Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation

Memory Load Test - A Concept for Cognitive Reserve Evaluation with Auditory Perception

<b>Introduction:</b> Auditory scene analysis refers to the system through which the auditory system distinguishes distinct auditory events and sources to create meaningful auditory information. The exact number of directly perceived auditory stimuli is unknown, studies suggest it may range from 3 to 5. This number differs among individuals, and potentially may indirectly indicate the ability to store and process the complex information, related to the memory load, which is combined with human cognitive processes.<b>Aim:</b> This study aims to further identify and quantify the number of sounds that can be perceived simultaneously in a complex auditory environment.<b>Material and methods:</b> Participants were presented with structured acoustic recordings and were asked to identify the exact number of targeted stimuli heard throughout the test. The experiment was designed to assess the auditory load and determine the maximum number of auditory stimuli that a healthy human can perceive at once.<b>Results:</b> Our study showed that on average, participants could identify up to three sounds at once with accuracy of responses declining progressively for four sounds or more.<b>Conclusions:</b> This study aimed to investigate the human capacity to detect and identify multiple sound signals simultaneously in a noisy environment. By understanding this ability, we sought to assess cognitive reserve in individuals. Our objective was to determine if auditory load could serve as a diagnostic tool for cognitive evaluation. We believe that further research will establish the validity of this approach, and we anticipate that it is only a matter of time before it becomes a viable method for assessing cognitive function.

Manipulation of Attention Affects Subitizing Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Subitizing is the fast and accurate enumeration of small sets. Whether attention is necessary for subitizing remains controversial considering (1) subitizing is claimed to be "pre-attentive", and (2) existing experimental methods and results are inconsistent. To determine whether manipulations to attention demonstratively affect subitizing, the current study comprises a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results from fourteen studies (22 experiments, 35 comparisons) suggest that changes to attentional demands interferes with enumeration of small sets; leading to slower response times, lower accuracy, and poorer Weber acuity (p <.010; p <.001; p <.001; respectively)-notwithstanding a potential publication bias. A unifying framework is proposed to explain the role of attention in visual enumeration, with progressively greater attentional involvement from estimation to subitizing to counting. Our findings suggest attention is integral for subitizing and highlights the need to emphasise attentional mechanisms into neurocognitive models of numerosity processing. We also discuss the possible role of attention in numerical processing difficulties (e.g., dyscalculia).

Raised Dot Enumeration Via Haptic Exploration

In two experiments we investigated blindfolded, sighted participants' capacity to extract the number of raised dots from arrays of braille cells that they scanned once via active touch. The arrays could contain between one and 12 raised dots and estimates were based on scanning with one or more fingers on one or both hands (Experiment 1), or when the dots were as maximally or minimally spaced as the braille code permits (Experiment 2). We sought evidence of discontinuities in performance that reflect more than one mode of enumeration. We found that participants' estimates of numerosity increased in a linear fashion with actual numerosity, but were increasingly underestimated beyond numerosity of six, and confidence in the judgment declined linearly with increasing numerosity. Finger combinations made no difference to accuracy, errors, or confidence. Increasing dot density had the effect of diminishing perceptual accuracy, exaggerating underestimation and reducing confidence. While perceptual accuracy was generally high up to six raised dots, patterns of confusions and scaling analyses suggest that numerosities of four or less are perceptually unique. In this article, we discuss these data in terms of enumeration in touch and other modalities, and consider whether this discontinuity in enumeration signifies a subitize-to-count or a count-to-estimate transition.

Parametric Representation of Tactile Numerosity in Working Memory

Estimated numerosity perception is processed in an approximate number system (ANS) that resembles the perception of a continuous magnitude. The ANS consists of a right lateralized frontoparietal network comprising the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and the intraparietal sulcus. Although the ANS has been extensively investigated, only a few studies have focused on the mental representation of retained numerosity estimates. Specifically, the underlying mechanisms of estimated numerosity working memory (WM) is unclear. Besides numerosities, as another form of abstract quantity, vibrotactile WM studies provide initial evidence that the right LPFC takes a central role in maintaining magnitudes. In the present fMRI multivariate pattern analysis study, we designed a delayed match-to-numerosity paradigm to test what brain regions retain approximate numerosity memoranda. In line with parametric WM results, our study found numerosity-specific WM representations in the right LPFC as well as in the supplementary motor area and the left premotor cortex extending into the superior frontal gyrus, thus bridging the gap in abstract quantity WM literature.