasms were found in 54 HNPCC families, including 139 colorectal cancers. Besides of colorectal cancer, extracolonic tumors occurred in stomach, endometrium, hepatobiliary system, and so on (8 gastric cancers, 6 endometrial cancers, 6 hepatobiliary system cancers and 19 others) can also be seen in Chinese ICG-HNPCC and sHNPCC families.

CONCLUSION: (1) Chinese HNPCC families have specific clinicopathological features, such as early onset, predilection for the involvement of colon, tendency of multiple CRCs, development of extracolonic tumors and well differentiation. (2) The criteria for suspected HNPCC is useful in clinical diagnosis and management of HNPCC.

Arterial chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C in the treatment of liver metastases of colorectal cancer

AIM: Regional chemotherapy using hepatic artery catheters is a good method of treating patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. We investigated the survival of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C Cthrough implantable hepatic arterial infusion port.

METHODS: Seventy-five patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were included between March, 1992 and November, 2001. We placed implantable hepatic arterial catheter (HAC) port by laparotomy.5-FU, 1000 mg/m²/d continuous infusion for five days every four weeks, was delivered in the hepatic arterial catheter through the port. Mitomycin C, 30 mg/m²/d infusion in the first day every cycle through the port. Response to the treatment was evaluated by serial determinations of plasma CEA and imaging techniques consisting of computerized tomography and sonography of liver.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight were performed hepatic artery chemotherapy and fifty-six were followed up among seventy-five HAC patients. Twenty-six patients (46.4%) have responded and 4 complete remission were achieved. Eight patients (14.3%) had stable liver metastases. Twenty-two patients (39.3%) were progressed with increased tumor size and number. Twenty-nine patients (51.8%) had a decreased serum CEA level, while 10 patients (17.9%) were stable and 17 patients (30.4%) had an increased serum CEA level. There were no operative death in this series. Complications, which occurred in 18 patients (32.1%), were as followed: hepatic artery thrombosis in 11, Upper gastric and intestinal bleeding in 3, liver abscess in 1, pocket infection in 1, cholangitis in 1, and hepatic artery pseudo-aneurysm in one patient.

CONCLUSION: Combined infusion of 5-FU and mitomycin C by hepatic artery catheter port is an effective treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The high response and lower complication rates prove the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer with this treatment.