Object-substitution masking weakens but does not eliminate shape interactions

Similarity in motion binds and bends judgments of aspect ratio

It is well known that objects become grouped in perceptual organization when they share some visual feature, like a common direction of motion. Less well known is that grouping can change how people perceive a set of objects. For example, when a pair of shapes consistently share a common region of space, their aspect ratios tend to be perceived as more similar (are attracted toward each other). Conversely, when shapes are assigned to different regions in space their aspect ratios repel from each other. Here we examine whether the visual system produce both attractive and repulsive distortions when the state of grouping between a pair of shapes changes on a moment-to-moment basis. Observers viewed a pair of ellipses that differed in terms of how flat or tall they were and reported the aspect ratio of one ellipse from the pair. Each ellipse was defined by a cloud of coherently-moving dots, and the dots within the two ellipses had either the same or different directions of motion, varying from trial-to-trial. We found that the cued ellipse's aspect ratio was reported to be repelled from the aspect ratio of the uncued ellipse when the shapes had different directions of motion compared to when they had the same direction of motion. These results suggest that the visual system can adaptively alter visual experience based on grouping, in particular, repelling the appearance of objects when they do not appear to go together, and it can do so quickly and flexibly.

Ensemble perception includes information from multiple spatial scales

Most visual scenes contain information at different spatial scales, including the local and global, or the detail and gist. Global processes have become increasingly implicated in research examining summary statistical perception, initially as the output of ensemble coding, and more recently as a gating mechanism for selecting which information is included in the averaging process itself. Yet local and global processing are known to be rapidly integrated by the visual system, and it is plausible that global-level information, like spatial organization, may be included as an input during ensemble coding. We tested this hypothesis using an ensemble shape-perception task in which observers evaluated the mean aspect ratios of sets of ellipses. In addition to varying the aspect ratios of the individual shapes, we independently varied the spatial arrangements of the sets so that they had either flat or tall organizations at the global level. We found that observers made precise summary judgments about the average aspect ratios of the sets by integrating information from multiple shapes. More importantly, global flat and tall organizations were incorporated into ensemble judgments about the sets; summary judgments were biased in the directions of the global spatial arrangements on each trial. This global-to-local integration even occurred when the global organizations were masked. Our results demonstrate that the process of summary representation can include information from both the local and global scales. The gist is not just an output of ensemble representation - it can be included as an input to the mechanism itself.

Anisotropic visual awareness of shapes

While object perception may feel instantaneous, it is an iterative process in which information is accumulated until ambiguity about identity and location is resolved. In theory, awareness of an object should depend on how efficiently this process occurs. Therefore, objects with inherently weak visual representations should be more susceptible to perceptual disruption. We tested this hypothesis by examining the perception of aspect ratio, a 2D feature of shapes with anisotropic representation (circular shapes are less robustly represented than elongated shapes in high-level visual areas). Observers viewed a target shape shown for 20-ms within an array of ellipses. The target, which varied from flat to tall, was either masked or unmasked. Observers indicated the target's aspect ratio and if it was visible. Observers reported seeing elongated shapes far more often than circular shapes, but only on trials with object-substitution masking. This effect replicated across five control experiments, even though the shapes were identical in basic image attributes (e.g., contrast, area). Our findings demonstrate that shapes with extreme aspect ratios are more readily available to awareness than shapes with ambiguous dimensionality. More generally, this work supports theories of object processing which suggest that strength of visual representation gates access to awareness.