Implications of OKN suppression by smooth pursuit for induced motion

Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand

Movement of the body, head, or eyes with respect to the world creates one of the most common yet complex situations in which the visuomotor system must localize objects. In this situation, vestibular, proprioceptive, and extra-retinal information contribute to accurate visuomotor control. The utility of retinal motion information, on the other hand, is questionable, since a single pattern of retinal motion can be produced by any number of head or eye movements. Here we investigated whether retinal motion during a smooth pursuit eye movement contributes to visuomotor control. When subjects pursued a moving object with their eyes and reached to the remembered location of a separate stationary target, the presence of a moving background significantly altered the endpoints of their reaching movements. A background that moved with the pursuit, creating a retinally stationary image (no retinal slip), caused the endpoints of the reaching movements to deviate in the direction of pursuit, overshooting the target. A physically stationary background pattern, however, producing retinal image motion opposite to the direction of pursuit, caused reaching movements to become more accurate. The results indicate that background retinal motion is used by the visuomotor system in the control of visually guided action.

Effects of spatial arrangement of visual stimulus on inverted self-motion perception induced by the foreground motion: examination of OKN-suppression hypothesis

Our previous study revealed that a slowly moving foreground, which is presented in front of a fast-moving orthogonal background, can induce self-motion perception in the same direction as its motion (inverted vection; Vis. Res. 40 (2000) 2915). The present study shows that inverted vection becomes stronger in the conditions where the foreground stimulus is presented in the central area of observer's visual field and the observer's eyes converge on the same depth plane. These stimulus conditions are consistent with the one where the foreground can induce observer's optokinetic nystagmus more effectively, and therefore, the results of this study support our hypothesis in that mis-registered eye-movement information caused by the suppression of optokinetic nystagmus induced by the foreground motion is a critical factor in perceiving inverted vection.

Sustained deviation of gaze direction can affect "inverted vection" induced by the foreground motion

A slowly moving foreground with an orthogonally moving background can induce self-motion perception in the same direction as the foreground motion (inverted vection; [Vision Research 40 (2000) 2915]). In the present study, we investigate the effect of sustained gaze deviation on inverted vection. We hypothesized that gaze deviation affects eye-movement information registered in the perceptual system, which might be a primary factor for causing inverted vection. The experiment revealed that strength of inverted vection decreases with observer's gaze deviation in the same direction as the foreground motion, while it increases with the deviation in the opposite direction to the foreground. These results support our hypothesis and suggest that inverted vection is affected by eye-movement information.

On the perceived location of global motion

We measured the effects of coherent motion of one set of dots on the perceived location of Gaussian envelopes formed by luminance modulation of a second set of dots. Perceived shifts in envelope location in the direction of coherent motion were obtained even when the dots forming the envelopes did not physically move in the direction of coherent motion. In such cases, perceived shifts coincided with stimulus configurations that permitted motion integration of the envelope dots with the coherently moving dots, for example, when envelope dots moved in random directions as opposed to being static. In subsequent experiments we explored the type of motion integration underlying the positional shifts obtained. We discounted the possibility that the visual system incorrectly attributes motion signals associated with coherently moving dots to envelope dots by demonstrating that positional shifts could be obtained even when the coherent dots were laterally displaced to either side of the envelope dots such that the regions occupied by the dots did not overlap. We also discounted spatio-temporal summation within the receptive fields of low-spatial-frequency motion-sensitive mechanisms by demonstrating that positional shifts persisted even when the dot displays were high-pass filtered. These results, coupled with the observation that the proportion of coherently moving dots required to produce positional shifts correlated well with global motion thresholds measured for the same dot configurations, suggests that visual processes which underlie motion-dependent positional shifts are based at least in part on cooperative interactions of the type implicated in global motion.

A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer's self-motion--a report of a new motion illusion: inverted vection

We investigated interactions between foreground and background stimuli during visually induced perception of self-motion (vection) by using a stimulus composed of orthogonally moving random-dot patterns. The results indicated that, when the foreground moves with a slower speed, a self-motion sensation with a component in the same direction as the foreground is induced. We named this novel component of self-motion perception 'inverted vection'. The robustness of inverted vection was confirmed using various measures of self-motion sensation and under different stimulus conditions. The mechanism underlying inverted vection is discussed with regard to potentially relevant factors, such as relative motion between the foreground and background, and the interaction between the mis-registration of eye-movement information and self-motion perception.

Motion-transparent inducers have different effects on induced motion and motion capture

To assess the relationship among the underlying mechanisms of induced motion, motion capture, and motion transparency, directions of the former two illusions in the presence of motion-transparent inducers were examined. Two random-dot patterns (inducers) were superimposed upon a stationary disk (target), and moved in orthogonal directions. Either a high-contrast target (for induced motion) or a low-contrast target (for motion capture) was used. The task was to report the perceived direction of the target. The depth order of inducers was controlled either by adding binocular disparity or by asking the subject to report subjective depth order. For induced motion, the target appeared to move in the direction opposite to the inducer that had a disparity closer to the target; when there was no difference in disparity, induced motion occurred oppositely to the 'vector sum' of the inducers' directions. For motion capture, the target was captured by the inducer that subjectively appeared behind. These results suggest that the underlying mechanism of motion capture utilizes the output from the process for motion transparency, whereas induced motion has no clear relationship to the output of the process for motion transparency.

The effects of visual depth and eccentricity on manual bias, induced motion, and vection

The relationship between the effects of visual-surround roll motion on compensatory manual tracking of a central display and the perceptual phenomena of induced motion and vection were investigated. To determine if manual-control biases generated in the direction of surround rotation compensate primarily for the perceived counterrotation of the central display ('induced motion') or the perceived counterrotation of the entire body ('vection'), the depth and eccentricity of the visual surround were varied. In the first experiment, twelve subjects attempted to keep an unstable central display level while viewing rotating visual surrounds in three depth planes: near (approximately 20 cm in front of the central display), coplanar, and far (approximately 21 cm behind the central display). In the second experiment, twelve additional subjects viewed a rotating surround that was presented either in the full visual field (0-110 deg) or in central and peripheral regions of similar width. Manual-control biases and induced motion were shown to be closely related to one another and strongly influenced both by central and by peripheral surround motion at or beyond the plane of fixation. Vection, on the other hand, was shown to be much more dependent on peripheral visual inputs.

An illusory transformation of optic flow fields

We compared a human observer's ability to locate the focus of expansion (FOE) of a radial optic flow field when this flow field was either combined with, or overlapped by, planar motion. With combined stimuli, in which the FOE was displaced in the direction opposite to the planar motion, subjects accurately located the displaced FOE. With overlapping (transparent) stimuli and the FOE remaining in the center of the display, we found an illusory transformation of the radial pattern: the focus of expansion appeared to be shifted in the direction of the planar motion. The speed of both the planar and radial patterns of motion influenced the illusion. Presence or absence of visual fixation had little effect. We suggest that this illusion might provide a clue as to the way the brain processes planar and radial motion which might in turn be relevant to the interaction of the planar and radial motion components of optic flow fields.

A reevaluation of the effect of velocity on induced motion

Induced motion (IM) was measured as a function of the temporal frequency of inducer oscillation. IM magnitude decreased as frequency increased above .5 Hz. Increasing the amplitude of inducer motion, and thereby its velocity, did not influence the temporal frequency dependence of IM. This suggests that it is the duration of inducer motion, rather than its velocity, that is the critical stimulus feature in studies that report decreased IM with higher frequencies of inducer oscillation. In a separate experiment, the optokinetic nystagmus elicited by the inducing stimulus in the absence of a fixation target displayed frequency-response characteristics similar to those of IM. This finding supports the hypothesis that IM magnitude is proportional to the voluntary effort required to suppress reflexive eye movements while maintaining stable fixation.

Effect of context and efference copy on visual straight ahead

Bias in efferent commands to the eye changes the apparent straight ahead direction in an unstructured visual field, but has little effect in a normal visual environment. Naive subjects set a visible marker to appear straight ahead under monocular viewing conditions and while pressing on the viewing eye. Three background conditions were used: a naturalistic landscape photograph, a blank field, and a repeating checkerboard texture that provides strong contours but no information about visual direction. Effect of eyepress on straight-ahead judgments was small but significant with the landscape background, and larger with the blank field; the checkerboard texture yielded a bias halfway between the magnitudes of bias in the other two conditions. A visual capture theory predicts that the textured field should work like a blank one, while an oculomotor theory predicts that it should work like a natural one. Interpreted in this context, the results show the two theories to be about equally important in judging straight ahead. A second experiment with experienced observers and moving backgrounds gave the same result.

Induced motion and optokinetic afternystagmus: parallel response dynamics with prolonged stimulation

Fixation of a stationary target during motion of background contours attenuates optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), while illusory induced motion (IM) of the fixated target occurs opposite the direction of contour motion. It is proposed that IM owes to a perceptually registered efferent signal for ocular pursuit which opposes an unregistered signal for OKN to achieve stable fixation. This proposal predicts parallel changes in the magnitudes of IM and optokinetic reflexes during and after optokinetic stimulation. Accordingly, leftward IM magnitude and rightward slow-phase velocity of optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN) increased at similar rates across 90 and 160 sec of 60 deg/sec motion of background contours, and decayed at similar rates after stimulus termination. Both responses decayed more deeply following stimulation with, rather than without fixation. Neither retinal image motion nor vection can explain the IM obtained.

The representation of nonuniform motion: induced movement

Induced motion occurs when there is a misallocation of nonuniform motion. Theories of induced motion are reviewed with respect to the model for uniform motion recently proposed by Swanston, Wade, and Day. Theories based on single processes operating at one of the retinocentric, orbitocentric, egocentric, or geocentric levels are not able to account for all aspects of the phenomenon. It is therefore suggested that induced motion is a consequence of combining two different types of motion signals: one provides information by registering the motion with respect to the retina, orbit, and egocentre; the other provides information only on the relational motions between the pattern elements. Simple rules are given for defining a frame of reference for the relational motion process, which can result in a reallocation of the motion signals. It is proposed that the two signals in combination are weighted differentially, with the greater influence coming from the relational signals. Procedures for determining the weighting factors are described, and predictions from the model are examined.

Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion

The possibility that nystagmus suppression contributes to illusory motion was investigated by measuring perceived motion of a stationary stimulus following the removal of an optokinetic stimulus. This was done because optokinetic nystagmus typically outlasts cessation of an optokinetic stimulus. Therefore, it would be expected that a stationary fixated stimulus should appear to move after removal of an optokinetic stimulus if illusory motion results from nystagmus suppression. Illusory motion was reported for a stationary fixation target following optokinetic stimulation. This motion was reported first in the same direction as the preceding induced motion, then in the opposite direction. The two directions of illusory motion following optokinetic stimulation are interpreted as resulting from the use of smooth ocular pursuit to suppress first one phase of optokinetic after nystagmus and then the reverse phase. Implications for the origins of induced motion are discussed.