[Study on the status of frailty and related determinants among the elderly in China]

Spousal education and frailty levels among Chinese older adults: A national longitudinal study

Background

Prior research has identified one's own education level as a risk factor for frailty. However, the association between spousal education and frailty in later life is uncertain. We aim to examine the longitudinal association between spousal education and frailty levels among Chinese older populations.

Methods

3856 participants aged 60 and older from the 2011-2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were analyzed. A 54-item deficit cumulative frailty index was developed to evaluate frailty levels at each follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the longitudinal association of spousal education with frailty levels, and whether this association varied by sex and own education level.

Results

Higher spouse education was associated with lower frailty levels, and this association decreased with age. Compared with older adults whose spouses had no formal education, older adults whose spouses had less than middle school education had an 8.82 lower level of frailty (95% CI: 15.05 to -2.58, P < 0.01); those with spouses with middle school education and above had a 23.44 lower level (95% CI: 31.43 to -15.44, P < 0.001). Stratified analysis showed that every additional year of spouse education was also associated with lower frailty levels in non-frail participants at baseline, but stronger among those already frail. The association between high spousal education and lower frailty did not vary by sex or own education.

Conclusion

This study reveals a significant association between having a more educated spouse and lower later-life frailty levels for both older men and women, regardless of one's own educational background. It emphasizes the importance of leveraging educated spouses to prevent and manage frailty.

Association between tea consumption and frailty among Chinese older adults: A cross-sectional study

Background

Chronic inflammation is considered one of the main mechanisms leading to frailty. It has been demonstrated that tea consumption reduces chronic inflammation. Few epidemiological studies have investigated the association between tea consumption and frailty.

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the association between tea consumption and frailty in Chinese older adults.

Methods

Between March and May 2021, we enrolled 2,144 older adults aged ≥60 years in Jinan City, Shandong Province, China, using multi-stage stratified cluster sampling. We assessed tea consumption and frailty in older adults using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the frequency of tea consumption, respectively. We applied multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association between tea consumption and frailty, controlling for a set of potential covariates.

Results

The prevalence of frailty among older Chinese adults was 38.3% (821/2,144). Tea consumption was categorized as daily (30.4%), occasionally (20.9%), and rarely or never (48.7%). As indicated by the fully adjusted model, daily tea consumption was associated with a lower prevalence of frailty (OR = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.57–0.94). However, this association only applied to men, younger older adults aged 60–79 years, rural residents, and regular participants in community activities. In addition, we observed a linear relationship between tea consumption and the prevalence of frailty (P for trend = 0.017).

Conclusions

Higher tea consumption was associated with a lower prevalence of frailty in older adults, especially those men, older adults aged 60–79, rural residents, and individuals who regularly participated in community activities. Further longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to determine the causation between tea consumption and frailty.

Contribution of life course circumstances to the acceleration of phenotypic and functional aging: A retrospective study

Background

Accelerated aging leads to increasing burdens of chronic diseases in late life, posing a huge challenge to the society. With two well-developed aging measures (i.e., physiological dysregulation [PD] and frailty index [FI]), this study aimed to evaluate the relative contributions of life course circumstances (e.g., childhood and adulthood socioeconomic status) to variance in aging.

Methods

We assembled data for 6224 middle-aged and older adults in China from the 2014 life course survey (June to December 2014), the 2015 biomarker collection (July 2015 to January 2016), and the 2015 main survey (July 2015 to January 2016) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Two aging measures (PD and FI) were calculated, with a higher value indicating more accelerated aging. Life course circumstances included childhood (i.e., socioeconomic status, war, health, trauma, relationship, and parents' health) and adulthood circumstances (i.e., socioeconomic status, adversity, and social support), demographics, and behaviours. The Shapley value decomposition, hierarchical clustering, and general linear regression models were performed.

Findings

The Shapley value decomposition revealed that all included life course circumstances accounted for about 6·3% and 29·7% of variance in PD and FI, respectively. We identified six subpopulations who shared similar patterns in terms of childhood and adulthood circumstances. The most disadvantaged subpopulation (i.e., subpopulation 6 [more childhood trauma and adulthood adversity]) consistently exhibited accelerated aging indicated by the two aging measures. Relative to the most advantaged subpopulation (i.e., subpopulation 1 [less childhood trauma and adulthood adversity]), PD and FI in the most disadvantaged subpopulation were increased by an average of 0·14 (i.e., coefficient, by one-standard deviation, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·06-0·21; p < 0·0001) and 0·10 (by one-point, 95% CI 0·09-0·11; p < 0·0001), respectively.

Interpretation

Our findings highlight the different contributions of life course circumstances to phenotypic and functional aging. Special attention should be given to promoting health for the disadvantaged subpopulation and narrowing their health gap with advantaged counterparts.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Milstein Medical Asian American Partnership Foundation, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, National Institute on Aging, National Centre for Advancing Translational Sciences, and Yale Alzheimer's Disease Research Centre.

Associations Between Intellectual and Social Activities With Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in China: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Frailty is one of the most important global health challenges. We aimed to examine the associations between frequency of intellectual and social activities and frailty among community-dwelling older adults in China.

Methods: This is a prospective analysis of older adults (aged ≥60 years) who had intellectual and social activity data and were free of frailty from the national representative China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The exposure was frequency of intellectual and social activities. Frailty was measured by the frailty index (FI) and defined as FI ≥ 0.25. Frailty incidents were followed up for 2 years. We estimated the relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using log-linear binominal regression adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: We documented 655 frailty cases over the past 2 years. Participants who had frequent intellectual activities had a lower frailty risk compared with participants who did not have intellectual activity (adjusted RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.47–0.90). The adjusted RRs were 0.51 (95%CI = 0.33–0.77) for participants who did not have a slip or a fall accident and 1.06 (95%CI = 0.65–1.75) for participants who had experienced slip and fall accidents (P = 0.01 for interaction). Having frequent social activities was not associated with a significant decrease in frailty risk compared with participants who did not have social activity (adjusted RR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.78–1.12).

Conclusions: This observational study showed that having frequent intellectual activities was associated with a decreased frailty risk. The association was likely to be stronger in participants without a slip or a fall accident. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this observational finding.