[Outcomes of adults with Ph-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the significance of minimal residual disease]

Optimizing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important postremission treatment for acute leukemia (AL). It is known that some prognostic factors, such as age, cytogenetic and molecular risk stratification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) status, are closely related to clinical outcomes following ASCT. Moreover, there are multiple measurements, including pretransplant treatment, stem cell mobilization and collection, conditioning regimens, and maintenance treatment after transplantation, that can affect prognosis after ASCT. Our clinical practice of ASCT should be better standardized to further improve patient outcomes. This review outlines optimization and quality control measures for ASCT developed at the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, the first established and largest autologous stem cell transplant center in China. These measures will enhance the development of best practices and strategies for AL ASCT therapies, thereby improving patient outcomes.

[The prognostic significance of minimal residual disease detection after first induction treatment in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of detection of minimal residual disease after first induction treatment (MRD(1)) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Methods: The clinical data of 87 ALL patients who underwent auto-HSCT during February 2006 to April 2017 with MRD(1) detection data by flow cytometry were analyzed retrospectively. The relationship between MRD(1) and relapse and survival of ALL patients after auto-HSCT was studied. Results: Of 87 patients, 26 (29.9%) were MRD(1) positive. The proportion of high-risk immunophenotype (pro-B, pro-T, pre-T, mature T) was significantly higher in MRD(1)-positive patients than that in MRD(1) negative patients (34.6% vs 14.5%, P=0.038). There was no significant difference between positive and negative MRD(1) patients at age, sex, lineage (T/B), immunophenotype (standard risk/high risk), high white blood cell count (B-ALL>30×10(9)/L or T-ALL>100×10(9)/L), high-risk chromosome/gene ratio, the time from first complete remission to transplantation and pre-treatment regimen. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in MRD(1) negative and positive patients were 72.7% vs 47.3% (P=0.004) and 75.7% vs 29.6% (P<0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that positive MRD(1) was an independent risk factor for OS (HR=3.007, 95% CI 1.256-7.200, P=0.013) , and positive MRD(1) and high-risk immunophenotype were risk factors for LFS (HR=3.986, 95% CI 1.813-8.764, P=0.001; HR=2.981, 95% CI 1.373-6.473, P=0.006) . Conclusions: Auto-HSCT could not reverse the poor prognosis of MRD(1) positive patients. Auto-HSCT treatment is optional for patients with MRD(1) negative and maintaining MRD(1) negative status during intensive therapy.