Preserved nodal number effects under equal reinforcement

Reexamining nodality in equivalence classes

Equivalence classes are defined according to the substitutability, or functional similarity, of the stimuli within a stimulus class. Several studies have demonstrated that the degree of functional similarity between stimuli in a class is dependent, in part, upon the number of nodes (intervening stimuli) between the stimuli. Higher nodal number is related to lower functional similarity. This effect is referred to as "nodality." There are three key factors that have not been simultaneously controlled for in the relevant studies: priming effects, reinforcement during training, and multiple stimulus functions of stimuli (sample, comparison, or both). In the present experiment, controlling for these factors, two 6-member, 4-node equivalence classes were established, and a within-class preference assessment was used to evaluate nodality. Of 12 participants, five achieved criterion accuracy (90%) during testing. These participants demonstrated nodality, showing preference for stimuli that were nodally proximal to a sample in the preference test. When distal comparisons were chosen, participants took longer, on average, to make the selection compared to selections of proximal stimuli. These findings are consistent with earlier studies demonstrating nodality, which suggests that nodality is a robust phenomenon and not an artifact of the factors that were controlled for in the present study.

A descriptive analysis of baseline and equivalence-class performances under many-to-one and one-to-many structures

The purpose of the present experiment was to describe responding as a function of One-to-Many (OTM) and Many-to-One (MTO) training structures and identify baseline performances correlated with the accuracy level in tests for equivalence class formation. Participants were 42 adults assigned to either the MTO or the OTM groups, trained on 24 baseline relations, and assessed on the emergence of three 9-member equivalence classes. Participants in the MTO group presented similar frequencies of responses to each of the comparisons throughout baseline training. Also, the number of trials required to meet the baseline mastery criterion was negatively correlated with test accuracy. Participants in the OTM group presented more variable frequencies of responses to each of the comparisons (participants tended to select some of the comparisons less often than others at the beginning of the training). In addition, the number of reinforced responses to the node presented as a sample during training was positively correlated with the number of correct responses during testing for the OTM group. The experiment contributed to an in-depth stimulus control analysis of baseline and test performances, and its results have implications for understanding potential sources of variability between the training structures.