Can computer mice be used as low-cost devices for the acquisition of planar human movement velocity signals?

Pushing forward in embodied cognition: may we mouse the mathematical mind?

Freely available software has popularized “mousetracking” to study cognitive processing; this involves the on-line recording of cursor positions while participants move a computer mouse to indicate their choice. Movement trajectories of the cursor can then be reconstructed off-line to assess the efficiency of responding in time and across space. Here we focus on the process of selecting among alternative numerical responses. Several studies have recently measured the mathematical mind with cursor movements while people decided about number magnitude or parity, computed sums or differences, or simply located numbers on a number line. After some general methodological considerations about mouse tracking we discuss several conceptual concerns that become particularly evident when “mousing” the mathematical mind.

A low-cost visual occlusion device

In this article, we propose a method to develop a low-cost visual occlusion device. This device is modified using three-dimensional (3-D) glasses (used to watch 3-D TV) that are operated via the active shutter technique. Because 3-D glasses are sold worldwide, they are readily available; moreover, the price of 3-D glasses is lower than that of other types of equipment used as the basis for visual occlusion devices. Three-dimensional glasses employing the active shutter technique have the same structure as do commercial visual occlusion devices; the modification of a voltage-driven liquid crystal display is fairly simple. In this study, we evaluated the response time and transparency of the proposed low-cost visual occlusion device; the experiments yielded reasonable results. The proposed visual occlusion device can be fabricated under a price of $100.

Agonistic and antagonistic interaction in speed/accuracy tradeoff: a delta-lognormal perspective

This paper reports the results of a model-based analysis of movements gathered in a 4×4 experimental design of speed/accuracy tradeoffs with variable target distances and width. Our study was performed on a large (120 participants) and varied sample (both genders, wide age range, various health conditions). The delta-lognormal equation was used for data modeling to investigate the interaction between the output of the agonist and the antagonist neuromuscular systems. Empirical observations show that the subjects must correlate more tightly the impulse commands sent to both neuromuscular systems in order to achieve good performances as the difficulty of the task increases whereas the correlation in the timing of the neuromuscular action co-varies with the size of the geometrical properties of the task. These new phenomena are discussed under the paradigm provided by the Kinematic Theory and new research hypotheses are proposed for further investigation of the speed/accuracy tradeoffs.

The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception

Visual information is an essential guide when interacting with moving objects, yet it can also be deceiving. For instance, motion can induce illusory position shifts, such that a moving ball can seem to have bounced past its true point of contact with the ground. Some evidence suggests illusory motion-induced position shifts bias pointing tasks to a greater extent than they do perceptual judgments. This, however, appears at odds with other findings and with our success when intercepting moving objects. Here we examined the accuracy of interceptive movements and of perceptual judgments in relation to simulated bounces. Participants were asked to intercept a moving disc at its bounce location by positioning a virtual paddle, and then to report where the disc had landed. Results showed that interceptive actions were accurate whereas perceptual judgments were inaccurate, biased in the direction of motion. Successful interceptions necessitated accurate information concerning both the location and timing of the bounce, so motor planning evidently had privileged access to an accurate forward model of bounce timing and location. This would explain why people can be accurate when intercepting a moving object, but lack insight into the accurate information that had guided their actions when asked to make a perceptual judgment.