Visual adaptation to a spatial contrast enhances visual evoked potentials

Neuromagnetic correlates of perceived contrast in primary visual cortex

When a target grating is flashed into a larger, surrounding grating, its contrast is perceived to be lower when both gratings are oriented collinearly rather than orthogonally. This effect can be used to dissociate the perceived contrast from the physical contrast of a target grating. We recorded the transient electric potentials and magnetic fields evoked by flashed target gratings and compared them with psychophysical judgments of perceived contrast. Both early (100 ms) and late (150 ms) transients were reduced in amplitude when targets were flashed into a collinear rather than orthogonal surround, thus paralleling the reduction in perceived contrast. Although targets in orthogonal backgrounds required 40% lower physical contrast to match the perceived contrast of collinear targets, the amplitudes of electrophysiological transients of matching stimuli were almost identical. Thus the responses correlated better with perceived than with physical target contrast. This holds especially for the late transient response. Source localization indicated that the transients in question may originate in primary visual cortex. Our results therefore identify the activity of primary visual cortex as one possible neural correlate of perceived contrast.

Electrophysiological correlates of the visual after effect by means of visual evoked potentials

An attempt was made to determine whether changes of electrical activity could be seen in the posterior cortex during an after image of high frequency luminance gratings. Steady state visual evoked potentials were recorded (midoccipital, right and left temporo-occipital sites) immediately after a period of visual adaptation (15 min) to the stimulus, while the subjects experienced the after image. During this illusion, frequencies of the fast Fourier transform spectra linked to the stimulation differed from the noise and were larger at temporo-occipital sites than at the midoccipital one. In view of these results, the hypothesis that the after effect represents a short term storage of the temporal characteristics of the stimulus is evoked.

Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials

Recording a VEP usually involves prolonged repetitions of the stimulus, but the influence of adaptation is rarely discussed in this context. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1 the time course of the response amplitude during steady-state stimulation was assessed. During the first seconds of stimulation we found an increase in amplitude, followed by a continuous exponential decline. This confirmed earlier results. There is considerable inter-subject variability concerning all aspects of the time course in our 19 subjects. Experiment 2 used two types of transient pattern reversal stimuli: one regular stimulus as used in standard clinical applications and one with a pause in between each reversal. N1 and P1 amplitudes did not show significant differential effects. N2 amplitude was reduced by 73% in the standard condition whereas P1 peak time increased slightly but significantly (3.2 ms).

Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials

We recorded visually evoked potentials (VEPs) to motion onset/offset of square-wave gratings (dominant spatial frequency 0.69 c/deg, velocity 4.9 deg/sec, contrast 10%, luminance 15 cd/m2) with three electrode combinations (Oz vs Fz, Oz vs linked ears and parietal vs linked ears). In one experiment (seven subjects), we examined the effect of the duty-cycle of motion vs non-motion (5-80%) on the size of the various motion-evoked components. In another experiment (six subjects, duty-cycle 10%), we examined the effect of motion adaptation on the motion VEP. We observed both a positive VEP component around 110 msec (P1) and a negative component around 180 msec (N200). The amplitude of these components depended on duty-cycle and electrode position: N200 dominated at < or = 20% motion duty-cycle, P1 at > or = 50%; P1 dominated medially, N200 laterally. Motion adaptation enhanced the P1 and reduced the N200 by a factor of 3. Previous controversies regarding the major components of motion-evoked potential may be due to different duty-cycles. The effect of duty-cycle is probably caused by adaptation to the test stimulus; it can be predicted quantitatively by a simple one-parameter model based on the assumption that the VEP amplitude is proportional to the non-adapted proportion of motion-response generators.