Effects of acute shock on body weight are mediated by changes in food intake

The effects of uncontrollable, unpredictable aversive and appetitive events: similar effects warrant similar, but not identical, explanations?

Exposure to uncontrollable, unpredictable appetitive events produces a variety of cognitive debilitations and vegetative changes, as does exposure to uncontrollable, unpredictable aversive events. Similarities include impaired escape from aversive events, impaired discrimination, finicky consumption, analgesia, and body weight loss. However, in stark contrast, uncontrollable aversive stress causes reduced motor activity where as similar appetitive treatment does not; aversively induced debilitation is causally related to energy regulation, whereas the appetitively induced effects are not. Parallel mechanisms are suggested to explain these effects in terms of a revised anxiety account of the aversive effects, and a frustration account of the appetitive effects. Finally, factors likely to limit important research to resolve the many remaining issues are identified: negative presentation of animal research, political decision making, and ignorance and fear in committees which review the ethics of research.

Pair housing induced feeding suppression: individual housing not novelty

Male rats that are moved from individual to pair housing suppress their feeding for a few days [O'Connor R, Eikelboom R. The effects of changes in housing on feeding and wheel running. Physiol Behav 2000;68:361-371]. The present study explored whether the suppression was a result of the period of individual housing or the novelty of the other animal. Two groups of 16 rats were pair-housed and one group of rats was individually housed for 21 days. The individually housed rats were then pair-housed (IP group) and rats in one of the pair-housed groups were re-housed with novel partners (NP group), while rats in the other pair-housed group remained with the same partner (SP group). Feeding was suppressed only for rats in the IP group, suggesting that the novelty of the partner did not suppress feeding, but rather, the change from individual to pair housing did. Water consumption was also measured, but was unaffected by the re-housing manipulation.

The effects of changes in housing on feeding and wheel running

The experiments explored the effects on feeding when rats were moved between individual and paired housing. In Experiment 1, rats moved to paired housing showed a 3-day suppression in feeding (initially 23%) compared to chronically individual- or pair-housed rats. In Experiment 2, half of the rats from the two control groups of Experiment 1 were moved between individual and paired housing on alternate days. Only the rats moved to paired housing showed a feeding suppression (initially 40%), but the nature of the suppression differed from Experiment 1: it appeared that only one rat of each pair showed a feeding suppression. Experiment 3 examined simultaneous introduction of running wheels and moves to paired housing. The feeding suppression induced by the move to paired housing was more immediate and shorter lived than the wheel-induced suppression. Unlike wheel access, paired housing produced only a temporary suppression of body weight. These experiments suggest that the relatively simple manipulation of moving rats from individual to paired housing results in a temporary stress-induced decrease in feeding.