[Lenalidomide for myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts with germline DDX41 mutation: a case report and literatures review]

DDX41: exploring the roles of a versatile helicase

DDX41 is a DEAD-box helicase and is conserved across species. Mutations in DDX41 have been associated with myeloid neoplasms, including myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Though its pathogenesis is not completely known, DDX41 has been shown to have many cellular roles, including in pre-mRNA splicing, innate immune sensing, ribosome biogenesis, translational regulation, and R-loop metabolism. In this review, we will summarize the latest understandings regarding the various roles of DDX41, as well as highlight challenges associated with drug development to target DDX41. Overall, understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms of DDX41 could help develop novel therapeutic options for DDX41 mutation-related hematologic malignancies.

Clinical features of DDX41 mutation-related diseases: a systematic review with individual patient data

Background:

DDX41 serves as a DNA sensor in innate immunity and mutated DDX41 is pathogenic, mainly for myeloid neoplasms.

Methods:

In this study, “DDX41” was searched in PubMed and Web of Science between 1 January 2015 and 29 April 2021 with individual-patient data seeking. A meta-analysis was not valid here due to the absence of a large dataset. Thirty articles were finally included in the qualitative analysis and 277 patients from 20 studies without overlap were involved in the quantitative summary.

Results:

Pooled incidence was 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.4–4.2%) of unselected myeloid neoplasms. Patients with hematologic disorders harboring mutated DDX41 were featured as 80% males, median 66 (20–88) years old at diagnosis, 75% acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 64% with normal karyotype. Eighty-five percent of patients had germline variants which were nationally diverse and more of frameshift type, whereas 64% of patients had somatic DDX41 variants where p.R525H and missense dominated. ASXL1 and TP53 were the top frequent concomitant somatic mutations. Therapeutically, 70% overall response rate was obtained of hypomethylating agents in MDS, 96% complete remission of chemotherapy in AML, and 8% of relapse in hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Neither overall survival nor progression-free survival could be summed.

Conclusions:

Several significant clinical differences were observed in different diagnosis groups, familial and sporadic cases, and p.R525H compared with other somatic variants. In conclusion, myeloid neoplasms carrying DDX41 mutations were mainly older, male, MDS, and AML patients who had promising responses to treatment. Both germline and somatic DDX41 variants possessed unique characteristics and groups of interest presented certain differences worth further research. (CRD42021228886)