Effect of low gravitational stimulation on the perception of target elevation: Role of spatial expertise

Otolith signals contribute to inter-individual differences in the perception of gravity-centered space

The aim of the present study was to investigate (1) the relative contribution of the egocentric reference as well as body orientation perception to visual horizon percept during tilt or during increased gravito-inertial acceleration (GiA, hypergravity environment) conditions and (2) the role of vestibular signals in the inter-individual differences observed in these perceptual modalities. Perceptual estimates analysis showed that backward tilt induced (1) an elevation of the visual horizon, (2) an elevation of the egocentric estimation (visual straight ahead) and (3) an overestimation of body tilt. The increase in the magnitude of GiA induced (1) a lowering of the apparent horizon, (2) a lowering of the straight ahead and (3) a perception of backward tilt. Overall, visual horizon percept can be expressed as the combination of body orientation perception and egocentric estimation. When assessing otolith reactivity using off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR), only visual egocentric estimation was significantly correlated with horizontal OVAR performance. On the one hand, we found a correlation between a low modulation amplitude of the otolith responses and straight ahead accuracy when the head axis was tilted relative to gravity. On the other hand, the bias of otolith responses was significantly correlated with straight ahead accuracy when subjects were submitted to an increase in the GiA. Thus, straight ahead sense would be dependent to some extent to otolith function. These results are discussed in terms of the contribution of otolith inputs in the overall multimodal integration subtending spatial constancy.

Influence of multisensory graviceptive information on the apparent zenith

We studied the contribution of vestibular and somatosensory/proprioceptive stimulation to the perception of the apparent zenith (AZ). Experiment 1 involved rotation on a centrifuge and settings of the AZ. Subjects were supine on the centrifuge, and their body position was varied in relation to the rotation axis so that the gravitoinertial resultant force at the otoliths was 1 or 1.2 g with the otolith organs positioned 50 or 100 cm from the axis of rotation. Their legs were also positioned in different configurations, flexed and elevated or extended, to create different distributions of blood and lymph. Experiment 2 involved (a) settings of the AZ for subjects positioned supine with legs fully extended or legs flexed and elevated to create a torsoward shift of blood and (b) settings of the subjective visual vertical for subjects horizontally positioned on their sides with legs extended or bent. Experiment 3 had subjects in the same body configurations as in Experiment 2 indicate when they were horizontal as they were rotated in pitch or roll about an inter-aural or naso-occipital axis. The experimental results for all three experiments demonstrated that both visual localization and apparent body horizontal are jointly determined by multimodal combinations of otolithic and somatosensory/proprioceptive stimulation. No evidence was found for non-overlapping or exclusive mechanisms determining one or the other. The subjective postural horizontal and AZ were affected in similar ways by comparable manipulations.

Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues

Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration is generally attributed to the otolithic system which reflects either a translation of the head or a reorientation of the head with respect to gravity (tilt/translation ambiguity). The main aim of this study was to compare the tilt perception during prolonged static tilt and translation between 8 and 20 degrees of tilt relative to the gravitoinertial forces (i.e., G and GIF, respectively) when the semicircular cues were no more available. An indirect measure of tilt perception was estimated by means of a visual and kinesthetic judgment of the gravitational horizon. The main results contrast with the interpretation regarding the tilt/translation ambiguity as the same orientation relative to the shear forces G for the true tilt or GIF in the centrifuge did not induce the same horizon perception. Visual adjustment and arm pointing in the centrifuge were always above the ones observed in a G environment. Part of the lowering of the judgment in the centrifuge may be related to the mechanical effect of GIF on the effectors as shown by the shift of the egocentric coordinates in the direction of GIF. The role of the extravestibular graviceptors in the judgment of the degree of tilt of one's own body relative to G or GIF was discussed.