Multisensory integration of visual cues from first- to third-person perspective avatars in the perception of self-motion

Body ownership and kinaesthetic illusions: Dissociated bodily experiences for distinct levels of body consciousness?

Seeing an embodied humanoid avatar move its arms can induce in the observer the illusion that its own (static) arms are moving accordingly, the kinematic signals emanating from this avatar thus being considered like those from the biological body. Here, we investigated the causal relationship between these kinaesthetic illusions and the illusion of body ownership, manipulated through visuomotor synchronisation. The results of two experiments revealed that the sense of body ownership over an avatar seen from a first-person perspective was intimately linked to visuomotor synchrony. This was not the case for kinaesthetic illusions indicating that when superimposed on the biological body, the avatar is inevitably treated at the sensorimotor level as one's own body, whether consciously considered as such or not. The question of whether these two bodily experiences (body ownership and kinaesthetic illusion) are underpinned by distinct representations, the body image, and the body schema, is discussed.

Involvement of visual signals in kinaesthesia: A virtual reality study

Body movements are invariably accompanied by various proprioceptive, visual, tactile and/or motor signals. It is therefore difficult to completely dissociate these various signals from each other in order to study their specific involvement in the perception of movement (kinaesthesia). Here, we manipulated visual motion signals in a virtual reality display by using a humanoid avatar. The visual signals of movement could therefore be manipulated freely, relative to the participant's actual movement or lack of movement. After an embodiment phase in which the avatar's movements were coupled to the participant's voluntary movements, kinaesthetic illusions were evoked by moving the avatar's right forearm (flexion or extension) while the participant's right arm remained static. The avatar's left forearm was hidden from view. In parallel, somaesthetic signals could be masked by agonist-antagonist co-vibration or be amplified (by agonist vibration only or antagonist vibration only) so that the real impact of visual cues of movement in kinaesthesia could be studied. In a study of 24 participants, masking the somaesthetic signals (which otherwise provide signals indicating that the arm is static) was associated with a greater intensity and shorter latency of the visually evoked illusions. These results confirm the importance of carefully considering somaesthetic signals when assessing the contribution of vision to kinaesthesia. The use of a combination of virtual reality and somaesthetic signal manipulation might be of clinical value.