Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review

Best practices for cleaning eye movement data in reading research

One challenge that comes with studying eye movement behavior is deciding how to clean the eye movement data (e.g., fixation durations) before conducting analyses. Reading researchers must decide which data cleaning methods they will use and which thresholds they will set to remove eye movements that are not reflective of lexical processing. The purpose of this project was to determine what data cleaning methods are typically used and if there are any consequences of using different data cleaning methods. In the first study, an analysis of 192 recently published articles indicated that there is inconsistency in the reporting and application of data cleaning methods. In the second study, three different data cleaning methods were applied based on the literature analysis in the first study. Analyses were conducted to determine the impact of different data cleaning methods on three commonly studied effects in reading research (frequency, predictability, and length). Overall, standardized estimates decreased for each effect when more data were removed; however, removing more data also resulted in decreased variance. As a result, effects remained significant with each data cleaning method, and simulated power remained high for both a moderate and small sample size. Effect sizes remained consistent for most effects but decreased for the length effect as more data were removed. Seven suggestions are provided that are based on open science practices with the intention of helping researchers, reviewers, and the field as a whole.

Refixation behavior in naturalistic viewing: Methods, mechanisms, and neural correlates

When freely viewing a scene, the eyes often return to previously visited locations. By tracking eye movements and coregistering eye movements and EEG, such refixations are shown to have multiple roles: repairing insufficient encoding from precursor fixations, supporting ongoing viewing by resampling relevant locations prioritized by precursor fixations, and aiding the construction of memory representations. All these functions of refixation behavior are understood to be underpinned by three oculomotor and cognitive systems and their associated brain structures. First, immediate saccade planning prior to refixations involves attentional selection of candidate locations to revisit. This process is likely supported by the dorsal attentional network. Second, visual working memory, involved in maintaining task-related information, is likely supported by the visual cortex. Third, higher-order relevance of scene locations, which depends on general knowledge and understanding of scene meaning, is likely supported by the hippocampal memory system. Working together, these structures bring about viewing behavior that balances exploring previously unvisited areas of a scene with exploiting visited areas through refixations.

Effectiveness of a time to fixate for fitness to drive evaluation in neurological patients

We present a method to automatically calculate time to fixate (TTF) from the eye-tracker data in subjects with neurological impairment using a driving simulator. TTF presents the time interval for a person to notice the stimulus from its first occurrence. Precisely, we measured the time since the children started to cross the street until the drivers directed their look to the children. From 108 neurological patients recruited for the study, the analysis of TTF was performed in 56 patients to assess fit-, unfit-, and conditionally-fit-to-drive patients. The results showed that the proposed method based on the YOLO (you only look once) object detector is efficient for computing TTFs from the eye-tracker data. We obtained discriminative results for fit-to-drive patients by application of Tukey's honest significant difference post hoc test (p < 0.01), while no difference was observed between conditionally-fit and unfit-to-drive groups (p = 0.542). Moreover, we show that time-to-collision (TTC), initial gaze distance (IGD) from pedestrians, and speed at the hazard onset did not influence the result, while the only significant interaction is among fitness, IGD, and TTC on TTF. Obtained TTFs are also compared with the perception response times (PRT) calculated independently from eye-tracker data and YOLO. Although we reached statistically significant results that speak in favor of possible method application for assessment of fitness to drive, we provide detailed directions for future driving simulation-based evaluation and propose processing workflow to secure reliable TTF calculation and its possible application in for example psychology and neuroscience.

Eye Movements as a Window into Decision-Making

For over 100 years, eye movements have been studied and used as indicators of human sensory and cognitive functions. This review evaluates how eye movements contribute to our understanding of the processes that underlie decision-making. Eye movement metrics signify the visual and task contexts in which information is accumulated and weighed. They indicate the efficiency with which we evaluate the instructions for decision tasks, the timing and duration of decision formation, the expected reward associated with a decision, the accuracy of the decision outcome, and our ability to predict and feel confident about a decision. Because of their continuous nature, eye movements provide an exciting opportunity to probe decision processes noninvasively in real time. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Vision Science, Volume 8 is September 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.