Temporal integration of double electrical pulses

Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis

Four experiments were done on the effects of electrode configuration (concentric vs. unifocal) and body axis (longitudinal vs. transverse) on localization of electrocutaneous pulse stimuli at the fingers and forearm. Subjects pointed to the apparent location of current pulses. For the transverse placement of electrodes, pulses were localized correctly, whatever the configuration and the body site might be. In addition, intrasubject variability at the forearm was smaller for the transverse axis than for the longitudinal axis. For the longitudinal placement of electrodes, pulses were localized as a function of configuration and body site. At the fingers, concentric electrodes provided precise localization but unifocal electrodes provided a great mislocalization; and intrasubject variability of localization was larger for the unifocal electrodes than for the concentric electrodes. At the forearm, whatever the configuration might be, the pulses were localized more proximally than the stimulus site; and intrasubject variability of localization did not differ between the configurations. These results are related to Boring's anchor theory, apparent distance between two points, and the localization of other somatosensory stimuli.

Perceived locus and intensity of electrocutaneous stimulation

Two experiments investigated perceived locus and intensity for electrocutaneous stimulation. In Experiment 1, 21 subjects reported the perceived locus for various combinations of four electrode sites, two current directions, two pulse characteristics (single versus multiple), and two sensation levels (detection versus pain). In Experiment 2, 16 subjects reported the perceived locus and intensity for a wide range of current levels and two polarity conditions. The main results were 1) sensations were likely to be perceived under the cathode at detection levels, but under both electrodes at intense levels; 2) the "cathode" localization was gradually supplanted by "both" ("anode" and "cathode") localization with increasing current; 3) subjective intensity under the cathode was greater than that under the anode; 4) the effects of cathode position on perceived locus were found for only some pairs of electrodes. These results challenge the simple hypothesis that electrical stimulation of the skin through paired electrodes is perceived under the cathode.

Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size

Five experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of electrode size on threshold for current pulses that flowed between the ventral and dorsal sides of the right forearm. The main result was that the total current threshold decreases as the size of the cathode and anode increases at least up to 15 mm in diameter. To account for this finding, a neural summation model was proposed, assuming that the central nervous system sums up neural impulses discharged near the conduction paths under electrodes. It was also found that the current flowing from the dorsal to the ventral side provided lower thresholds and more stable localization than the opposite flow of current did. This finding suggested that current threshold and its perceived locus are determined by both the body site on which electrodes were placed and the relative polarity that was assigned to electrodes.

Magnitude estimates for electrical pulses: evidence for two neural mechanisms

The hypothesis that there are two neural mechanisms for electrocutaneous stimulation--one that is sensitive to low current and is adaptive to repeated stimulation and another that is responsive to high current and is less adaptive--was tested in a control and four main experiments. In the main experiments, magnitude estimates obtained for single electrical pulses (of 2-msec duration) were described by a simple power function for each combination of high- and low-current levels and 10 trial blocks. The results were: (1) The slope of the power function for low current was steeper than was that for high current; (2) for low current, the intercept of the power function decreased with increasing block, whereas for high current, it remained constant over blocks; (3) this decrease of the intercept for low current disappeared when judgmental blocks were separated by a rest period of 8 min; (4) the modulus did not affect the slope; (5) for a large modulus combined with low current, the intercept decreased rapidly over trial blocks, whereas for a small modulus combined with high current, the intercept increased over trial blocks. The first four findings support the two-mechanism hypothesis, but the last one may also be interpretable in terms of the regression to absolute scale values.