Suppression of optokinesis by a stabilized target: effects of instruction and stimulus frequency

Impact of the motion and visual complexity of the background on players' performance in video game-like displays

The visual interfaces of virtual environments such as video games often show scenes where objects are superimposed on a moving background. Three experiments were designed to better understand the impact of the complexity and/or overall motion of two types of visual backgrounds often used in video games on the detection and use of superimposed, stationary items. The impact of background complexity and motion was assessed during two typical video game tasks: a relatively complex visual search task and a classic, less demanding shooting task. Background motion impaired participants' performance only when they performed the shooting game task, and only when the simplest of the two backgrounds was used. In contrast, and independently of background motion, performance on both tasks was impaired when the complexity of the background increased. Eye movement recordings demonstrated that most of the findings reflected the impact of low-level features of the two backgrounds on gaze control.

The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms

Fixation disparity is a minute ocular misalignment under conditions of binocular single vision and is typically detected in primary eye care practices in the UK using the Mallett Unit Fixation Disparity Test. This instrument creates natural viewing conditions, when the patient's binocular system is fused using both central and peripheral fusion locks. This allows the examiner to determine the minimum prism power that eliminates the fixation disparity: the associated phoria or aligning prism. The spherical power that eliminates the fixation disparity, the aligning sphere, can also be determined. The near Mallett Unit Fixation Disparity Test has been shown to have good sensitivity and specificity for detecting symptomatic heterophoria. Cases of decompensated heterophoria tend to have a fixation disparity and the aligning prism or aligning sphere is a good indicator of the correction that will render the heterophoria compensated. The purpose of this study was, for the first time, to investigate the effect of test instructions on the results of the Mallett Unit Fixation Disparity Test. In study 1, we surveyed and observed practitioners to determine the instructions that are typically used. In study 2, we compared results obtained with this "standard" method of questioning with a more "specific" form of questioning that has been suggested in the literature. The participants for study 2 were 105 patients aged 7-70 years who were randomly selected from those attending a community optometric practice. Significantly different results were obtained with the two sets of instructions. The specific form of questioning revealed more cases of fixation disparity and the results with this method showed a better correlation with symptoms. This only held for near vision: for distance vision, symptoms were not significantly correlated with the presence of fixation disparity. This agrees with previous work with the Mallett unit, which showed a significant relationship with symptoms only at near. We also found that patients with more severe symptoms had greater degrees of aligning prism. Our study supports previous work indicating that the Mallett unit is a useful tool for detecting symptomatic heterophoria at near. However, we found that the testing method is important: patients need to be asked not just whether the nonius strips are aligned but also whether one or both of the strips ever moves. More research is needed to investigate the significance of precise test instructions in other optometric and orthoptic tests.

Modulation of spatial attention with unidirectional field motion: an implication for the shift of the OKN beating field

During optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) the mean eye position of gaze (the beating field) shifts in the direction of the fast phases. The function of this shift may be to re-orient the eyes in the direction of self-motion which optic flow implies (in-coming field). This idea leads to the hypothesis that visual attention may be directed toward the In-coming field. In Experiment 1, subjects detected a visual flash presented against unidirectional field motion. The OKN beating field was shifted toward the In-coming field, and manual reaction times were shorter when the target appeared in the In-coming field. Experiment 2 revealed that this In-coming field advantage occurred even when OKN (and thus the mean eye-position shift) was suppressed. Subsequent experiments showed that the In-coming field advantage is not due to a local motion interaction (Experiment 3), survives subject's voluntary allocation of attention (Experiment 4), and develops over less than 320 ms after the onset of the motion field (Experiment 5). These results suggest that unidirectional field motion tends to automatically shift visual attention toward the In-coming field.

Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: effects of target presence and subject attention

Subjects made smooth pursuit eye movements with a target moving horizontally at 15 deg/sec. At a specified location the target either: (1) suddenly vanished; or (2) jumped to the fovea with target retinal velocity and feedback becoming 0 (target stabilized at the fovea). In each type of trial, the subjects either: "looked" at the target, "pushed" the target, or "passively" gazed. When the target vanished, eye velocity decreased exponentially with a short time-constant (tau approximately 0.10 sec), regardless of whether the subjects were "looking," "pushing" or "passively" gazing. However, some subjects while "pushing" (using an imaginary target) did generate low velocity smooth movement (1-2.5 deg/sec) late in the offset. When the target was stabilized at the fovea, eye velocity also decreased, but with a relatively long time-constant (tau = 0.4-0.8 sec). The time-constant was the same with both "looking," and "pushing", but was shorter for some subjects with "passive" gazing (tau = 0.1-0.5 sec). These findings show that smooth pursuit offset is influenced by the presence of a target, but is relatively independent of attentional mode. All of the pursuit offset responses can be simulated using a model of the pursuit system with target velocity and position inputs, and an internal positive feedback loop enabled by target presence.

Optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) suppression by fixation of a stabilized target: the effect of OKN-stimulus predictability

In previous work, subjects looked at a target stabilized at the fovea, superimposed on a sinusiodally moving OKN stimulus. The stabilized target (no retinal-slip) suppressed OKN leaving residual eye movements that were often in counterphase with the OKN stimulus motion. In the present study we explored how this type of suppression of OKN is influenced by OKN stimulus predictability: OKN stimulus motion was either sinusoidal or a random walk of half-sinusoids. During fixation of a stabilized target with sinusoidal stimulus motion, OKN was suppressed leaving residual eye movement whose amplitude was typically less than OKN and with a phase lag of about 180 deg (roughly in counterphase with stimulus motion). With random-walk stimulus motion, the residual movement amplitude was even smaller, and at higher frequencies the phase lag decreased to become the same as for OKN. For both stimulus motions, OKN was suppressed when the target was present, but counterphase residual movements appear to depend on stimulus predictability.

Visual fixation of a target and suppression of optokinetic nystagmus: effects of varying target feedback

The ability to maintain foveal fixation of a target with either a stationary or moving background is often assumed to depend primarily on a difference (in velocity and/or position) between fovea and target. However, when subjects look at a target stabilized at the fovea presented against sinusoidal motion of an optokinetic stimulus field, optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) is suppressed. This suppression is not simply the absence of movement but instead most subjects show some amount of residual slow eye movements roughly counterphase to the field motion. We have varied the visual feedback of the target from 0 (stabilized) to -1 (stationary in space); as feedback increased, amplitude and phase lag of residual eye movements decreased systematically. The mechanism responsible for residual movements appears to operate for all feedback values (including the "real world" value of -1), which suggests a new view of the role played by retinal slip during fixation of a target and suppression of OKN.