[The value of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for early diagnosis of contrast-induced nephropathy]

Predictive value of cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Background

There are still limited studies comprehensively examining the diagnostic performance of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C in contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The study aimed to investigate and compare the predictive value of NGAL and cystatin C in the early diagnosis of CIN.

Methods and materials

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases until November 10, 2019. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) modeling were performed to summarize and compare the diagnostic performance of blood/urine NGAL and serum cystatin C in CIN. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed according to the study and patient characteristics.

Results

Thirty-seven studies from thirty-one original studies were included (blood NGAL, 1840 patients in 9 studies; urine NGAL, 1701 patients in 10 studies; serum cystatin C, 5509 patients in 18 studies). Overall, serum cystatin C performed better than serum/urine NGAL (pooled DOR: 43 (95%CI: 12–152); AUROC: 0.93; λ: 3.79); serum and urine NGAL had a similar diagnostic performance (pooled DOR: 25 (95%CI: 6–108)/22(95%CI: 8–64); AUROC: 0.90/0.89; λ: 3.20/3.08). Meta-regression analysis indicated that the sources of heterogeneity might be CIN definition, assays, and nationalities.

Conclusion

Both NGAL and cystatin C can serve as early diagnostic indicators of CIN, while cystatin C may perform better than NGAL.