A mathematical model of saccadic reaction time as a function of the fixation point brightness gain

Distinct Sensory and Goal Related Signals Underlie the Gap Effect in the Superior Colliculus

The removal of a fixation point (FP) prior to the appearance of a saccade target (gap effect) influences pre-motor circuits and reduces saccadic reaction time (SRT). Saccade preparation signals underlying the gap effect have been observed within the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SCi). Neurons in the caudal SCi, coding a target location, increase their activity during the gap, while neurons in the rostral SCi, with tonic activity related to visual fixation, decrease activity. However, the gap effect confounds two factors: 1) a goal-driven temporal warning component (upcoming saccade target appearance); and 2) a stimulus-driven sensory component (FP disappearance). These factors combine to reduce SRT and elicit pre-target responses in the SCi. To dissociate warning and sensory effects, we altered the luminance of the FP during the gap period (renamed warning period) such that it could increase, decrease, or stay the same. Faster SRTs resulted with larger decrements in FP luminance. Different categories of SCi warning period activity were evaluated: 1) always increasing or decreasing; or 2) sensory-linked responses to changes in FP luminance. In the caudal SCi (at the location coding the target), all activity correlated negatively with SRT (i.e. saccade facilitation) and two categories of activity were observed (always increasing or opposing FP luminance changes). In the rostral SCi, four categories of activity were observed: Activity that increased or followed the change in FP luminance correlated positively with SRT (i.e. saccade inhibition), while activity that decreased or opposed FP luminance changes correlated negatively with SRT. Such SCi activity reflected both goal-driven saccade preparation signals and FP sensory properties.

The role of transients in action observation

A large number of studies have now described the various ways in which the observation of another person's dynamic movement can influence the speed with which the observer is able to prepare a motor action themselves. The typical results are most often explained with reference to theories that link perception and action. Such theories argue that the cognitive structures associated with each share common representations. Consequently, action preparation and action observation are often said to be functionally equivalent. However, the dominance of these theories in explaining action observation effects has masked the potential contribution from processes associated with the detection of low-level "transients" resulting from observing a body movement, such as motion and sound. In the present review, we describe work undertaken in one particular action observation phenomenon ("social inhibition of return") and show that the transient account provides the best explanation of the effect. We argue that future work should consider attention capture and orienting as a potential contributing factor to action observation effects more broadly.