[Cone beam CT-derived adaptive radiotherapy for setup error assessment and correction in whole breast intensity modulated radiotherapy]

A simplified non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for the whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampus avoidance

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of using a simplified non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) and investigate its dosimetric advantages compared with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (C-VMAT) for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT).

Methods

Ten patients with brain metastase (BM) were included for HA-WBRT. Three treatment plans were generated for each case using IMRT, C-VMAT, and NC-VMAT, respectively.

Results

The dosimetric results of the three techniques complied roughly with the RTOG 0933 criteria. After dose normalization, the V_30Gy of whole brain planned target volume (WB-PTV) in all the plans was controlled at 95%. Homogeneity index (HI) of WB-PTV was significantly reduced in NC-VMAT (0.249 ± 0.017) over IMRT (0.265 ± 0.020, p=0.005) and C-VMAT (0.261 ± 0.014, p=0.020). In terms of conformity index (CI), NC-VMAT could provide a value of 0.821 ± 0.010, which was significantly superior to IMRT (0.788 ± 0.019, p<0.001). According to D_2% of WB-PTV, NC-VMAT could provide a value of 35.62 ± 0.37Gy, significantly superior to IMRT (36.43 ± 0.65Gy, p<0.001). According to D_50% of WB-PTV, NC-VMAT can achieve the lowest value of 33.18 ± 0.29Gy, significantly different from IMRT (33.47 ± 0.43, p=0.034) and C-VMAT (33.58 ± 0.37, p=0.006). Regarding D_2%, D_98%, and D_mean of hippocampus, NC-VMAT could control them at 15.57 ± 0.18Gy, 8.37 ± 0.26Gy and 11.71 ± 0.48Gy, respectively. D_2% and D_mean of hippocampus for NC-VMAT was significantly lower than IMRT (D_2%: 16.07 ± 0.29Gy, p=0.001 D_mean: 12.18 ± 0.33Gy, p<0.001) and C-VMAT (D_2%: 15.92 ± 0.37Gy, p=0.009 D_mean: 12.21 ± 0.54Gy, p<0.001). For other organs-at-risk (OARs), according to D_2% of the right optic nerves and the right lenses, NC-VMAT had the lowest values of 31.86 ± 1.11Gy and 7.15 ± 0.31Gy, respectively, which were statistically different from the other two techniques. For other organs including eyes and optic chiasm, NC-VMAT could achieve the lowest doses, different from IMRT statistically.

Conclusion

The dosimetry of the three techniques for HA-WBRT could roughly comply with the proposals from RTOG 0933. After dose normalization (D_95%=30Gy), NC-VMAT could significantly improve dose homogeneity and reduce the D_50% in the brain. Besides, it can reduce the D_2% of the hippocampus, optic nerves, and lens. With this approach, an efficient and straightforward plan was accomplished.

Areas of breast tissue covered in cone beam breast CT imaging

The value of cone beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) imaging on covered areas of breast tissue, which is the relation between imaging quality and CT dose were studied. Multi-energy spectrum was used to radiate same-size built-in calcifications and lump breast motifs under the condition of the same number of particles by utilizing the Monte Carlo-based GATE simulation software; breast motif images were restructured by using FBP restructuration algorithm to gain the distribution of radiation dose in the breast motif; radiation dose was calculated and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to define how quality factor M and dose efficiency η reflect the relations between radiation dose and imaging quality. Based on the comparison of the calcification number, diameter, and the diameter of tumor among head side, foot side, inner side, outer side and rear side, the difference was meaningless in terms of statistics. Based on the comparison between SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio and between dose efficiency η and quality factor M in different areas, the difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the imaging quality of CBBCT was good in the head, foot, inner, outer and rear sides of breast, with acceptable CT dose.